Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism
Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evolutionary biology 2010-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2739-2746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2746 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2739 |
container_title | Journal of evolutionary biology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | GODSOE, W YODER, J.B SMITH, C.I DRUMMOND, C.S PELLMYR, O |
description | Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860378757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>860378757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQhyMEoqXwChBx4ZRlxrFj58ChVC1_VIlDqcTN8saTrVdOHOIEurc-As_Ik-B0Sw9ICHzxyPN9I41-zrIcYYXpvN6ukDMoagRcMUivwJDB6vpBdnjfeJjq1Cqgwi8H2ZMYtwBYcSEeZwcMkSEoeZhdHq8j9Q3loc2HMMzeTC70P29-ePpGPh-uqA_TbqC8M1Nz5fpN7vrc9HlYe7cxEyXJe9ffWnk3T7PxLnZPs0et8ZGe3d1H2cXZ6eeT98X5p3cfTo7Pi0YwAUVpBTW2wTUaaWzLZUm1lXatyLRViSCBW2YlI2ZqrFuwiirRGMaVJGHLo-zVfuowhq8zxUl3LjbkvekpzFGrCkqppJD_JlEIUSlVJ_LlH-Q2zGOfltBSclVXwKsEqT3UjCHGkVo9jK4z404j6CUgvdVLDnrJQS8B6duA9HVSn9_Nn9cd2XvxdyIJeLMHvjtPu_8erD-evl2q5L_Y-60J2mxGF_XlRSI5QPoJlVB_JUrAGgVnvPwF_tGyFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>774896046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GODSOE, W ; YODER, J.B ; SMITH, C.I ; DRUMMOND, C.S ; PELLMYR, O</creator><creatorcontrib>GODSOE, W ; YODER, J.B ; SMITH, C.I ; DRUMMOND, C.S ; PELLMYR, O</creatorcontrib><description>Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21121087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agavaceae ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; codivergence ; Coevolution ; Evolution ; Flowers - anatomy & histology ; Host-parasite interactions ; host-parasite relationships ; insects ; Moths - anatomy & histology ; Moths - physiology ; Mutualism ; Oviposition ; Phenotype ; plants ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Population Dynamics ; Population levels ; Prodoxidae ; Speciation ; Tegeticula ; Trees ; Yucca ; Yucca - anatomy & histology ; Yucca - physiology ; Yucca brevifolia</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2010-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2739-2746</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2010.02120.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2010.02120.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21121087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GODSOE, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YODER, J.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, C.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRUMMOND, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PELLMYR, O</creatorcontrib><title>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.</description><subject>Agavaceae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>codivergence</subject><subject>Coevolution</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flowers - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Host-parasite interactions</subject><subject>host-parasite relationships</subject><subject>insects</subject><subject>Moths - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>plants</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population levels</subject><subject>Prodoxidae</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Tegeticula</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Yucca</subject><subject>Yucca - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Yucca - physiology</subject><subject>Yucca brevifolia</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQhyMEoqXwChBx4ZRlxrFj58ChVC1_VIlDqcTN8saTrVdOHOIEurc-As_Ik-B0Sw9ICHzxyPN9I41-zrIcYYXpvN6ukDMoagRcMUivwJDB6vpBdnjfeJjq1Cqgwi8H2ZMYtwBYcSEeZwcMkSEoeZhdHq8j9Q3loc2HMMzeTC70P29-ePpGPh-uqA_TbqC8M1Nz5fpN7vrc9HlYe7cxEyXJe9ffWnk3T7PxLnZPs0et8ZGe3d1H2cXZ6eeT98X5p3cfTo7Pi0YwAUVpBTW2wTUaaWzLZUm1lXatyLRViSCBW2YlI2ZqrFuwiirRGMaVJGHLo-zVfuowhq8zxUl3LjbkvekpzFGrCkqppJD_JlEIUSlVJ_LlH-Q2zGOfltBSclVXwKsEqT3UjCHGkVo9jK4z404j6CUgvdVLDnrJQS8B6duA9HVSn9_Nn9cd2XvxdyIJeLMHvjtPu_8erD-evl2q5L_Y-60J2mxGF_XlRSI5QPoJlVB_JUrAGgVnvPwF_tGyFw</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>GODSOE, W</creator><creator>YODER, J.B</creator><creator>SMITH, C.I</creator><creator>DRUMMOND, C.S</creator><creator>PELLMYR, O</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</title><author>GODSOE, W ; YODER, J.B ; SMITH, C.I ; DRUMMOND, C.S ; PELLMYR, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agavaceae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>codivergence</topic><topic>Coevolution</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flowers - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Host-parasite interactions</topic><topic>host-parasite relationships</topic><topic>insects</topic><topic>Moths - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>plants</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population levels</topic><topic>Prodoxidae</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Tegeticula</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Yucca</topic><topic>Yucca - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Yucca - physiology</topic><topic>Yucca brevifolia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GODSOE, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YODER, J.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, C.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRUMMOND, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PELLMYR, O</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GODSOE, W</au><au>YODER, J.B</au><au>SMITH, C.I</au><au>DRUMMOND, C.S</au><au>PELLMYR, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2739</spage><epage>2746</epage><pages>2739-2746</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21121087</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-061X |
ispartof | Journal of evolutionary biology, 2010-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2739-2746 |
issn | 1010-061X 1420-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860378757 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agavaceae Animals Biological Evolution codivergence Coevolution Evolution Flowers - anatomy & histology Host-parasite interactions host-parasite relationships insects Moths - anatomy & histology Moths - physiology Mutualism Oviposition Phenotype plants Pollination Pollinators Population Dynamics Population levels Prodoxidae Speciation Tegeticula Trees Yucca Yucca - anatomy & histology Yucca - physiology Yucca brevifolia |
title | Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A44%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absence%20of%20population%E2%80%90level%20phenotype%20matching%20in%20an%20obligate%20pollination%20mutualism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=GODSOE,%20W&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2739&rft.epage=2746&rft.pages=2739-2746&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E860378757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=774896046&rft_id=info:pmid/21121087&rfr_iscdi=true |