Generative approaches to language learning

All proponents of generative approaches to language learning argue that the syntactic knowledge which language learners acquire is underdetermined by the input. Therefore, they assume an innate language acquisition device which constrains the hypothesis space of children when they acquire their nati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistics 2009-03, Vol.47 (2), p.273-310
1. Verfasser: Eisenbeiss, Sonja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 2
container_start_page 273
container_title Linguistics
container_volume 47
creator Eisenbeiss, Sonja
description All proponents of generative approaches to language learning argue that the syntactic knowledge which language learners acquire is underdetermined by the input. Therefore, they assume an innate language acquisition device which constrains the hypothesis space of children when they acquire their native language. However, it is still a matter of debate how general or domain-specific this acquisition mechanism is and whether it is fully available from the onset of language acquisition. This article provides an overview of the different answers that have been provided for these questions within generative linguistics. Moreover, it shows how the generative concept of “learning” has been applied to the acquisition of syntax, morphology, phonology and vocabulary, language processing, L2-acquisition, nontypical language development, creoles and language change. Finally, current developments, merits and problems of the generative approach to learning are discussed. The focus of this discussion will be on efforts to reduce assumptions about domain-specific innate predispositions for language learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/LING.2009.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85706434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85706434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-2d085a72c6aaadc36421676883687483d1c2def79b7e34c5d21af998fd8fba2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AURQdRsFaX7rNyISTOV2YmSy1aK1UpVnA3vE5eYjRN6kwi-u9Nqejq3sXhcjmEnDKasJSlF_PZwzThlGYJZWyPjJhiIhaZetknI0q5HLrMDslRCG-UUik0H5HzKTbooas-MYLNxrfgXjFEXRvV0JQ9lBjVCL6pmvKYHBRQBzz5zTF5vrleTm7j-eN0Nrmcx05Q1cU8pyYFzZ0CgNwJJTlTWhkjlNHSiJw5nmOhs5VGIV2acwZFlpkiN8UKOIoxOdvtDm8-egydXVfBYT0cwrYP1qSaKinkAMY70Pk2BI-F3fhqDf7bMmq3RuzWiN0asYORf74KHX79weDfrdJCp3axlHah7640Wz7Ze_EDm5diFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85706434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generative approaches to language learning</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</creatorcontrib><description>All proponents of generative approaches to language learning argue that the syntactic knowledge which language learners acquire is underdetermined by the input. Therefore, they assume an innate language acquisition device which constrains the hypothesis space of children when they acquire their native language. However, it is still a matter of debate how general or domain-specific this acquisition mechanism is and whether it is fully available from the onset of language acquisition. This article provides an overview of the different answers that have been provided for these questions within generative linguistics. Moreover, it shows how the generative concept of “learning” has been applied to the acquisition of syntax, morphology, phonology and vocabulary, language processing, L2-acquisition, nontypical language development, creoles and language change. Finally, current developments, merits and problems of the generative approach to learning are discussed. The focus of this discussion will be on efforts to reduce assumptions about domain-specific innate predispositions for language learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-396X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/LING.2009.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LINGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</publisher><ispartof>Linguistics, 2009-03, Vol.47 (2), p.273-310</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-2d085a72c6aaadc36421676883687483d1c2def79b7e34c5d21af998fd8fba2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-2d085a72c6aaadc36421676883687483d1c2def79b7e34c5d21af998fd8fba2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</creatorcontrib><title>Generative approaches to language learning</title><title>Linguistics</title><addtitle>Linguistics</addtitle><description>All proponents of generative approaches to language learning argue that the syntactic knowledge which language learners acquire is underdetermined by the input. Therefore, they assume an innate language acquisition device which constrains the hypothesis space of children when they acquire their native language. However, it is still a matter of debate how general or domain-specific this acquisition mechanism is and whether it is fully available from the onset of language acquisition. This article provides an overview of the different answers that have been provided for these questions within generative linguistics. Moreover, it shows how the generative concept of “learning” has been applied to the acquisition of syntax, morphology, phonology and vocabulary, language processing, L2-acquisition, nontypical language development, creoles and language change. Finally, current developments, merits and problems of the generative approach to learning are discussed. The focus of this discussion will be on efforts to reduce assumptions about domain-specific innate predispositions for language learning.</description><issn>0024-3949</issn><issn>1613-396X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AURQdRsFaX7rNyISTOV2YmSy1aK1UpVnA3vE5eYjRN6kwi-u9Nqejq3sXhcjmEnDKasJSlF_PZwzThlGYJZWyPjJhiIhaZetknI0q5HLrMDslRCG-UUik0H5HzKTbooas-MYLNxrfgXjFEXRvV0JQ9lBjVCL6pmvKYHBRQBzz5zTF5vrleTm7j-eN0Nrmcx05Q1cU8pyYFzZ0CgNwJJTlTWhkjlNHSiJw5nmOhs5VGIV2acwZFlpkiN8UKOIoxOdvtDm8-egydXVfBYT0cwrYP1qSaKinkAMY70Pk2BI-F3fhqDf7bMmq3RuzWiN0asYORf74KHX79weDfrdJCp3axlHah7640Wz7Ze_EDm5diFw</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Generative approaches to language learning</title><author>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-2d085a72c6aaadc36421676883687483d1c2def79b7e34c5d21af998fd8fba2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenbeiss, Sonja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generative approaches to language learning</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle><addtitle>Linguistics</addtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>273-310</pages><issn>0024-3949</issn><eissn>1613-396X</eissn><coden>LINGBP</coden><abstract>All proponents of generative approaches to language learning argue that the syntactic knowledge which language learners acquire is underdetermined by the input. Therefore, they assume an innate language acquisition device which constrains the hypothesis space of children when they acquire their native language. However, it is still a matter of debate how general or domain-specific this acquisition mechanism is and whether it is fully available from the onset of language acquisition. This article provides an overview of the different answers that have been provided for these questions within generative linguistics. Moreover, it shows how the generative concept of “learning” has been applied to the acquisition of syntax, morphology, phonology and vocabulary, language processing, L2-acquisition, nontypical language development, creoles and language change. Finally, current developments, merits and problems of the generative approach to learning are discussed. The focus of this discussion will be on efforts to reduce assumptions about domain-specific innate predispositions for language learning.</abstract><pub>Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</pub><doi>10.1515/LING.2009.011</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3949
ispartof Linguistics, 2009-03, Vol.47 (2), p.273-310
issn 0024-3949
1613-396X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85706434
source De Gruyter journals
title Generative approaches to language learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generative%20approaches%20to%20language%20learning&rft.jtitle=Linguistics&rft.au=Eisenbeiss,%20Sonja&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=273-310&rft.issn=0024-3949&rft.eissn=1613-396X&rft.coden=LINGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/LING.2009.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85706434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85706434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true