Sniffing out Endodontic Pain: Use of an Intranasal Analgesic in a Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Introduction Orofacial pain is a common encounter in dentistry (affecting 12% of the population) and is a primary reason for patients seeking emergency care. Dentists often prescribe oral analgesics, which have disadvantages of decreased absorption rates and delayed onset. Intranasal (IN) d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2011-04, Vol.37 (4), p.439-444
Hauptverfasser: Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS, Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS, Lunos, Scott, MS, Johnson, Neil, BS, Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD, Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 444
container_issue 4
container_start_page 439
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 37
creator Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS
Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS
Lunos, Scott, MS
Johnson, Neil, BS
Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD
Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD
description Abstract Introduction Orofacial pain is a common encounter in dentistry (affecting 12% of the population) and is a primary reason for patients seeking emergency care. Dentists often prescribe oral analgesics, which have disadvantages of decreased absorption rates and delayed onset. Intranasal (IN) delivery takes advantage of a large surface area of mucosal tissue for rapid absorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IN ketorolac for endodontic pain using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design study. Methods Twenty-two patients presenting with moderate to severe endodontic pain were selected to receive IN treatment with placebo (n = 11) or ketorolac (n = 11) 30 minutes before endodontic treatment was started and immediately after the completion of endodontic treatment. Baseline pain levels were recorded before IN treatment. Pain levels were also recorded at 15 and 30 minutes after the initial IN dosing (before endodontic treatment); 30 minutes after completion of endodontic treatment; and 4, 8, and 12 hours after the initial IN spray. Primary analysis was a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results IN ketorolac alone or with endodontic treatment showed significantly better pain relief compared with IN placebo spray alone or with endodontic treatment at 30 minutes after the first or second intranasal dose and at 4 hours after the first intranasal dose ( P = .03). Conclusions These results suggest that IN ketorolac may provide a novel and efficacious method for pain relief in endodontic pain patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858287878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239910010484</els_id><sourcerecordid>858287878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ca83f53baff1b6d353b7c5662ca764926c7bae2b5654ec6139916de8935751ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LHTEYhUOx1Kv1D7iQ7FzNNR-TTEakIBe_QGipunIRMpl3JNO5iU1mBPvrzXBvXbhwdUI458D7HIQOKVlSQuVJv-wD-CUj8wdbZvmCFlRVquBClDtoQUhdF4zX9S7aS6knhFacV9_QLqMlrZmSC_R4513XOf-EwzTiC9-GNvjRWfzLOH-KHxLg0GHj8Y0fo_EmmQGfezM8Qcom57HBv01Ord0_aPFqcN7ZbLmPzgzf0dfODAkOtrqPHi4v7lfXxe3Pq5vV-W1hS0rGwhrFO8Eb03W0kS3Pz8oKKZk1lSxrJm3VGGCNkKIEK2m-h8oWVM1FJSgA30fHm97nGP5OkEa9dsnCMBgPYUpaCcUylUplJ9s4bQwpRej0c3RrE181JXpmqns9M9UzU02ZzpJDR9v6qVlD-x75DzEbzjYGyEe-OIg6WQfeQusi2FG3wX3e_-ND3G4x_oFXSH2YYgaeNNUpB_TdvOo8Ks17klKV_A17BZwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858287878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sniffing out Endodontic Pain: Use of an Intranasal Analgesic in a Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS ; Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS ; Lunos, Scott, MS ; Johnson, Neil, BS ; Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD ; Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS ; Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS ; Lunos, Scott, MS ; Johnson, Neil, BS ; Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD ; Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Orofacial pain is a common encounter in dentistry (affecting 12% of the population) and is a primary reason for patients seeking emergency care. Dentists often prescribe oral analgesics, which have disadvantages of decreased absorption rates and delayed onset. Intranasal (IN) delivery takes advantage of a large surface area of mucosal tissue for rapid absorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IN ketorolac for endodontic pain using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design study. Methods Twenty-two patients presenting with moderate to severe endodontic pain were selected to receive IN treatment with placebo (n = 11) or ketorolac (n = 11) 30 minutes before endodontic treatment was started and immediately after the completion of endodontic treatment. Baseline pain levels were recorded