Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia

Background:  To establish the current surgical approach to rectal cancer in a group of colorectal surgeons in Australasia and the current opinion regarding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods:  An online survey was distributed to the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANZ journal of surgery 2011-04, Vol.81 (4), p.281-286
Hauptverfasser: Ong, Eugene J. S., Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 4
container_start_page 281
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 81
creator Ong, Eugene J. S.
Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
description Background:  To establish the current surgical approach to rectal cancer in a group of colorectal surgeons in Australasia and the current opinion regarding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods:  An online survey was distributed to the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand members. Results:  123/177 surgeons responded. During the last year, 94.3% had performed a laparoscopic colorectal case, 77.2% a laparoscopic rectal case and 65% a laparoscopic rectal cancer case. The most common approach to high anterior resection was pure laparoscopic (52.8%). Low anterior resections were most commonly performed with a laparoscopic component (25.2% pure laparoscopic, 33.3% hybrid). Most surgeons (>50%) performed ultra‐low anterior resections or abdomino‐perineal resections via an open technique. In addition, 64.2% intended to perform laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) within 2 years. Most surgeons believe that the quality of laparoscopic TME and oncological outcomes are similar, and surgical access and short‐term outcomes are superior when compared to the open procedure. The major concerns were in performing a low rectal transection, controlling haemorrhage and resource utilization/cost. Conclusion:  Laparoscopic rectal surgery is now widely practiced by Australasian colorectal surgeons and projected to increase in the near future. However, only 10% of surgeons are routinely performing total laparoscopic ultra‐low anterior resections which may have implications for the generalizability of clinical trials in laparoscopic TME and the ability to credential surgeons in this technically challenging field. Quality of TME and oncological outcomes were rated similar to the open operation. Areas of concern included low rectal transection, haemorrhage control and resource utilization/cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05590.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858280401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2297583771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4990-16a500e49bbfd2625cf7146be99975b27e4fc9ba87d83d9730b7cd74e1ee6b2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtu2zAYhYmgQe6vEBBdOskhxZs4dHCN5gI4yZAEGQmS-lXIlSWXlFD77UPFjodM4cIf5HcOyA8hTMmEpnW1mFDORZZTrSY5SadECE0m6wN0sr_4tpspZ-wYnca4IIRKqcUROs4ppwVX_AT9mg0hQNvj2NsecFfhxq5s6KLvVrXHAXxvG-xt6yHgOIQ_EDa4bvF0iH2wjY21PUeHlW0iXOz2M_Ry_ft5dpvNH2_uZtN55rnWJKPSCkKAa-eqMpe58JWiXDrQWivhcgW88trZQpUFK7VixClfKg4UQLrcsTP0Y9u7Ct2_AWJvlnX00DS2hW6IphBFXhBOaCK_fyIX3RDa9LgEqYIzzmWCii3k029jgMqsQr20YWMoMaNlszCjQDPKNKNl827ZrFP0ctc_uCWU--CH1gT83AL_6wY2Xy4204encUr5bJuvYw_rfd6Gv0YqpoR5fbgxc8KkJHNm7tkbQnqZPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857843446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ong, Eugene J. S. ; Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ong, Eugene J. S. ; Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:  To establish the current surgical approach to rectal cancer in a group of colorectal surgeons in Australasia and the current opinion regarding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods:  An online survey was distributed to the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand members. Results:  123/177 surgeons responded. During the last year, 94.3% had performed a laparoscopic colorectal case, 77.2% a laparoscopic rectal case and 65% a laparoscopic rectal cancer case. The most common approach to high anterior resection was pure laparoscopic (52.8%). Low anterior resections were most commonly performed with a laparoscopic component (25.2% pure laparoscopic, 33.3% hybrid). Most surgeons (&gt;50%) performed ultra‐low anterior resections or abdomino‐perineal resections via an open technique. In addition, 64.2% intended to perform laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) within 2 years. Most surgeons believe that the quality of laparoscopic TME and oncological outcomes are similar, and surgical access and short‐term outcomes are superior when compared to the open procedure. The major concerns were in performing a low rectal transection, controlling haemorrhage and resource utilization/cost. Conclusion:  Laparoscopic rectal surgery is now widely practiced by Australasian colorectal surgeons and projected to increase in the near future. However, only 10% of surgeons are routinely performing total laparoscopic ultra‐low anterior resections which may have implications for the generalizability of clinical trials in laparoscopic TME and the ability to credential surgeons in this technically challenging field. Quality of TME and oncological outcomes were rated similar to the open operation. Areas of concern included low rectal transection, haemorrhage control and resource utilization/cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05590.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21418474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Australia ; Clinical Competence ; Colectomy - methods ; Colectomy - standards ; Colectomy - utilization ; Colorectal cancer ; colorectal surgery ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Health Care Surveys - methods ; Humans ; laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - standards ; Laparoscopy - utilization ; Middle Aged ; New Zealand ; Polls &amp; surveys ; rectal cancer ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; rectal surgery ; Surgeons ; Surgical techniques ; survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2011-04, Vol.81 (4), p.281-286</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2010 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2010 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4990-16a500e49bbfd2625cf7146be99975b27e4fc9ba87d83d9730b7cd74e1ee6b2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4990-16a500e49bbfd2625cf7146be99975b27e4fc9ba87d83d9730b7cd74e1ee6b2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.2010.05590.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.2010.05590.