Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes

Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700 bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of microbiological methods 2011, Vol.84 (1), p.81-87
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Minseok, Morrison, Mark, Yu, Zhongtang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Journal of microbiological methods
container_volume 84
creator Kim, Minseok
Morrison, Mark
Yu, Zhongtang
description Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700 bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700 bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860376267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167701210003623</els_id><sourcerecordid>820788921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS1UVLa0n6BS5UvFKYv_JXYOPSBEWyQEEtCz5djjrVdJvLWzSPvtcdiF3trTSDO_9zQzD6HPlCwpoc35ejmEAaYlIy-dJWHkCC2okqxSvG7foUWhZCUJZSfoQ85rQmjNhXqPThglQtacL9Dq6sn0WzOFOOLosQveQ4JxwhuTpmB6TJsHnO5vL_AKRsAZ_mxhtIATrIokYx8T3vze9XEeT8FiM5p-l0Oe3YZgU-xCHCB_RMfe9Bk-Heop-vX96vHyZ3Vz9-P68uKmskI1U9W1LXihnO1aIIRxV1vvG8mtoMR1qpaSdpQJzp20woBkwthSOlcTb4Sn_BSd7X03KZZV86SHkC30vRkhbrNWDeGyYcXyvyQjUqmWzZ58T5Zrck7g9SaFwaSdpkTPUei1folCz1HMzRJFUX05-G-7Adyb5vX3Bfh6AEy2pvfJjDbkvxyXrGlkW7hvew7K354CJJ1tmENwIYGdtIvhn4s8A8sHqRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>820788921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kim, Minseok ; Morrison, Mark ; Yu, Zhongtang</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minseok ; Morrison, Mark ; Yu, Zhongtang</creatorcontrib><description>Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700 bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700 bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21047533</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMIMDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>16S rRNA gene ; Archaea ; Archaea - classification ; Archaea - genetics ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diversity ; DNA, Archaeal - genetics ; DNA, Ribosomal - genetics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genes, rRNA ; Metagenome ; Metagenomics - methods ; Microbiology ; OTUs ; Partial sequences ; RNA, Bacterial - genetics ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2011, Vol.84 (1), p.81-87</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23726679$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21047533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhongtang</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700 bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700 bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.</description><subject>16S rRNA gene</subject><subject>Archaea</subject><subject>Archaea - classification</subject><subject>Archaea - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>DNA, Archaeal - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genes, rRNA</subject><subject>Metagenome</subject><subject>Metagenomics - methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>OTUs</subject><subject>Partial sequences</subject><subject>RNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS1UVLa0n6BS5UvFKYv_JXYOPSBEWyQEEtCz5djjrVdJvLWzSPvtcdiF3trTSDO_9zQzD6HPlCwpoc35ejmEAaYlIy-dJWHkCC2okqxSvG7foUWhZCUJZSfoQ85rQmjNhXqPThglQtacL9Dq6sn0WzOFOOLosQveQ4JxwhuTpmB6TJsHnO5vL_AKRsAZ_mxhtIATrIokYx8T3vze9XEeT8FiM5p-l0Oe3YZgU-xCHCB_RMfe9Bk-Heop-vX96vHyZ3Vz9-P68uKmskI1U9W1LXihnO1aIIRxV1vvG8mtoMR1qpaSdpQJzp20woBkwthSOlcTb4Sn_BSd7X03KZZV86SHkC30vRkhbrNWDeGyYcXyvyQjUqmWzZ58T5Zrck7g9SaFwaSdpkTPUei1folCz1HMzRJFUX05-G-7Adyb5vX3Bfh6AEy2pvfJjDbkvxyXrGlkW7hvew7K354CJJ1tmENwIYGdtIvhn4s8A8sHqRw</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Kim, Minseok</creator><creator>Morrison, Mark</creator><creator>Yu, Zhongtang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</title><author>Kim, Minseok ; Morrison, Mark ; Yu, Zhongtang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA gene</topic><topic>Archaea</topic><topic>Archaea - classification</topic><topic>Archaea - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>DNA, Archaeal - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genes, rRNA</topic><topic>Metagenome</topic><topic>Metagenomics - methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>OTUs</topic><topic>Partial sequences</topic><topic>RNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhongtang</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Minseok</au><au>Morrison, Mark</au><au>Yu, Zhongtang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>81-87</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><coden>JMIMDQ</coden><abstract>Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700 bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700 bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21047533</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-7012
ispartof Journal of microbiological methods, 2011, Vol.84 (1), p.81-87
issn 0167-7012
1872-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860376267
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects 16S rRNA gene
Archaea
Archaea - classification
Archaea - genetics
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - genetics
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Diversity
DNA, Archaeal - genetics
DNA, Ribosomal - genetics
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genes, rRNA
Metagenome
Metagenomics - methods
Microbiology
OTUs
Partial sequences
RNA, Bacterial - genetics
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
title Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A29%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20partial%2016S%20rRNA%20gene%20sequence%20regions%20for%20phylogenetic%20analysis%20of%20microbiomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Kim,%20Minseok&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=81-87&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft.coden=JMIMDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E820788921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=820788921&rft_id=info:pmid/21047533&rft_els_id=S0167701210003623&rfr_iscdi=true