SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROROCENTRUM LIMA (DINOPHYCEAE, PROROCENTRALES), BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERS
Wild and cultured specimens of Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenb.) F. Stein from 26 widely different areas in 13 countries were examined in order to determine consistent characters for delimiting species boundaries in this taxon. The morphological characters valve shape, valve size, valve ornamentation, num...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of phycology 2011-02, Vol.47 (1), p.178-189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 189 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 178 |
container_title | Journal of phycology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Nagahama, Yukio Murray, Shauna Tomaru, Akiko Fukuyo, Yasuwo |
description | Wild and cultured specimens of Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenb.) F. Stein from 26 widely different areas in 13 countries were examined in order to determine consistent characters for delimiting species boundaries in this taxon. The morphological characters valve shape, valve size, valve ornamentation, number and shape of valve pores, number and shape of marginal pores, and periflagellar platelets were observed using LM and SEM, and two molecular genetic regions were sequenced. We identified stable morphological characters that were consistent among wild specimens and all cultures, which were valve shape, valve ornamentation, and number and arrangement of periflagellar platelets. All cultures of P. lima identified by these characters formed a monophyletic group in phylogenetic analyses based on the two genes, which, however, included the species Prorocentrum arenarium. P. arenarium was determined to be within the range of morphological variation of P. lima, and therefore we synonymize the two taxa. Within this monophyletic group, P. lima was divided into several subclades in the all phylogenetic analyses. There were no morphological characters specifically related to any one subclade. The subclades appeared to correlate broadly to sample collection regions, suggesting that geographically separated populations may have become genetically distinct within this epi-benthic species. We have emended species boundaries in P. lima. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00939.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860389252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785729990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f305t-21a3548b534b775704b613d743dea5f51663691a3babc98f2c90d581b13f8e403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90dtumzAYB3BrWrWm3V5h8906qWQ-4NOlS9yARAwCssOVBQlM6ZKlg0RqX2NPPEdJq17VNz78f99nyQYAYjTGfny9G2NGVCAlFmOC_ClCiqrxwxsweg7eghFChASUh_wcXAzDHUJIcIbfgXMiEMGC0BH4V-YmSkwJb7K5nejisEwsrGIDq-xHEsFJYrPbVE9NmurKwLzIiiwytirmM5gmMw2vDiKPf0ZGm-sXuU5N-eUa3ujSTGBm4Swr8jhLs2kS6RRqO4G-yG-NNZW_J4p1oaPKFOV7cNbV66H9cJovwfzWVFEcnGqDjiK2CwiuKQtlw2jYCMEEChuO6VKEdNnWrGOYc8qVR03dLJTsyEKhJZO4wbSTbYjoJfh87Hvfb__u22HnNqth0a7X9Z92ux-c5IhKRRjx8upViYVkgiilDk0_nui-2bRLd9-vNnX_6J5e3IPgCFbDrn14zuv-t-OCCua-26mrpjm2YYrdN-8_HX1Xb139q18Nbl76P6cIq5ArKuh_yQSPeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785729990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROROCENTRUM LIMA (DINOPHYCEAE, PROROCENTRALES), BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERS</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nagahama, Yukio ; Murray, Shauna ; Tomaru, Akiko ; Fukuyo, Yasuwo</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagahama, Yukio ; Murray, Shauna ; Tomaru, Akiko ; Fukuyo, Yasuwo</creatorcontrib><description>Wild and cultured specimens of Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenb.) F. Stein from 26 widely different areas in 13 countries were examined in order to determine consistent characters for delimiting species boundaries in this taxon. The morphological characters valve shape, valve size, valve ornamentation, number and shape of valve pores, number and shape of marginal pores, and periflagellar platelets were observed using LM and SEM, and two molecular genetic regions were sequenced. We identified stable morphological characters that were consistent among wild specimens and all cultures, which were valve shape, valve ornamentation, and number and arrangement of periflagellar platelets. All cultures of P. lima identified by these characters formed a monophyletic group in phylogenetic analyses based on the two genes, which, however, included the species Prorocentrum arenarium. P. arenarium was determined to be within the range of morphological variation of P. lima, and therefore we synonymize the two taxa. Within this monophyletic group, P. lima was divided into several subclades in the all phylogenetic analyses. There were no morphological characters specifically related to any one subclade. The subclades appeared to correlate broadly to sample collection regions, suggesting that geographically separated populations may have become genetically distinct within this epi-benthic species. We have emended species boundaries in P. lima.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00939.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27021723</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Dinophyceae ; DSP ; ITS ; Prorocentrales ; Prorocentrum ; Prorocentrum arenarium ; Prorocentrum lima ; rDNA ; species boundary ; taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of phycology, 2011-02, Vol.47 (1), p.178-189</ispartof><rights>2011 Phycological Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27021723$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagahama, Yukio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaru, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuyo, Yasuwo</creatorcontrib><title>SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROROCENTRUM LIMA (DINOPHYCEAE, PROROCENTRALES), BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERS</title><title>Journal of phycology</title><addtitle>J Phycol</addtitle><description>Wild and cultured specimens of Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenb.) F. Stein from 26 widely different areas in 13 countries were examined in order to determine consistent characters for delimiting species boundaries in this taxon. The morphological characters valve shape, valve size, valve ornamentation, number and shape of valve pores, number and shape of marginal pores, and periflagellar platelets were observed using LM and SEM, and two molecular genetic regions were sequenced. We identified stable morphological characters that were consistent among wild specimens and all cultures, which were valve shape, valve ornamentation, and number and arrangement of periflagellar platelets. All cultures of P. lima identified by these characters formed a monophyletic group in phylogenetic analyses based on the two genes, which, however, included the species Prorocentrum arenarium. P. arenarium was determined to be within the range of morphological variation of P. lima, and therefore we synonymize the two taxa. Within this monophyletic group, P. lima was divided into several subclades in the all phylogenetic analyses. There were no morphological characters specifically related to any one subclade. The subclades appeared to correlate broadly to sample collection regions, suggesting that geographically separated populations may have become genetically distinct within this epi-benthic species. We have emended species boundaries in P. lima.</description><subject>Dinophyceae</subject><subject>DSP</subject><subject>ITS</subject><subject>Prorocentrales</subject><subject>Prorocentrum</subject><subject>Prorocentrum arenarium</subject><subject>Prorocentrum lima</subject><subject>rDNA</subject><subject>species boundary</subject><subject>taxonomy</subject><issn>0022-3646</issn><issn>1529-8817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90dtumzAYB3BrWrWm3V5h8906qWQ-4NOlS9yARAwCssOVBQlM6ZKlg0RqX2NPPEdJq17VNz78f99nyQYAYjTGfny9G2NGVCAlFmOC_ClCiqrxwxsweg7eghFChASUh_wcXAzDHUJIcIbfgXMiEMGC0BH4V-YmSkwJb7K5nejisEwsrGIDq-xHEsFJYrPbVE9NmurKwLzIiiwytirmM5gmMw2vDiKPf0ZGm-sXuU5N-eUa3ujSTGBm4Swr8jhLs2kS6RRqO4G-yG-NNZW_J4p1oaPKFOV7cNbV66H9cJovwfzWVFEcnGqDjiK2CwiuKQtlw2jYCMEEChuO6VKEdNnWrGOYc8qVR03dLJTsyEKhJZO4wbSTbYjoJfh87Hvfb__u22HnNqth0a7X9Z92ux-c5IhKRRjx8upViYVkgiilDk0_nui-2bRLd9-vNnX_6J5e3IPgCFbDrn14zuv-t-OCCua-26mrpjm2YYrdN-8_HX1Xb139q18Nbl76P6cIq5ArKuh_yQSPeA</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Nagahama, Yukio</creator><creator>Murray, Shauna</creator><creator>Tomaru, Akiko</creator><creator>Fukuyo, Yasuwo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROROCENTRUM LIMA (DINOPHYCEAE, PROROCENTRALES), BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERS</title><author>Nagahama, Yukio ; Murray, Shauna ; Tomaru, Akiko ; Fukuyo, Yasuwo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f305t-21a3548b534b775704b613d743dea5f51663691a3babc98f2c90d581b13f8e403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Dinophyceae</topic><topic>DSP</topic><topic>ITS</topic><topic>Prorocentrales</topic><topic>Prorocentrum</topic><topic>Prorocentrum arenarium</topic><topic>Prorocentrum lima</topic><topic>rDNA</topic><topic>species boundary</topic><topic>taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagahama, Yukio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaru, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuyo, Yasuwo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of phycology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagahama, Yukio</au><au>Murray, Shauna</au><au>Tomaru, Akiko</au><au>Fukuyo, Yasuwo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROROCENTRUM LIMA (DINOPHYCEAE, PROROCENTRALES), BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phycology</jtitle><addtitle>J Phycol</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>178-189</pages><issn>0022-3646</issn><eissn>1529-8817</eissn><abstract>Wild and cultured specimens of Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenb.) F. Stein from 26 widely different areas in 13 countries were examined in order to determine consistent characters for delimiting species boundaries in this taxon. The morphological characters valve shape, valve size, valve ornamentation, number and shape of valve pores, number and shape of marginal pores, and periflagellar platelets were observed using LM and SEM, and two molecular genetic regions were sequenced. We identified stable morphological characters that were consistent among wild specimens and all cultures, which were valve shape, valve ornamentation, and number and arrangement of periflagellar platelets. All cultures of P. lima identified by these characters formed a monophyletic group in phylogenetic analyses based on the two genes, which, however, included the species Prorocentrum arenarium. P. arenarium was determined to be within the range of morphological variation of P. lima, and therefore we synonymize the two taxa. Within this monophyletic group, P. lima was divided into several subclades in the all phylogenetic analyses. There were no morphological characters specifically related to any one subclade. The subclades appeared to correlate broadly to sample collection regions, suggesting that geographically separated populations may have become genetically distinct within this epi-benthic species. We have emended species boundaries in P. lima.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27021723</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00939.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3646 |
ispartof | Journal of phycology, 2011-02, Vol.47 (1), p.178-189 |
issn | 0022-3646 1529-8817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860389252 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Dinophyceae DSP ITS Prorocentrales Prorocentrum Prorocentrum arenarium Prorocentrum lima rDNA species boundary taxonomy |
title | SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROROCENTRUM LIMA (DINOPHYCEAE, PROROCENTRALES), BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SPECIES%20BOUNDARIES%20IN%20THE%20TOXIC%20DINOFLAGELLATE%20PROROCENTRUM%20LIMA%20(DINOPHYCEAE,%20PROROCENTRALES),%20BASED%20ON%20MORPHOLOGICAL%20AND%20PHYLOGENETIC%20CHARACTERS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phycology&rft.au=Nagahama,%20Yukio&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=178-189&rft.issn=0022-3646&rft.eissn=1529-8817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00939.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1785729990%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785729990&rft_id=info:pmid/27021723&rfr_iscdi=true |