Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis

We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2011-04, Vol.30 (4), p.904-914
Hauptverfasser: Das, M, Gifford, H C, O'Connor, J M, Glick, S J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 914
container_issue 4
container_start_page 904
container_title IEEE transactions on medical imaging
container_volume 30
creator Das, M
Gifford, H C
O'Connor, J M
Glick, S J
description We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861205695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5610726</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>861205695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFrFDEUh0NR2m3tvSDI3DxNfUkmmcxFsNXqwhZFVvAWspkXN-3MZJvMFOtfb9ZdFz2F8PveL498hFxQuKQUmjfL2_klg3xjoBrZVEdkRoVQJRPV92dkBqxWJYBkJ-Q0pTsAWglojskJo1BRKtSM9F9wMJ3_hW1xa376fuqLhb_Hzq9DaIuvaMOQxjjZ0YehcCEW834Tw-MW9zYGazrrnbfmT_4eR9yRfiiuIpo0FsvQh_Q0jGtMPr0gz53pEp7vzzPy7ebD8vpTufj8cX79blFaIZuxFM6K2pjaccGAGWrUiraKNwKqumpzYLlc1dRVpuFWIrc1d4Jy0XLmLKsZPyNvd72badVja3EYo-n0JvrexCcdjNf_J4Nf6x_hUXPeqErJXPB6XxDDw4Rp1L1PFrvODBimpJWkDPKuIpOwI_NvpBTRHV6hoLeSdJakt5L0XlIeefXvdoeBv1Yy8HIHeEQ8xEJSqJnkvwHdKJl4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861205695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Das, M ; Gifford, H C ; O'Connor, J M ; Glick, S J</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, M ; Gifford, H C ; O'Connor, J M ; Glick, S J</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0062</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-254X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21041158</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITMID4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Attenuation ; Breast ; Breast - anatomy &amp; histology ; Breast - metabolism ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Diseases - metabolism ; Breast Diseases - pathology ; Breast tomosynthesis ; Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging ; Computer Simulation ; Detectors ; dose ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image reconstruction ; Mammography - methods ; microcalcifications ; Noise ; Observers ; penalised maximum likelihood ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Pixel ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2011-04, Vol.30 (4), p.904-914</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5610726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,792,881,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5610726$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21041158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, S J</creatorcontrib><title>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</title><title>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</title><addtitle>TMI</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</addtitle><description>We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Breast tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>dose</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>microcalcifications</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>penalised maximum likelihood</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Pixel</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0278-0062</issn><issn>1558-254X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFrFDEUh0NR2m3tvSDI3DxNfUkmmcxFsNXqwhZFVvAWspkXN-3MZJvMFOtfb9ZdFz2F8PveL498hFxQuKQUmjfL2_klg3xjoBrZVEdkRoVQJRPV92dkBqxWJYBkJ-Q0pTsAWglojskJo1BRKtSM9F9wMJ3_hW1xa376fuqLhb_Hzq9DaIuvaMOQxjjZ0YehcCEW834Tw-MW9zYGazrrnbfmT_4eR9yRfiiuIpo0FsvQh_Q0jGtMPr0gz53pEp7vzzPy7ebD8vpTufj8cX79blFaIZuxFM6K2pjaccGAGWrUiraKNwKqumpzYLlc1dRVpuFWIrc1d4Jy0XLmLKsZPyNvd72badVja3EYo-n0JvrexCcdjNf_J4Nf6x_hUXPeqErJXPB6XxDDw4Rp1L1PFrvODBimpJWkDPKuIpOwI_NvpBTRHV6hoLeSdJakt5L0XlIeefXvdoeBv1Yy8HIHeEQ8xEJSqJnkvwHdKJl4</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Das, M</creator><creator>Gifford, H C</creator><creator>O'Connor, J M</creator><creator>Glick, S J</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</title><author>Das, M ; Gifford, H C ; O'Connor, J M ; Glick, S J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Breast tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>dose</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>microcalcifications</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>penalised maximum likelihood</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Pixel</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, S J</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, M</au><au>Gifford, H C</au><au>O'Connor, J M</au><au>Glick, S J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</jtitle><stitle>TMI</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>904-914</pages><issn>0278-0062</issn><eissn>1558-254X</eissn><coden>ITMID4</coden><abstract>We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>21041158</pmid><doi>10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0278-0062
ispartof IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2011-04, Vol.30 (4), p.904-914
issn 0278-0062
1558-254X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861205695
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Algorithms
Attenuation
Breast
Breast - anatomy & histology
Breast - metabolism
Breast - pathology
Breast Diseases - metabolism
Breast Diseases - pathology
Breast tomosynthesis
Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging
Computer Simulation
Detectors
dose
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Image reconstruction
Mammography - methods
microcalcifications
Noise
Observers
penalised maximum likelihood
Phantoms, Imaging
Pixel
Reproducibility of Results
ROC Curve
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Penalized%20Maximum%20Likelihood%20Reconstruction%20for%20Improved%20Microcalcification%20Detection%20in%20Breast%20Tomosynthesis&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20medical%20imaging&rft.au=Das,%20M&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=904-914&rft.issn=0278-0062&rft.eissn=1558-254X&rft.coden=ITMID4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E861205695%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861205695&rft_id=info:pmid/21041158&rft_ieee_id=5610726&rfr_iscdi=true