V1 or V2?: On the left in Niuean

This paper presents an analysis of word order in Niuean, a Polynesian language traditionally considered to be V1. The central issue explored is: what are the relations between languages traditionally described as V1 and those traditionally described as V2? Landing sites, motivations for movement, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lingua 2010-02, Vol.120 (2), p.284-302
1. Verfasser: Massam, Diane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 302
container_issue 2
container_start_page 284
container_title Lingua
container_volume 120
creator Massam, Diane
description This paper presents an analysis of word order in Niuean, a Polynesian language traditionally considered to be V1. The central issue explored is: what are the relations between languages traditionally described as V1 and those traditionally described as V2? Landing sites, motivations for movement, and movement types are compared, and although at first glance the language types seem different, many common points can be discerned. Particular attention is paid to whether Niuean, a language in which tense does not appear on the verb but rather as a separate constituent, can fit into recent hypotheses that both V1 and V2 languages arise through an attempt to avoid verb-first (*V-1) or tense-first (*T-1) orders. The conclusion is that it can, in spite of appearances, but several tricky issues emerge regarding the definition of “first”. For example, neither *V-1 nor *T-1 can be a simple phonological constraint, and it becomes evident that to determine the validity of the two constraints we need a clearer understanding of the visibility (or not) of different types of elements including null and syncretic morphemes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85707639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0024384109000564</els_id><sourcerecordid>85707639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c19b0d32a6a579ca33a13bc50dd9b9cc72b402a81a86c0047b6f3f6fc2020a083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwDxg8sSW8Zyd2zABCFV9SRRfoajmOA47SpNgJEv-eVGFmusu5V7qHkEuEFAHFdZO2vvsYTcoAihQxBcyOyAILyRKBPD8mCwCWJbzI8JScxdgATIhSC0K3SPtAt-zuhm46Onw62rp6oL6jr350pjsnJ7Vpo7v4yyV5f3x4Wz0n683Ty-p-nVjO5ZBYVCVUnBlhcqms4dwgL20OVaVKZa1kZQbMFGgKYQEyWYqa16K2DBgYKPiSXM27-9B_jS4OeuejdW1rOtePURe5BCm4msBsBm3oYwyu1vvgdyb8aAR90KEbPevQBx0aUU9fp9rtXHPTiW_vgo7Wu866ygdnB131_v-BX3UkZ0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85707639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>V1 or V2?: On the left in Niuean</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Massam, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Massam, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an analysis of word order in Niuean, a Polynesian language traditionally considered to be V1. The central issue explored is: what are the relations between languages traditionally described as V1 and those traditionally described as V2? Landing sites, motivations for movement, and movement types are compared, and although at first glance the language types seem different, many common points can be discerned. Particular attention is paid to whether Niuean, a language in which tense does not appear on the verb but rather as a separate constituent, can fit into recent hypotheses that both V1 and V2 languages arise through an attempt to avoid verb-first (*V-1) or tense-first (*T-1) orders. The conclusion is that it can, in spite of appearances, but several tricky issues emerge regarding the definition of “first”. For example, neither *V-1 nor *T-1 can be a simple phonological constraint, and it becomes evident that to determine the validity of the two constraints we need a clearer understanding of the visibility (or not) of different types of elements including null and syncretic morphemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6135</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.014</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LINGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Complementizer ; Niuean ; Null tense ; Polynesian language ; Tense ; Verb fronting ; Verb initial ; Verb second ; Word order</subject><ispartof>Lingua, 2010-02, Vol.120 (2), p.284-302</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c19b0d32a6a579ca33a13bc50dd9b9cc72b402a81a86c0047b6f3f6fc2020a083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c19b0d32a6a579ca33a13bc50dd9b9cc72b402a81a86c0047b6f3f6fc2020a083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384109000564$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Massam, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>V1 or V2?: On the left in Niuean</title><title>Lingua</title><description>This paper presents an analysis of word order in Niuean, a Polynesian