The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure

Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure. International Endodontic Journal, 44, 458–468, 2011. Aim  To compare posts of different flexibility using static load testing. Hypotheses tested were (1) the flexural modulus of endo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International endodontic journal 2011-05, Vol.44 (5), p.458-468
Hauptverfasser: Stewardson, D. A., Shortall, A. C., Marquis, P. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 468
container_issue 5
container_start_page 458
container_title International endodontic journal
container_volume 44
creator Stewardson, D. A.
Shortall, A. C.
Marquis, P. M.
description Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure. International Endodontic Journal, 44, 458–468, 2011. Aim  To compare posts of different flexibility using static load testing. Hypotheses tested were (1) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show a linear relationship with failure load and (2) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show an association with failure mode. Methodology  Thirty 2 mm diameter rods of a glass fibre material Aesthetiplus (A), a carbon fibre Composipost (C) and stainless steel (S) were cemented into 90 roots of extracted human teeth using resin cement. Composite resin cores were added and the roots embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin. Samples were loaded at 90° in a universal testing machine until failure. Failure loads and fracture levels were compared using one‐way anova and post‐hoc Scheffé tests. Proportions of different failure modes were compared with Chi square tests (α = 0.05). Results  Mean failure loads – MPa (SD) were A – 278.69 (85.79), C – 258.86 (82.05), S – 347.37 (74.50). There was no significant difference in the mean failure load of roots containing the FRC posts (P = 0.639), but it was significantly greater for steel post samples (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01851.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857816117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>857816117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-a22640e0410cc2428d5c4c4affb29177557fee6b4259c76452497d8c2e8c203c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFPwyAUxonRuDn9F0xvnlp5FEp38GAWN2cWPajReCGMPmJnN2Zp4_zvLW7uLAnhvY_ve4QfIRHQBLp1uUggzUTMxBASRgESCrmAZHNA-vuLQ9KnwNOY5bnokRPvF5RSQVM4Jj0GTGYURJ_Mnt4xQmvRNJGzURO6SvumNNHSFW3V-iDjqnCFWwV17XzTaavINzr0ldNFZHVZtTWekiOrK49nu3NAnsc3T6PbePYwmY6uZ7HhkkGsGcs4RcqBGsM4ywthuOHa2jkbgpRCSIuYzXn3DSMzLhgfyiI3DLtNU5MOyMV27rp2ny36Ri1Lb7Cq9Apd61UuZA4ZgOyc-dZpaud9jVat63Kp628FVAWUaqECMRWIqYBS_aJUmy56vnuknS-x2Af_2HWGq63hq6zw-9-D1fTmLlRdPt7mS9_gZp_X9YfKZCqFermfqMdXlr3Jxxc1Tn8A31OQFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857816117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stewardson, D. A. ; Shortall, A. C. ; Marquis, P. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stewardson, D. A. ; Shortall, A. C. ; Marquis, P. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure. International Endodontic Journal, 44, 458–468, 2011. Aim  To compare posts of different flexibility using static load testing. Hypotheses tested were (1) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show a linear relationship with failure load and (2) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show an association with failure mode. Methodology  Thirty 2 mm diameter rods of a glass fibre material Aesthetiplus (A), a carbon fibre Composipost (C) and stainless steel (S) were cemented into 90 roots of extracted human teeth using resin cement. Composite resin cores were added and the roots embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin. Samples were loaded at 90° in a universal testing machine until failure. Failure loads and fracture levels were compared using one‐way anova and post‐hoc Scheffé tests. Proportions of different failure modes were compared with Chi square tests (α = 0.05). Results  Mean failure loads – MPa (SD) were A – 278.69 (85.79), C – 258.86 (82.05), S – 347.37 (74.50). There was no significant difference in the mean failure load of roots containing the FRC posts (P = 0.639), but it was significantly greater for steel post samples (P &lt; 0.01). The mean level of fracture among the groups was not significantly different (P = 0.879). No root fractures were ‘favourable’. Significantly more root fractures and fewer core fractures occurred for group A than for groups C or S (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion  The elastic modulus of an endodontic post does not appear to be a principal factor influencing load at failure or mode of failure of post‐restored teeth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01851.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21276015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Composite Resins - therapeutic use ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Dental Materials ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Elastic Modulus ; endodontic post ; fibre-reinforced composite ; fracture ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Pliability ; Post and Core Technique - instrumentation ; root ; Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation ; static loading</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2011-05, Vol.44 (5), p.458-468</ispartof><rights>2011 International Endodontic Journal</rights><rights>2011 International Endodontic Journal.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-a22640e0410cc2428d5c4c4affb29177557fee6b4259c76452497d8c2e8c203c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-a22640e0410cc2428d5c4c4affb29177557fee6b4259c76452497d8c2e8c203c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2011.01851.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2011.01851.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276015$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stewardson, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortall, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquis, P. M.