Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism

Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2010-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2739-2746
Hauptverfasser: GODSOE, W, YODER, J.B, SMITH, C.I, DRUMMOND, C.S, PELLMYR, O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2746
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2739
container_title Journal of evolutionary biology
container_volume 23
creator GODSOE, W
YODER, J.B
SMITH, C.I
DRUMMOND, C.S
PELLMYR, O
description Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860378757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>860378757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQhyMEoqXwChBx4ZRlxrFj58ChVC1_VIlDqcTN8saTrVdOHOIEurc-As_Ik-B0Sw9ICHzxyPN9I41-zrIcYYXpvN6ukDMoagRcMUivwJDB6vpBdnjfeJjq1Cqgwi8H2ZMYtwBYcSEeZwcMkSEoeZhdHq8j9Q3loc2HMMzeTC70P29-ePpGPh-uqA_TbqC8M1Nz5fpN7vrc9HlYe7cxEyXJe9ffWnk3T7PxLnZPs0et8ZGe3d1H2cXZ6eeT98X5p3cfTo7Pi0YwAUVpBTW2wTUaaWzLZUm1lXatyLRViSCBW2YlI2ZqrFuwiirRGMaVJGHLo-zVfuowhq8zxUl3LjbkvekpzFGrCkqppJD_JlEIUSlVJ_LlH-Q2zGOfltBSclVXwKsEqT3UjCHGkVo9jK4z404j6CUgvdVLDnrJQS8B6duA9HVSn9_Nn9cd2XvxdyIJeLMHvjtPu_8erD-evl2q5L_Y-60J2mxGF_XlRSI5QPoJlVB_JUrAGgVnvPwF_tGyFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>774896046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GODSOE, W ; YODER, J.B ; SMITH, C.I ; DRUMMOND, C.S ; PELLMYR, O</creator><creatorcontrib>GODSOE, W ; YODER, J.B ; SMITH, C.I ; DRUMMOND, C.S ; PELLMYR, O</creatorcontrib><description>Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21121087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agavaceae ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; codivergence ; Coevolution ; Evolution ; Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology ; Host-parasite interactions ; host-parasite relationships ; insects ; Moths - anatomy &amp; histology ; Moths - physiology ; Mutualism ; Oviposition ; Phenotype ; plants ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Population Dynamics ; Population levels ; Prodoxidae ; Speciation ; Tegeticula ; Trees ; Yucca ; Yucca - anatomy &amp; histology ; Yucca - physiology ; Yucca brevifolia</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2010-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2739-2746</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2010.02120.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2010.02120.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21121087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GODSOE, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YODER, J.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, C.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRUMMOND, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PELLMYR, O</creatorcontrib><title>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.</description><subject>Agavaceae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>codivergence</subject><subject>Coevolution</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Host-parasite interactions</subject><subject>host-parasite relationships</subject><subject>insects</subject><subject>Moths - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>plants</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population levels</subject><subject>Prodoxidae</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Tegeticula</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Yucca</subject><subject>Yucca - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Yucca - physiology</subject><subject>Yucca brevifolia</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQhyMEoqXwChBx4ZRlxrFj58ChVC1_VIlDqcTN8saTrVdOHOIEurc-As_Ik-B0Sw9ICHzxyPN9I41-zrIcYYXpvN6ukDMoagRcMUivwJDB6vpBdnjfeJjq1Cqgwi8H2ZMYtwBYcSEeZwcMkSEoeZhdHq8j9Q3loc2HMMzeTC70P29-ePpGPh-uqA_TbqC8M1Nz5fpN7vrc9HlYe7cxEyXJe9ffWnk3T7PxLnZPs0et8ZGe3d1H2cXZ6eeT98X5p3cfTo7Pi0YwAUVpBTW2wTUaaWzLZUm1lXatyLRViSCBW2YlI2ZqrFuwiirRGMaVJGHLo-zVfuowhq8zxUl3LjbkvekpzFGrCkqppJD_JlEIUSlVJ_LlH-Q2zGOfltBSclVXwKsEqT3UjCHGkVo9jK4z404j6CUgvdVLDnrJQS8B6duA9HVSn9_Nn9cd2XvxdyIJeLMHvjtPu_8erD-evl2q5L_Y-60J2mxGF_XlRSI5QPoJlVB_JUrAGgVnvPwF_tGyFw</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>GODSOE, W</creator><creator>YODER, J.B</creator><creator>SMITH, C.I</creator><creator>DRUMMOND, C.S</creator><creator>PELLMYR, O</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</title><author>GODSOE, W ; YODER, J.B ; SMITH, C.I ; DRUMMOND, C.S ; PELLMYR, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5250-3d5ecdc1b1a7adf473e9d7db8eaf6310704d2d72e2a919f0d8e65ca2487e5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agavaceae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>codivergence</topic><topic>Coevolution</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Host-parasite interactions</topic><topic>host-parasite relationships</topic><topic>insects</topic><topic>Moths - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>plants</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population levels</topic><topic>Prodoxidae</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Tegeticula</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Yucca</topic><topic>Yucca - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Yucca - physiology</topic><topic>Yucca brevifolia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GODSOE, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YODER, J.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, C.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRUMMOND, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PELLMYR, O</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GODSOE, W</au><au>YODER, J.B</au><au>SMITH, C.I</au><au>DRUMMOND, C.S</au><au>PELLMYR, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2739</spage><epage>2746</epage><pages>2739-2746</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Coevolution is thought to promote evolutionary change between demes that ultimately results in speciation. If this is the case, then we should expect to see similar patterns of trait matching and phenotypic divergence between populations and between species in model systems for coevolution. As measures of divergence are frequently only available at one scale (population level or taxon level), this contention is rarely tested directly. Here, we use the case of co‐divergence between different varieties of Joshua tree Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae) and their obligate pollinators, two yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Prodoxidae), to test for trait matching between taxa and among populations. Using model selection, we show that there is trait matching between mutualists at the taxon level, but once we account for differences between taxa, there is no indication of trait matching in local populations. This result differs from similar studies in other coevolving systems. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises because coevolution in obligate mutualisms favours divergence less strongly than coevolution in other systems, such as host-parasite interactions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21121087</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-061X
ispartof Journal of evolutionary biology, 2010-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2739-2746
issn 1010-061X
1420-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860378757
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agavaceae
Animals
Biological Evolution
codivergence
Coevolution
Evolution
Flowers - anatomy & histology
Host-parasite interactions
host-parasite relationships
insects
Moths - anatomy & histology
Moths - physiology
Mutualism
Oviposition
Phenotype
plants
Pollination
Pollinators
Population Dynamics
Population levels
Prodoxidae
Speciation
Tegeticula
Trees
Yucca
Yucca - anatomy & histology
Yucca - physiology
Yucca brevifolia
title Absence of population‐level phenotype matching in an obligate pollination mutualism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A44%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absence%20of%20population%E2%80%90level%20phenotype%20matching%20in%20an%20obligate%20pollination%20mutualism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=GODSOE,%20W&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2739&rft.epage=2746&rft.pages=2739-2746&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02120.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E860378757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=774896046&rft_id=info:pmid/21121087&rfr_iscdi=true