Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level

Therapeutic proteins provide innovative and effective therapies for numerous diseases. However, some of these products are associated with unwanted immunogenicity that may lead to clinical consequences such as reduced or loss of efficacy, altered pharmacokinetics (PK), general immune and hypersensit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biologicals 2011-03, Vol.39 (2), p.100-109
Hauptverfasser: Büttel, I.C., Chamberlain, P., Chowers, Y., Ehmann, F., Greinacher, A., Jefferis, R., Kramer, D., Kropshofer, H., Lloyd, P., Lubiniecki, A., Krause, R., Mire-Sluis, A., Platts-Mills, T., Ragheb, J.A., Reipert, B.M., Schellekens, H., Seitz, R., Stas, P., Subramanyam, M., Thorpe, R., Trouvin, J.-H., Weise, M., Windisch, J., Schneider, C.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 2
container_start_page 100
container_title Biologicals
container_volume 39
creator Büttel, I.C.
Chamberlain, P.
Chowers, Y.
Ehmann, F.
Greinacher, A.
Jefferis, R.
Kramer, D.
Kropshofer, H.
Lloyd, P.
Lubiniecki, A.
Krause, R.
Mire-Sluis, A.
Platts-Mills, T.
Ragheb, J.A.
Reipert, B.M.
Schellekens, H.
Seitz, R.
Stas, P.
Subramanyam, M.
Thorpe, R.
Trouvin, J.-H.
Weise, M.
Windisch, J.
Schneider, C.K.
description Therapeutic proteins provide innovative and effective therapies for numerous diseases. However, some of these products are associated with unwanted immunogenicity that may lead to clinical consequences such as reduced or loss of efficacy, altered pharmacokinetics (PK), general immune and hypersensitivity reactions, and neutralisation of the natural counterpart (e.g. the physiological hormone). Regulatory guidance on immunogenicity assessment needs to take into consideration a great diversity of products, indications and patient populations as well as constantly advancing manufacturing technologies. Such guidance needs to be sufficiently specific while, at the same time, allowing interactive discussion and adjusted benefit-risk weighing of each product on a case-by-case basis, e.g. for a unique treatment of a life threatening disease acceptable treatment risks may differ considerably from the ones in case of less serious disease. This theme was the focus of the international conference “Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level”, held at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut in Langen, Germany, on the 10–11. June 2010. The objectives of the conference were to highlight how the field could move from that of a mere description of risk factors to a system of risk assessment and mitigation, as well as an understanding of the impact of unwanted immunogenicity on the overall benefit/risk consideration for a medicinal product. More than 150 experts from industry, academia and regulatory authorities worldwide discussed the phenomenon of undesired immunogenicity from different perspectives. The conference focussed on issues relevant to three areas: (1) new European guidelines that are currently the subject of discussion; (2) testing strategies for immunogenicity assessment; and (3) scientific progress on the product-related factors that may contribute to the development of pathogenesis of immunogenicity, in particular in the field of protein aggregation and post-translational modifications. This report provides an overview of issues, insights, and conclusions that were discussed and achieved during the meeting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.01.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857130387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1045105611000224</els_id><sourcerecordid>857130387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-bf3e3200e5422a3c2848a84a7b6cd49e7c00a6dd8cb71dc2c8f9e5a9e531ecea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCxBWrFLGcZzHElU8VYkF7dpynElxSeJiOwj-HlctiCXSWLasMzNXh5BLClMKNLteTyttWrPSSrZumgClUwgF2QEZUyh5XLAEDrfvlMcUeDYiJ86tIYBpnh6TUUIZZ7zMxuRpId90v4p01w29WWGvlfZfkXQOneuw95FpIv-KVm5w8FpFG2s86t5F3mz_ox4_fdTiB7an5KgJefBsf0_I8u52MXuI58_3j7ObeaxSAB9XDcMQD5CnSSKZSoq0kEUq8ypTdVpirgBkVteFqnJaq0QVTYlchsMoKpRsQq52c0OU9wGdF512CttW9mgGJwqeUwasyANZ7khljXMWG7GxupP2S1AQW5NiLf6YFFuTAkJBFnrP91uGqsP6t_NHXQAudkAjjZArq51YvoQJPGjOOARuQmY7AoOND41WOKWxV1hri8qL2uh_BPkGvLiVdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857130387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Büttel, I.C. ; Chamberlain, P. ; Chowers, Y. ; Ehmann, F. ; Greinacher, A. ; Jefferis, R. ; Kramer, D. ; Kropshofer, H. ; Lloyd, P. ; Lubiniecki, A. ; Krause, R. ; Mire-Sluis, A. ; Platts-Mills, T. ; Ragheb, J.A. ; Reipert, B.M. ; Schellekens, H. ; Seitz, R. ; Stas, P. ; Subramanyam, M. ; Thorpe, R. ; Trouvin, J.-H. ; Weise, M. ; Windisch, J. ; Schneider, C.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Büttel, I.C. ; Chamberlain, P. ; Chowers, Y. ; Ehmann, F. ; Greinacher, A. ; Jefferis, R. ; Kramer, D. ; Kropshofer, H. ; Lloyd, P. ; Lubiniecki, A. ; Krause, R. ; Mire-Sluis, A. ; Platts-Mills, T. ; Ragheb, J.A. ; Reipert, B.M. ; Schellekens, H. ; Seitz, R. ; Stas, P. ; Subramanyam, M. ; Thorpe, R. ; Trouvin, J.-H. ; Weise, M. ; Windisch, J. ; Schneider, C.