Towards a Democratic Bill of Rights
This paper examines two different bill of rights models for Australia: the Dialogue model and a Democratic model. The Dialogue model aims to protect rights through a bill of rights, strong political review mechanisms, intergovernmental dialogue, and rights-based judicial review. The paper argues tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian journal of political science 2011-03, Vol.46 (1), p.71-86 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 86 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Australian journal of political science |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Barry, Nicholas Campbell, Tom |
description | This paper examines two different bill of rights models for Australia: the Dialogue model and a Democratic model. The Dialogue model aims to protect rights through a bill of rights, strong political review mechanisms, intergovernmental dialogue, and rights-based judicial review. The paper argues that, despite its popularity, there are serious problems with the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Dialogue model and it outlines an alternative model, a 'democratic bill of rights', which attempts to avoid these problems by strengthening democratic institutions and political review mechanisms without adopting rights-based judicial review. The paper concludes that a democratic bill of rights is likely to be an effective and more democratically legitimate way of protecting and promoting human rights in Australia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10361146.2010.544288 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857122498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20111802</informt_id><sourcerecordid>875715897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-d081954daf8388d6458b51ffddae9f1fc8e5662e5bbc3cdcc4ced09d55b907db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LwzAAhosoOKf_wEPRg6fOpEm69CQ6nQoDQSZ4C2k-toyuqUnG2L83tXrZQT0lJM_7wPsmyTkEIwgouIYAFRDiYpSD-EQwzik9SAYQFSgDCLwfxntEso45Tk68XwEAc1wWg-RybrfcSZ_y9F6trXA8GJHembpOrU5fzWIZ_GlypHnt1dn3OUzepg_zyVM2e3l8ntzOMkFyHDIJKCwJllxTRKksMKEVgVpLyVWpoRZUkaLIFakqgYQUAgslQSkJqUowlhUaJle9t3X2Y6N8YGvjhapr3ii78YyOyRgSWo7_JiOYx4I0khd75MpuXBNrRAgDFHfpdLiHhLPeO6VZ68yaux2DgHULs5-FWbcw6xeOsWkfc2sTGG-5DmwZQuuZ5IEz02j79WPdgklrOhlCsGBG1RHuVJ2WgH3Rwvj2f6ZvtDNBCvIouulFfYJvraslC3xXW6cdb4TxDP3a6RNOdrGx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854031037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a Democratic Bill of Rights</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Barry, Nicholas ; Campbell, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Barry, Nicholas ; Campbell, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines two different bill of rights models for Australia: the Dialogue model and a Democratic model. The Dialogue model aims to protect rights through a bill of rights, strong political review mechanisms, intergovernmental dialogue, and rights-based judicial review. The paper argues that, despite its popularity, there are serious problems with the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Dialogue model and it outlines an alternative model, a 'democratic bill of rights', which attempts to avoid these problems by strengthening democratic institutions and political review mechanisms without adopting rights-based judicial review. The paper concludes that a democratic bill of rights is likely to be an effective and more democratically legitimate way of protecting and promoting human rights in Australia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1036-1146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1363-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2010.544288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Australia ; Australia: Law and legislation ; Basic rights ; BILL OF RIGHTS ; Civil rights ; Democracy ; Democratic model ; Dialogue model ; GOVERNMENT ; HUMAN RIGHTS ; Judicial review ; Legal protection ; Legislation ; Legitimacy ; PARLIAMENT ; Political instability</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of political science, 2011-03, Vol.46 (1), p.71-86</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Mar 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-d081954daf8388d6458b51ffddae9f1fc8e5662e5bbc3cdcc4ced09d55b907db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-d081954daf8388d6458b51ffddae9f1fc8e5662e5bbc3cdcc4ced09d55b907db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barry, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a Democratic Bill of Rights</title><title>Australian journal of political science</title><description>This paper examines two different bill of rights models for Australia: the Dialogue model and a Democratic model. The Dialogue model aims to protect rights through a bill of rights, strong political review mechanisms, intergovernmental dialogue, and rights-based judicial review. The paper argues that, despite its popularity, there are serious problems with the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Dialogue model and it outlines an alternative model, a 'democratic bill of rights', which attempts to avoid these problems by strengthening democratic institutions and political review mechanisms without adopting rights-based judicial review. The paper concludes that a democratic bill of rights is likely to be an effective and more democratically legitimate way of protecting and promoting human rights in Australia.