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ong, Eugene J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background:  To establish the current surgical approach to rectal cancer in a group of colorectal surgeons in Australasia and the current opinion regarding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods:  An online survey was distributed to the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand members. Results:  123/177 surgeons responded. During the last year, 94.3% had performed a laparoscopic colorectal case, 77.2% a laparoscopic rectal case and 65% a laparoscopic rectal cancer case. The most common approach to high anterior resection was pure laparoscopic (52.8%). Low anterior resections were most commonly performed with a laparoscopic component (25.2% pure laparoscopic, 33.3% hybrid). Most surgeons (&gt;50%) performed ultra‐low anterior resections or abdomino‐perineal resections via an open technique. In addition, 64.2% intended to perform laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) within 2 years. Most surgeons believe that the quality of laparoscopic TME and oncological outcomes are similar, and surgical access and short‐term outcomes are superior when compared to the open procedure. The major concerns were in performing a low rectal transection, controlling haemorrhage and resource utilization/cost. Conclusion:  Laparoscopic rectal surgery is now widely practiced by Australasian colorectal surgeons and projected to increase in the near future. However, only 10% of surgeons are routinely performing total laparoscopic ultra‐low anterior resections which may have implications for the generalizability of clinical trials in laparoscopic TME and the ability to credential surgeons in this technically challenging field. Quality of TME and oncological outcomes were rated similar to the open operation. Areas of concern included low rectal transection, haemorrhage control and resource utilization/cost.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colectomy - standards</subject><subject>Colectomy - utilization</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Continuing</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>rectal cancer</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>rectal surgery</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkLtu2zAYhYmgQe6vEBBdOskhxZs4dHCN5gI4yZAEGQmS-lXIlSWXlFD77UPFjodM4cIf5HcOyA8hTMmEpnW1mFDORZZTrSY5SadECE0m6wN0sr_4tpspZ-wYnca4IIRKqcUROs4ppwVX_AT9mg0hQNvj2NsecFfhxq5s6KLvVrXHAXxvG-xt6yHgOIQ_EDa4bvF0iH2wjY21PUeHlW0iXOz2M_Ry_ft5dpvNH2_uZtN55rnWJKPSCkKAa-eqMpe58JWiXDrQWivhcgW88trZQpUFK7VixClfKg4UQLrcsTP0Y9u7Ct2_AWJvlnX00DS2hW6IphBFXhBOaCK_fyIX3RDa9LgEqYIzzmWCii3k029jgMqsQr20YWMoMaNlszCjQDPKNKNl827ZrFP0ctc_uCWU--CH1gT83AL_6wY2Xy4204encUr5bJuvYw_rfd6Gv0YqpoR5fbgxc8KkJHNm7tkbQnqZPQ</recordid><startdate>201104</startdate><enddate>201104</enddate><creator>Ong, Eugene J. S.</creator><creator>Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201104</creationdate><title>Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia</title><author>Ong, Eugene J. S. ; Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4990-16a500e49bbfd2625cf7146be99975b27e4fc9ba87d83d9730b7cd74e1ee6b2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colectomy - standards</topic><topic>Colectomy - utilization</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Continuing</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>rectal cancer</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>rectal surgery</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ong, Eugene J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ong, Eugene J. S.</au><au>Stevenson, Andrew R. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2011-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>281-286</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background:  To establish the current surgical approach to rectal cancer in a group of colorectal surgeons in Australasia and the current opinion regarding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods:  An online survey was distributed to the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand members. Results:  123/177 surgeons responded. During the last year, 94.3% had performed a laparoscopic colorectal case, 77.2% a laparoscopic rectal case and 65% a laparoscopic rectal cancer case. The most common approach to high anterior resection was pure laparoscopic (52.8%). Low anterior resections were most commonly performed with a laparoscopic component (25.2% pure laparoscopic, 33.3% hybrid). Most surgeons (&gt;50%) performed ultra‐low anterior resections or abdomino‐perineal resections via an open technique. In addition, 64.2% intended to perform laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) within 2 years. Most surgeons believe that the quality of laparoscopic TME and oncological outcomes are similar, and surgical access and short‐term outcomes are superior when compared to the open procedure. The major concerns were in performing a low rectal transection, controlling haemorrhage and resource utilization/cost. Conclusion:  Laparoscopic rectal surgery is now widely practiced by Australasian colorectal surgeons and projected to increase in the near future. However, only 10% of surgeons are routinely performing total laparoscopic ultra‐low anterior resections which may have implications for the generalizability of clinical trials in laparoscopic TME and the ability to credential surgeons in this technically challenging field. Quality of TME and oncological outcomes were rated similar to the open operation. Areas of concern included low rectal transection, haemorrhage control and resource utilization/cost.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>21418474</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05590.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2011-04, Vol.81 (4), p.281-286
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858280401
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Australia
Clinical Competence
Colectomy - methods
Colectomy - standards
Colectomy - utilization
Colorectal cancer
colorectal surgery
Education, Medical, Continuing
Health Care Surveys - methods
Humans
laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - standards
Laparoscopy - utilization
Middle Aged
New Zealand
Polls & surveys
rectal cancer
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
rectal surgery
Surgeons
Surgical techniques
survey
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A48%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20state%20of%20laparoscopic%20rectal%20cancer%20surgery%20in%20Australasia&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Ong,%20Eugene%20J.%20S.&rft.date=2011-04&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=281-286&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05590.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2297583771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857843446&rft_id=info:pmid/21418474&rfr_iscdi=true