The Importance of Assessing Both Inpatient and Outpatient Surgical Quality

We aimed to determine whether hospital-level surgical performance was similar across outpatient and inpatient settings. The majority of surgical procedures in the United States are performed in an outpatient setting but most quality improvement focuses on inpatient care. Using data from the 2006 to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2011-03, Vol.253 (3), p.611-618
Hauptverfasser: RAVAL, Mehul V, HAMILTON, Barton H, INGRAHAM, Angela M, KO, Clifford Y, HALL, Bruce L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 618
container_issue 3
container_start_page 611
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 253
creator RAVAL, Mehul V
HAMILTON, Barton H
INGRAHAM, Angela M
KO, Clifford Y
HALL, Bruce L
description We aimed to determine whether hospital-level surgical performance was similar across outpatient and inpatient settings. The majority of surgical procedures in the United States are performed in an outpatient setting but most quality improvement focuses on inpatient care. Using data from the 2006 to 2008 American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, risk-adjusted hospital observed to expected ratios for morbidity and mortality were compared for inpatient and outpatient cases. In addition, hospital outpatient performance in each year was compared with performances in subsequent years. Hospitals demonstrated variation in outcomes for outpatient morbidity with both good and poor outliers in each year. Outpatient mortality was so rare as to not support robust modeling. There was a lack of congruence between hospital performance for outpatient morbidity and either inpatient morbidity or inpatient mortality in each year, indicating that inpatient performance is not interchangeable with outpatient performance. Outpatient morbidity performance correlation between years was only moderate (correlations 0.449-0.534, all P < 0.001) indicating that although outcomes from 1 year mildly predict subsequent years, substitution of data would likely lead to missed opportunities for improvement. Assessments of risk-adjusted hospital-level outpatient morbidity performance demonstrate (1) variability across American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sites; (2) a lack of congruence between outpatient morbidity performance and either inpatient morbidity or mortality performance; (3) year-to-year variation of outpatient morbidity performance at individual institutions. Continuing evaluation of both outpatient and inpatient outcomes is supported. Given the substantial volume of outpatient care delivered, outpatient assessments are likely to be an important component of ongoing quality improvement efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fd50
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857481127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>857481127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-736050ec4c4635e3aa33b3e9beb51add1523f5b8d82cc72b8c15f58251deef953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5FcxFPqTmY32Rxr8aNSKNJ6DpvNpI3ky-zm0H9vpFXB0zDwvO8wD2PXwKfA4-h-vZxNecoBCUEFXOWZ5CdsDDJQPoDgp2zMOUdfxBiM2IW1H5yDUDw6Z6MAQKEScsxeNzvyFlXbdE7Xhrwm92bWkrVFvfUeGrfzFnWrXUG183Sdeave_azrvtsWRpfeW6_Lwu0v2VmuS0tXxzlh70-Pm_mLv1w9L-azpW8QQ-dHGHLJyQgjQpSEWiOmSHFKqQSdZcMDmMtUZSowJgpSZUDmUgUSMqI8ljhhd4fetms-e7IuqQprqCx1TU1vEyUjoQCCaCDFgTRdY21HedJ2RaW7fQI8-ZaYDBKT_xKH2M3xQJ9WlP2GfqwNwO0R0HYQkHeDusL-cRhDGArEL0zHexM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857481127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Importance of Assessing Both Inpatient and Outpatient Surgical Quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>RAVAL, Mehul V ; HAMILTON, Barton H ; INGRAHAM, Angela M ; KO, Clifford Y ; HALL, Bruce L</creator><creatorcontrib>RAVAL, Mehul V ; HAMILTON, Barton H ; INGRAHAM, Angela M ; KO, Clifford Y ; HALL, Bruce L</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to determine whether hospital-level surgical performance was similar across outpatient and inpatient settings. The majority of surgical procedures in the United States are performed in an outpatient setting but most quality improvement focuses on inpatient care. Using data from the 2006 to 2008 American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, risk-adjusted hospital observed to expected ratios for morbidity and mortality were compared for inpatient and outpatient cases. In addition, hospital outpatient performance in each year was compared with performances in subsequent years. Hospitals demonstrated variation in outcomes for outpatient morbidity with both good and poor outliers in each year. Outpatient mortality was so rare as to not support robust modeling. There was a lack of congruence between hospital performance for outpatient morbidity and either inpatient morbidity or inpatient mortality in each year, indicating that inpatient performance is not interchangeable with outpatient performance. Outpatient morbidity performance correlation between years was only moderate (correlations 0.449-0.534, all P &lt; 0.001) indicating that although outcomes from 1 year mildly predict subsequent years, substitution of data would likely lead to missed opportunities for improvement. Assessments of risk-adjusted hospital-level outpatient morbidity performance demonstrate (1) variability across American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sites; (2) a lack of congruence between outpatient morbidity performance and either inpatient morbidity or mortality performance; (3) year-to-year variation of outpatient morbidity performance at individual institutions. Continuing evaluation of both outpatient and inpatient outcomes is supported. Given the substantial volume of outpatient care delivered, outpatient assessments are likely to be an important component of ongoing quality improvement efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fd50</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21183845</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cause of Death ; General aspects ; Health Services Research - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Missouri ; Odds Ratio ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Admission - standards ; Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Quality Improvement - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Statistics as Topic ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2011-03, Vol.253 (3), p.611-618</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-736050ec4c4635e3aa33b3e9beb51add1523f5b8d82cc72b8c15f58251deef953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-736050ec4c4635e3aa33b3e9beb51add1523f5b8d82cc72b8c15f58251deef953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23916643$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21183845$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAVAL, Mehul V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMILTON, Barton H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INGRAHAM, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KO, Clifford Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALL, Bruce L</creatorcontrib><title>The Importance of Assessing Both Inpatient and Outpatient Surgical Quality</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>We aimed to determine whether hospital-level surgical performance was similar across