Mixing in the Transition Layer during Two Storm Events
Upper-ocean dynamics analyzed from mooring-array observations are contrasted between two storms of comparable magnitude. Particular emphasis is put on the role of the transition layer, the strongly stratified layer between the well-mixed upper layer, and the deeper more weakly stratified region. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physical oceanography 2011, Vol.41 (1), p.42-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 66 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Journal of physical oceanography |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | DOHAN, Kathleen DAVIS, Russ E |
description | Upper-ocean dynamics analyzed from mooring-array observations are contrasted between two storms of comparable magnitude. Particular emphasis is put on the role of the transition layer, the strongly stratified layer between the well-mixed upper layer, and the deeper more weakly stratified region. The midlatitude autumn storms occurred within 20 days of each other and were measured at five moorings. In the first storm, the mixed layer follows a classical slab-layer response, with a steady deepening during the course of the storm and little mixing of the thermocline beneath. In the second storm, rather than deepening, the mixed layer shoals while intense near-inertial waves are resonantly excited within the mixed layer. These create a large shear throughout the transition layer, generating turbulence that broadens the transition layer.
Details of the space–time structure of the frequencies in both short waves and near-inertial waves are presented. Small-scale waves are excited within the transition layer. Their frequencies change with time and there are no clear peaks at harmonics of inertial or tidal frequencies. Wavelet transforms of the inertial oscillations show the evolution as a spreading in frequency, a deepening of the core into the transition layer, and a shift off the inertial frequency. A second near-inertial energy core appears below the transition layer at all moorings coincident with a rapid decay of mixed layer currents.
An overall result is that direct wind-generated motions extend to the depth of the transition layer. The transition layer is a location of enhanced wave activity and enhanced shear-driven mixing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2010JPO4253.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860392134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2286132741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ce213ec0e90ef3e985cc81bd35d71f595c5ae4263972041922c0b25c5fc173643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkN9LwzAQx4MoOKePvhdBfOq8XJq0eZQxfzGZYH0OWZZqRpfOpFX339uxIeLTwd3nvnd8CDmnMKI059cIFB6fZxlyNqIHZEA5QgpZwQ_JAAAxZSKHY3IS4xIABEU5IOLJfTv_ljiftO82KYP20bWu8clUb2xIFl3YjsuvJnlpm7BKJp_Wt_GUHFW6jvZsX4fk9XZSju_T6ezuYXwzTQ0TvE2NRcqsASvBVszKghtT0PmC8UVOKy654dpmKJjMETIqEQ3Mse9WhuZMZGxIrna569B8dDa2auWisXWtvW26qAoBTPY3tuTFP3LZdMH3z6mC8wJQZNBD6Q4yoYkx2Eqtg1vpsFEU1Nah-uNQ0Z6_3IfqaHRd9XaMi79LyIoMMZfsB2ApbkM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>855802640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mixing in the Transition Layer during Two Storm Events</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>DOHAN, Kathleen ; DAVIS, Russ E</creator><creatorcontrib>DOHAN, Kathleen ; DAVIS, Russ E</creatorcontrib><description>Upper-ocean dynamics analyzed from mooring-array observations are contrasted between two storms of comparable magnitude. Particular emphasis is put on the role of the transition layer, the strongly stratified layer between the well-mixed upper layer, and the deeper more weakly stratified region. The midlatitude autumn storms occurred within 20 days of each other and were measured at five moorings. In the first storm, the mixed layer follows a classical slab-layer response, with a steady deepening during the course of the storm and little mixing of the thermocline beneath. In the second storm, rather than deepening, the mixed layer shoals while intense near-inertial waves are resonantly excited within the mixed layer. These create a large shear throughout the transition layer, generating turbulence that broadens the transition layer.
Details of the space–time structure of the frequencies in both short waves and near-inertial waves are presented. Small-scale waves are excited within the transition layer. Their frequencies change with time and there are no clear peaks at harmonics of inertial or tidal frequencies. Wavelet transforms of the inertial oscillations show the evolution as a spreading in frequency, a deepening of the core into the transition layer, and a shift off the inertial frequency. A second near-inertial energy core appears below the transition layer at all moorings coincident with a rapid decay of mixed layer currents.
An overall result is that direct wind-generated motions extend to the depth of the transition layer. The transition layer is a location of enhanced wave activity and enhanced shear-driven mixing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2010JPO4253.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPYOBT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Physics of the oceans ; Shoals ; Storms ; Thermocline ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of physical oceanography, 2011, Vol.41 (1), p.42-66</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ce213ec0e90ef3e985cc81bd35d71f595c5ae4263972041922c0b25c5fc173643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ce213ec0e90ef3e985cc81bd35d71f595c5ae4263972041922c0b25c5fc173643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3681,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23842279$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DOHAN, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, Russ E</creatorcontrib><title>Mixing in the Transition Layer during Two Storm Events</title><title>Journal of physical oceanography</title><description>Upper-ocean dynamics analyzed from mooring-array observations are contrasted between two storms of comparable magnitude. Particular emphasis is put on the role of the transition layer, the strongly stratified layer between the well-mixed upper layer, and the deeper more weakly stratified region. The midlatitude autumn storms occurred within 20 days of each other and were measured at five moorings. In the first storm, the mixed layer follows a classical slab-layer response, with a steady deepening during the course of the storm and little mixing of the thermocline beneath. In the second storm, rather than deepening, the mixed layer shoals while intense near-inertial waves are resonantly excited within the mixed layer. These create a large shear throughout the transition layer, generating turbulence that broadens the transition layer.