before IN treatment. Pain levels were also recorded at 15 and 30 minutes after the initial IN dosing (before endodontic treatment); 30 minutes after completion of endodontic treatment; and 4, 8, and 12 hours after the initial IN spray. Primary analysis was a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results IN ketorolac alone or with endodontic treatment showed significantly better pain relief compared with IN placebo spray alone or with endodontic treatment at 30 minutes after the first or second intranasal dose and at 4 hours after the first intranasal dose ( P = .03). Conclusions These results suggest that IN ketorolac may provide a novel and efficacious method for pain relief in endodontic pain patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21419286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Intranasal ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage ; Chronic Disease ; Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy ; Dental Pulp Necrosis - therapy ; Dentistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Endodontic pain ; Facial Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; intranasal analgesia ; ketorolac ; Ketorolac - administration &amp; dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Periapical Abscess - therapy ; Periapical Periodontitis - therapy ; placebo ; Placebos ; Premedication ; Prospective Studies ; Pulpitis - therapy ; Root Canal Therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2011-04, Vol.37 (4), p.439-444</ispartof><rights>American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>2011 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ca83f53baff1b6d353b7c5662ca764926c7bae2b5654ec6139916de8935751ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ca83f53baff1b6d353b7c5662ca764926c7bae2b5654ec6139916de8935751ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239910010484$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21419286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunos, Scott, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Neil, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Sniffing out Endodontic Pain: Use of an Intranasal Analgesic in a Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Orofacial pain is a common encounter in dentistry (affecting 12% of the population) and is a primary reason for patients seeking emergency care. Dentists often prescribe oral analgesics, which have disadvantages of decreased absorption rates and delayed onset. Intranasal (IN) delivery takes advantage of a large surface area of mucosal tissue for rapid absorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IN ketorolac for endodontic pain using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design study. Methods Twenty-two patients presenting with moderate to severe endodontic pain were selected to receive IN treatment with placebo (n = 11) or ketorolac (n = 11) 30 minutes before endodontic treatment was started and immediately after the completion of endodontic treatment. Baseline pain levels were recorded before IN treatment. Pain levels were also recorded at 15 and 30 minutes after the initial IN dosing (before endodontic treatment); 30 minutes after completion of endodontic treatment; and 4, 8, and 12 hours after the initial IN spray. Primary analysis was a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results IN ketorolac alone or with endodontic treatment showed significantly better pain relief compared with IN placebo spray alone or with endodontic treatment at 30 minutes after the first or second intranasal dose and at 4 hours after the first intranasal dose ( P = .03). Conclusions These results suggest that IN ketorolac may provide a novel and efficacious method for pain relief in endodontic pain patients.</description><subject>Administration, Intranasal</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Necrosis - therapy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Endodontic pain</subject><subject>Facial Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intranasal analgesia</subject><subject>ketorolac</subject><subject>Ketorolac - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Periapical Abscess - therapy</subject><subject>Periapical Periodontitis - therapy</subject><subject>placebo</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Premedication</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulpitis - therapy</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LHTEYhUOx1Kv1D7iQ7FzNNR-TTEakIBe_QGipunIRMpl3JNO5iU1mBPvrzXBvXbhwdUI458D7HIQOKVlSQuVJv-wD-CUj8wdbZvmCFlRVquBClDtoQUhdF4zX9S7aS6knhFacV9_QLqMlrZmSC_R4513XOf-EwzTiC9-GNvjRWfzLOH-KHxLg0GHj8Y0fo_EmmQGfezM8Qcom57HBv01Ord0_aPFqcN7ZbLmPzgzf0dfODAkOtrqPHi4v7lfXxe3Pq5vV-W1hS0rGwhrFO8Eb03W0kS3Pz8oKKZk1lSxrJm3VGGCNkKIEK2m-h8oWVM1FJSgA30fHm97nGP5OkEa9dsnCMBgPYUpaCcUylUplJ9s4bQwpRej0c3RrE181JXpmqns9M9UzU02ZzpJDR9v6qVlD-x75DzEbzjYGyEe-OIg6WQfeQusi2FG3wX3e_-ND3G4x_oFXSH2YYgaeNNUpB_TdvOo8Ks17klKV_A17BZwI</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS</creator><creator>Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS</creator><creator>Lunos, Scott, MS</creator><creator>Johnson, Neil, BS</creator><creator>Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD</creator><creator>Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Sniffing