Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation
In recent years the French philosopher Jacques Rancière has addressed the predicament of artists and curators who, in their eagerness to convey a critical message or engage their viewers in an emancipatory process, end up predetermining the outcomes of the experience, hence blocking its critical or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in philosophy and education 2011-03, Vol.30 (2), p.211-223 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 223 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Studies in philosophy and education |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Ruitenberg, Claudia W. |
description | In recent years the French philosopher Jacques Rancière has addressed the predicament of artists and curators who, in their eagerness to convey a critical message or engage their viewers in an emancipatory process, end up predetermining the outcomes of the experience, hence blocking its critical or emancipatory potential. In this essay I consider Rancière’s writing on this topic and draw out the parallels with the predicament of teachers and curriculum designers who have critical and emancipatory objectives. The risk of education that strives for emancipation is that it can become so directive in steering students to the “right” outcomes that it does not leave these students any intellectual room. Rancière’s work is helpful in reminding us that teachers and curricula with explicitly critical, political, emancipatory objectives can defeat their own purposes and become stultifying if they do not leave the student room to use her or his own intelligence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11217-010-9216-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861387594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ918517</ericid><sourcerecordid>2294730321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b7857d8f92066e51a7a75bb33be1c1cf905dc4266a53f7391ef258244f3b2cf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QHAxuHFho7nJ5LWUUl8ULKLgLmQySZ0ynanJdOG_d8qIguDqLs53zj0chE6BXAEh8joBUJCYAMGagsB8D42AS4ZBw9s-GhHCNGYyF4foKKUVIQCCqRG6vIndJFu0ddVVLk0y25RZ9-6zhS_tsl1WztbZs69tV7XNMToItk7-5PuO0evt7GV6j-dPdw_Tmzl2TKgOF1JxWaqgKRHCc7DSSl4UjBUeHLigCS9dToWwnAXJNPhAuaJ5HlhBXaBsjC6G3E1sP7Y-dWZdJefr2ja-3SajBDAluc578vwPuWq3senLmb5DDrlmOwgGyMU2peiD2cRqbeOnAWJ245lhPNOPZ3bjGd57zgaPj5X74WePGhQH2ct0kFMvNUsff__-n_kF1J54DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857414934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years the French philosopher Jacques Rancière has addressed the predicament of artists and curators who, in their eagerness to convey a critical message or engage their viewers in an emancipatory process, end up predetermining the outcomes of the experience, hence blocking its critical or emancipatory potential. In this essay I consider Rancière’s writing on this topic and draw out the parallels with the predicament of teachers and curriculum designers who have critical and emancipatory objectives. The risk of education that strives for emancipation is that it can become so directive in steering students to the “right” outcomes that it does not leave these students any intellectual room. Rancière’s work is helpful in reminding us that teachers and curricula with explicitly critical, political, emancipatory objectives can defeat their own purposes and become stultifying if they do not leave the student room to use her or his own intelligence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-191X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11217-010-9216-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aesthetic Education ; Aesthetics ; Art Education ; Artists ; Audiences ; Banking ; Compulsory Education ; Criticism ; Curriculum ; Curriculum development ; Education ; Educational Philosophy ; Emancipation ; Essays ; Human Relations ; Intellectual ability ; Intelligence ; Learning Processes ; Painting (Visual Arts) ; Pedagogy ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Education ; Political influences ; Politics ; Rancière, Jacques ; Students ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Studies in philosophy and education, 2011-03, Vol.30 (2), p.211-223</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b7857d8f92066e51a7a75bb33be1c1cf905dc4266a53f7391ef258244f3b2cf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b7857d8f92066e51a7a75bb33be1c1cf905dc4266a53f7391ef258244f3b2cf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11217-010-9216-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11217-010-9216-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ918517$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</creatorcontrib><title>Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation</title><title>Studies in philosophy and education</title><addtitle>Stud Philos Educ</addtitle><description>In recent years the French philosopher Jacques Rancière has addressed the predicament of artists and curators who, in their eagerness to convey a critical message or engage their viewers in an emancipatory process, end up predetermining the outcomes of the experience, hence blocking its critical or emancipatory potential. In this essay I consider Rancière’s writing on this topic and draw out the parallels with the predicament of teachers and curriculum designers who have critical and emancipatory objectives. The risk of education that strives for emancipation is that it can become so directive in steering students to the “right” outcomes that it does not leave these students any intellectual room. Rancière’s work is helpful in reminding us that teachers and curricula with explicitly critical, political, emancipatory objectives can defeat their own purposes and become stultifying if they do not leave the student room to use her or his own intelligence.