Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes
Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700 bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of microbiological methods 2011, Vol.84 (1), p.81-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | Journal of microbiological methods |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Kim, Minseok Morrison, Mark Yu, Zhongtang |
description | Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700
bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700
bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860376267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167701210003623</els_id><sourcerecordid>820788921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS1UVLa0n6BS5UvFKYv_JXYOPSBEWyQEEtCz5djjrVdJvLWzSPvtcdiF3trTSDO_9zQzD6HPlCwpoc35ejmEAaYlIy-dJWHkCC2okqxSvG7foUWhZCUJZSfoQ85rQmjNhXqPThglQtacL9Dq6sn0WzOFOOLosQveQ4JxwhuTpmB6TJsHnO5vL_AKRsAZ_mxhtIATrIokYx8T3vze9XEeT8FiM5p-l0Oe3YZgU-xCHCB_RMfe9Bk-Heop-vX96vHyZ3Vz9-P68uKmskI1U9W1LXihnO1aIIRxV1vvG8mtoMR1qpaSdpQJzp20woBkwthSOlcTb4Sn_BSd7X03KZZV86SHkC30vRkhbrNWDeGyYcXyvyQjUqmWzZ58T5Zrck7g9SaFwaSdpkTPUei1folCz1HMzRJFUX05-G-7Adyb5vX3Bfh6AEy2pvfJjDbkvxyXrGlkW7hvew7K354CJJ1tmENwIYGdtIvhn4s8A8sHqRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>820788921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kim, Minseok ; Morrison, Mark ; Yu, Zhongtang</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minseok ; Morrison, Mark ; Yu, Zhongtang</creatorcontrib><description>Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700
bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700
bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21047533</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMIMDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>16S rRNA gene ; Archaea ; Archaea - classification ; Archaea - genetics ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diversity ; DNA, Archaeal - genetics ; DNA, Ribosomal - genetics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genes, rRNA ; Metagenome ; Metagenomics - methods ; Microbiology ; OTUs ; Partial sequences ; RNA, Bacterial - genetics ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2011, Vol.84 (1), p.81-87</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23726679$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21047533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhongtang</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700
bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700
bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.</description><subject>16S rRNA gene</subject><subject>Archaea</subject><subject>Archaea - classification</subject><subject>Archaea - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>DNA, Archaeal - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genes, rRNA</subject><subject>Metagenome</subject><subject>Metagenomics - methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>OTUs</subject><subject>Partial sequences</subject><subject>RNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS1UVLa0n6BS5UvFKYv_JXYOPSBEWyQEEtCz5djjrVdJvLWzSPvtcdiF3trTSDO_9zQzD6HPlCwpoc35ejmEAaYlIy-dJWHkCC2okqxSvG7foUWhZCUJZSfoQ85rQmjNhXqPThglQtacL9Dq6sn0WzOFOOLosQveQ4JxwhuTpmB6TJsHnO5vL_AKRsAZ_mxhtIATrIokYx8T3vze9XEeT8FiM5p-l0Oe3YZgU-xCHCB_RMfe9Bk-Heop-vX96vHyZ3Vz9-P68uKmskI1U9W1LXihnO1aIIRxV1vvG8mtoMR1qpaSdpQJzp20woBkwthSOlcTb4Sn_BSd7X03KZZV86SHkC30vRkhbrNWDeGyYcXyvyQjUqmWzZ58T5Zrck7g9SaFwaSdpkTPUei1folCz1HMzRJFUX05-G-7Adyb5vX3Bfh6AEy2pvfJjDbkvxyXrGlkW7hvew7K354CJJ1tmENwIYGdtIvhn4s8A8sHqRw</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Kim, Minseok</creator><creator>Morrison, Mark</creator><creator>Yu, Zhongtang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</title><author>Kim, Minseok ; Morrison, Mark ; Yu, Zhongtang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b99ef48dcb9e0023d5cff673c410db85771b12433d7c4ae724acae7bd50fa4f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA gene</topic><topic>Archaea</topic><topic>Archaea - classification</topic><topic>Archaea - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>DNA, Archaeal - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genes, rRNA</topic><topic>Metagenome</topic><topic>Metagenomics - methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>OTUs</topic><topic>Partial sequences</topic><topic>RNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhongtang</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Minseok</au><au>Morrison, Mark</au><au>Yu, Zhongtang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>81-87</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><coden>JMIMDQ</coden><abstract>Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are conventionally defined at a phylogenetic distance (0.03—species, 0.05—genus, 0.10—family) based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences. However, partial sequences (700
bp or shorter) have been used in most studies. This discord may affect analysis of diversity and species richness because sequence divergence is not distributed evenly along the 16S rRNA gene. In this study, we compared a set each of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences of nearly full length with multiple sets of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequences derived therefrom (approximately 440–700
bp), at conventional and alternative distance levels. Our objective was to identify partial sequence region(s) and distance level(s) that allow more accurate phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rRNA genes. Our results showed that no partial sequence region could estimate OTU richness or define OTUs as reliably as nearly full-length genes. However, the V1–V4 regions can provide more accurate estimates than others. For analysis of archaea, we recommend the V1–V3 and the V4–V7 regions and clustering of species-level OTUs at 0.03 and 0.02 distances, respectively. For analysis of bacteria, the V1–V3 and the V1–V4 regions should be targeted, with species-level OTUs being clustered at 0.04 distance in both cases.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21047533</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-7012 |
ispartof | Journal of microbiological methods, 2011, Vol.84 (1), p.81-87 |
issn | 0167-7012 1872-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860376267 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | 16S rRNA gene Archaea Archaea - classification Archaea - genetics Bacteria - classification Bacteria - genetics Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Diversity DNA, Archaeal - genetics DNA, Ribosomal - genetics Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genes, rRNA Metagenome Metagenomics - methods Microbiology OTUs Partial sequences RNA, Bacterial - genetics RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics |
title | Evaluation of different partial 16S rRNA gene sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis of microbiomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A29%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20partial%2016S%20rRNA%20gene%20sequence%20regions%20for%20phylogenetic%20analysis%20of%20microbiomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Kim,%20Minseok&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=81-87&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft.coden=JMIMDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E820788921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=820788921&rft_id=info:pmid/21047533&rft_els_id=S0167701210003623&rfr_iscdi=true |