Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils
The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Det...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil biology & biochemistry 2011-04, Vol.43 (4), p.736-748 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 748 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 736 |
container_title | Soil biology & biochemistry |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Williamson, Kurt. E. Kan, Jinjun Polson, Shawn W. Williamson, Shannon J. |
description | The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (>400
kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038071710001604</els_id><sourcerecordid>858421271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5ByQZwS1o_Ezgkq3lJFL3C2XGcDLmlc7BQBv55EqbhyWmk1szP7EXJKIaNAi4tVFr1rls5nDPodiAyo3CMTqmSZcsHUPpkAcJWCpPKQHMW4AgCWUz4hV4tN59bux7WvSfeGiWsrF9B2CX51wdjO-TbxdbIJ_t2Eb985m9w8zZI6-HUypMZjclCbJuLJbk7Jy93t8_VDOl_cP17P5qkVXHapYkyYHLjkinELiKCKYikNVlYs8wItYmlQMVWbWinJVAEVsiI3RUkrUQg-Jefj3b7KxxZjp9cuWmwa06LfRq1yJRhlkvbKfFTa4GMMWOtNcOu-vaagB2B6pXfA9ABMg9A9sN53tksw0ZqmDqa1Lv6ZGS85p2JocjnqsH_302HQ0TpsLY7kdOXdP0m_xUKDig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858421271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Williamson, Kurt. E. ; Kan, Jinjun ; Polson, Shawn W. ; Williamson, Shannon J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Kurt. E. ; Kan, Jinjun ; Polson, Shawn W. ; Williamson, Shannon J.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (>400
kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SBIOAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biochemistry and biology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Clone libraries ; DGGE ; DNA ; Extraction ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; Prokaryotes ; RAPD-PCR ; Soil ; Soil science</subject><ispartof>Soil biology & biochemistry, 2011-04, Vol.43 (4), p.736-748</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23933144$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Kurt. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kan, Jinjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polson, Shawn W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Shannon J.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</title><title>Soil biology & biochemistry</title><description>The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (>400
kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biochemistry and biology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Clone libraries</subject><subject>DGGE</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>Prokaryotes</subject><subject>RAPD-PCR</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><issn>0038-0717</issn><issn>1879-3428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5ByQZwS1o_Ezgkq3lJFL3C2XGcDLmlc7BQBv55EqbhyWmk1szP7EXJKIaNAi4tVFr1rls5nDPodiAyo3CMTqmSZcsHUPpkAcJWCpPKQHMW4AgCWUz4hV4tN59bux7WvSfeGiWsrF9B2CX51wdjO-TbxdbIJ_t2Eb985m9w8zZI6-HUypMZjclCbJuLJbk7Jy93t8_VDOl_cP17P5qkVXHapYkyYHLjkinELiKCKYikNVlYs8wItYmlQMVWbWinJVAEVsiI3RUkrUQg-Jefj3b7KxxZjp9cuWmwa06LfRq1yJRhlkvbKfFTa4GMMWOtNcOu-vaagB2B6pXfA9ABMg9A9sN53tksw0ZqmDqa1Lv6ZGS85p2JocjnqsH_302HQ0TpsLY7kdOXdP0m_xUKDig</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Williamson, Kurt. E.</creator><creator>Kan, Jinjun</creator><creator>Polson, Shawn W.</creator><creator>Williamson, Shannon J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</title><author>Williamson, Kurt. E. ; Kan, Jinjun ; Polson, Shawn W. ; Williamson, Shannon J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-8224a50373823c0ee0866b7aedc4b56ecee9ae828faf8872860de265a691d4643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biochemistry and biology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Clone libraries</topic><topic>DGGE</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>Prokaryotes</topic><topic>RAPD-PCR</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Kurt. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kan, Jinjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polson, Shawn W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Shannon J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Soil biology & biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williamson, Kurt. E.</au><au>Kan, Jinjun</au><au>Polson, Shawn W.</au><au>Williamson, Shannon J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils</atitle><jtitle>Soil biology & biochemistry</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>736</spage><epage>748</epage><pages>736-748</pages><issn>0038-0717</issn><eissn>1879-3428</eissn><coden>SBIOAH</coden><abstract>The objective of this work was to develop protocols to selectively extract prokaryotic DNA from soils, representative of the whole community, amenable to high-throughput whole genome shotgun sequencing. Prokaryotic cells were extracted from soils by blending, followed by gradient centrifugation. Detergent (sodium deoxycholate) was required for complete dispersion of soil aggregates and detachment of prokaryotic cells from a broad range of soil types. Repeated extractions of a given soil sample were critical to maximize cell yield. Furthermore, cells obtained through repeated extractions captured unique prokaryotic assemblages that would otherwise have been missed in single-pass extractions. DNA was isolated from extracted cells using one of the following treatments: i) lysozyme–SDS–proteinase K (enzymatic) digestion; ii) potassium ethyl xanthogenate digestion; or iii) enzymatic digestion of cells embedded in agarose plugs. In addition, these methods were compared to a commercial bead-beating extraction kit (MoBio UltraClean). Of the indirect DNA extraction methods, plug digestion generated the largest yields (up to 70% of yields obtained by direct DNA extraction) of high-molecular weight DNA (>400
kb). Thus, plug digestion is amenable to large-insert metagenomic library construction and analysis. Comparisons of banding patterns generated by RAPD-PCR and DGGE indicated that sequence composition and inferred community composition of a given extract varied greatly with DNA isolation method. While overall diversity did not change significantly with the cell lysis method, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that each extraction procedure produced unique distributions of prokaryotic phyla within the sample population.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0717 |
ispartof | Soil biology & biochemistry, 2011-04, Vol.43 (4), p.736-748 |
issn | 0038-0717 1879-3428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421271 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biochemistry and biology Biological and medical sciences Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties Clone libraries DGGE DNA Extraction Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils Prokaryotes RAPD-PCR Soil Soil science |
title | Optimizing the indirect extraction of prokaryotic DNA from soils |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20the%20indirect%20extraction%20of%20prokaryotic%20DNA%20from%20soils&rft.jtitle=Soil%20biology%20&%20biochemistry&rft.au=Williamson,%20Kurt.%20E.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=736&rft.epage=748&rft.pages=736-748&rft.issn=0038-0717&rft.eissn=1879-3428&rft.coden=SBIOAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E858421271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858421271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038071710001604&rfr_iscdi=true |