Failed exstrophy closure

Children with bladder exstrophy present a formidable surgical challenge. Like all major reconstructive surgeries, the best hope for a favorable outcome lies in achieving success in the first operative attempt. Regardless of the surgical approach, however, complications do occur. A failed exstrophy c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in pediatric surgery 2011-05, Vol.20 (2), p.97-101
1. Verfasser: Novak, Thomas E., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 2
container_start_page 97
container_title Seminars in pediatric surgery
container_volume 20
creator Novak, Thomas E., MD
description Children with bladder exstrophy present a formidable surgical challenge. Like all major reconstructive surgeries, the best hope for a favorable outcome lies in achieving success in the first operative attempt. Regardless of the surgical approach, however, complications do occur. A failed exstrophy closure is a major complication with significant implications on the long-term surgical outcome and ultimate fate of the urinary tract. Successful repeat exstrophy closure can be accomplished in most cases when performed in conjunction with pelvic osteotomy and proper postoperative immobilization. Modern staged repair of exstrophy, complete primary repair of exstrophy, and immediate continent urinary diversion have been advocated by different groups in the management of a failed exstrophy closure. It is apparent that compared with children who undergo successful primary closure, a failed closure with subsequent successful repeat closure makes the child much less likely to achieve sufficient bladder growth to be considered for bladder neck reconstruction, and furthermore, makes them less likely to have a successful bladder neck reconstruction even when they are an acceptable candidate. Although acceptable dryness rates after repeat closure can ultimately be obtained, they are typically at the expense of a commitment to intermittent catheterization and continent diversion.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.12.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_859761937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1055858610001095</els_id><sourcerecordid>859761937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9bd41faa96964e4157bbcfdeace4f1d6bdd1b1b9da02ab8b70641d3f22e37bee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLAzEURoMotlb3rqQ7V1PzmMxjI2ixKhRcqOuQxx3NOC-TGbH_3gytCq5cJYTzfZeci9Cc4AXBnF2UCw91B8YP7mVB8fhMFxjHe2hKOKNRHnO2H-6Y8yjjWTJBR96XGNMkofwQTSgJQMbZFJ2upK3AzOHT967tXjdzXbWhFo7RQSErDye7c4aeVzdPy7to_XB7v7xaRzqmWR_lysSkkDJP8iSGmPBUKV0YkBrigphEGUMUUbmRmEqVqRQnMTGsoBRYqgDYDJ1vezvXvg_ge1Fbr6GqZAPt4EXG8zQhOUsDmW1J7VrvHRSic7aWbiMIFqMWUYpfLWLUIggVQUuInu2GDKoG8xP89hCA6y0A4asfFpzw2kKjwVgHuhemtf-ZcvmnRFe2sVpWb7ABX7aDa4JKQYQPAfE4rmfcDsE4tOScfQGx6I3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859761937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failed exstrophy closure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Novak, Thomas E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Novak, Thomas E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Children with bladder exstrophy present a formidable surgical challenge. Like all major reconstructive surgeries, the best hope for a favorable outcome lies in achieving success in the first operative attempt. Regardless of the surgical approach, however, complications do occur. A failed exstrophy closure is a major complication with significant implications on the long-term surgical outcome and ultimate fate of the urinary tract. Successful repeat exstrophy closure can be accomplished in most cases when performed in conjunction with pelvic osteotomy and proper postoperative immobilization. Modern staged repair of exstrophy, complete primary repair of exstrophy, and immediate continent urinary diversion have been advocated by different groups in the management of a failed exstrophy closure. It is apparent that compared with children who undergo successful primary closure, a failed closure with subsequent successful repeat closure makes the child much less likely to achieve sufficient bladder growth to be considered for bladder neck reconstruction, and furthermore, makes them less likely to have a successful bladder neck reconstruction even when they are an acceptable candidate. Although acceptable dryness rates after repeat closure can ultimately be obtained, they are typically at the expense of a commitment to intermittent catheterization and continent diversion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-8586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9453</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21453853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bladder exstrophy ; Bladder Exstrophy - surgery ; Child ; Complications ; Failed exstrophy ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Pediatrics ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Reoperation ; Surgery ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - surgery ; Treatment Failure ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><ispartof>Seminars in pediatric surgery, 2011-05, Vol.20 (2), p.97-101</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9bd41faa96964e4157bbcfdeace4f1d6bdd1b1b9da02ab8b70641d3f22e37bee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9bd41faa96964e4157bbcfdeace4f1d6bdd1b1b9da02ab8b70641d3f22e37bee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.12.