Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol
The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision proc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & policy 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.28-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | Environmental science & policy |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Kelly, Andrew Lumbreras, Julio Maas, Rob Pignatelli, Tiziano Ferreira, Francisco Engleryd, Anna |
description | The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1462901109001269</els_id><sourcerecordid>58837195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39Bh5yUi89Vv50J_EgyOLuCgsK6jlk0tVrhkwyJunBxS9v2vE8QlH1IL96kHpd95LChgId3-42GI_F-Q0D0Ju1gD_qLqiSvB8FHR83LUbWa6D0afeslB0ASDXqi-73V6zVx3sSbfUp2kBw70tpkjj0ob0UMqdMrM_kkEJYqo21vFu1dw8kYCkpNiSnPbGR4K_-kEoleLRh-etI0kzqDyQ3qfW4XfI9-ZJTTS6F592T2YaCL_7Ny-779cdvV7f93eebT1cf7nonOK-95VpMTOgt52IEDUICUEYl8nlSwzihdoy7LdUMmLVSSK4tHxS2y2z1pCd-2b0--R5y-rlgqaZ90WEINmJailGDEowqIRr56iw5KMUl1cN_QS6ZkFpAA9-cBamUkg4wKN5QcUJdTqVknM0h-73ND4aCWXM2O3PK2aw5m7VgXXt_WsN2wqPHbBqB0eHkM7pqpuTPG_wBJnuzwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777150583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kelly, Andrew ; Lumbreras, Julio ; Maas, Rob ; Pignatelli, Tiziano ; Ferreira, Francisco ; Engleryd, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Andrew ; Lumbreras, Julio ; Maas, Rob ; Pignatelli, Tiziano ; Ferreira, Francisco ; Engleryd, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-9011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Ceilings ; Cost effectiveness ; Emission ; Emission ceilings ; Emission drivers ; Environmental policy ; Gothenburg ; Gothenburg Protocol ; Government policy ; Integrated assessment modelling ; Lessons ; Management ; Mathematical models ; Policies ; Policy ; Pollutants ; Pollution control ; Projection ; Projections ; Rain ; Transboundary air pollution ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & policy, 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.28-41</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27852,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbreras, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignatelli, Tiziano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engleryd, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</title><title>Environmental science & policy</title><description>The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Ceilings</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emission ceilings</subject><subject>Emission drivers</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Gothenburg</subject><subject>Gothenburg Protocol</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Integrated assessment modelling</subject><subject>Lessons</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Projections</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Transboundary air pollution</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1462-9011</issn><issn>1873-6416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39Bh5yUi89Vv50J_EgyOLuCgsK6jlk0tVrhkwyJunBxS9v2vE8QlH1IL96kHpd95LChgId3-42GI_F-Q0D0Ju1gD_qLqiSvB8FHR83LUbWa6D0afeslB0ASDXqi-73V6zVx3sSbfUp2kBw70tpkjj0ob0UMqdMrM_kkEJYqo21vFu1dw8kYCkpNiSnPbGR4K_-kEoleLRh-etI0kzqDyQ3qfW4XfI9-ZJTTS6F592T2YaCL_7Ny-779cdvV7f93eebT1cf7nonOK-95VpMTOgt52IEDUICUEYl8nlSwzihdoy7LdUMmLVSSK4tHxS2y2z1pCd-2b0--R5y-rlgqaZ90WEINmJailGDEowqIRr56iw5KMUl1cN_QS6ZkFpAA9-cBamUkg4wKN5QcUJdTqVknM0h-73ND4aCWXM2O3PK2aw5m7VgXXt_WsN2wqPHbBqB0eHkM7pqpuTPG_wBJnuzwQ</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Kelly, Andrew</creator><creator>Lumbreras, Julio</creator><creator>Maas, Rob</creator><creator>Pignatelli, Tiziano</creator><creator>Ferreira, Francisco</creator><creator>Engleryd, Anna</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</title><author>Kelly, Andrew ; Lumbreras, Julio ; Maas, Rob ; Pignatelli, Tiziano ; Ferreira, Francisco ; Engleryd, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Ceilings</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emission ceilings</topic><topic>Emission drivers</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Gothenburg</topic><topic>Gothenburg Protocol</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Integrated assessment modelling</topic><topic>Lessons</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Projections</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Transboundary air pollution</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbreras, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignatelli, Tiziano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engleryd, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Andrew</au><au>Lumbreras, Julio</au><au>Maas, Rob</au><au>Pignatelli, Tiziano</au><au>Ferreira, Francisco</au><au>Engleryd, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & policy</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>28-41</pages><issn>1462-9011</issn><eissn>1873-6416</eissn><abstract>The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-9011 |
ispartof | Environmental science & policy, 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.28-41 |
issn | 1462-9011 1873-6416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421844 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Air pollution Ceilings Cost effectiveness Emission Emission ceilings Emission drivers Environmental policy Gothenburg Gothenburg Protocol Government policy Integrated assessment modelling Lessons Management Mathematical models Policies Policy Pollutants Pollution control Projection Projections Rain Transboundary air pollution Uncertainty |
title | Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A49%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setting%20national%20emission%20ceilings%20for%20air%20pollutants:%20policy%20lessons%20from%20an%20ex-post%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Gothenburg%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20policy&rft.au=Kelly,%20Andrew&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=28-41&rft.issn=1462-9011&rft.eissn=1873-6416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58837195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777150583&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1462901109001269&rfr_iscdi=true |