Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils

The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Det...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil biology & biochemistry 2011-04, Vol.43 (4), p.736-748
Hauptverfasser: Williamson, Kurt. E., Kan, Jinjun, Polson, Shawn W., Williamson, Shannon J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 748
container_issue 4
container_start_page 736
container_title Soil biology & biochemistry
container_volume 43
creator Williamson, Kurt. E.
Kan, Jinjun
Polson, Shawn W.
Williamson, Shannon J.
description The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (>400 kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038071710001604</els_id><sourcerecordid>858421271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5ByQZwS1o_Ezgkq3lJFL3C2XGcDLmlc7BQBv55EqbhyWmk1szP7EXJKIaNAi4tVFr1rls5nDPodiAyo3CMTqmSZcsHUPpkAcJWCpPKQHMW4AgCWUz4hV4tN59bux7WvSfeGiWsrF9B2CX51wdjO-TbxdbIJ_t2Eb985m9w8zZI6-HUypMZjclCbJuLJbk7Jy93t8_VDOl_cP17P5qkVXHapYkyYHLjkinELiKCKYikNVlYs8wItYmlQMVWbWinJVAEVsiI3RUkrUQg-Jefj3b7KxxZjp9cuWmwa06LfRq1yJRhlkvbKfFTa4GMMWOtNcOu-vaagB2B6pXfA9ABMg9A9sN53tksw0ZqmDqa1Lv6ZGS85p2JocjnqsH_302HQ0TpsLY7kdOXdP0m_xUKDig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858421271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Williamson, Kurt. E. ; Kan, Jinjun ; Polson, Shawn W. ; Williamson, Shannon J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Kurt. E. ; Kan, Jinjun ; Polson, Shawn W. ; Williamson, Shannon J.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (&gt;400 kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SBIOAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biochemistry and biology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Clone libraries ; DGGE ; DNA ; Extraction ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; Prokaryotes ; RAPD-PCR ; Soil ; Soil science</subject><ispartof>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry, 2011-04, Vol.43 (4), p.736-748</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23933144$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Kurt. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kan, Jinjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polson, Shawn W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Shannon J.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</title><title>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</title><description>The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (&gt;400 kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biochemistry and biology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Clone libraries</subject><subject>DGGE</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>Prokaryotes</subject><subject>RAPD-PCR</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><issn>0038-0717</issn><issn>1879-3428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5ByQZwS1o_Ezgkq3lJFL3C2XGcDLmlc7BQBv55EqbhyWmk1szP7EXJKIaNAi4tVFr1rls5nDPodiAyo3CMTqmSZcsHUPpkAcJWCpPKQHMW4AgCWUz4hV4tN59bux7WvSfeGiWsrF9B2CX51wdjO-TbxdbIJ_t2Eb985m9w8zZI6-HUypMZjclCbJuLJbk7Jy93t8_VDOl_cP17P5qkVXHapYkyYHLjkinELiKCKYikNVlYs8wItYmlQMVWbWinJVAEVsiI3RUkrUQg-Jefj3b7KxxZjp9cuWmwa06LfRq1yJRhlkvbKfFTa4GMMWOtNcOu-vaagB2B6pXfA9ABMg9A9sN53tksw0ZqmDqa1Lv6ZGS85p2JocjnqsH_302HQ0TpsLY7kdOXdP0m_xUKDig</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Williamson, Kurt. E.</creator><creator>Kan, Jinjun</creator><creator>Polson, Shawn W.</creator><creator>Williamson, Shannon J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</title><author>Williamson, Kurt. E. ; Kan, Jinjun ; Polson, Shawn W. ; Williamson, Shannon J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biochemistry and biology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Clone libraries</topic><topic>DGGE</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>Prokaryotes</topic><topic>RAPD-PCR</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Kurt. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kan, Jinjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polson, Shawn W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Shannon J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williamson, Kurt. E.</au><au>Kan, Jinjun</au><au>Polson, Shawn W.</au><au>Williamson, Shannon J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</atitle><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>736</spage><epage>748</epage><pages>736-748</pages><issn>0038-0717</issn><eissn>1879-3428</eissn><coden>SBIOAH</coden><abstract>The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (&gt;400 kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0717
ispartof Soil biology & biochemistry, 2011-04, Vol.43 (4), p.736-748
issn 0038-0717
1879-3428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421271
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biochemistry and biology
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties
Clone libraries
DGGE
DNA
Extraction
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils
Prokaryotes
RAPD-PCR
Soil
Soil science
title Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20the%20indirect%20extraction%20of%20prokaryotic%20DNA%20from%20soils&rft.jtitle=Soil%20biology%20&%20biochemistry&rft.au=Williamson,%20Kurt.%20E.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=736&rft.epage=748&rft.pages=736-748&rft.issn=0038-0717&rft.eissn=1879-3428&rft.coden=SBIOAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E858421271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858421271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038071710001604&rfr_iscdi=true