Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years

Purpose We assessed the clinical and radiologic results of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component used with a third-generation prosthesis. Methods Between 1996 and 2003, in 4 European centers, 333 shoulder arthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis by use of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2011-04, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394
Hauptverfasser: Walch, Gilles, MD, Young, Allan A., MD, Melis, Barbara, MD, Gazielly, Dominique, MD, Loew, Markus, MD, Boileau, Pascal, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 394
container_issue 3
container_start_page 385
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 20
creator Walch, Gilles, MD
Young, Allan A., MD
Melis, Barbara, MD
Gazielly, Dominique, MD
Loew, Markus, MD
Boileau, Pascal, MD
description Purpose We assessed the clinical and radiologic results of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component used with a third-generation prosthesis. Methods Between 1996 and 2003, in 4 European centers, 333 shoulder arthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis by use of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed, and clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score, range of motion, and subjective evaluation. Results At a mean of 89.5 months’ follow-up, the Constant score improved from 31.4 to 67.6 points ( P < .0001). Active forward elevation improved from 94.9° to 146.6° ( P < .0001) and external rotation from 9.0° to 35.3° ( P < .0001). Of the patients, 93.5% were either satisfied or very satisfied. The rate of revision for glenoid loosening was 0.6%; however, the rate of radiologic glenoid loosening was 18.9%. Glenoid survival was 99.7% at 5 years and 98.3% at 10 years with endpoint defined as revision surgery for glenoid loosening and 99.7% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years with endpoint defined as radiologic loosening. Conclusions We showed highly satisfactory clinical outcomes and extremely low rates of revision for glenoid loosening using a cemented convex-back keeled glenoid. There was a concerning rate of radiologic loosening, which only became apparent after 5 years, and this was associated with excessive glenoid reaming. Because radiologic changes are progressive and precede the need for revision, innovations in this field need to report radiologic and clinical results with follow-up of at least 5 to 10 years to prove any superiority.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857132101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1058274610002855</els_id><sourcerecordid>857132101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f08556b0a53f226aaa2eb35611ac86d1844b4fb42babf33873682fb39273c41a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsuKFDEUDaI4M60f4EayEVfV5lGpqlYYkMFRYUDwsQ6p1M10qlNJm6Rm7I_wn03RrYILVzfhnnMf51yEnlGypoQ2r8b1mGDNSPmTdk0ofYDOqeCsagQhD8ubiK5ibd2coYuURkLIpibsMTpjJSM2LTtHPz9Dml1OOBissA7-Dn5UvdI7rGECn2HAOwBXwq0DH-xQMNM--JLC1uN9tJOKBxxShqBi3kabbXqNp1LT6oUfccrzcMD3Nm9LBxOcC_fVvMe3EdSSzlvlscAHUDE9QY-McgmenuIKfbt-9_XqQ3Xz6f3Hq7c3la55mytDOiGanijBDWONUopBz0VDqdJdM9Curvva9DXrVW8471redMz0fMNarmuq-Aq9PNbdx_B9hpTlZJMG55SHMCfZiZbyIhItSHpE6hhSimDkaWVJiVxMkKMsJsjFBElaWUwonOen6nM_wfCH8Vv1AnhxAqiklTNReW3TX1xNNoKUWVfozREHRYs7C1EmbcFrGGwEneUQ7H_HuPyHrZ31tjTcwQHSGOboi8iSysQkkV-Wa1mOhZY7YUVg_gsOrbtP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857132101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Walch, Gilles, MD ; Young, Allan A., MD ; Melis, Barbara, MD ; Gazielly, Dominique, MD ; Loew, Markus, MD ; Boileau, Pascal, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Walch, Gilles, MD ; Young, Allan A., MD ; Melis, Barbara, MD ; Gazielly, Dominique, MD ; Loew, Markus, MD ; Boileau, Pascal, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose We assessed the clinical and radiologic results of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component used with a third-generation prosthesis. Methods Between 1996 and 2003, in 4 European centers, 333 shoulder arthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis by use of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed, and clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score, range of motion, and subjective evaluation. Results At a mean of 89.5 months’ follow-up, the Constant score improved from 31.4 to 67.6 points ( P &lt; .0001). Active forward elevation improved from 94.9° to 146.6° ( P &lt; .0001) and external rotation from 9.0° to 35.3° ( P &lt; .0001). Of the patients, 93.5% were either satisfied or very satisfied. The rate of revision for glenoid loosening was 0.6%; however, the rate of radiologic glenoid loosening was 18.9%. Glenoid survival was 99.7% at 5 years and 98.3% at 10 years with endpoint defined as revision surgery for glenoid loosening and 99.7% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years with endpoint defined as radiologic loosening. Conclusions We showed highly satisfactory clinical outcomes and extremely low rates of revision for glenoid loosening using a cemented convex-back keeled glenoid. There was a concerning rate of radiologic loosening, which only became apparent after 5 years, and this was associated with excessive glenoid reaming. Because radiologic changes are progressive and precede the need for revision, innovations in this field need to report radiologic and clinical results with follow-up of at least 5 to 10 years to prove any superiority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21055972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cementation ; convex ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Follow-Up Studies ; glenoid ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis ; Kaplan-Meier ; keel ; loosening ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation ; revision ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; TSA</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2011-04, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f08556b0a53f226aaa2eb35611ac86d1844b4fb42babf33873682fb39273c41a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f08556b0a53f226aaa2eb35611ac86d1844b4fb42babf33873682fb39273c41a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24095027$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21055972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walch, Gilles, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Allan A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melis, Barbara, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazielly, Dominique, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loew, Markus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boileau, Pascal, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose We assessed the clinical and radiologic results of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component used with a third-generation