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure. International Endodontic Journal, 44, 458–468, 2011. Aim  To compare posts of different flexibility using static load testing. Hypotheses tested were (1) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show a linear relationship with failure load and (2) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show an association with failure mode. Methodology  Thirty 2 mm diameter rods of a glass fibre material Aesthetiplus (A), a carbon fibre Composipost (C) and stainless steel (S) were cemented into 90 roots of extracted human teeth using resin cement. Composite resin cores were added and the roots embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin. Samples were loaded at 90° in a universal testing machine until failure. Failure loads and fracture levels were compared using one‐way anova and post‐hoc Scheffé tests. Proportions of different failure modes were compared with Chi square tests (α = 0.05). Results  Mean failure loads – MPa (SD) were A – 278.69 (85.79), C – 258.86 (82.05), S – 347.37 (74.50). There was no significant difference in the mean failure load of roots containing the FRC posts (P = 0.639), but it was significantly greater for steel post samples (P &lt; 0.01). The mean level of fracture among the groups was not significantly different (P = 0.879). No root fractures were ‘favourable’. Significantly more root fractures and fewer core fractures occurred for group A than for groups C or S (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion  The elastic modulus of an endodontic post does not appear to be a principal factor influencing load at failure or mode of failure of post‐restored teeth.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Composite Resins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>endodontic post</subject><subject>fibre-reinforced composite</subject><subject>fracture</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Pliability</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>root</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>static loading</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFPwyAUxonRuDn9F0xvnlp5FEp38GAWN2cWPajReCGMPmJnN2Zp4_zvLW7uLAnhvY_ve4QfIRHQBLp1uUggzUTMxBASRgESCrmAZHNA-vuLQ9KnwNOY5bnokRPvF5RSQVM4Jj0GTGYURJ_Mnt4xQmvRNJGzURO6SvumNNHSFW3V-iDjqnCFWwV17XzTaavINzr0ldNFZHVZtTWekiOrK49nu3NAnsc3T6PbePYwmY6uZ7HhkkGsGcs4RcqBGsM4ywthuOHa2jkbgpRCSIuYzXn3DSMzLhgfyiI3DLtNU5MOyMV27rp2ny36Ri1Lb7Cq9Apd61UuZA4ZgOyc-dZpaud9jVat63Kp628FVAWUaqECMRWIqYBS_aJUmy56vnuknS-x2Af_2HWGq63hq6zw-9-D1fTmLlRdPt7mS9_gZp_X9YfKZCqFermfqMdXlr3Jxxc1Tn8A31OQFA</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Stewardson, D. A.</creator><creator>Shortall, A. C.</creator><creator>Marquis, P. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure</title><author>Stewardson, D. A. ; Shortall, A. C. ; Marquis, P. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-a22640e0410cc2428d5c4c4affb29177557fee6b4259c76452497d8c2e8c203c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Composite Resins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>endodontic post</topic><topic>fibre-reinforced composite</topic><topic>fracture</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Pliability</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>root</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>static loading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewardson, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortall, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquis, P. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewardson, D. A.</au><au>Shortall, A. C.</au><au>Marquis, P. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>458</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>458-468</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure. International Endodontic Journal, 44, 458–468, 2011. Aim  To compare posts of different flexibility using static load testing. Hypotheses tested were (1) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show a linear relationship with failure load and (2) the flexural modulus of endodontic posts does not show an association with failure mode. Methodology  Thirty 2 mm diameter rods of a glass fibre material Aesthetiplus (A), a carbon fibre Composipost (C) and stainless steel (S) were cemented into 90 roots of extracted human teeth using resin cement. Composite resin cores were added and the roots embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin. Samples were loaded at 90° in a universal testing machine until failure. Failure loads and fracture levels were compared using one‐way anova and post‐hoc Scheffé tests. Proportions of different failure modes were compared with Chi square tests (α = 0.05). Results  Mean failure loads – MPa (SD) were A – 278.69 (85.79), C – 258.86 (82.05), S – 347.37 (74.50). There was no significant difference in the mean failure load of roots containing the FRC posts (P = 0.639), but it was significantly greater for steel post samples (P &lt; 0.01). The mean level of fracture among the groups was not significantly different (P = 0.879). No root fractures were ‘favourable’. Significantly more root fractures and fewer core fractures occurred for group A than for groups C or S (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion  The elastic modulus of an endodontic post does not appear to be a principal factor influencing load at failure or mode of failure of post‐restored teeth.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21276015</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01851.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International endodontic journal, 2011-05, Vol.44 (5), p.458-468
issn 0143-2885
1365-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857816117
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Carbon
Composite Resins - chemistry
Composite Resins - therapeutic use
Dental Bonding - methods
Dental Materials
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Restoration Failure
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Elastic Modulus
endodontic post
fibre-reinforced composite
fracture
Humans
Materials Testing
Pliability
Post and Core Technique - instrumentation
root
Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation
static loading
title The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20the%20elastic%20modulus%20of%20endodontic%20posts%20on%20static%20load%20failure&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Stewardson,%20D.%20A.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=458&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=458-468&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01851.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E857816117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857816117&rft_id=info:pmid/21276015&rfr_iscdi=true