Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?

This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which infor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of social work 2010-09, Vol.40 (6), p.1866-1889
Hauptverfasser: Doel, Mark, Allmark, Peter, Conway, Paul, Cowburn, Malcolm, Flynn, Margaret, Nelson, Pete, Tod, Angela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1889
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1866
container_title The British journal of social work
container_volume 40
creator Doel, Mark
Allmark, Peter
Conway, Paul
Cowburn, Malcolm
Flynn, Margaret
Nelson, Pete
Tod, Angela
description This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjsw/bcp106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857119893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43687576</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43687576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9L3EAUB_ChVHCrnjwXQi8tSPS9TOZXL8UudhUWFPSw7GWYJC_dbNfMOpPF-t-bkLIHD_U08L4f5vD9MnaKcI5g-EWxjs8XRblFkB_YBHOp00zyxUc2AchFyhGyQ_YpxjUAKAE4YZd3wdcUY-Nbt0l--l1budBQ_J5Mg-_P7e_EJfOmpcSH5KrtKAynbkXJ_cpV_jn-OGYHtdtEOvn3HrGHX1cP0-t0fju7mV7O01KA6tKqrCAj0oLAZAVqVFmdgzYmR2HI1ZXQRjmZk9E1d4WhTDvJK066kMoRP2Jfx2-3wT_tKHb2sYklbTauJb-LVguFaLTh70vUqmdC9PLbfyWKDDhHwaGnX97Qtd-FvrNo-yLzDLnBHp2NqBy6C1TbbWgeXXixCHYYyA4D2XGgXn8e9Tp2PuxpzqVWQg15OuZN7OjvPnfhj5WKK2GvF0t7t1wiSj6zkr8CatqbbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750421391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Doel, Mark ; Allmark, Peter ; Conway, Paul ; Cowburn, Malcolm ; Flynn, Margaret ; Nelson, Pete ; Tod, Angela</creator><creatorcontrib>Doel, Mark ; Allmark, Peter ; Conway, Paul ; Cowburn, Malcolm ; Flynn, Margaret ; Nelson, Pete ; Tod, Angela</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSWAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Borders ; Boundaries ; code of practice ; Codes of practice ; Engagement ; Ethical codes ; Ethical instruction ; Exercise ; Guidance ; Informants ; Interpersonal relations ; Nursing education ; Perception ; Police ; Police services ; Political ethics ; practice dilemmas ; Professional boundaries ; Professional ethics ; professional relationship ; Professional relationships ; Research universities ; Social ethics ; Social work ; Social Workers</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2010-09, Vol.40 (6), p.1866-1889</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Social Workers 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43687576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43687576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,30998,30999,33773,33774,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmark, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowburn, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tod, Angela</creatorcontrib><title>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.</description><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>code of practice</subject><subject>Codes of practice</subject><subject>Engagement</subject><subject>Ethical codes</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Informants</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police services</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>practice dilemmas</subject><subject>Professional boundaries</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>professional relationship</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Social Workers</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9L3EAUB_ChVHCrnjwXQi8tSPS9TOZXL8UudhUWFPSw7GWYJC_dbNfMOpPF-t-bkLIHD_U08L4f5vD9MnaKcI5g-EWxjs8XRblFkB_YBHOp00zyxUc2AchFyhGyQ_YpxjUAKAE4YZd3wdcUY-Nbt0l--l1budBQ_J5Mg-_P7e_EJfOmpcSH5KrtKAynbkXJ_cpV_jn-OGYHtdtEOvn3HrGHX1cP0-t0fju7mV7O01KA6tKqrCAj0oLAZAVqVFmdgzYmR2HI1ZXQRjmZk9E1d4WhTDvJK066kMoRP2Jfx2-3wT_tKHb2sYklbTauJb-LVguFaLTh70vUqmdC9PLbfyWKDDhHwaGnX97Qtd-FvrNo-yLzDLnBHp2NqBy6C1TbbWgeXXixCHYYyA4D2XGgXn8e9Tp2PuxpzqVWQg15OuZN7OjvPnfhj5WKK2GvF0t7t1wiSj6zkr8CatqbbQ</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Doel, Mark</creator><creator>Allmark, Peter</creator><creator>Conway, Paul</creator><creator>Cowburn, Malcolm</creator><creator>Flynn, Margaret</creator><creator>Nelson, Pete</creator><creator>Tod, Angela</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</title><author>Doel, Mark ; Allmark, Peter ; Conway, Paul ; Cowburn, Malcolm ; Flynn, Margaret ; Nelson, Pete ; Tod, Angela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-dcd02ee85e092b18172f408994159eafd5897a64e98f3ab9e28a63d3e8b67ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>code of practice</topic><topic>Codes of practice</topic><topic>Engagement</topic><topic>Ethical codes</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Informants</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police services</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>practice dilemmas</topic><topic>Professional boundaries</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>professional relationship</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Social Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmark, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowburn, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tod, Angela</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doel, Mark</au><au>Allmark, Peter</au><au>Conway, Paul</au><au>Cowburn, Malcolm</au><au>Flynn, Margaret</au><au>Nelson, Pete</au><au>Tod, Angela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1866</spage><epage>1889</epage><pages>1866-1889</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><coden>BJSWAS</coden><abstract>This article explores the professional boundaries guidance for social workers. It presents research findings from the formal literature, from agency codes of practice, from telephone interviews with regulatory and professional bodies and from an exercise using ‘snowballing techniques’ in which informants responded to brief scenarios illustrating boundary dilemmas. The findings suggest that formal research plays little part in the guidance that individuals use to help them determine professional boundaries. Similarly, only 10–15 per cent of informants made regular reference to regulatory and professional codes of practice, with an even smaller percentage quoting specific sections from these codes. A slightly larger group (15–20 per cent) made fairly regular reference to their agency's policy documents. However, a clear majority relied on their own sense of what is appropriate or inappropriate, and made their judgements with no reference to any formal guidance. Agency guidance tended to ignore the ambiguous areas of practice and seemed to act as an insurance policy, brought out and dusted off when something goes awry. The authors caution against ever-increasing bullet points of advice and prescription, and advance a notion of ethical engagement in which professionals exercise their ethical senses through regular discussion of professional boundary dilemmas.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcp106</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3102
ispartof The British journal of social work, 2010-09, Vol.40 (6), p.1866-1889
issn 0045-3102
1468-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857119893
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Borders
Boundaries
code of practice
Codes of practice
Engagement
Ethical codes
Ethical instruction
Exercise
Guidance
Informants
Interpersonal relations
Nursing education
Perception
Police
Police services
Political ethics
practice dilemmas
Professional boundaries
Professional ethics
professional relationship
Professional relationships
Research universities
Social ethics
Social work
Social Workers
title Professional Boundaries: Crossing a Line or Entering the Shadows?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional%20Boundaries:%20Crossing%20a%20Line%20or%20Entering%20the%20Shadows?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Doel,%20Mark&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1866&rft.epage=1889&rft.pages=1866-1889&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft.coden=BJSWAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp106&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43687576%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750421391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43687576&rfr_iscdi=true