outpatient and inpatient settings. The majority of surgical procedures in the United States are performed in an outpatient setting but most quality improvement focuses on inpatient care. Using data from the 2006 to 2008 American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, risk-adjusted hospital observed to expected ratios for morbidity and mortality were compared for inpatient and outpatient cases. In addition, hospital outpatient performance in each year was compared with performances in subsequent years. Hospitals demonstrated variation in outcomes for outpatient morbidity with both good and poor outliers in each year. Outpatient mortality was so rare as to not support robust modeling. There was a lack of congruence between hospital performance for outpatient morbidity and either inpatient morbidity or inpatient mortality in each year, indicating that inpatient performance is not interchangeable with outpatient performance. Outpatient morbidity performance correlation between years was only moderate (correlations 0.449-0.534, all P &lt; 0.001) indicating that although outcomes from 1 year mildly predict subsequent years, substitution of data would likely lead to missed opportunities for improvement. Assessments of risk-adjusted hospital-level outpatient morbidity performance demonstrate (1) variability across American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sites; (2) a lack of congruence between outpatient morbidity performance and either inpatient morbidity or mortality performance; (3) year-to-year variation of outpatient morbidity performance at individual institutions. Continuing evaluation of both outpatient and inpatient outcomes is supported. Given the substantial volume of outpatient care delivered, outpatient assessments are likely to be an important component of ongoing quality improvement efforts.</description><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Services Research - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Admission - standards</subject><subject>Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5FcxFPqTmY32Rxr8aNSKNJ6DpvNpI3ky-zm0H9vpFXB0zDwvO8wD2PXwKfA4-h-vZxNecoBCUEFXOWZ5CdsDDJQPoDgp2zMOUdfxBiM2IW1H5yDUDw6Z6MAQKEScsxeNzvyFlXbdE7Xhrwm92bWkrVFvfUeGrfzFnWrXUG183Sdeave_azrvtsWRpfeW6_Lwu0v2VmuS0tXxzlh70-Pm_mLv1w9L-azpW8QQ-dHGHLJyQgjQpSEWiOmSHFKqQSdZcMDmMtUZSowJgpSZUDmUgUSMqI8ljhhd4fetms-e7IuqQprqCx1TU1vEyUjoQCCaCDFgTRdY21HedJ2RaW7fQI8-ZaYDBKT_xKH2M3xQJ9WlP2GfqwNwO0R0HYQkHeDusL-cRhDGArEL0zHexM</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>RAVAL, Mehul V</creator><creator>HAMILTON, Barton H</creator><creator>INGRAHAM, Angela M</creator><creator>KO, Clifford Y</creator><creator>HALL, Bruce L</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>The Importance of Assessing Both Inpatient and Outpatient Surgical Quality</title><author>RAVAL, Mehul V ; HAMILTON, Barton H ; INGRAHAM, Angela M ; KO, Clifford Y ; HALL, Bruce L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-736050ec4c4635e3aa33b3e9beb51add1523f5b8d82cc72b8c15f58251deef953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Services Research - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Admission - standards</topic><topic>Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAVAL, Mehul V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMILTON, Barton H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INGRAHAM, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KO, Clifford Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALL, Bruce L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAVAL, Mehul V</au><au>HAMILTON, Barton H</au><au>INGRAHAM, Angela M</au><au>KO, Clifford Y</au><au>HALL, Bruce L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Importance of Assessing Both Inpatient and Outpatient Surgical Quality</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>253</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>611-618</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>We aimed to determine whether hospital-level surgical performance was similar across outpatient and inpatient settings. The majority of surgical procedures in the United States are performed in an outpatient setting but most quality improvement focuses on inpatient care. Using data from the 2006 to 2008 American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, risk-adjusted hospital observed to expected ratios for morbidity and mortality were compared for inpatient and outpatient cases. In addition, hospital outpatient performance in each year was compared with performances in subsequent years. Hospitals demonstrated variation in outcomes for outpatient morbidity with both good and poor outliers in each year. Outpatient mortality was so rare as to not support robust modeling. There was a lack of congruence between hospital performance for outpatient morbidity and either inpatient morbidity or inpatient mortality in each year, indicating that inpatient performance is not interchangeable with outpatient performance. Outpatient morbidity performance correlation between years was only moderate (correlations 0.449-0.534, all P &lt; 0.001) indicating that although outcomes from 1 year mildly predict subsequent years, substitution of data would likely lead to missed opportunities for improvement. Assessments of risk-adjusted hospital-level outpatient morbidity performance demonstrate (1) variability across American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sites; (2) a lack of congruence between outpatient morbidity performance and either inpatient morbidity or mortality performance; (3) year-to-year variation of outpatient morbidity performance at individual institutions. Continuing evaluation of both outpatient and inpatient outcomes is supported. Given the substantial volume of outpatient care delivered, outpatient assessments are likely to be an important component of ongoing quality improvement efforts.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>21183845</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fd50</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2011-03, Vol.253 (3), p.611-618
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857481127
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - mortality
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards
Biological and medical sciences
Cause of Death
General aspects
Health Services Research - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Medical sciences
Missouri
Odds Ratio
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Patient Admission - standards
Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards
Quality Improvement - standards
Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards
Statistics as Topic
Survival Analysis
title The Importance of Assessing Both Inpatient and Outpatient Surgical Quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A14%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Importance%20of%20Assessing%20Both%20Inpatient%20and%20Outpatient%20Surgical%20Quality&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=RAVAL,%20Mehul%20V&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=253&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=611-618&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fd50&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E857481127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857481127&rft_id=info:pmid/21183845&rfr_iscdi=true