language traditionally considered to be V1. The central issue explored is: what are the relations between languages traditionally described as V1 and those traditionally described as V2? Landing sites, motivations for movement, and movement types are compared, and although at first glance the language types seem different, many common points can be discerned. Particular attention is paid to whether Niuean, a language in which tense does not appear on the verb but rather as a separate constituent, can fit into recent hypotheses that both V1 and V2 languages arise through an attempt to avoid verb-first (*V-1) or tense-first (*T-1) orders. The conclusion is that it can, in spite of appearances, but several tricky issues emerge regarding the definition of “first”. For example, neither *V-1 nor *T-1 can be a simple phonological constraint, and it becomes evident that to determine the validity of the two constraints we need a clearer understanding of the visibility (or not) of different types of elements including null and syncretic morphemes.</description><subject>Complementizer</subject><subject>Niuean</subject><subject>Null tense</subject><subject>Polynesian language</subject><subject>Tense</subject><subject>Verb fronting</subject><subject>Verb initial</subject><subject>Verb second</subject><subject>Word order</subject><issn>0024-3841</issn><issn>1872-6135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwDxg8sSW8Zyd2zABCFV9SRRfoajmOA47SpNgJEv-eVGFmusu5V7qHkEuEFAHFdZO2vvsYTcoAihQxBcyOyAILyRKBPD8mCwCWJbzI8JScxdgATIhSC0K3SPtAt-zuhm46Onw62rp6oL6jr350pjsnJ7Vpo7v4yyV5f3x4Wz0n683Ty-p-nVjO5ZBYVCVUnBlhcqms4dwgL20OVaVKZa1kZQbMFGgKYQEyWYqa16K2DBgYKPiSXM27-9B_jS4OeuejdW1rOtePURe5BCm4msBsBm3oYwyu1vvgdyb8aAR90KEbPevQBx0aUU9fp9rtXHPTiW_vgo7Wu866ygdnB131_v-BX3UkZ0w</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Massam, Diane</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>V1 or V2?: On the left in Niuean</title><author>Massam, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c19b0d32a6a579ca33a13bc50dd9b9cc72b402a81a86c0047b6f3f6fc2020a083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Complementizer</topic><topic>Niuean</topic><topic>Null tense</topic><topic>Polynesian language</topic><topic>Tense</topic><topic>Verb fronting</topic><topic>Verb initial</topic><topic>Verb second</topic><topic>Word order</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Massam, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Lingua</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Massam, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>V1 or V2?: On the left in Niuean</atitle><jtitle>Lingua</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>284-302</pages><issn>0024-3841</issn><eissn>1872-6135</eissn><coden>LINGAO</coden><abstract>This paper presents an analysis of word order in Niuean, a Polynesian language traditionally considered to be V1. The central issue explored is: what are the relations between languages traditionally described as V1 and those traditionally described as V2? Landing sites, motivations for movement, and movement types are compared, and although at first glance the language types seem different, many common points can be discerned. Particular attention is paid to whether Niuean, a language in which tense does not appear on the verb but rather as a separate constituent, can fit into recent hypotheses that both V1 and V2 languages arise through an attempt to avoid verb-first (*V-1) or tense-first (*T-1) orders. The conclusion is that it can, in spite of appearances, but several tricky issues emerge regarding the definition of “first”. For example, neither *V-1 nor *T-1 can be a simple phonological constraint, and it becomes evident that to determine the validity of the two constraints we need a clearer understanding of the visibility (or not) of different types of elements including null and syncretic morphemes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.014</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3841
ispartof Lingua, 2010-02, Vol.120 (2), p.284-302
issn 0024-3841
1872-6135
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85707639
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Complementizer
Niuean
Null tense
Polynesian language
Tense
Verb fronting
Verb initial
Verb second
Word order
title V1 or V2?: On the left in Niuean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=V1%20or%20V2?:%20On%20the%20left%20in%20Niuean&rft.jtitle=Lingua&rft.au=Massam,%20Diane&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=284-302&rft.issn=0024-3841&rft.eissn=1872-6135&rft.coden=LINGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85707639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85707639&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0024384109000564&rfr_iscdi=true