Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis
We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2011-04, Vol.30 (4), p.904-914 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 914 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 904 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on medical imaging |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Das, M Gifford, H C O'Connor, J M Glick, S J |
description | We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861205695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5610726</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>861205695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFrFDEUh0NR2m3tvSDI3DxNfUkmmcxFsNXqwhZFVvAWspkXN-3MZJvMFOtfb9ZdFz2F8PveL498hFxQuKQUmjfL2_klg3xjoBrZVEdkRoVQJRPV92dkBqxWJYBkJ-Q0pTsAWglojskJo1BRKtSM9F9wMJ3_hW1xa376fuqLhb_Hzq9DaIuvaMOQxjjZ0YehcCEW834Tw-MW9zYGazrrnbfmT_4eR9yRfiiuIpo0FsvQh_Q0jGtMPr0gz53pEp7vzzPy7ebD8vpTufj8cX79blFaIZuxFM6K2pjaccGAGWrUiraKNwKqumpzYLlc1dRVpuFWIrc1d4Jy0XLmLKsZPyNvd72badVja3EYo-n0JvrexCcdjNf_J4Nf6x_hUXPeqErJXPB6XxDDw4Rp1L1PFrvODBimpJWkDPKuIpOwI_NvpBTRHV6hoLeSdJakt5L0XlIeefXvdoeBv1Yy8HIHeEQ8xEJSqJnkvwHdKJl4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861205695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Das, M ; Gifford, H C ; O'Connor, J M ; Glick, S J</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, M ; Gifford, H C ; O'Connor, J M ; Glick, S J</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0062</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-254X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21041158</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITMID4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Attenuation ; Breast ; Breast - anatomy & histology ; Breast - metabolism ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Diseases - metabolism ; Breast Diseases - pathology ; Breast tomosynthesis ; Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging ; Computer Simulation ; Detectors ; dose ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image reconstruction ; Mammography - methods ; microcalcifications ; Noise ; Observers ; penalised maximum likelihood ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Pixel ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2011-04, Vol.30 (4), p.904-914</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5610726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,792,881,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5610726$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21041158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, S J</creatorcontrib><title>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</title><title>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</title><addtitle>TMI</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</addtitle><description>We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Breast tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>dose</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>microcalcifications</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>penalised maximum likelihood</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Pixel</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0278-0062</issn><issn>1558-254X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFrFDEUh0NR2m3tvSDI3DxNfUkmmcxFsNXqwhZFVvAWspkXN-3MZJvMFOtfb9ZdFz2F8PveL498hFxQuKQUmjfL2_klg3xjoBrZVEdkRoVQJRPV92dkBqxWJYBkJ-Q0pTsAWglojskJo1BRKtSM9F9wMJ3_hW1xa376fuqLhb_Hzq9DaIuvaMOQxjjZ0YehcCEW834Tw-MW9zYGazrrnbfmT_4eR9yRfiiuIpo0FsvQh_Q0jGtMPr0gz53pEp7vzzPy7ebD8vpTufj8cX79blFaIZuxFM6K2pjaccGAGWrUiraKNwKqumpzYLlc1dRVpuFWIrc1d4Jy0XLmLKsZPyNvd72badVja3EYo-n0JvrexCcdjNf_J4Nf6x_hUXPeqErJXPB6XxDDw4Rp1L1PFrvODBimpJWkDPKuIpOwI_NvpBTRHV6hoLeSdJakt5L0XlIeefXvdoeBv1Yy8HIHeEQ8xEJSqJnkvwHdKJl4</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Das, M</creator><creator>Gifford, H C</creator><creator>O'Connor, J M</creator><creator>Glick, S J</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</title><author>Das, M ; Gifford, H C ; O'Connor, J M ; Glick, S J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-5fc57aa7f35202a1a8b1d83950474daa7c36b71f4a93c6e3c73f5135d32fc2723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Breast tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>dose</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>microcalcifications</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>penalised maximum likelihood</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Pixel</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, S J</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, M</au><au>Gifford, H C</au><au>O'Connor, J M</au><au>Glick, S J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</jtitle><stitle>TMI</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>904-914</pages><issn>0278-0062</issn><eissn>1558-254X</eissn><coden>ITMID4</coden><abstract>We examined the application of an iterative penalized maximum likelihood (PML) reconstruction method for improved detectability of microcalcifications (MCs) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Localized receiver operating characteristic (LROC) psychophysical studies with human observers and 2-D image slices were conducted to evaluate the performance of this reconstruction method and to compare its performance against the commonly used Feldkamp FBP algorithm. DBT projections were generated using rigorous computer simulations that included accurate modeling of the noise and detector blur. Acquisition dose levels of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mGy in a 5-cm-thick compressed breast were tested. The defined task was to localize and detect MC clusters consisting of seven MCs. The individual MC diameter was 150 μm. Compressed-breast phantoms derived from CT images of actual mastectomy specimens provided realistic background structures for the detection task. Four observers each read 98 test images for each combination of reconstruction method and acquisition dose. All observers performed better with the PML images than with the FBP images. With the acquisition dose of 0.7 mGy, the average areas under the LROC curve (A L ) for the PML and FBP algorithms were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. For the 1.0-mGy dose, the values of A L were 0.93 (PML) and 0.7 (FBP), while the 1.5-mGy dose resulted in areas of 1.0 and 0.9, respectively, for the PML and FBP algorithms. A 2-D analysis of variance applied to the individual observer areas showed statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) between the reconstruction strategies at all three dose levels. There were no significant differences in observer performance for any of the dose levels.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>21041158</pmid><doi>10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-0062 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2011-04, Vol.30 (4), p.904-914 |
issn | 0278-0062 1558-254X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861205695 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Algorithms Attenuation Breast Breast - anatomy & histology Breast - metabolism Breast - pathology Breast Diseases - metabolism Breast Diseases - pathology Breast tomosynthesis Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging Computer Simulation Detectors dose Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Image reconstruction Mammography - methods microcalcifications Noise Observers penalised maximum likelihood Phantoms, Imaging Pixel Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Penalized%20Maximum%20Likelihood%20Reconstruction%20for%20Improved%20Microcalcification%20Detection%20in%20Breast%20Tomosynthesis&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20medical%20imaging&rft.au=Das,%20M&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=904-914&rft.issn=0278-0062&rft.eissn=1558-254X&rft.coden=ITMID4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TMI.2010.2089694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E861205695%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861205695&rft_id=info:pmid/21041158&rft_ieee_id=5610726&rfr_iscdi=true |