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Therapeutic proteins provide innovative and effective therapies for numerous diseases. However, some of these products are associated with unwanted immunogenicity that may lead to clinical consequences such as reduced or loss of efficacy, altered pharmacokinetics (PK), general immune and hypersensitivity reactions, and neutralisation of the natural counterpart (e.g. the physiological hormone). Regulatory guidance on immunogenicity assessment needs to take into consideration a great diversity of products, indications and patient populations as well as constantly advancing manufacturing technologies. Such guidance needs to be sufficiently specific while, at the same time, allowing interactive discussion and adjusted benefit-risk weighing of each product on a case-by-case basis, e.g. for a unique treatment of a life threatening disease acceptable treatment risks may differ considerably from the ones in case of less serious disease. This theme was the focus of the international conference “Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level”, held at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut in Langen, Germany, on the 10–11. June 2010. The objectives of the conference were to highlight how the field could move from that of a mere description of risk factors to a system of risk assessment and mitigation, as well as an understanding of the impact of unwanted immunogenicity on the overall benefit/risk consideration for a medicinal product. More than 150 experts from industry, academia and regulatory authorities worldwide discussed the phenomenon of undesired immunogenicity from different perspectives. The conference focussed on issues relevant to three areas: (1) new European guidelines that are currently the subject of discussion; (2) testing strategies for immunogenicity assessment; and (3) scientific progress on the product-related factors that may contribute to the development of pathogenesis of immunogenicity, in particular in the field of protein aggregation and post-translational modifications. This report provides an overview of issues, insights, and conclusions that were discussed and achieved during the meeting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-1056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.01.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21353596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; Antibody Formation - physiology ; Benefit/risk consideration ; Biological Products - adverse effects ; Biological Products - immunology ; biopharmaceuticals ; Biosimilars ; Congresses as Topic ; Drug Evaluation - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Drug Evaluation - methods ; Drug Evaluation - trends ; Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; experts ; guidelines ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; hypersensitivity ; immune response ; Immunity, Innate - drug effects ; Immunogenicity ; Legislation, Drug ; manufacturing ; Models, Biological ; needs assessment ; neutralization ; pathogenesis ; patients ; pharmacokinetics ; post-translational modification ; Protein Processing, Post-Translational ; Proteins - adverse effects ; Proteins - immunology ; Regulatory guidance ; risk description ; risk factors ; Risk-based approach</subject><ispartof>Biologicals, 2011-03, Vol.39 (2), p.100-109</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-bf3e3200e5422a3c2848a84a7b6cd49e7c00a6dd8cb71dc2c8f9e5a9e531ecea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-bf3e3200e5422a3c2848a84a7b6cd49e7c00a6dd8cb71dc2c8f9e5a9e531ecea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105611000224$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21353596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Büttel, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowers, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehmann, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greinacher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropshofer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubiniecki, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mire-Sluis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platts-Mills, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragheb, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reipert, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellekens, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stas, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramanyam, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouvin, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weise, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windisch, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, C.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level</title><title>Biologicals</title><addtitle>Biologicals</addtitle><description>Therapeutic proteins provide innovative and effective therapies for numerous diseases. However, some of these products are associated with unwanted immunogenicity that may lead to clinical consequences such as reduced or loss of efficacy, altered pharmacokinetics (PK), general immune and hypersensitivity reactions, and neutralisation of the natural counterpart (e.g. the physiological hormone). Regulatory guidance on immunogenicity assessment needs to take into consideration a great diversity of products, indications and patient populations as well as constantly advancing manufacturing technologies. Such guidance needs to be sufficiently specific while, at the same time, allowing interactive discussion and adjusted benefit-risk weighing of each product on a case-by-case basis, e.g. for a unique treatment of a life threatening disease acceptable treatment risks may differ considerably from the ones in case of less serious disease. This theme was the focus of the international conference “Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level”, held at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut in Langen, Germany, on the 10–11. June 2010. The objectives of the conference were to highlight how the field could move from that of a mere description of risk factors to a system of risk assessment and mitigation, as well as an understanding of the impact of unwanted immunogenicity on the overall benefit/risk consideration for a medicinal product. More than 150 experts from industry, academia and regulatory authorities worldwide discussed the phenomenon of undesired immunogenicity from different perspectives. The conference focussed on issues relevant to three areas: (1) new European guidelines that are currently the subject of discussion; (2) testing strategies for immunogenicity assessment; and (3) scientific progress on the product-related factors that may contribute to the development of pathogenesis of immunogenicity, in particular in the field of protein aggregation and post-translational modifications. This report provides an overview of issues, insights, and conclusions that were discussed and achieved during the meeting.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibody Formation - physiology</subject><subject>Benefit/risk consideration</subject><subject>Biological Products - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological Products - immunology</subject><subject>biopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Biosimilars</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation - trends</subject><subject>Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>experts</subject><subject>guidelines</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypersensitivity</subject><subject>immune response</subject><subject>Immunity, Innate - drug effects</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Legislation, Drug</subject><subject>manufacturing</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>needs assessment</subject><subject>neutralization</subject><subject>pathogenesis</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>post-translational modification</subject><subject>Protein Processing, Post-Translational</subject><subject>Proteins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Regulatory guidance</subject><subject>risk description</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><subject>Risk-based approach</subject><issn>1045-1056</issn><issn>1095-8320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCxBWrFLGcZzHElU8VYkF7dpynElxSeJiOwj-HlctiCXSWLasMzNXh5BLClMKNLteTyttWrPSSrZumgClUwgF2QEZUyh5XLAEDrfvlMcUeDYiJ86tIYBpnh6TUUIZZ7zMxuRpId90v4p01w29WWGvlfZfkXQOneuw95FpIv-KVm5w8FpFG2s86t5F3mz_ox4_fdTiB7an5KgJefBsf0_I8u52MXuI58_3j7ObeaxSAB9XDcMQD5CnSSKZSoq0kEUq8ypTdVpirgBkVteFqnJaq0QVTYlchsMoKpRsQq52c0OU9wGdF512CttW9mgGJwqeUwasyANZ7khljXMWG7GxupP2S1AQW5NiLf6YFFuTAkJBFnrP91uGqsP6t_NHXQAudkAjjZArq51YvoQJPGjOOARuQmY7AoOND41WOKWxV1hri8qL2uh_BPkGvLiVdQ</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Büttel, I.C.</creator><creator>Chamberlain, P.</creator><creator>Chowers, Y.</creator><creator>Ehmann, F.</creator><creator>Greinacher, A.</creator><creator>Jefferis, R.</creator><creator>Kramer, D.</creator><creator>Kropshofer, H.</creator><creator>Lloyd, P.</creator><creator>Lubiniecki, A.</creator><creator>Krause, R.</creator><creator>Mire-Sluis, A.</creator><creator>Platts-Mills, T.</creator><creator>Ragheb, J.A.</creator><creator>Reipert, B.M.</creator><creator>Schellekens, H.</creator><creator>Seitz, R.</creator><creator>Stas, P.</creator><creator>Subramanyam, M.</creator><creator>Thorpe, R.</creator><creator>Trouvin, J.-H.</creator><creator>Weise, M.</creator><creator>Windisch, J.</creator><creator>Schneider, C.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level</title><author>Büttel, I.C. ; Chamberlain, P. ; Chowers, Y. ; Ehmann, F. ; Greinacher, A. ; Jefferis, R. ; Kramer, D. ; Kropshofer, H. ; Lloyd, P. ; Lubiniecki, A. ; Krause, R. ; Mire-Sluis, A. ; Platts-Mills, T. ; Ragheb, J.A. ; Reipert, B.M. ; Schellekens, H. ; Seitz, R. ; Stas, P. ; Subramanyam, M. ; Thorpe, R. ; Trouvin, J.-H. ; Weise, M. ; Windisch, J. ; Schneider, C.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-bf3e3200e5422a3c2848a84a7b6cd49e7c00a6dd8cb71dc2c8f9e5a9e531ecea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibody Formation - physiology</topic><topic>Benefit/risk consideration</topic><topic>Biological Products - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological Products - immunology</topic><topic>biopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Biosimilars</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation - trends</topic><topic>Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>experts</topic><topic>guidelines</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypersensitivity</topic><topic>immune response</topic><topic>Immunity, Innate - drug effects</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Legislation, Drug</topic><topic>manufacturing</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>needs assessment</topic><topic>neutralization</topic><topic>pathogenesis</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>post-translational modification</topic><topic>Protein Processing, Post-Translational</topic><topic>Proteins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Regulatory guidance</topic><topic>risk description</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>Risk-based approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Büttel, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowers, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehmann, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greinacher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropshofer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubiniecki, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mire-Sluis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platts-Mills, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragheb, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reipert, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellekens, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stas, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramanyam, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouvin, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weise, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windisch, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, C.