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21453853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novak, Thomas E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Failed exstrophy closure</title><title>Seminars in pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>Semin Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Children with bladder exstrophy present a formidable surgical challenge. Like all major reconstructive surgeries, the best hope for a favorable outcome lies in achieving success in the first operative attempt. Regardless of the surgical approach, however, complications do occur. A failed exstrophy closure is a major complication with significant implications on the long-term surgical outcome and ultimate fate of the urinary tract. Successful repeat exstrophy closure can be accomplished in most cases when performed in conjunction with pelvic osteotomy and proper postoperative immobilization. Modern staged repair of exstrophy, complete primary repair of exstrophy, and immediate continent urinary diversion have been advocated by different groups in the management of a failed exstrophy closure. It is apparent that compared with children who undergo successful primary closure, a failed closure with subsequent successful repeat closure makes the child much less likely to achieve sufficient bladder growth to be considered for bladder neck reconstruction, and furthermore, makes them less likely to have a successful bladder neck reconstruction even when they are an acceptable candidate. Although acceptable dryness rates after repeat closure can ultimately be obtained, they are typically at the expense of a commitment to intermittent catheterization and continent diversion.</description><subject>Bladder exstrophy</subject><subject>Bladder Exstrophy - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Failed exstrophy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><issn>1055-8586</issn><issn>1532-9453</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLAzEURoMotlb3rqQ7V1PzmMxjI2ixKhRcqOuQxx3NOC-TGbH_3gytCq5cJYTzfZeci9Cc4AXBnF2UCw91B8YP7mVB8fhMFxjHe2hKOKNRHnO2H-6Y8yjjWTJBR96XGNMkofwQTSgJQMbZFJ2upK3AzOHT967tXjdzXbWhFo7RQSErDye7c4aeVzdPy7to_XB7v7xaRzqmWR_lysSkkDJP8iSGmPBUKV0YkBrigphEGUMUUbmRmEqVqRQnMTGsoBRYqgDYDJ1vezvXvg_ge1Fbr6GqZAPt4EXG8zQhOUsDmW1J7VrvHRSic7aWbiMIFqMWUYpfLWLUIggVQUuInu2GDKoG8xP89hCA6y0A4asfFpzw2kKjwVgHuhemtf-ZcvmnRFe2sVpWb7ABX7aDa4JKQYQPAfE4rmfcDsE4tOScfQGx6I3U</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Novak, Thomas E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Failed exstrophy closure</title><author>Novak, Thomas E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9bd41faa96964e4157bbcfdeace4f1d6bdd1b1b9da02ab8b70641d3f22e37bee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bladder exstrophy</topic><topic>Bladder Exstrophy - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Failed exstrophy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novak, Thomas E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novak, Thomas E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failed exstrophy closure</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>97-101</pages><issn>1055-8586</issn><eissn>1532-9453</eissn><abstract>Children with bladder exstrophy present a formidable surgical challenge. Like all major reconstructive surgeries, the best hope for a favorable outcome lies in achieving success in the first operative attempt. Regardless of the surgical approach, however, complications do occur. A failed exstrophy closure is a major complication with significant implications on the long-term surgical outcome and ultimate fate of the urinary tract. Successful repeat exstrophy closure can be accomplished in most cases when performed in conjunction with pelvic osteotomy and proper postoperative immobilization. Modern staged repair of exstrophy, complete primary repair of exstrophy, and immediate continent urinary diversion have been advocated by different groups in the management of a failed exstrophy closure. It is apparent that compared with children who undergo successful primary closure, a failed closure with subsequent successful repeat closure makes the child much less likely to achieve sufficient bladder growth to be considered for bladder neck reconstruction, and furthermore, makes them less likely to have a successful bladder neck reconstruction even when they are an acceptable candidate. Although acceptable dryness rates after repeat closure can ultimately be obtained, they are typically at the expense of a commitment to intermittent catheterization and continent diversion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21453853</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.12.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-8586
ispartof Seminars in pediatric surgery, 2011-05, Vol.20 (2), p.97-101
issn 1055-8586
1532-9453
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_859761937
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bladder exstrophy
Bladder Exstrophy - surgery
Child
Complications
Failed exstrophy
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Pediatrics
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Reoperation
Surgery
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - surgery
Treatment Failure
Urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence - etiology
Urinary Incontinence - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
title Failed exstrophy closure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A36%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failed%20exstrophy%20closure&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Novak,%20Thomas%20E.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=97-101&rft.issn=1055-8586&rft.eissn=1532-9453&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E859761937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859761937&rft_id=info:pmid/21453853&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1055858610001095&rfr_iscdi=true