Optimism and firm formation
This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is kno...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic theory 2011, Vol.46 (1), p.1-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Economic theory |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Rigotti, Luca Ryan, Matthew Vaithianathan, Rhema |
description | This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857120093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A380342114</galeid><jstor_id>41485804</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A380342114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYNYcN32B4iIi33oS6fe3CQzmcdSbBUKfWj7HJKZzJhlZ7LmzkD992YZUSsiIQkk37m5J4exNxwuOED1kQB4XRcAeSrgxdMLtuJSYAGyql-yFdRCF4iqfsVeE20BQKlSr9jbu_0UhkDDxo7tpgtp2HQxDXYKcTxmR53dkT_5ua_Z4_Wnh6vPxe3dzZery9uiUSVMRet0p0RVelFqVBIdola-ktohR-m9tahKIeqmtmXbeo9OKeeccNBU2LZOrNnZUnef4rfZ02RyQ43f7ezo40xGq4pjdiYy-eEvchvnNObmjEZeSaEkZOh0gXq78yaMXZySbQ4lzaXQICTy_DNrdvEPKo_WD6GJo-9CPn8mOP9D4GYKo6e8UOi_TtTbmeg5zhe8SZEo-c7sUxhs-m44mENkZonMZGPmEJl5yhpcNJTZsffpt73_id4toi1NMf16RXKplYZDI--X-85GY_sUyDzeI3CRC6FQlRA_ADjcp_k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821743540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimism and firm formation</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rigotti, Luca ; Ryan, Matthew ; Vaithianathan, Rhema</creator><creatorcontrib>Rigotti, Luca ; Ryan, Matthew ; Vaithianathan, Rhema</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-2259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Belief function ; Career choice ; diffusion ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Emerging technology ; Enterprises ; Entrepreneur ; Entrepreneurs ; Equilibrium ; Expected utility ; Game Theory ; Growth industries ; Industrial market ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Labor market ; Microeconomics ; Optimism ; Optimism/pessimism ; Pessimism ; Public Finance ; Research Article ; Revenue ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Startups ; Studies ; Technological innovation ; Technological planning ; Technology ; Wages ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Economic theory, 2011, Vol.46 (1), p.1-38</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41485804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41485804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rigotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaithianathan, Rhema</creatorcontrib><title>Optimism and firm formation</title><title>Economic theory</title><addtitle>Econ Theory</addtitle><description>This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Belief function</subject><subject>Career choice</subject><subject>diffusion</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Emerging technology</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Entrepreneur</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Growth industries</subject><subject>Industrial market</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Optimism</subject><subject>Optimism/pessimism</subject><subject>Pessimism</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technological planning</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0938-2259</issn><issn>1432-0479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYNYcN32B4iIi33oS6fe3CQzmcdSbBUKfWj7HJKZzJhlZ7LmzkD992YZUSsiIQkk37m5J4exNxwuOED1kQB4XRcAeSrgxdMLtuJSYAGyql-yFdRCF4iqfsVeE20BQKlSr9jbu_0UhkDDxo7tpgtp2HQxDXYKcTxmR53dkT_5ua_Z4_Wnh6vPxe3dzZery9uiUSVMRet0p0RVelFqVBIdola-ktohR-m9tahKIeqmtmXbeo9OKeeccNBU2LZOrNnZUnef4rfZ02RyQ43f7ezo40xGq4pjdiYy-eEvchvnNObmjEZeSaEkZOh0gXq78yaMXZySbQ4lzaXQICTy_DNrdvEPKo_WD6GJo-9CPn8mOP9D4GYKo6e8UOi_TtTbmeg5zhe8SZEo-c7sUxhs-m44mENkZonMZGPmEJl5yhpcNJTZsffpt73_id4toi1NMf16RXKplYZDI--X-85GY_sUyDzeI3CRC6FQlRA_ADjcp_k</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Rigotti, Luca</creator><creator>Ryan, Matthew</creator><creator>Vaithianathan, Rhema</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Optimism and firm formation</title><author>Rigotti, Luca ; Ryan, Matthew ; Vaithianathan, Rhema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Belief function</topic><topic>Career choice</topic><topic>diffusion</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Emerging technology</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Entrepreneur</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Growth industries</topic><topic>Industrial market</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Optimism</topic><topic>Optimism/pessimism</topic><topic>Pessimism</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technological planning</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rigotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaithianathan, Rhema</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Economic theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rigotti, Luca</au><au>Ryan, Matthew</au><au>Vaithianathan, Rhema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimism and firm formation</atitle><jtitle>Economic theory</jtitle><stitle>Econ Theory</stitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>1-38</pages><issn>0938-2259</issn><eissn>1432-0479</eissn><abstract>This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-2259 |
ispartof | Economic theory, 2011, Vol.46 (1), p.1-38 |
issn | 0938-2259 1432-0479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857120093 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Ambiguity Belief function Career choice diffusion Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Emerging technology Enterprises Entrepreneur Entrepreneurs Equilibrium Expected utility Game Theory Growth industries Industrial market Innovation Innovations Labor market Microeconomics Optimism Optimism/pessimism Pessimism Public Finance Research Article Revenue Social and Behav. Sciences Startups Studies Technological innovation Technological planning Technology Wages Workers |
title | Optimism and firm formation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimism%20and%20firm%20formation&rft.jtitle=Economic%20theory&rft.au=Rigotti,%20Luca&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=1-38&rft.issn=0938-2259&rft.eissn=1432-0479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA380342114%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821743540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A380342114&rft_jstor_id=41485804&rfr_iscdi=true |