Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of standard anthropometric linear measurements made with three different three-dimensional scanning systems namely laser surface scanning (Minolta Vivid 900), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3D stereo-photogrammetry (D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forensic science international 2011-04, Vol.207 (1), p.127-134
Hauptverfasser: Fourie, Zacharias, Damstra, Janalt, Gerrits, Peter O, Ren, Yijin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 1
container_start_page 127
container_title Forensic science international
container_volume 207
creator Fourie, Zacharias
Damstra, Janalt
Gerrits, Peter O
Ren, Yijin
description Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of standard anthropometric linear measurements made with three different three-dimensional scanning systems namely laser surface scanning (Minolta Vivid 900), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3D stereo-photogrammetry (Di3D system) and to compare them to physical linear measurements. The study sample consisted of seven cadaver heads. The reliability and accuracy were assessed by means of a series of 21 standardized, linear facial measurements derived from 15 landmarks taken both directly on the face with a set of digital callipers and indirectly from a three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue surface models derived from CBCT, laser surface scans and 3D photographs. Statistical analysis for the reliability was done by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Accuracy was determined by means of the absolute error (AE) and absolute percentage error (APE) by comparison of the 3D measurements to the physical anthropometrical measurements. All the 3D scanning systems were proved to be very reliable (ICC > 0.923–0.999) when compared to the physical measurements (ICC; 0.964–0.999). Only one CBCT measurement (t-g) and one Di3D measurement (t-sn left) had a mean AE of more than 1.5 mm. There are clear potential benefits of using 3D measurements appose to direct measurements in the assessment of facial deformities. Measurements recorded by the three 3D systems appeared to be both sufficiently accurate and reliable enough for research and clinical use.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_859496203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0379073810004524</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671279004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-10cc3e2b27022ab15a67d77a27530a5f9fd7a5bad539f3f105cb15b778bc22c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0t9r1TAUB_AiirtO_wUtisyXXk-S5kdfhDHmFAY-qM8hTU9crm16TdpB_3tT7nWDgeJTIHzOyY_vKYpXBLYEiHi_27oxJut9mLYU8i40WyDqUbEhStJKUMUeFxtgsqlAMnVSPEtpBwCcU_G0OKHQcMKJ3BQ3l7emn83kx1COrjRhuonjfhxwit6Wxto5Grvk_a6M2HvT-t5PSzknH36UnXcOI4apzFWIVecHDCm3Mn2ZrAlhRWlJEw7pefHEmT7hi-N6Wnz_ePnt4lN1_eXq88X5dWV5zaaKgLUMaUslUGpawo2QnZSGSs7AcNe4Thremo6zxjFHgNuMWilVaym1lJ0WZ4e--zj-mjFNevDJYt-bgOOctOJN3QgKLMt3_5RESEJlA1Bn-voB3Y1zzM_M_YRgtaSSZPTmb4gAq5VUQoms5EHZOKYU0el99IOJS0Z6zVbv9F22es1WQ6Nztrny5bH_3A7Y3dX9CTODt0dg8u_3Lppgfbp3NahawerODw5zDrceo86nYbDY-Yh20t3o_-MyHx70sL0PPh_7ExdM9y_XiWrQX9dRXCeR5CGsOa3Zb8Ma294</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034878686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fourie, Zacharias ; Damstra, Janalt ; Gerrits, Peter O ; Ren, Yijin</creator><creatorcontrib>Fourie, Zacharias ; Damstra, Janalt ; Gerrits, Peter O ; Ren, Yijin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of standard anthropometric linear measurements made with three different three-dimensional scanning systems namely laser surface scanning (Minolta Vivid 900), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3D stereo-photogrammetry (Di3D system) and to compare them to physical linear measurements. The study sample consisted of seven cadaver heads. The reliability and accuracy were assessed by means of a series of 21 standardized, linear facial measurements derived from 15 landmarks taken both directly on the face with a set of digital callipers and indirectly from a three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue surface models derived from CBCT, laser surface scans and 3D photographs. Statistical analysis for the reliability was done by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Accuracy was determined by means of the absolute error (AE) and absolute percentage error (APE) by comparison of the 3D measurements to the physical anthropometrical measurements. All the 3D scanning systems were proved to be very reliable (ICC &gt; 0.923–0.999) when compared to the physical measurements (ICC; 0.964–0.999). Only one CBCT measurement (t-g) and one Di3D measurement (t-sn left) had a mean AE of more than 1.5 mm. There are clear potential benefits of using 3D measurements appose to direct measurements in the assessment of facial deformities. Measurements recorded by the three 3D systems appeared to be both sufficiently accurate and reliable enough for research and clinical use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20951517</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FSINDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Anthropometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cadaver ; Comparative analysis ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Face - anatomy &amp; histology ; Facial ; Forensic Anthropology ; Forensic medicine ; Forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; General aspects ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laser surface scanning ; Lasers ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Medical sciences ; Pathology ; Photogrammetry ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scanning ; Statistical analysis ; Stereo-photogrammetry ; Three dimensional ; Tissues ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international, 2011-04, Vol.207 (1), p.127-134</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-10cc3e2b27022ab15a67d77a27530a5f9fd7a5bad539f3f105cb15b778bc22c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-10cc3e2b27022ab15a67d77a27530a5f9fd7a5bad539f3f105cb15b778bc22c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073810004524$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24084807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20951517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fourie, Zacharias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damstra, Janalt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, Peter O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Yijin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems</title><title>Forensic science international</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><description>Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of standard anthropometric linear measurements made with three different three-dimensional scanning systems namely laser surface scanning (Minolta Vivid 900), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3D stereo-photogrammetry (Di3D system) and to compare them to physical linear measurements. The study sample consisted of seven cadaver heads. The reliability and accuracy were assessed by means of a series of 21 standardized, linear facial measurements derived from 15 landmarks taken both directly on the face with a set of digital callipers and indirectly from a three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue surface models derived from CBCT, laser surface scans and 3D photographs. Statistical analysis for the reliability was done by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Accuracy was determined by means of the absolute error (AE) and absolute percentage error (APE) by comparison of the 3D measurements to the physical anthropometrical measurements. All the 3D scanning systems were proved to be very reliable (ICC &gt; 0.923–0.999) when compared to the physical measurements (ICC; 0.964–0.999). Only one CBCT measurement (t-g) and one Di3D measurement (t-sn left) had a mean AE of more than 1.5 mm. There are clear potential benefits of using 3D measurements appose to direct measurements in the assessment of facial deformities. Measurements recorded by the three 3D systems appeared to be both sufficiently accurate and reliable enough for research and clinical use.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Facial</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology</subject><subject>Forensic medicine</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laser surface scanning</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stereo-photogrammetry</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0379-0738</issn><issn>1872-6283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0t9r1TAUB_AiirtO_wUtisyXXk-S5kdfhDHmFAY-qM8hTU9crm16TdpB_3tT7nWDgeJTIHzOyY_vKYpXBLYEiHi_27oxJut9mLYU8i40WyDqUbEhStJKUMUeFxtgsqlAMnVSPEtpBwCcU_G0OKHQcMKJ3BQ3l7emn83kx1COrjRhuonjfhxwit6Wxto5Grvk_a6M2HvT-t5PSzknH36UnXcOI4apzFWIVecHDCm3Mn2ZrAlhRWlJEw7pefHEmT7hi-N6Wnz_ePnt4lN1_eXq88X5dWV5zaaKgLUMaUslUGpawo2QnZSGSs7AcNe4Thremo6zxjFHgNuMWilVaym1lJ0WZ4e--zj-mjFNevDJYt-bgOOctOJN3QgKLMt3_5RESEJlA1Bn-voB3Y1zzM_M_YRgtaSSZPTmb4gAq5VUQoms5EHZOKYU0el99IOJS0Z6zVbv9F22es1WQ6Nztrny5bH_3A7Y3dX9CTODt0dg8u_3Lppgfbp3NahawerODw5zDrceo86nYbDY-Yh20t3o_-MyHx70sL0PPh_7ExdM9y_XiWrQX9dRXCeR5CGsOa3Zb8Ma294</recordid><startdate>20110415</startdate><enddate>20110415</enddate><creator>Fourie, Zacharias</creator><creator>Damstra, Janalt</creator><creator>Gerrits, Peter O</creator><creator>Ren, Yijin</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110415</creationdate><title>Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems</title><author>Fourie, Zacharias ; Damstra, Janalt ; Gerrits, Peter O ; Ren, Yijin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-10cc3e2b27022ab15a67d77a27530a5f9fd7a5bad539f3f105cb15b778bc22c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Facial</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology</topic><topic>Forensic medicine</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laser surface scanning</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stereo-photogrammetry</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fourie, Zacharias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damstra, Janalt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, Peter O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Yijin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fourie, Zacharias</au><au>Damstra, Janalt</au><au>Gerrits, Peter O</au><au>Ren, Yijin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><date>2011-04-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>207</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>127-134</pages><issn>0379-0738</issn><eissn>1872-6283</eissn><coden>FSINDR</coden><abstract>Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of standard anthropometric linear measurements made with three different three-dimensional scanning systems namely laser surface scanning (Minolta Vivid 900), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3D stereo-photogrammetry (Di3D system) and to compare them to physical linear measurements. The study sample consisted of seven cadaver heads. The reliability and accuracy were assessed by means of a series of 21 standardized, linear facial measurements derived from 15 landmarks taken both directly on the face with a set of digital callipers and indirectly from a three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue surface models derived from CBCT, laser surface scans and 3D photographs. Statistical analysis for the reliability was done by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Accuracy was determined by means of the absolute error (AE) and absolute percentage error (APE) by comparison of the 3D measurements to the physical anthropometrical measurements. All the 3D scanning systems were proved to be very reliable (ICC &gt; 0.923–0.999) when compared to the physical measurements (ICC; 0.964–0.999). Only one CBCT measurement (t-g) and one Di3D measurement (t-sn left) had a mean AE of more than 1.5 mm. There are clear potential benefits of using 3D measurements appose to direct measurements in the assessment of facial deformities. Measurements recorded by the three 3D systems appeared to be both sufficiently accurate and reliable enough for research and clinical use.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>20951517</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.018</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0379-0738
ispartof Forensic science international, 2011-04, Vol.207 (1), p.127-134
issn 0379-0738
1872-6283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_859496203
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Accuracy
Anthropometry
Biological and medical sciences
Cadaver
Comparative analysis
Cone beam computed tomography
Error analysis
Errors
Face - anatomy & histology
Facial
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic medicine
Forensic science
Forensic sciences
General aspects
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Laser surface scanning
Lasers
Mathematical models
Measurement
Medical sciences
Pathology
Photogrammetry
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Scanning
Statistical analysis
Stereo-photogrammetry
Three dimensional
Tissues
Tomography
title Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A02%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20anthropometric%20accuracy%20and%20reliability%20using%20different%20three-dimensional%20scanning%20systems&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international&rft.au=Fourie,%20Zacharias&rft.date=2011-04-15&rft.volume=207&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=127-134&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.eissn=1872-6283&rft.coden=FSINDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671279004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034878686&rft_id=info:pmid/20951517&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0379073810004524&rfr_iscdi=true