Optimism and firm formation

This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is kno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic theory 2011, Vol.46 (1), p.1-38
Hauptverfasser: Rigotti, Luca, Ryan, Matthew, Vaithianathan, Rhema
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Economic theory
container_volume 46
creator Rigotti, Luca
Ryan, Matthew
Vaithianathan, Rhema
description This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857120093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A380342114</galeid><jstor_id>41485804</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A380342114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYNYcN32B4iIi33oS6fe3CQzmcdSbBUKfWj7HJKZzJhlZ7LmzkD992YZUSsiIQkk37m5J4exNxwuOED1kQB4XRcAeSrgxdMLtuJSYAGyql-yFdRCF4iqfsVeE20BQKlSr9jbu_0UhkDDxo7tpgtp2HQxDXYKcTxmR53dkT_5ua_Z4_Wnh6vPxe3dzZery9uiUSVMRet0p0RVelFqVBIdola-ktohR-m9tahKIeqmtmXbeo9OKeeccNBU2LZOrNnZUnef4rfZ02RyQ43f7ezo40xGq4pjdiYy-eEvchvnNObmjEZeSaEkZOh0gXq78yaMXZySbQ4lzaXQICTy_DNrdvEPKo_WD6GJo-9CPn8mOP9D4GYKo6e8UOi_TtTbmeg5zhe8SZEo-c7sUxhs-m44mENkZonMZGPmEJl5yhpcNJTZsffpt73_id4toi1NMf16RXKplYZDI--X-85GY_sUyDzeI3CRC6FQlRA_ADjcp_k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821743540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimism and firm formation</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rigotti, Luca ; Ryan, Matthew ; Vaithianathan, Rhema</creator><creatorcontrib>Rigotti, Luca ; Ryan, Matthew ; Vaithianathan, Rhema</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-2259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Belief function ; Career choice ; diffusion ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Emerging technology ; Enterprises ; Entrepreneur ; Entrepreneurs ; Equilibrium ; Expected utility ; Game Theory ; Growth industries ; Industrial market ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Labor market ; Microeconomics ; Optimism ; Optimism/pessimism ; Pessimism ; Public Finance ; Research Article ; Revenue ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Startups ; Studies ; Technological innovation ; Technological planning ; Technology ; Wages ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Economic theory, 2011, Vol.46 (1), p.1-38</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41485804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41485804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rigotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaithianathan, Rhema</creatorcontrib><title>Optimism and firm formation</title><title>Economic theory</title><addtitle>Econ Theory</addtitle><description>This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Belief function</subject><subject>Career choice</subject><subject>diffusion</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Emerging technology</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Entrepreneur</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Growth industries</subject><subject>Industrial market</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Optimism</subject><subject>Optimism/pessimism</subject><subject>Pessimism</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technological planning</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0938-2259</issn><issn>1432-0479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYNYcN32B4iIi33oS6fe3CQzmcdSbBUKfWj7HJKZzJhlZ7LmzkD992YZUSsiIQkk37m5J4exNxwuOED1kQB4XRcAeSrgxdMLtuJSYAGyql-yFdRCF4iqfsVeE20BQKlSr9jbu_0UhkDDxo7tpgtp2HQxDXYKcTxmR53dkT_5ua_Z4_Wnh6vPxe3dzZery9uiUSVMRet0p0RVelFqVBIdola-ktohR-m9tahKIeqmtmXbeo9OKeeccNBU2LZOrNnZUnef4rfZ02RyQ43f7ezo40xGq4pjdiYy-eEvchvnNObmjEZeSaEkZOh0gXq78yaMXZySbQ4lzaXQICTy_DNrdvEPKo_WD6GJo-9CPn8mOP9D4GYKo6e8UOi_TtTbmeg5zhe8SZEo-c7sUxhs-m44mENkZonMZGPmEJl5yhpcNJTZsffpt73_id4toi1NMf16RXKplYZDI--X-85GY_sUyDzeI3CRC6FQlRA_ADjcp_k</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Rigotti, Luca</creator><creator>Ryan, Matthew</creator><creator>Vaithianathan, Rhema</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Optimism and firm formation</title><author>Rigotti, Luca ; Ryan, Matthew ; Vaithianathan, Rhema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-db8f5376e3682542b2285e748b2124eeaa256339c9a6ddee2b55bbb3b0c72ddb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Belief function</topic><topic>Career choice</topic><topic>diffusion</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Emerging technology</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Entrepreneur</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Growth industries</topic><topic>Industrial market</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Optimism</topic><topic>Optimism/pessimism</topic><topic>Pessimism</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technological planning</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rigotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaithianathan, Rhema</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Economic theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rigotti, Luca</au><au>Ryan, Matthew</au><au>Vaithianathan, Rhema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimism and firm formation</atitle><jtitle>Economic theory</jtitle><stitle>Econ Theory</stitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>1-38</pages><issn>0938-2259</issn><eissn>1432-0479</eissn><abstract>This paper analyses firm formation and innovation in an economy where agents differ with respect to their optimism in the face of ambiguity. Individuals choose between starting a firm or working in one; and also between employing a traditional technology or a new technology about which little is known. In the face of ambiguity, decision-makers are either optimistic or pessimistic. We study the innovation-proof equilibria of the economy: wages clear all labor markets when agents make optimal occupational choices, and no mutually beneficial opportunity for innovation remains unexploited. In equilibrium, optimists are more likely to form firms, but also more likely to be workers in firms using the ambiguous technology. This phenomenon sheds new light on the relationship between firm culture and technology. We find that three types of firms emerge in equilibrium: entrepreneurial firms, where both owners and workers are optimists operating a highly ambiguous technology; traditional firms, where an optimistic owner employs a pessimistic worker and uses a less ambiguous technology; and bureaucratic firms where both owners and workers are pessimists employing a well-known technology. We also suggest how the relative scarcity of the optimists may help to explain the commonly observed S-shaped diffusion profile for successful innovations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-2259
ispartof Economic theory, 2011, Vol.46 (1), p.1-38
issn 0938-2259
1432-0479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857120093
source Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ambiguity
Belief function
Career choice
diffusion
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Emerging technology
Enterprises
Entrepreneur
Entrepreneurs
Equilibrium
Expected utility
Game Theory
Growth industries
Industrial market
Innovation
Innovations
Labor market
Microeconomics
Optimism
Optimism/pessimism
Pessimism
Public Finance
Research Article
Revenue
Social and Behav. Sciences
Startups
Studies
Technological innovation
Technological planning
Technology
Wages
Workers
title Optimism and firm formation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimism%20and%20firm%20formation&rft.jtitle=Economic%20theory&rft.au=Rigotti,%20Luca&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=1-38&rft.issn=0938-2259&rft.eissn=1432-0479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00199-009-0501-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA380342114%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821743540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A380342114&rft_jstor_id=41485804&rfr_iscdi=true