Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta
SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolution & development 2010-11, Vol.12 (6), p.592-600 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 600 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 592 |
container_title | Evolution & development |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Tobler, Alexandra Nijhout, H. Frederik |
description | SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858422364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2192264481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wCmCxYZXB17-JxAa1Q4sosGAqRmyunMQpGTLx1E7amR2PwDPyJDhNmQUb8OZeX3_nXFknSQjQGcTzajUDyWQKgi1njMYppUKI2fZBcrh_eHjX01QKWB4kRyGsKAUtWP44OWBABRVMHiaLU3tjW7dZ2643LSldF3pvmq4PxHWk_2aJvXHt0Dfx5mpy23RXv378LFy1I6Zt3dr2fkeajnwwXTWUhgS77c2T5FFt2mCf3tfj5PLtfHFynl58Ont38uYiLaUUIlUZKFZTobjVldTcyJzXUJoqE0BVkddGVlrmtVRFURlVaOBgeMUNp3mlM8mPk5eT78a768GGHtdNKG3bms66IWAmM8EYV-KfpFaMaQGgIvniL3LlBt_Fb2BGtaDA8nFxNkGldyF4W-PGN2vjdwgUx4RwhWMQOAaBY0J4lxBuo_TZvf9QrG21F_6JJAKvJ-C2ae3uv41xfjqPTZSnk7wJvd3u5cZ_R6W5lvjl4xlSBfliCe_xa-SfT3xtHJor3wS8_ByNOYWcqriA_wa40rch</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807401295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tobler, Alexandra ; Nijhout, H. Frederik</creator><creatorcontrib>Tobler, Alexandra ; Nijhout, H. Frederik</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-142X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21040425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Allometry ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Body Size ; Butterflies & moths ; Developmental biology ; Dietary restrictions ; Evolution ; Evolutionary biology ; Genetics ; Larva - anatomy & histology ; Larva - growth & development ; Manduca - anatomy & histology ; Manduca - growth & development ; Manduca sexta ; Scaling ; Size ; Wings ; Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology ; Wings, Animal - growth & development]]></subject><ispartof>Evolution & development, 2010-11, Vol.12 (6), p.592-600</ispartof><rights>2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1525-142X.2010.00444.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1525-142X.2010.00444.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tobler, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhout, H. Frederik</creatorcontrib><title>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</title><title>Evolution & development</title><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.</description><subject>Allometry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Developmental biology</subject><subject>Dietary restrictions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Larva - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Larva - growth & development</subject><subject>Manduca - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Manduca - growth & development</subject><subject>Manduca sexta</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Size</subject><subject>Wings</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - growth & development</subject><issn>1520-541X</issn><issn>1525-142X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wCmCxYZXB17-JxAa1Q4sosGAqRmyunMQpGTLx1E7amR2PwDPyJDhNmQUb8OZeX3_nXFknSQjQGcTzajUDyWQKgi1njMYppUKI2fZBcrh_eHjX01QKWB4kRyGsKAUtWP44OWBABRVMHiaLU3tjW7dZ2643LSldF3pvmq4PxHWk_2aJvXHt0Dfx5mpy23RXv378LFy1I6Zt3dr2fkeajnwwXTWUhgS77c2T5FFt2mCf3tfj5PLtfHFynl58Ont38uYiLaUUIlUZKFZTobjVldTcyJzXUJoqE0BVkddGVlrmtVRFURlVaOBgeMUNp3mlM8mPk5eT78a768GGHtdNKG3bms66IWAmM8EYV-KfpFaMaQGgIvniL3LlBt_Fb2BGtaDA8nFxNkGldyF4W-PGN2vjdwgUx4RwhWMQOAaBY0J4lxBuo_TZvf9QrG21F_6JJAKvJ-C2ae3uv41xfjqPTZSnk7wJvd3u5cZ_R6W5lvjl4xlSBfliCe_xa-SfT3xtHJor3wS8_ByNOYWcqriA_wa40rch</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Tobler, Alexandra</creator><creator>Nijhout, H. Frederik</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</title><author>Tobler, Alexandra ; Nijhout, H. Frederik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Allometry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Developmental biology</topic><topic>Dietary restrictions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Larva - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Larva - growth & development</topic><topic>Manduca - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Manduca - growth & development</topic><topic>Manduca sexta</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Size</topic><topic>Wings</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - growth & development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tobler, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhout, H. Frederik</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution & development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tobler, Alexandra</au><au>Nijhout, H. Frederik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</atitle><jtitle>Evolution & development</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>592-600</pages><issn>1520-541X</issn><eissn>1525-142X</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21040425</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-541X |
ispartof | Evolution & development, 2010-11, Vol.12 (6), p.592-600 |
issn | 1520-541X 1525-142X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858422364 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Allometry Animals Biological Evolution Body Size Butterflies & moths Developmental biology Dietary restrictions Evolution Evolutionary biology Genetics Larva - anatomy & histology Larva - growth & development Manduca - anatomy & histology Manduca - growth & development Manduca sexta Scaling Size Wings Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology Wings, Animal - growth & development |
title | Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A03%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developmental%20constraints%20on%20the%20evolution%20of%20wing%E2%80%90body%20allometry%20in%20Manduca%20sexta&rft.jtitle=Evolution%20&%20development&rft.au=Tobler,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=592-600&rft.issn=1520-541X&rft.eissn=1525-142X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2192264481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807401295&rft_id=info:pmid/21040425&rfr_iscdi=true |