out Endodontic Pain: Use of an Intranasal Analgesic in a Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS ; Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS ; Lunos, Scott, MS ; Johnson, Neil, BS ; Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD ; Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ca83f53baff1b6d353b7c5662ca764926c7bae2b5654ec6139916de8935751ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intranasal</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Necrosis - therapy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Endodontic pain</topic><topic>Facial Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intranasal analgesia</topic><topic>ketorolac</topic><topic>Ketorolac - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Periapical Abscess - therapy</topic><topic>Periapical Periodontitis - therapy</topic><topic>placebo</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Premedication</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulpitis - therapy</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunos, Scott, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Neil, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Casey L., MS, DDS</au><au>Eggleston, Garry W., MS, DDS</au><au>Lunos, Scott, MS</au><au>Johnson, Neil, BS</au><au>Wiedmann, Tim S., PhD</au><au>Bowles, Walter R., MS, DDS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sniffing out Endodontic Pain: Use of an Intranasal Analgesic in a Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>439-444</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Orofacial pain is a common encounter in dentistry (affecting 12% of the population) and is a primary reason for patients seeking emergency care. Dentists often prescribe oral analgesics, which have disadvantages of decreased absorption rates and delayed onset. Intranasal (IN) delivery takes advantage of a large surface area of mucosal tissue for rapid absorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IN ketorolac for endodontic pain using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design study. Methods Twenty-two patients presenting with moderate to severe endodontic pain were selected to receive IN treatment with placebo (n = 11) or ketorolac (n = 11) 30 minutes before endodontic treatment was started and immediately after the completion of endodontic treatment. Baseline pain levels were recorded before IN treatment. Pain levels were also recorded at 15 and 30 minutes after the initial IN dosing (before endodontic treatment); 30 minutes after completion of endodontic treatment; and 4, 8, and 12 hours after the initial IN spray. Primary analysis was a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results IN ketorolac alone or with endodontic treatment showed significantly better pain relief compared with IN placebo spray alone or with endodontic treatment at 30 minutes after the first or second intranasal dose and at 4 hours after the first intranasal dose ( P = .03). Conclusions These results suggest that IN ketorolac may provide a novel and efficacious method for pain relief in endodontic pain patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21419286</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2011-04, Vol.37 (4), p.439-444
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858287878
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Administration, Intranasal
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage
Chronic Disease
Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy
Dental Pulp Necrosis - therapy
Dentistry
Double-Blind Method
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Endodontic pain
Facial Pain - prevention & control
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
intranasal analgesia
ketorolac
Ketorolac - administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Periapical Abscess - therapy
Periapical Periodontitis - therapy
placebo
Placebos
Premedication
Prospective Studies
Pulpitis - therapy
Root Canal Therapy
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Sniffing out Endodontic Pain: Use of an Intranasal Analgesic in a Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sniffing%20out%20Endodontic%20Pain:%20Use%20of%20an%20Intranasal%20Analgesic%20in%20a%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Turner,%20Casey%20L.,%20MS,%20DDS&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=439-444&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E858287878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858287878&rft_id=info:pmid/21419286&rft_els_id=S0099239910010484&rfr_iscdi=true