Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol

The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision proc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & policy 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.28-41
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Andrew, Lumbreras, Julio, Maas, Rob, Pignatelli, Tiziano, Ferreira, Francisco, Engleryd, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Environmental science & policy
container_volume 13
creator Kelly, Andrew
Lumbreras, Julio
Maas, Rob
Pignatelli, Tiziano
Ferreira, Francisco
Engleryd, Anna
description The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1462901109001269</els_id><sourcerecordid>58837195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39Bh5yUi89Vv50J_EgyOLuCgsK6jlk0tVrhkwyJunBxS9v2vE8QlH1IL96kHpd95LChgId3-42GI_F-Q0D0Ju1gD_qLqiSvB8FHR83LUbWa6D0afeslB0ASDXqi-73V6zVx3sSbfUp2kBw70tpkjj0ob0UMqdMrM_kkEJYqo21vFu1dw8kYCkpNiSnPbGR4K_-kEoleLRh-etI0kzqDyQ3qfW4XfI9-ZJTTS6F592T2YaCL_7Ny-779cdvV7f93eebT1cf7nonOK-95VpMTOgt52IEDUICUEYl8nlSwzihdoy7LdUMmLVSSK4tHxS2y2z1pCd-2b0--R5y-rlgqaZ90WEINmJailGDEowqIRr56iw5KMUl1cN_QS6ZkFpAA9-cBamUkg4wKN5QcUJdTqVknM0h-73ND4aCWXM2O3PK2aw5m7VgXXt_WsN2wqPHbBqB0eHkM7pqpuTPG_wBJnuzwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777150583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kelly, Andrew ; Lumbreras, Julio ; Maas, Rob ; Pignatelli, Tiziano ; Ferreira, Francisco ; Engleryd, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Andrew ; Lumbreras, Julio ; Maas, Rob ; Pignatelli, Tiziano ; Ferreira, Francisco ; Engleryd, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-9011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Ceilings ; Cost effectiveness ; Emission ; Emission ceilings ; Emission drivers ; Environmental policy ; Gothenburg ; Gothenburg Protocol ; Government policy ; Integrated assessment modelling ; Lessons ; Management ; Mathematical models ; Policies ; Policy ; Pollutants ; Pollution control ; Projection ; Projections ; Rain ; Transboundary air pollution ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; policy, 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.28-41</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27852,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbreras, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignatelli, Tiziano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engleryd, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</title><title>Environmental science &amp; policy</title><description>The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Ceilings</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emission ceilings</subject><subject>Emission drivers</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Gothenburg</subject><subject>Gothenburg Protocol</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Integrated assessment modelling</subject><subject>Lessons</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Projections</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Transboundary air pollution</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1462-9011</issn><issn>1873-6416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39Bh5yUi89Vv50J_EgyOLuCgsK6jlk0tVrhkwyJunBxS9v2vE8QlH1IL96kHpd95LChgId3-42GI_F-Q0D0Ju1gD_qLqiSvB8FHR83LUbWa6D0afeslB0ASDXqi-73V6zVx3sSbfUp2kBw70tpkjj0ob0UMqdMrM_kkEJYqo21vFu1dw8kYCkpNiSnPbGR4K_-kEoleLRh-etI0kzqDyQ3qfW4XfI9-ZJTTS6F592T2YaCL_7Ny-779cdvV7f93eebT1cf7nonOK-95VpMTOgt52IEDUICUEYl8nlSwzihdoy7LdUMmLVSSK4tHxS2y2z1pCd-2b0--R5y-rlgqaZ90WEINmJailGDEowqIRr56iw5KMUl1cN_QS6ZkFpAA9-cBamUkg4wKN5QcUJdTqVknM0h-73ND4aCWXM2O3PK2aw5m7VgXXt_WsN2wqPHbBqB0eHkM7pqpuTPG_wBJnuzwQ</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Kelly, Andrew</creator><creator>Lumbreras, Julio</creator><creator>Maas, Rob</creator><creator>Pignatelli, Tiziano</creator><creator>Ferreira, Francisco</creator><creator>Engleryd, Anna</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</title><author>Kelly, Andrew ; Lumbreras, Julio ; Maas, Rob ; Pignatelli, Tiziano ; Ferreira, Francisco ; Engleryd, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-a394d249b334609047001217e3fd856de9c23cb19202aa74739a358e016b9d9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Ceilings</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emission ceilings</topic><topic>Emission drivers</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Gothenburg</topic><topic>Gothenburg Protocol</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Integrated assessment modelling</topic><topic>Lessons</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Projections</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Transboundary air pollution</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbreras, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignatelli, Tiziano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engleryd, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Andrew</au><au>Lumbreras, Julio</au><au>Maas, Rob</au><au>Pignatelli, Tiziano</au><au>Ferreira, Francisco</au><au>Engleryd, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; policy</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>28-41</pages><issn>1462-9011</issn><eissn>1873-6416</eissn><abstract>The Gothenburg Protocol set national emission ceilings for transboundary air pollutants in 2010. These ceilings were formulated in 1999 using the Regional Air Pollution Information and Simulation (RAINS) model and national forecast data. The 2010 ceiling deadline is approaching as is a revision process which may lead to the setting of emission ceilings for 2020. This paper considers the original 1999 projections of six countries that were used within the RAINS model to inform the setting of their respective Gothenburg Protocol 2010 emission ceilings. These data are then contrast against recent inventory data and contemporary short-term forecasts out to 2010. These recent forecasts indicate that major downward shifts in the trends of pollutant emissions have been achieved, and whilst compliance challenges remain, there is a clear indication of the potential of such international agreements and their associated legislative and policy driven mechanisms. However, in a process governed by a maxim of achieving international environmental objectives at ‘least-cost’, the recent experience offers some valuable lessons. Specifically, in relation to the accuracy of energy projections and assumptions of other relevant variables in the modelling process. This paper considers these lessons and opens a discussion on the role of more adaptable mechanisms for the ongoing management of international agreements with long-term compliance horizons.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-9011
ispartof Environmental science & policy, 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.28-41
issn 1462-9011
1873-6416
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421844
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Air pollution
Ceilings
Cost effectiveness
Emission
Emission ceilings
Emission drivers
Environmental policy
Gothenburg
Gothenburg Protocol
Government policy
Integrated assessment modelling
Lessons
Management
Mathematical models
Policies
Policy
Pollutants
Pollution control
Projection
Projections
Rain
Transboundary air pollution
Uncertainty
title Setting national emission ceilings for air pollutants: policy lessons from an ex-post evaluation of the Gothenburg Protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A49%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setting%20national%20emission%20ceilings%20for%20air%20pollutants:%20policy%20lessons%20from%20an%20ex-post%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Gothenburg%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20policy&rft.au=Kelly,%20Andrew&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=28-41&rft.issn=1462-9011&rft.eissn=1873-6416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58837195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777150583&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1462901109001269&rfr_iscdi=true