Details of the space–time structure of the frequencies in both short waves and near-inertial waves are presented. Small-scale waves are excited within the transition layer. Their frequencies change with time and there are no clear peaks at harmonics of inertial or tidal frequencies. Wavelet transforms of the inertial oscillations show the evolution as a spreading in frequency, a deepening of the core into the transition layer, and a shift off the inertial frequency. A second near-inertial energy core appears below the transition layer at all moorings coincident with a rapid decay of mixed layer currents.
An overall result is that direct wind-generated motions extend to the depth of the transition layer. The transition layer is a location of enhanced wave activity and enhanced shear-driven mixing.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Physics of the oceans</subject><subject>Shoals</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Thermocline</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0022-3670</issn><issn>1520-0485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkN9LwzAQx4MoOKePvhdBfOq8XJq0eZQxfzGZYH0OWZZqRpfOpFX339uxIeLTwd3nvnd8CDmnMKI059cIFB6fZxlyNqIHZEA5QgpZwQ_JAAAxZSKHY3IS4xIABEU5IOLJfTv_ljiftO82KYP20bWu8clUb2xIFl3YjsuvJnlpm7BKJp_Wt_GUHFW6jvZsX4fk9XZSju_T6ezuYXwzTQ0TvE2NRcqsASvBVszKghtT0PmC8UVOKy654dpmKJjMETIqEQ3Mse9WhuZMZGxIrna569B8dDa2auWisXWtvW26qAoBTPY3tuTFP3LZdMH3z6mC8wJQZNBD6Q4yoYkx2Eqtg1vpsFEU1Nah-uNQ0Z6_3IfqaHRd9XaMi79LyIoMMZfsB2ApbkM</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>DOHAN, Kathleen</creator><creator>DAVIS, Russ E</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Mixing in the Transition Layer during Two Storm Events</title><author>DOHAN, Kathleen ; DAVIS, Russ E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ce213ec0e90ef3e985cc81bd35d71f595c5ae4263972041922c0b25c5fc173643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Physics of the oceans</topic><topic>Shoals</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Thermocline</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DOHAN, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, Russ E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of physical oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DOHAN, Kathleen</au><au>DAVIS, Russ E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mixing in the Transition Layer during Two Storm Events</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical oceanography</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>42-66</pages><issn>0022-3670</issn><eissn>1520-0485</eissn><coden>JPYOBT</coden><abstract>Upper-ocean dynamics analyzed from mooring-array observations are contrasted between two storms of comparable magnitude. Particular emphasis is put on the role of the transition layer, the strongly stratified layer between the well-mixed upper layer, and the deeper more weakly stratified region. The midlatitude autumn storms occurred within 20 days of each other and were measured at five moorings. In the first storm, the mixed layer follows a classical slab-layer response, with a steady deepening during the course of the storm and little mixing of the thermocline beneath. In the second storm, rather than deepening, the mixed layer shoals while intense near-inertial waves are resonantly excited within the mixed layer. These create a large shear throughout the transition layer, generating turbulence that broadens the transition layer.
Details of the space–time structure of the frequencies in both short waves and near-inertial waves are presented. Small-scale waves are excited within the transition layer. Their frequencies change with time and there are no clear peaks at harmonics of inertial or tidal frequencies. Wavelet transforms of the inertial oscillations show the evolution as a spreading in frequency, a deepening of the core into the transition layer, and a shift off the inertial frequency. A second near-inertial energy core appears below the transition layer at all moorings coincident with a rapid decay of mixed layer currents.
An overall result is that direct wind-generated motions extend to the depth of the transition layer. The transition layer is a location of enhanced wave activity and enhanced shear-driven mixing.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2010JPO4253.1</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3670 |
ispartof | Journal of physical oceanography, 2011, Vol.41 (1), p.42-66 |
issn | 0022-3670 1520-0485 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860392134 |
source | American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Marine Meteorology Physics of the oceans Shoals Storms Thermocline Wind |
title | Mixing in the Transition Layer during Two Storm Events |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A44%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mixing%20in%20the%20Transition%20Layer%20during%20Two%20Storm%20Events&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20oceanography&rft.au=DOHAN,%20Kathleen&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=42-66&rft.issn=0022-3670&rft.eissn=1520-0485&rft.coden=JPYOBT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2010JPO4253.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2286132741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=855802640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |