Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba

Free-living amoebae might be pathogenic by themselves and be a reservoir for bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. Not only could amoebae protect intra-cellular Legionella but Legionella grown within amoebae could undergo physiological modifications and become more resistant and more...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2011-01, Vol.45 (3), p.1087-1094
Hauptverfasser: Dupuy, Mathieu, Mazoua, Stéphane, Berne, Florence, Bodet, Charles, Garrec, Nathalie, Herbelin, Pascaline, Ménard-Szczebara, Florence, Oberti, Sandrine, Rodier, Marie-Hélène, Soreau, Sylvie, Wallet, France, Héchard, Yann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1094
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1087
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 45
creator Dupuy, Mathieu
Mazoua, Stéphane
Berne, Florence
Bodet, Charles
Garrec, Nathalie
Herbelin, Pascaline
Ménard-Szczebara, Florence
Oberti, Sandrine
Rodier, Marie-Hélène
Soreau, Sylvie
Wallet, France
Héchard, Yann
description Free-living amoebae might be pathogenic by themselves and be a reservoir for bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. Not only could amoebae protect intra-cellular Legionella but Legionella grown within amoebae could undergo physiological modifications and become more resistant and more virulent. Therefore, it is important to study the efficiency of treatments on amoebae and Legionella grown within these amoebae to improve their application and to limit their impact on the environment. With this aim, we compared various water disinfectants against trophozoites of three Acanthamoeba strains and L. pneumophila alone or in co-culture. Three oxidizing disinfectants (chlorine, monochloramine, and chorine dioxide) were assessed. All the samples were treated with disinfectants for 1 h and the disinfectant concentration was followed to calculate disinfectant exposure (Ct). We noticed that there were significant differences of susceptibility among the Acanthamoeba strains. However no difference was observed between infected and non-infected amoebae. Also, the comparison between the three disinfectants indicates that monochloramine was efficient at the same level towards free or co-cultured L. pneumophila while chlorine and chlorine dioxide were less efficient on co-cultured L. pneumophila. It suggests that these disinfectants should have different modes of action. Finally, our results provide for the first time disinfectant exposure values for Acanthamoeba treatments that might be used as references for disinfection of water systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860381255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135410007207</els_id><sourcerecordid>822362923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-a74d847f8c9dc74848e41c98046e4d7b915c6fc8004bf233e065c112bb7260fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQhy3UqizbvgGiuSBOWfw3cS6VEKJQaSUkKGfLccaLVxt7a2dBvE2fpU9WhyztrT3Zsr6Z3_gbhI4JXhBMqvP14lkPEdKC4tenBabiAM2IrJuSci7foRnGnJWECX6IjlJaY4wpZc0HdEgJbhgmdIburqx1xoE3L0WwRW4Jsehcct6CGbQfUqFX2vk0FEtYueBhs9HF1sOuD9tHl-_ad79-XpiMPuo-QKs_ovdWbxJ82p9z9PD16vvlTbm8vf52ebEsjSBsKHXNO8lrK03TmZpLLoET00jMK-Bd3TZEmMoamT_RWsoY4EoYQmjb1rTC1rA5Opv6bmP4sYM0qN4lM87nIeySkhVmklAh_k9mLRVtcsgc8Yk0MaQUwaptdL2OL4pgNWpXazVpV6P28TVrz2Un-4Bd20P3p-jNcwZO94BORm9s1N649JdjNRVcysx9njirg9KrmJmH-5wk8u5IFjBGfZkIyGqfHESVXtcHnYt5Y6oL7t-z_gZBCqwD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822362923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dupuy, Mathieu ; Mazoua, Stéphane ; Berne, Florence ; Bodet, Charles ; Garrec, Nathalie ; Herbelin, Pascaline ; Ménard-Szczebara, Florence ; Oberti, Sandrine ; Rodier, Marie-Hélène ; Soreau, Sylvie ; Wallet, France ; Héchard, Yann</creator><creatorcontrib>Dupuy, Mathieu ; Mazoua, Stéphane ; Berne, Florence ; Bodet, Charles ; Garrec, Nathalie ; Herbelin, Pascaline ; Ménard-Szczebara, Florence ; Oberti, Sandrine ; Rodier, Marie-Hélène ; Soreau, Sylvie ; Wallet, France ; Héchard, Yann</creatorcontrib><description>Free-living amoebae might be pathogenic by themselves and be a reservoir for bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. Not only could amoebae protect intra-cellular Legionella but Legionella grown within amoebae could undergo physiological modifications and become more resistant and more virulent. Therefore, it is important to study the efficiency of treatments on amoebae and Legionella grown within these amoebae to improve their application and to limit their impact on the environment. With this aim, we compared various water disinfectants against trophozoites of three Acanthamoeba strains and L. pneumophila alone or in co-culture. Three oxidizing disinfectants (chlorine, monochloramine, and chorine dioxide) were assessed. All the samples were treated with disinfectants for 1 h and the disinfectant concentration was followed to calculate disinfectant exposure (Ct). We noticed that there were significant differences of susceptibility among the Acanthamoeba strains. However no difference was observed between infected and non-infected amoebae. Also, the comparison between the three disinfectants indicates that monochloramine was efficient at the same level towards free or co-cultured L. pneumophila while chlorine and chlorine dioxide were less efficient on co-cultured L. pneumophila. It suggests that these disinfectants should have different modes of action. Finally, our results provide for the first time disinfectant exposure values for Acanthamoeba treatments that might be used as references for disinfection of water systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21093012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acanthamoeba ; Acanthamoeba - drug effects ; Amoebae ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Biocide ; Chlorine ; Chlorine - pharmacology ; Chlorine dioxide ; coculture ; disinfectants ; Disinfectants - pharmacology ; disinfection ; Environmental impact ; Exact sciences and technology ; Legionella pneumophila ; Legionella pneumophila - drug effects ; Mathematical analysis ; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge ; Oxidant ; Pathogens ; Pollution ; Strain ; Temperature ; trophozoites ; Wastes ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2011-01, Vol.45 (3), p.1087-1094</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-a74d847f8c9dc74848e41c98046e4d7b915c6fc8004bf233e065c112bb7260fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-a74d847f8c9dc74848e41c98046e4d7b915c6fc8004bf233e065c112bb7260fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23725488$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21093012$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dupuy, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazoua, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berne, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodet, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrec, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbelin, Pascaline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ménard-Szczebara, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberti, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodier, Marie-Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soreau, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallet, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Héchard, Yann</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Free-living amoebae might be pathogenic by themselves and be a reservoir for bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. Not only could amoebae protect intra-cellular Legionella but Legionella grown within amoebae could undergo physiological modifications and become more resistant and more virulent. Therefore, it is important to study the efficiency of treatments on amoebae and Legionella grown within these amoebae to improve their application and to limit their impact on the environment. With this aim, we compared various water disinfectants against trophozoites of three Acanthamoeba strains and L. pneumophila alone or in co-culture. Three oxidizing disinfectants (chlorine, monochloramine, and chorine dioxide) were assessed. All the samples were treated with disinfectants for 1 h and the disinfectant concentration was followed to calculate disinfectant exposure (Ct). We noticed that there were significant differences of susceptibility among the Acanthamoeba strains. However no difference was observed between infected and non-infected amoebae. Also, the comparison between the three disinfectants indicates that monochloramine was efficient at the same level towards free or co-cultured L. pneumophila while chlorine and chlorine dioxide were less efficient on co-cultured L. pneumophila. It suggests that these disinfectants should have different modes of action. Finally, our results provide for the first time disinfectant exposure values for Acanthamoeba treatments that might be used as references for disinfection of water systems.</description><subject>Acanthamoeba</subject><subject>Acanthamoeba - drug effects</subject><subject>Amoebae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biocide</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Chlorine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Chlorine dioxide</subject><subject>coculture</subject><subject>disinfectants</subject><subject>Disinfectants - pharmacology</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - drug effects</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Oxidant</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>trophozoites</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQhy3UqizbvgGiuSBOWfw3cS6VEKJQaSUkKGfLccaLVxt7a2dBvE2fpU9WhyztrT3Zsr6Z3_gbhI4JXhBMqvP14lkPEdKC4tenBabiAM2IrJuSci7foRnGnJWECX6IjlJaY4wpZc0HdEgJbhgmdIburqx1xoE3L0WwRW4Jsehcct6CGbQfUqFX2vk0FEtYueBhs9HF1sOuD9tHl-_ad79-XpiMPuo-QKs_ovdWbxJ82p9z9PD16vvlTbm8vf52ebEsjSBsKHXNO8lrK03TmZpLLoET00jMK-Bd3TZEmMoamT_RWsoY4EoYQmjb1rTC1rA5Opv6bmP4sYM0qN4lM87nIeySkhVmklAh_k9mLRVtcsgc8Yk0MaQUwaptdL2OL4pgNWpXazVpV6P28TVrz2Un-4Bd20P3p-jNcwZO94BORm9s1N649JdjNRVcysx9njirg9KrmJmH-5wk8u5IFjBGfZkIyGqfHESVXtcHnYt5Y6oL7t-z_gZBCqwD</recordid><startdate>201101</startdate><enddate>201101</enddate><creator>Dupuy, Mathieu</creator><creator>Mazoua, Stéphane</creator><creator>Berne, Florence</creator><creator>Bodet, Charles</creator><creator>Garrec, Nathalie</creator><creator>Herbelin, Pascaline</creator><creator>Ménard-Szczebara, Florence</creator><creator>Oberti, Sandrine</creator><creator>Rodier, Marie-Hélène</creator><creator>Soreau, Sylvie</creator><creator>Wallet, France</creator><creator>Héchard, Yann</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201101</creationdate><title>Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba</title><author>Dupuy, Mathieu ; Mazoua, Stéphane ; Berne, Florence ; Bodet, Charles ; Garrec, Nathalie ; Herbelin, Pascaline ; Ménard-Szczebara, Florence ; Oberti, Sandrine ; Rodier, Marie-Hélène ; Soreau, Sylvie ; Wallet, France ; Héchard, Yann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-a74d847f8c9dc74848e41c98046e4d7b915c6fc8004bf233e065c112bb7260fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acanthamoeba</topic><topic>Acanthamoeba - drug effects</topic><topic>Amoebae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biocide</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Chlorine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Chlorine dioxide</topic><topic>coculture</topic><topic>disinfectants</topic><topic>Disinfectants - pharmacology</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - drug effects</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Oxidant</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>trophozoites</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dupuy, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazoua, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berne, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodet, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrec, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbelin, Pascaline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ménard-Szczebara, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberti, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodier, Marie-Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soreau, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallet, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Héchard, Yann</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dupuy, Mathieu</au><au>Mazoua, Stéphane</au><au>Berne, Florence</au><au>Bodet, Charles</au><au>Garrec, Nathalie</au><au>Herbelin, Pascaline</au><au>Ménard-Szczebara, Florence</au><au>Oberti, Sandrine</au><au>Rodier, Marie-Hélène</au><au>Soreau, Sylvie</au><au>Wallet, France</au><au>Héchard, Yann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2011-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1094</epage><pages>1087-1094</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Free-living amoebae might be pathogenic by themselves and be a reservoir for bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. Not only could amoebae protect intra-cellular Legionella but Legionella grown within amoebae could undergo physiological modifications and become more resistant and more virulent. Therefore, it is important to study the efficiency of treatments on amoebae and Legionella grown within these amoebae to improve their application and to limit their impact on the environment. With this aim, we compared various water disinfectants against trophozoites of three Acanthamoeba strains and L. pneumophila alone or in co-culture. Three oxidizing disinfectants (chlorine, monochloramine, and chorine dioxide) were assessed. All the samples were treated with disinfectants for 1 h and the disinfectant concentration was followed to calculate disinfectant exposure (Ct). We noticed that there were significant differences of susceptibility among the Acanthamoeba strains. However no difference was observed between infected and non-infected amoebae. Also, the comparison between the three disinfectants indicates that monochloramine was efficient at the same level towards free or co-cultured L. pneumophila while chlorine and chlorine dioxide were less efficient on co-cultured L. pneumophila. It suggests that these disinfectants should have different modes of action. Finally, our results provide for the first time disinfectant exposure values for Acanthamoeba treatments that might be used as references for disinfection of water systems.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21093012</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2011-01, Vol.45 (3), p.1087-1094
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860381255
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acanthamoeba
Acanthamoeba - drug effects
Amoebae
Animals
Applied sciences
Bacteria
Biocide
Chlorine
Chlorine - pharmacology
Chlorine dioxide
coculture
disinfectants
Disinfectants - pharmacology
disinfection
Environmental impact
Exact sciences and technology
Legionella pneumophila
Legionella pneumophila - drug effects
Mathematical analysis
Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge
Oxidant
Pathogens
Pollution
Strain
Temperature
trophozoites
Wastes
Water treatment and pollution
title Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20of%20water%20disinfectants%20against%20Legionella%20pneumophila%20and%C2%A0Acanthamoeba&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Dupuy,%20Mathieu&rft.date=2011-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1094&rft.pages=1087-1094&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822362923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822362923&rft_id=info:pmid/21093012&rft_els_id=S0043135410007207&rfr_iscdi=true