</description><subject>Aesthetic Education</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Art Education</subject><subject>Artists</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Compulsory Education</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Emancipation</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Human Relations</subject><subject>Intellectual ability</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Painting (Visual Arts)</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Education</subject><subject>Political influences</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rancière, Jacques</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0039-3746</issn><issn>1573-191X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QHAxuHFho7nJ5LWUUl8ULKLgLmQySZ0ynanJdOG_d8qIguDqLs53zj0chE6BXAEh8joBUJCYAMGagsB8D42AS4ZBw9s-GhHCNGYyF4foKKUVIQCCqRG6vIndJFu0ddVVLk0y25RZ9-6zhS_tsl1WztbZs69tV7XNMToItk7-5PuO0evt7GV6j-dPdw_Tmzl2TKgOF1JxWaqgKRHCc7DSSl4UjBUeHLigCS9dToWwnAXJNPhAuaJ5HlhBXaBsjC6G3E1sP7Y-dWZdJefr2ja-3SajBDAluc578vwPuWq3senLmb5DDrlmOwgGyMU2peiD2cRqbeOnAWJ245lhPNOPZ3bjGd57zgaPj5X74WePGhQH2ct0kFMvNUsff__-n_kF1J54DA</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation</title><author>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-b7857d8f92066e51a7a75bb33be1c1cf905dc4266a53f7391ef258244f3b2cf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic Education</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Art Education</topic><topic>Artists</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Compulsory Education</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Emancipation</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Human Relations</topic><topic>Intellectual ability</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Painting (Visual Arts)</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Education</topic><topic>Political influences</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rancière, Jacques</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Studies in philosophy and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruitenberg, Claudia W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ918517</ericid><atitle>Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation</atitle><jtitle>Studies in philosophy and education</jtitle><stitle>Stud Philos Educ</stitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>211-223</pages><issn>0039-3746</issn><eissn>1573-191X</eissn><abstract>In recent years the French philosopher Jacques Rancière has addressed the predicament of artists and curators who, in their eagerness to convey a critical message or engage their viewers in an emancipatory process, end up predetermining the outcomes of the experience, hence blocking its critical or emancipatory potential. In this essay I consider Rancière’s writing on this topic and draw out the parallels with the predicament of teachers and curriculum designers who have critical and emancipatory objectives. The risk of education that strives for emancipation is that it can become so directive in steering students to the “right” outcomes that it does not leave these students any intellectual room. Rancière’s work is helpful in reminding us that teachers and curricula with explicitly critical, political, emancipatory objectives can defeat their own purposes and become stultifying if they do not leave the student room to use her or his own intelligence.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11217-010-9216-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-3746 |
ispartof | Studies in philosophy and education, 2011-03, Vol.30 (2), p.211-223 |
issn | 0039-3746 1573-191X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861387594 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Education Source |
subjects | Aesthetic Education Aesthetics Art Education Artists Audiences Banking Compulsory Education Criticism Curriculum Curriculum development Education Educational Philosophy Emancipation Essays Human Relations Intellectual ability Intelligence Learning Processes Painting (Visual Arts) Pedagogy Philosophy Philosophy of Education Political influences Politics Rancière, Jacques Students Teaching Teaching Methods |
title | Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A11%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Art,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Pedagogical%20Relation&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20philosophy%20and%20education&rft.au=Ruitenberg,%20Claudia%20W.&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=211-223&rft.issn=0039-3746&rft.eissn=1573-191X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11217-010-9216-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2294730321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857414934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ918517&rfr_iscdi=true |