prosthesis. Methods Between 1996 and 2003, in 4 European centers, 333 shoulder arthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis by use of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed, and clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score, range of motion, and subjective evaluation. Results At a mean of 89.5 months’ follow-up, the Constant score improved from 31.4 to 67.6 points ( P &lt; .0001). Active forward elevation improved from 94.9° to 146.6° ( P &lt; .0001) and external rotation from 9.0° to 35.3° ( P &lt; .0001). Of the patients, 93.5% were either satisfied or very satisfied. The rate of revision for glenoid loosening was 0.6%; however, the rate of radiologic glenoid loosening was 18.9%. Glenoid survival was 99.7% at 5 years and 98.3% at 10 years with endpoint defined as revision surgery for glenoid loosening and 99.7% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years with endpoint defined as radiologic loosening. Conclusions We showed highly satisfactory clinical outcomes and extremely low rates of revision for glenoid loosening using a cemented convex-back keeled glenoid. There was a concerning rate of radiologic loosening, which only became apparent after 5 years, and this was associated with excessive glenoid reaming. Because radiologic changes are progressive and precede the need for revision, innovations in this field need to report radiologic and clinical results with follow-up of at least 5 to 10 years to prove any superiority.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cementation</subject><subject>convex</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>glenoid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier</subject><subject>keel</subject><subject>loosening</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>revision</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>TSA</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsuKFDEUDaI4M60f4EayEVfV5lGpqlYYkMFRYUDwsQ6p1M10qlNJm6Rm7I_wn03RrYILVzfhnnMf51yEnlGypoQ2r8b1mGDNSPmTdk0ofYDOqeCsagQhD8ubiK5ibd2coYuURkLIpibsMTpjJSM2LTtHPz9Dml1OOBissA7-Dn5UvdI7rGECn2HAOwBXwq0DH-xQMNM--JLC1uN9tJOKBxxShqBi3kabbXqNp1LT6oUfccrzcMD3Nm9LBxOcC_fVvMe3EdSSzlvlscAHUDE9QY-McgmenuIKfbt-9_XqQ3Xz6f3Hq7c3la55mytDOiGanijBDWONUopBz0VDqdJdM9Curvva9DXrVW8471redMz0fMNarmuq-Aq9PNbdx_B9hpTlZJMG55SHMCfZiZbyIhItSHpE6hhSimDkaWVJiVxMkKMsJsjFBElaWUwonOen6nM_wfCH8Vv1AnhxAqiklTNReW3TX1xNNoKUWVfozREHRYs7C1EmbcFrGGwEneUQ7H_HuPyHrZ31tjTcwQHSGOboi8iSysQkkV-Wa1mOhZY7YUVg_gsOrbtP</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Walch, Gilles, MD</creator><creator>Young, Allan A., MD</creator><creator>Melis, Barbara, MD</creator><creator>Gazielly, Dominique, MD</creator><creator>Loew, Markus, MD</creator><creator>Boileau, Pascal, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years</title><author>Walch, Gilles, MD ; Young, Allan A., MD ; Melis, Barbara, MD ; Gazielly, Dominique, MD ; Loew, Markus, MD ; Boileau, Pascal, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f08556b0a53f226aaa2eb35611ac86d1844b4fb42babf33873682fb39273c41a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cementation</topic><topic>convex</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>glenoid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier</topic><topic>keel</topic><topic>loosening</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>revision</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>TSA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walch, Gilles, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Allan A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melis, Barbara, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazielly, Dominique, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loew, Markus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boileau, Pascal, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walch, Gilles, MD</au><au>Young, Allan A., MD</au><au>Melis, Barbara, MD</au><au>Gazielly, Dominique, MD</au><au>Loew, Markus, MD</au><au>Boileau, Pascal, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>385-394</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Purpose We assessed the clinical and radiologic results of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component used with a third-generation prosthesis. Methods Between 1996 and 2003, in 4 European centers, 333 shoulder arthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis by use of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed, and clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score, range of motion, and subjective evaluation. Results At a mean of 89.5 months’ follow-up, the Constant score improved from 31.4 to 67.6 points ( P &lt; .0001). Active forward elevation improved from 94.9° to 146.6° ( P &lt; .0001) and external rotation from 9.0° to 35.3° ( P &lt; .0001). Of the patients, 93.5% were either satisfied or very satisfied. The rate of revision for glenoid loosening was 0.6%; however, the rate of radiologic glenoid loosening was 18.9%. Glenoid survival was 99.7% at 5 years and 98.3% at 10 years with endpoint defined as revision surgery for glenoid loosening and 99.7% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years with endpoint defined as radiologic loosening. Conclusions We showed highly satisfactory clinical outcomes and extremely low rates of revision for glenoid loosening using a cemented convex-back keeled glenoid. There was a concerning rate of radiologic loosening, which only became apparent after 5 years, and this was associated with excessive glenoid reaming. Because radiologic changes are progressive and precede the need for revision, innovations in this field need to report radiologic and clinical results with follow-up of at least 5 to 10 years to prove any superiority.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21055972</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2011-04, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857132101
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement
Biological and medical sciences
Cementation
convex
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Follow-Up Studies
glenoid
Humans
Joint Prosthesis
Kaplan-Meier
keel
loosening
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Reoperation
revision
Shoulder Joint - surgery
TSA
title Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T02%3A01%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20a%20convex-back%20cemented%20keeled%20glenoid%20component%20in%20primary%20osteoarthritis:%20multicenter%20study%20with%20a%20follow-up%20greater%20than%205%20years&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Walch,%20Gilles,%20MD&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=385-394&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E857132101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857132101&rft_id=info:pmid/21055972&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1058274610002855&rfr_iscdi=true