Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta

SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolution & development 2010-11, Vol.12 (6), p.592-600
Hauptverfasser: Tobler, Alexandra, Nijhout, H. Frederik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 600
container_issue 6
container_start_page 592
container_title Evolution & development
container_volume 12
creator Tobler, Alexandra
Nijhout, H. Frederik
description SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858422364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2192264481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wCmCxYZXB17-JxAa1Q4sosGAqRmyunMQpGTLx1E7amR2PwDPyJDhNmQUb8OZeX3_nXFknSQjQGcTzajUDyWQKgi1njMYppUKI2fZBcrh_eHjX01QKWB4kRyGsKAUtWP44OWBABRVMHiaLU3tjW7dZ2643LSldF3pvmq4PxHWk_2aJvXHt0Dfx5mpy23RXv378LFy1I6Zt3dr2fkeajnwwXTWUhgS77c2T5FFt2mCf3tfj5PLtfHFynl58Ont38uYiLaUUIlUZKFZTobjVldTcyJzXUJoqE0BVkddGVlrmtVRFURlVaOBgeMUNp3mlM8mPk5eT78a768GGHtdNKG3bms66IWAmM8EYV-KfpFaMaQGgIvniL3LlBt_Fb2BGtaDA8nFxNkGldyF4W-PGN2vjdwgUx4RwhWMQOAaBY0J4lxBuo_TZvf9QrG21F_6JJAKvJ-C2ae3uv41xfjqPTZSnk7wJvd3u5cZ_R6W5lvjl4xlSBfliCe_xa-SfT3xtHJor3wS8_ByNOYWcqriA_wa40rch</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807401295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tobler, Alexandra ; Nijhout, H. Frederik</creator><creatorcontrib>Tobler, Alexandra ; Nijhout, H. Frederik</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-142X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21040425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Allometry ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Body Size ; Butterflies & moths ; Developmental biology ; Dietary restrictions ; Evolution ; Evolutionary biology ; Genetics ; Larva - anatomy & histology ; Larva - growth & development ; Manduca - anatomy & histology ; Manduca - growth & development ; Manduca sexta ; Scaling ; Size ; Wings ; Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology ; Wings, Animal - growth & development]]></subject><ispartof>Evolution &amp; development, 2010-11, Vol.12 (6), p.592-600</ispartof><rights>2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1525-142X.2010.00444.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1525-142X.2010.00444.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tobler, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhout, H. Frederik</creatorcontrib><title>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</title><title>Evolution &amp; development</title><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.</description><subject>Allometry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Developmental biology</subject><subject>Dietary restrictions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Larva - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Larva - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Manduca - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Manduca - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Manduca sexta</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Size</subject><subject>Wings</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - growth &amp; development</subject><issn>1520-541X</issn><issn>1525-142X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wCmCxYZXB17-JxAa1Q4sosGAqRmyunMQpGTLx1E7amR2PwDPyJDhNmQUb8OZeX3_nXFknSQjQGcTzajUDyWQKgi1njMYppUKI2fZBcrh_eHjX01QKWB4kRyGsKAUtWP44OWBABRVMHiaLU3tjW7dZ2643LSldF3pvmq4PxHWk_2aJvXHt0Dfx5mpy23RXv378LFy1I6Zt3dr2fkeajnwwXTWUhgS77c2T5FFt2mCf3tfj5PLtfHFynl58Ont38uYiLaUUIlUZKFZTobjVldTcyJzXUJoqE0BVkddGVlrmtVRFURlVaOBgeMUNp3mlM8mPk5eT78a768GGHtdNKG3bms66IWAmM8EYV-KfpFaMaQGgIvniL3LlBt_Fb2BGtaDA8nFxNkGldyF4W-PGN2vjdwgUx4RwhWMQOAaBY0J4lxBuo_TZvf9QrG21F_6JJAKvJ-C2ae3uv41xfjqPTZSnk7wJvd3u5cZ_R6W5lvjl4xlSBfliCe_xa-SfT3xtHJor3wS8_ByNOYWcqriA_wa40rch</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Tobler, Alexandra</creator><creator>Nijhout, H. Frederik</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</title><author>Tobler, Alexandra ; Nijhout, H. Frederik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5544-68162f0463e7d573a593f1cad84106b9fa5d759f56bbda6b7131a3d3a309d7853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Allometry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Developmental biology</topic><topic>Dietary restrictions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Larva - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Larva - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Manduca - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Manduca - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Manduca sexta</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Size</topic><topic>Wings</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - growth &amp; development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tobler, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhout, H. Frederik</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tobler, Alexandra</au><au>Nijhout, H. Frederik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta</atitle><jtitle>Evolution &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>592-600</pages><issn>1520-541X</issn><eissn>1525-142X</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY Artificial selection on body size in Manduca sexta produced genetic strains with large and small body sizes. The wing‐body allometries of these strains differed significantly from the wild type. Selection on small body size led to a change in the scaling of wing and body size without changing the allometry: the wings were smaller relative to the body, but to the same degree at all body sizes. Selection for large body size led to a change in allometry with a decrease in the allometric coefficient, wing size becoming progressively smaller relative to body as body size increased. When larvae were deprived of food so as to produce adults of a range of small body sizes, all strains retained the same allometric coefficient but showed an increase in the scaling factor. Thus individuals starved as larvae had a smaller adult body size but had proportionally larger wings than fed individuals. We analyzed the developmental processes that could give rise to this pattern of allometries. Differences in the relative growth of body and wing disks can account for the differences in the allometric coefficients among the three body size strains. The change in wing‐body allometry at large body sizes was primarily due to an insufficient time period for growth. The available time period for growth of the wing imaginal disks poses a significant constraint on the proportional growth of wings, and thus on the evolution of large body size.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21040425</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-541X
ispartof Evolution & development, 2010-11, Vol.12 (6), p.592-600
issn 1520-541X
1525-142X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858422364
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Allometry
Animals
Biological Evolution
Body Size
Butterflies & moths
Developmental biology
Dietary restrictions
Evolution
Evolutionary biology
Genetics
Larva - anatomy & histology
Larva - growth & development
Manduca - anatomy & histology
Manduca - growth & development
Manduca sexta
Scaling
Size
Wings
Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology
Wings, Animal - growth & development
title Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A03%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developmental%20constraints%20on%20the%20evolution%20of%20wing%E2%80%90body%20allometry%20in%20Manduca%20sexta&rft.jtitle=Evolution%20&%20development&rft.au=Tobler,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=592-600&rft.issn=1520-541X&rft.eissn=1525-142X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2192264481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807401295&rft_id=info:pmid/21040425&rfr_iscdi=true