Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?
This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which infor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of social work 2010-09, Vol.40 (6), p.1866-1889 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1889 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1866 |
container_title | The British journal of social work |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Doel, Mark Allmark, Peter Conway, Paul Cowburn, Malcolm Flynn, Margaret Nelson, Pete Tod, Angela |
description | This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjsw/bcp106 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857119893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43687576</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43687576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9L3EAUB_ChVHCrnjwXQi8tSPS9TOZXL8UudhUWFPSw7GWYJC_dbNfMOpPF-t-bkLIHD_U08L4f5vD9MnaKcI5g-EWxjs8XRblFkB_YBHOp00zyxUc2AchFyhGyQ_YpxjUAKAE4YZd3wdcUY-Nbt0l--l1budBQ_J5Mg-_P7e_EJfOmpcSH5KrtKAynbkXJ_cpV_jn-OGYHtdtEOvn3HrGHX1cP0-t0fju7mV7O01KA6tKqrCAj0oLAZAVqVFmdgzYmR2HI1ZXQRjmZk9E1d4WhTDvJK066kMoRP2Jfx2-3wT_tKHb2sYklbTauJb-LVguFaLTh70vUqmdC9PLbfyWKDDhHwaGnX97Qtd-FvrNo-yLzDLnBHp2NqBy6C1TbbWgeXXixCHYYyA4D2XGgXn8e9Tp2PuxpzqVWQg15OuZN7OjvPnfhj5WKK2GvF0t7t1wiSj6zkr8CatqbbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750421391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Doel, Mark ; Allmark, Peter ; Conway, Paul ; Cowburn, Malcolm ; Flynn, Margaret ; Nelson, Pete ; Tod, Angela</creator><creatorcontrib>Doel, Mark ; Allmark, Peter ; Conway, Paul ; Cowburn, Malcolm ; Flynn, Margaret ; Nelson, Pete ; Tod, Angela</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSWAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Borders ; Boundaries ; code of practice ; Codes of practice ; Engagement ; Ethical codes ; Ethical instruction ; Exercise ; Guidance ; Informants ; Interpersonal relations ; Nursing education ; Perception ; Police ; Police services ; Political ethics ; practice dilemmas ; Professional boundaries ; Professional ethics ; professional relationship ; Professional relationships ; Research universities ; Social ethics ; Social work ; Social Workers</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2010-09, Vol.40 (6), p.1866-1889</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Social Workers 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43687576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43687576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,30998,30999,33773,33774,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmark, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowburn, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tod, Angela</creatorcontrib><title>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.</description><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>code of practice</subject><subject>Codes of practice</subject><subject>Engagement</subject><subject>Ethical codes</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Informants</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police services</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>practice dilemmas</subject><subject>Professional boundaries</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>professional relationship</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Social Workers</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9L3EAUB_ChVHCrnjwXQi8tSPS9TOZXL8UudhUWFPSw7GWYJC_dbNfMOpPF-t-bkLIHD_U08L4f5vD9MnaKcI5g-EWxjs8XRblFkB_YBHOp00zyxUc2AchFyhGyQ_YpxjUAKAE4YZd3wdcUY-Nbt0l--l1budBQ_J5Mg-_P7e_EJfOmpcSH5KrtKAynbkXJ_cpV_jn-OGYHtdtEOvn3HrGHX1cP0-t0fju7mV7O01KA6tKqrCAj0oLAZAVqVFmdgzYmR2HI1ZXQRjmZk9E1d4WhTDvJK066kMoRP2Jfx2-3wT_tKHb2sYklbTauJb-LVguFaLTh70vUqmdC9PLbfyWKDDhHwaGnX97Qtd-FvrNo-yLzDLnBHp2NqBy6C1TbbWgeXXixCHYYyA4D2XGgXn8e9Tp2PuxpzqVWQg15OuZN7OjvPnfhj5WKK2GvF0t7t1wiSj6zkr8CatqbbQ</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Doel, Mark</creator><creator>Allmark, Peter</creator><creator>Conway, Paul</creator><creator>Cowburn, Malcolm</creator><creator>Flynn, Margaret</creator><creator>Nelson, Pete</creator><creator>Tod, Angela</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</title><author>Doel, Mark ; Allmark, Peter ; Conway, Paul ; Cowburn, Malcolm ; Flynn, Margaret ; Nelson, Pete ; Tod, Angela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>code of practice</topic><topic>Codes of practice</topic><topic>Engagement</topic><topic>Ethical codes</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Informants</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police services</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>practice dilemmas</topic><topic>Professional boundaries</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>professional relationship</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Social Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmark, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowburn, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tod, Angela</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doel, Mark</au><au>Allmark, Peter</au><au>Conway, Paul</au><au>Cowburn, Malcolm</au><au>Flynn, Margaret</au><au>Nelson, Pete</au><au>Tod, Angela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1866</spage><epage>1889</epage><pages>1866-1889</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><coden>BJSWAS</coden><abstract>This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcp106</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-3102 |
ispartof | The British journal of social work, 2010-09, Vol.40 (6), p.1866-1889 |
issn | 0045-3102 1468-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857119893 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Borders Boundaries code of practice Codes of practice Engagement Ethical codes Ethical instruction Exercise Guidance Informants Interpersonal relations Nursing education Perception Police Police services Political ethics practice dilemmas Professional boundaries Professional ethics professional relationship Professional relationships Research universities Social ethics Social work Social Workers |
title | Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional%20Boundaries:%20Crossing%20a%20Line%20or%20Entering%20the%20Shadows?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Doel,%20Mark&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1866&rft.epage=1889&rft.pages=1866-1889&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft.coden=BJSWAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp106&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43687576%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750421391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43687576&rfr_iscdi=true |