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biologicals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Büttel, I.C.</au><au>Chamberlain, P.</au><au>Chowers, Y.</au><au>Ehmann, F.</au><au>Greinacher, A.</au><au>Jefferis, R.</au><au>Kramer, D.</au><au>Kropshofer, H.</au><au>Lloyd, P.</au><au>Lubiniecki, A.</au><au>Krause, R.</au><au>Mire-Sluis, A.</au><au>Platts-Mills, T.</au><au>Ragheb, J.A.</au><au>Reipert, B.M.</au><au>Schellekens, H.</au><au>Seitz, R.</au><au>Stas, P.</au><au>Subramanyam, M.</au><au>Thorpe, R.</au><au>Trouvin, J.-H.</au><au>Weise, M.</au><au>Windisch, J.</au><au>Schneider, C.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level</atitle><jtitle>Biologicals</jtitle><addtitle>Biologicals</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>100-109</pages><issn>1045-1056</issn><eissn>1095-8320</eissn><abstract>Therapeutic proteins provide innovative and effective therapies for numerous diseases. However, some of these products are associated with unwanted immunogenicity that may lead to clinical consequences such as reduced or loss of efficacy, altered pharmacokinetics (PK), general immune and hypersensitivity reactions, and neutralisation of the natural counterpart (e.g. the physiological hormone). Regulatory guidance on immunogenicity assessment needs to take into consideration a great diversity of products, indications and patient populations as well as constantly advancing manufacturing technologies. Such guidance needs to be sufficiently specific while, at the same time, allowing interactive discussion and adjusted benefit-risk weighing of each product on a case-by-case basis, e.g. for a unique treatment of a life threatening disease acceptable treatment risks may differ considerably from the ones in case of less serious disease. This theme was the focus of the international conference “Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level”, held at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut in Langen, Germany, on the 10–11. June 2010. The objectives of the conference were to highlight how the field could move from that of a mere description of risk factors to a system of risk assessment and mitigation, as well as an understanding of the impact of unwanted immunogenicity on the overall benefit/risk consideration for a medicinal product. More than 150 experts from industry, academia and regulatory authorities worldwide discussed the phenomenon of undesired immunogenicity from different perspectives. The conference focussed on issues relevant to three areas: (1) new European guidelines that are currently the subject of discussion; (2) testing strategies for immunogenicity assessment; and (3) scientific progress on the product-related factors that may contribute to the development of pathogenesis of immunogenicity, in particular in the field of protein aggregation and post-translational modifications. This report provides an overview of issues, insights, and conclusions that were discussed and achieved during the meeting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21353596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.01.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-1056
ispartof Biologicals, 2011-03, Vol.39 (2), p.100-109
issn 1045-1056
1095-8320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857130387
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Animals
Antibody Formation - physiology
Benefit/risk consideration
Biological Products - adverse effects
Biological Products - immunology
biopharmaceuticals
Biosimilars
Congresses as Topic
Drug Evaluation - legislation & jurisprudence
Drug Evaluation - methods
Drug Evaluation - trends
Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
experts
guidelines
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
hypersensitivity
immune response
Immunity, Innate - drug effects
Immunogenicity
Legislation, Drug
manufacturing
Models, Biological
needs assessment
neutralization
pathogenesis
patients
pharmacokinetics
post-translational modification
Protein Processing, Post-Translational
Proteins - adverse effects
Proteins - immunology
Regulatory guidance
risk description
risk factors
Risk-based approach
title Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A55%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking%20immunogenicity%20assessment%20of%20therapeutic%20proteins%20to%20the%20next%20level&rft.jtitle=Biologicals&rft.au=B%C3%BCttel,%20I.C.&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=100-109&rft.issn=1045-1056&rft.eissn=1095-8320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.01.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E857130387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857130387&rft_id=info:pmid/21353596&rft_els_id=S1045105611000224&rfr_iscdi=true