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia: Law and legislation</subject><subject>Basic rights</subject><subject>BILL OF RIGHTS</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratic model</subject><subject>Dialogue model</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>HUMAN RIGHTS</subject><subject>Judicial review</subject><subject>Legal protection</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>PARLIAMENT</subject><subject>Political instability</subject><issn>1036-1146</issn><issn>1363-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LwzAAhosoOKf_wEPRg6fOpEm69CQ6nQoDQSZ4C2k-toyuqUnG2L83tXrZQT0lJM_7wPsmyTkEIwgouIYAFRDiYpSD-EQwzik9SAYQFSgDCLwfxntEso45Tk68XwEAc1wWg-RybrfcSZ_y9F6trXA8GJHembpOrU5fzWIZ_GlypHnt1dn3OUzepg_zyVM2e3l8ntzOMkFyHDIJKCwJllxTRKksMKEVgVpLyVWpoRZUkaLIFakqgYQUAgslQSkJqUowlhUaJle9t3X2Y6N8YGvjhapr3ii78YyOyRgSWo7_JiOYx4I0khd75MpuXBNrRAgDFHfpdLiHhLPeO6VZ68yaux2DgHULs5-FWbcw6xeOsWkfc2sTGG-5DmwZQuuZ5IEz02j79WPdgklrOhlCsGBG1RHuVJ2WgH3Rwvj2f6ZvtDNBCvIouulFfYJvraslC3xXW6cdb4TxDP3a6RNOdrGx</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Barry, Nicholas</creator><creator>Campbell, Tom</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Towards a Democratic Bill of Rights</title><author>Barry, Nicholas ; Campbell, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-d081954daf8388d6458b51ffddae9f1fc8e5662e5bbc3cdcc4ced09d55b907db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia: Law and legislation</topic><topic>Basic rights</topic><topic>BILL OF RIGHTS</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratic model</topic><topic>Dialogue model</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>HUMAN RIGHTS</topic><topic>Judicial review</topic><topic>Legal protection</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>PARLIAMENT</topic><topic>Political instability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barry, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barry, Nicholas</au><au>Campbell, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a Democratic Bill of Rights</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of political science</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>71-86</pages><issn>1036-1146</issn><eissn>1363-030X</eissn><abstract>This paper examines two different bill of rights models for Australia: the Dialogue model and a Democratic model. The Dialogue model aims to protect rights through a bill of rights, strong political review mechanisms, intergovernmental dialogue, and rights-based judicial review. The paper argues that, despite its popularity, there are serious problems with the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Dialogue model and it outlines an alternative model, a 'democratic bill of rights', which attempts to avoid these problems by strengthening democratic institutions and political review mechanisms without adopting rights-based judicial review. The paper concludes that a democratic bill of rights is likely to be an effective and more democratically legitimate way of protecting and promoting human rights in Australia.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10361146.2010.544288</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1036-1146 |
ispartof | Australian journal of political science, 2011-03, Vol.46 (1), p.71-86 |
issn | 1036-1146 1363-030X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857122498 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Australia Australia: Law and legislation Basic rights BILL OF RIGHTS Civil rights Democracy Democratic model Dialogue model GOVERNMENT HUMAN RIGHTS Judicial review Legal protection Legislation Legitimacy PARLIAMENT Political instability |
title | Towards a Democratic Bill of Rights |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20Democratic%20Bill%20of%20Rights&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Barry,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=71-86&rft.issn=1036-1146&rft.eissn=1363-030X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10361146.2010.544288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E875715897%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854031037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20111802&rfr_iscdi=true |