Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue

There is an academic dispute regarding the role of the right hemisphere in language processing. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was used to test the hypothesis that Wernicke's area processes dominant meanings (“teller”) whereas its right homologue processes subordinate meanings (“river”...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cortex 2009-10, Vol.45 (9), p.1097-1103
Hauptverfasser: Harpaz, Yuval, Levkovitz, Yechiel, Lavidor, Michal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1103
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1097
container_title Cortex
container_volume 45
creator Harpaz, Yuval
Levkovitz, Yechiel
Lavidor, Michal
description There is an academic dispute regarding the role of the right hemisphere in language processing. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was used to test the hypothesis that Wernicke's area processes dominant meanings (“teller”) whereas its right homologue processes subordinate meanings (“river”) of ambiguous words (“bank”; Jung-Beeman, 2005). Participants were asked to make a semantic decision on ambiguous words that were followed either by unrelated words or by words associated with their dominant or subordinate meanings. A 10Hz TMS train was applied on each trial over CP5 (left Wernicke), CP6 (right Wernicke) or Cz (vertex) scalp positions, and was synchronized with the word presentation. Accuracy and d′ analysis revealed a TMS LOCATION by MEANING interaction. TMS over Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to dominant meaning blocks compared to stimulating the right Wernicke's area and the vertex. In contrast, TMS over the right Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to subordinate meaning blocks, compared to stimulating the left Wernicke's area and the vertex. The left and right Wernicke's areas function as processors of dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous words, respectively. While previous research methods have yielded indecisive results, TMS proved to be a useful tool in demonstrating a causal role of the two brain regions in a double dissociation design with healthy subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85713960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001094520900029X</els_id><sourcerecordid>85713960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f4d9ec52d26e835cced8dad025cf5e2d8c49612f9ff55798045f4c24bc349f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6D0Ry0lO3lXSqJ7kIsugqDHhRPIZMUpnN2N1Zk27Z_ff2MgPe3FNdvvcK3sfYawGtANG_P7Y-l5nuWglgWhAtgHzCNsJsu0YLkE_ZBkBAYxTKC_ai1uMKgEZ8zi6EkSgk4oZd7-gueTdwN-7TYUnzPS9U87DMKU88TfwnlSn5X_SuclfIcTcFnubKSzrczPwmj3nIh4VesmfRDZVene8l-_H50_erL83u2_XXq4-7xisp5yaqYMijDLIn3aH3FHRwAST6iCSD9sr0QkYTI-LWaFAYlZdq7ztlYi-6S_b21Htb8u-F6mzHVD0Ng5soL9Vq3IrO9PAo2G-xNxofb5RCdAJQr6A6gb7kWgtFe1vS6Mq9FWAflNijPSmxD0osCLsuvsbenPuX_UjhX-jsYAU-nABad_uTqNjqE03rNKmQn23I6f8f_gKMc567</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21131058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Harpaz, Yuval ; Levkovitz, Yechiel ; Lavidor, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Harpaz, Yuval ; Levkovitz, Yechiel ; Lavidor, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>There is an academic dispute regarding the role of the right hemisphere in language processing. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was used to test the hypothesis that Wernicke's area processes dominant meanings (“teller”) whereas its right homologue processes subordinate meanings (“river”) of ambiguous words (“bank”; Jung-Beeman, 2005). Participants were asked to make a semantic decision on ambiguous words that were followed either by unrelated words or by words associated with their dominant or subordinate meanings. A 10Hz TMS train was applied on each trial over CP5 (left Wernicke), CP6 (right Wernicke) or Cz (vertex) scalp positions, and was synchronized with the word presentation. Accuracy and d′ analysis revealed a TMS LOCATION by MEANING interaction. TMS over Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to dominant meaning blocks compared to stimulating the right Wernicke's area and the vertex. In contrast, TMS over the right Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to subordinate meaning blocks, compared to stimulating the left Wernicke's area and the vertex. The left and right Wernicke's areas function as processors of dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous words, respectively. While previous research methods have yielded indecisive results, TMS proved to be a useful tool in demonstrating a causal role of the two brain regions in a double dissociation design with healthy subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19251255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambiguous ; Analysis of Variance ; Dominance, Cerebral - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular ; Humans ; Language ; Language Tests ; Laterality ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Semantics ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Temporal Lobe - physiology ; TMS ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Wernicke's area</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2009-10, Vol.45 (9), p.1097-1103</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Srl</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f4d9ec52d26e835cced8dad025cf5e2d8c49612f9ff55798045f4c24bc349f613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f4d9ec52d26e835cced8dad025cf5e2d8c49612f9ff55798045f4c24bc349f613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19251255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harpaz, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levkovitz, Yechiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavidor, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>There is an academic dispute regarding the role of the right hemisphere in language processing. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was used to test the hypothesis that Wernicke's area processes dominant meanings (“teller”) whereas its right homologue processes subordinate meanings (“river”) of ambiguous words (“bank”; Jung-Beeman, 2005). Participants were asked to make a semantic decision on ambiguous words that were followed either by unrelated words or by words associated with their dominant or subordinate meanings. A 10Hz TMS train was applied on each trial over CP5 (left Wernicke), CP6 (right Wernicke) or Cz (vertex) scalp positions, and was synchronized with the word presentation. Accuracy and d′ analysis revealed a TMS LOCATION by MEANING interaction. TMS over Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to dominant meaning blocks compared to stimulating the right Wernicke's area and the vertex. In contrast, TMS over the right Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to subordinate meaning blocks, compared to stimulating the left Wernicke's area and the vertex. The left and right Wernicke's areas function as processors of dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous words, respectively. While previous research methods have yielded indecisive results, TMS proved to be a useful tool in demonstrating a causal role of the two brain regions in a double dissociation design with healthy subjects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambiguous</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Laterality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Temporal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>TMS</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Wernicke's area</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6D0Ry0lO3lXSqJ7kIsugqDHhRPIZMUpnN2N1Zk27Z_ff2MgPe3FNdvvcK3sfYawGtANG_P7Y-l5nuWglgWhAtgHzCNsJsu0YLkE_ZBkBAYxTKC_ai1uMKgEZ8zi6EkSgk4oZd7-gueTdwN-7TYUnzPS9U87DMKU88TfwnlSn5X_SuclfIcTcFnubKSzrczPwmj3nIh4VesmfRDZVene8l-_H50_erL83u2_XXq4-7xisp5yaqYMijDLIn3aH3FHRwAST6iCSD9sr0QkYTI-LWaFAYlZdq7ztlYi-6S_b21Htb8u-F6mzHVD0Ng5soL9Vq3IrO9PAo2G-xNxofb5RCdAJQr6A6gb7kWgtFe1vS6Mq9FWAflNijPSmxD0osCLsuvsbenPuX_UjhX-jsYAU-nABad_uTqNjqE03rNKmQn23I6f8f_gKMc567</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Harpaz, Yuval</creator><creator>Levkovitz, Yechiel</creator><creator>Lavidor, Michal</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue</title><author>Harpaz, Yuval ; Levkovitz, Yechiel ; Lavidor, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f4d9ec52d26e835cced8dad025cf5e2d8c49612f9ff55798045f4c24bc349f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambiguous</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Laterality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Temporal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>TMS</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Wernicke's area</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harpaz, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levkovitz, Yechiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavidor, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harpaz, Yuval</au><au>Levkovitz, Yechiel</au><au>Lavidor, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1103</epage><pages>1097-1103</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>There is an academic dispute regarding the role of the right hemisphere in language processing. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was used to test the hypothesis that Wernicke's area processes dominant meanings (“teller”) whereas its right homologue processes subordinate meanings (“river”) of ambiguous words (“bank”; Jung-Beeman, 2005). Participants were asked to make a semantic decision on ambiguous words that were followed either by unrelated words or by words associated with their dominant or subordinate meanings. A 10Hz TMS train was applied on each trial over CP5 (left Wernicke), CP6 (right Wernicke) or Cz (vertex) scalp positions, and was synchronized with the word presentation. Accuracy and d′ analysis revealed a TMS LOCATION by MEANING interaction. TMS over Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to dominant meaning blocks compared to stimulating the right Wernicke's area and the vertex. In contrast, TMS over the right Wernicke's area resulted in more accurate responses and higher sensitivity to subordinate meaning blocks, compared to stimulating the left Wernicke's area and the vertex. The left and right Wernicke's areas function as processors of dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous words, respectively. While previous research methods have yielded indecisive results, TMS proved to be a useful tool in demonstrating a causal role of the two brain regions in a double dissociation design with healthy subjects.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19251255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-9452
ispartof Cortex, 2009-10, Vol.45 (9), p.1097-1103
issn 0010-9452
1973-8102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85713960
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Ambiguous
Analysis of Variance
Dominance, Cerebral - physiology
Electroencephalography
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Language
Language Tests
Laterality
Male
Photic Stimulation
Reaction Time - physiology
Semantics
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Temporal Lobe - physiology
TMS
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Visual Perception - physiology
Wernicke's area
title Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lexical%20ambiguity%20resolution%20in%20Wernicke's%20area%20and%20its%20right%20homologue&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Harpaz,%20Yuval&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1103&rft.pages=1097-1103&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85713960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21131058&rft_id=info:pmid/19251255&rft_els_id=S001094520900029X&rfr_iscdi=true