Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows
Objectives of this study were to quantify production responses of lactating dairy cows to supplying absorbable Met as isopropyl-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMBi), or rumen-protected Met (RPM, Smartamine M; Adisseo, Alpharetta, GA) fed with or without 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic aci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 2011-04, Vol.94 (4), p.1978-1988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1988 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1978 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Chen, Z.H Broderick, G.A Luchini, N.D Sloan, B.K Devillard, E |
description | Objectives of this study were to quantify production responses of lactating dairy cows to supplying absorbable Met as isopropyl-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMBi), or rumen-protected Met (RPM, Smartamine M; Adisseo, Alpharetta, GA) fed with or without 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMB), and to determine whether Met supplementation will allow the feeding of reduced dietary crude protein (CP). Seventy cows were blocked by parity and days in milk into 14 blocks and randomly assigned within blocks to 1 of the 5 dietary treatments based on alfalfa and corn silages plus high-moisture corn: 1 diet with 15.6% CP and no Met source (negative control); 3 diets with 15.6% CP plus 0.17% HMBi, 0.06% RPM + 0.10% HMB, or 0.06% RPM alone; and 1 diet with 16.8% CP and no Met supplement (positive control). Assuming that 50% of ingested HMBi was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and 80% of the Met in RPM was absorbed at intestine, the HMBi and RPM supplements increased metabolizable Met supply by 9 g/d and improved the Lys:Met ratio from 3.6 to 3.0. After a 2-wk covariate period during which all cows received the same diet, cows were fed test diets continuously for 12 wk. Diet did not affect dry matter intake (mean ± SD, 25.0 ± 0.3 kg/d), body weight gain (0.59 ± 0.2 kg/d), or milk yield (41.7 ± 0.6 kg/d). However, feeding HMBi increased yield of energy-corrected milk and milk content of protein and solids-not-fat. Moreover, trends were observed for increased milk fat content and yield of fat and true protein on all 3 diets containing supplemental Met. Apparent N efficiency (milk N/N intake) was highest on the RPM treatment. Feeding 16.8% CP without a Met source elevated milk urea N and urinary excretion of urea N and total N and reduced apparent N efficiency from 34.5 to 30.2%, without improving production. Overall results suggested that feeding HMBi or RPM would give similar improvements in milk production and N utilization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.2010-3578 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858417100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>858417100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-93e33d09ba2c01389e553f148e2d160d0ddb3848c27eb4a3fb5103ec4b70c7443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtvFiEUhonR2Isu3Sob09VUrjPM0jT1kjR1oV0TBg6VOgMVmJh20d8u4_epXQHvefIe8iD0ipJTTnv17saVU0Yo6bgc1BN0SCWTHaejevrofoCOSrkhhFFG5HN0wKhg_ajGQ_Rw7j3YipPHHsCFeI1daFGGWHFJa7ZQtmFeF4jdbU610eDwAvV7SDFEwCniJcw_cBu61daWYhMdvuzWGuZwb_4kIeLZ2Noe2wYT8h226Vd5gZ55Mxd4uT-P0dWH829nn7qLLx8_n72_6CxXsnYjB84dGSfDLKFcjSAl91QoYI72xBHnJq6EsmyASRjuJ0kJByumgdhBCH6MTna97ZM_VyhVL6FYmGcTIa1FK6kEHSghjex2pM2plAxe3-awmHynKdGbcd2M68243ow3_vW-eZ0WcP_ov4ob8HYPmGLN7LOJNpT_nGhVlMjGvdlx3iRtrnNjrr62PZzQUQ6i7_lvd_6UNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858417100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Chen, Z.H ; Broderick, G.A ; Luchini, N.D ; Sloan, B.K ; Devillard, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Z.H ; Broderick, G.A ; Luchini, N.D ; Sloan, B.K ; Devillard, E</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives of this study were to quantify production responses of lactating dairy cows to supplying absorbable Met as isopropyl-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMBi), or rumen-protected Met (RPM, Smartamine M; Adisseo, Alpharetta, GA) fed with or without 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMB), and to determine whether Met supplementation will allow the feeding of reduced dietary crude protein (CP). Seventy cows were blocked by parity and days in milk into 14 blocks and randomly assigned within blocks to 1 of the 5 dietary treatments based on alfalfa and corn silages plus high-moisture corn: 1 diet with 15.6% CP and no Met source (negative control); 3 diets with 15.6% CP plus 0.17% HMBi, 0.06% RPM + 0.10% HMB, or 0.06% RPM alone; and 1 diet with 16.8% CP and no Met supplement (positive control). Assuming that 50% of ingested HMBi was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and 80% of the Met in RPM was absorbed at intestine, the HMBi and RPM supplements increased metabolizable Met supply by 9 g/d and improved the Lys:Met ratio from 3.6 to 3.0. After a 2-wk covariate period during which all cows received the same diet, cows were fed test diets continuously for 12 wk. Diet did not affect dry matter intake (mean ± SD, 25.0 ± 0.3 kg/d), body weight gain (0.59 ± 0.2 kg/d), or milk yield (41.7 ± 0.6 kg/d). However, feeding HMBi increased yield of energy-corrected milk and milk content of protein and solids-not-fat. Moreover, trends were observed for increased milk fat content and yield of fat and true protein on all 3 diets containing supplemental Met. Apparent N efficiency (milk N/N intake) was highest on the RPM treatment. Feeding 16.8% CP without a Met source elevated milk urea N and urinary excretion of urea N and total N and reduced apparent N efficiency from 34.5 to 30.2%, without improving production. Overall results suggested that feeding HMBi or RPM would give similar improvements in milk production and N utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3578</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21426989</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier</publisher><subject>alfalfa silage ; Animal Feed ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butyrates - administration & dosage ; Butyrates - metabolism ; Cattle - metabolism ; Cattle - physiology ; cattle feeds ; corn ; cow feeding ; dairy cows ; Diet - veterinary ; dietary nutrient sources ; dietary protein ; Dietary Supplements ; dry matter intake ; experimental diets ; feed supplements ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; intestines ; Lactation - physiology ; lactation stage ; lipid content ; methionine ; Methionine - administration & dosage ; Methionine - metabolism ; milk ; Milk - secretion ; milk fat yield ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; nitrogen content ; Rumen - metabolism ; Terrestrial animal productions ; true protein ; urea ; Vertebrates ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; weight gain</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2011-04, Vol.94 (4), p.1978-1988</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-93e33d09ba2c01389e553f148e2d160d0ddb3848c27eb4a3fb5103ec4b70c7443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-93e33d09ba2c01389e553f148e2d160d0ddb3848c27eb4a3fb5103ec4b70c7443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24010105$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21426989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Z.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, G.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luchini, N.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloan, B.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devillard, E</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives of this study were to quantify production responses of lactating dairy cows to supplying absorbable Met as isopropyl-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMBi), or rumen-protected Met (RPM, Smartamine M; Adisseo, Alpharetta, GA) fed with or without 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMB), and to determine whether Met supplementation will allow the feeding of reduced dietary crude protein (CP). Seventy cows were blocked by parity and days in milk into 14 blocks and randomly assigned within blocks to 1 of the 5 dietary treatments based on alfalfa and corn silages plus high-moisture corn: 1 diet with 15.6% CP and no Met source (negative control); 3 diets with 15.6% CP plus 0.17% HMBi, 0.06% RPM + 0.10% HMB, or 0.06% RPM alone; and 1 diet with 16.8% CP and no Met supplement (positive control). Assuming that 50% of ingested HMBi was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and 80% of the Met in RPM was absorbed at intestine, the HMBi and RPM supplements increased metabolizable Met supply by 9 g/d and improved the Lys:Met ratio from 3.6 to 3.0. After a 2-wk covariate period during which all cows received the same diet, cows were fed test diets continuously for 12 wk. Diet did not affect dry matter intake (mean ± SD, 25.0 ± 0.3 kg/d), body weight gain (0.59 ± 0.2 kg/d), or milk yield (41.7 ± 0.6 kg/d). However, feeding HMBi increased yield of energy-corrected milk and milk content of protein and solids-not-fat. Moreover, trends were observed for increased milk fat content and yield of fat and true protein on all 3 diets containing supplemental Met. Apparent N efficiency (milk N/N intake) was highest on the RPM treatment. Feeding 16.8% CP without a Met source elevated milk urea N and urinary excretion of urea N and total N and reduced apparent N efficiency from 34.5 to 30.2%, without improving production. Overall results suggested that feeding HMBi or RPM would give similar improvements in milk production and N utilization.</description><subject>alfalfa silage</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butyrates - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Butyrates - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>cattle feeds</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>cow feeding</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>dietary nutrient sources</subject><subject>dietary protein</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>dry matter intake</subject><subject>experimental diets</subject><subject>feed supplements</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>intestines</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>lactation stage</subject><subject>lipid content</subject><subject>methionine</subject><subject>Methionine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Methionine - metabolism</subject><subject>milk</subject><subject>Milk - secretion</subject><subject>milk fat yield</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>nitrogen content</subject><subject>Rumen - metabolism</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>true protein</subject><subject>urea</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>weight gain</subject><issn>1525-3198</issn><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtvFiEUhonR2Isu3Sob09VUrjPM0jT1kjR1oV0TBg6VOgMVmJh20d8u4_epXQHvefIe8iD0ipJTTnv17saVU0Yo6bgc1BN0SCWTHaejevrofoCOSrkhhFFG5HN0wKhg_ajGQ_Rw7j3YipPHHsCFeI1daFGGWHFJa7ZQtmFeF4jdbU610eDwAvV7SDFEwCniJcw_cBu61daWYhMdvuzWGuZwb_4kIeLZ2Noe2wYT8h226Vd5gZ55Mxd4uT-P0dWH829nn7qLLx8_n72_6CxXsnYjB84dGSfDLKFcjSAl91QoYI72xBHnJq6EsmyASRjuJ0kJByumgdhBCH6MTna97ZM_VyhVL6FYmGcTIa1FK6kEHSghjex2pM2plAxe3-awmHynKdGbcd2M68243ow3_vW-eZ0WcP_ov4ob8HYPmGLN7LOJNpT_nGhVlMjGvdlx3iRtrnNjrr62PZzQUQ6i7_lvd_6UNA</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Chen, Z.H</creator><creator>Broderick, G.A</creator><creator>Luchini, N.D</creator><creator>Sloan, B.K</creator><creator>Devillard, E</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows</title><author>Chen, Z.H ; Broderick, G.A ; Luchini, N.D ; Sloan, B.K ; Devillard, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-93e33d09ba2c01389e553f148e2d160d0ddb3848c27eb4a3fb5103ec4b70c7443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>alfalfa silage</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butyrates - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Butyrates - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>cattle feeds</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>cow feeding</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>dietary nutrient sources</topic><topic>dietary protein</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>dry matter intake</topic><topic>experimental diets</topic><topic>feed supplements</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>intestines</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>lactation stage</topic><topic>lipid content</topic><topic>methionine</topic><topic>Methionine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Methionine - metabolism</topic><topic>milk</topic><topic>Milk - secretion</topic><topic>milk fat yield</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>nitrogen content</topic><topic>Rumen - metabolism</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>true protein</topic><topic>urea</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>weight gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Z.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, G.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luchini, N.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloan, B.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devillard, E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Z.H</au><au>Broderick, G.A</au><au>Luchini, N.D</au><au>Sloan, B.K</au><au>Devillard, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1978</spage><epage>1988</epage><pages>1978-1988</pages><issn>1525-3198</issn><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>Objectives of this study were to quantify production responses of lactating dairy cows to supplying absorbable Met as isopropyl-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMBi), or rumen-protected Met (RPM, Smartamine M; Adisseo, Alpharetta, GA) fed with or without 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMB), and to determine whether Met supplementation will allow the feeding of reduced dietary crude protein (CP). Seventy cows were blocked by parity and days in milk into 14 blocks and randomly assigned within blocks to 1 of the 5 dietary treatments based on alfalfa and corn silages plus high-moisture corn: 1 diet with 15.6% CP and no Met source (negative control); 3 diets with 15.6% CP plus 0.17% HMBi, 0.06% RPM + 0.10% HMB, or 0.06% RPM alone; and 1 diet with 16.8% CP and no Met supplement (positive control). Assuming that 50% of ingested HMBi was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and 80% of the Met in RPM was absorbed at intestine, the HMBi and RPM supplements increased metabolizable Met supply by 9 g/d and improved the Lys:Met ratio from 3.6 to 3.0. After a 2-wk covariate period during which all cows received the same diet, cows were fed test diets continuously for 12 wk. Diet did not affect dry matter intake (mean ± SD, 25.0 ± 0.3 kg/d), body weight gain (0.59 ± 0.2 kg/d), or milk yield (41.7 ± 0.6 kg/d). However, feeding HMBi increased yield of energy-corrected milk and milk content of protein and solids-not-fat. Moreover, trends were observed for increased milk fat content and yield of fat and true protein on all 3 diets containing supplemental Met. Apparent N efficiency (milk N/N intake) was highest on the RPM treatment. Feeding 16.8% CP without a Met source elevated milk urea N and urinary excretion of urea N and total N and reduced apparent N efficiency from 34.5 to 30.2%, without improving production. Overall results suggested that feeding HMBi or RPM would give similar improvements in milk production and N utilization.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>21426989</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2010-3578</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-3198 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2011-04, Vol.94 (4), p.1978-1988 |
issn | 1525-3198 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858417100 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | alfalfa silage Animal Feed Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Butyrates - administration & dosage Butyrates - metabolism Cattle - metabolism Cattle - physiology cattle feeds corn cow feeding dairy cows Diet - veterinary dietary nutrient sources dietary protein Dietary Supplements dry matter intake experimental diets feed supplements Feeding. Feeding behavior Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology intestines Lactation - physiology lactation stage lipid content methionine Methionine - administration & dosage Methionine - metabolism milk Milk - secretion milk fat yield Nitrogen - metabolism nitrogen content Rumen - metabolism Terrestrial animal productions true protein urea Vertebrates Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems weight gain |
title | Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20feeding%20different%20sources%20of%20rumen-protected%20methionine%20on%20milk%20production%20and%20N-utilization%20in%20lactating%20dairy%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Chen,%20Z.H&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1978&rft.epage=1988&rft.pages=1978-1988&rft.issn=1525-3198&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2010-3578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E858417100%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858417100&rft_id=info:pmid/21426989&rfr_iscdi=true |