Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?
Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated a striking phenomenon: Words rated for relevance to a grasslands survival scenario were remembered better than identical words encoded under other deep processing conditions. Having replicated this effect using a novel set of words (Experiment 1),...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Memory & cognition 2008-07, Vol.36 (5), p.913-919 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 919 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 913 |
| container_title | Memory & cognition |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Weinstein, Yana Bugg, Julie M. Roediger, Henry L. |
| description | Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated a striking phenomenon: Words rated for relevance to a grasslands survival scenario were remembered better than identical words encoded under other deep processing conditions. Having replicated this effect using a novel set of words (Experiment 1), we contrasted the schematic processing and evolutionary accounts of the recall advantage (Experiment 2). Inconsistent with the schematic processing account, the grasslands survival scenario produced better recall than did a city survival scenario requiring comparable schematic processing. Recall in the grasslands scenario was unaffected by a self-reference manipulation. The findings are consistent with an evolutionary account that attributes the recall advantage to adaptive memory biases. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/MC.36.5.913 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85706203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1528999251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a8e49ce92289a66606ed9e043e42b73ecee574205ba653508ae67bf4784c2f473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1LHDEUAPBQWnS1PfVeQkEvdbYv38lJytBWQenFQm8hk32rI_OxTXYW979vZBcFEXp6h_fjfRLykcFcGGW_Xtdzoedq7ph4Q2ZMCV4pJ_VbMgNwUCngfw7JUc73AKCU0wfkkFktgDk7I5d1GOj6Dmme0qbdhI4mjKHraFhswrAOt0gbpPiw6kI74II2W9qE3EbaYz-mLV2lMWLOmM_fk3fL0GX8sI_H5PeP7zf1RXX16-dl_e2qilK6dRUsShfRcW5d0FqDxoVDkAIlb4zAiKiM5KCaoJVQYANq0yylsTLyEsQxOd3VLa3_TpjXvm9zxK4LA45T9lYZ0BzEf6F2AoyxvMDPL-D9OKWhLOE5M1KBYrKgLzsU05hzwqVfpbYPaesZ-Mc_-OvaC-2VL38o-tO-5NT0uHi2-8MXcLIHIZd7L1MYYpufHAdpmLasuLOdyyU13GJ6nu21vv8AQN-cZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217450514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Weinstein, Yana ; Bugg, Julie M. ; Roediger, Henry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Yana ; Bugg, Julie M. ; Roediger, Henry L.</creatorcontrib><description>Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated a striking phenomenon: Words rated for relevance to a grasslands survival scenario were remembered better than identical words encoded under other deep processing conditions. Having replicated this effect using a novel set of words (Experiment 1), we contrasted the schematic processing and evolutionary accounts of the recall advantage (Experiment 2). Inconsistent with the schematic processing account, the grasslands survival scenario produced better recall than did a city survival scenario requiring comparable schematic processing. Recall in the grasslands scenario was unaffected by a self-reference manipulation. The findings are consistent with an evolutionary account that attributes the recall advantage to adaptive memory biases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.5.913</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18630198</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological Evolution ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasslands ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vocabulary ; Within-subjects design</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2008-07, Vol.36 (5), p.913-919</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a8e49ce92289a66606ed9e043e42b73ecee574205ba653508ae67bf4784c2f473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a8e49ce92289a66606ed9e043e42b73ecee574205ba653508ae67bf4784c2f473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/MC.36.5.913$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/MC.36.5.913$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20471681$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18630198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Yana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugg, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roediger, Henry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Memory & Cognition</addtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated a striking phenomenon: Words rated for relevance to a grasslands survival scenario were remembered better than identical words encoded under other deep processing conditions. Having replicated this effect using a novel set of words (Experiment 1), we contrasted the schematic processing and evolutionary accounts of the recall advantage (Experiment 2). Inconsistent with the schematic processing account, the grasslands survival scenario produced better recall than did a city survival scenario requiring comparable schematic processing. Recall in the grasslands scenario was unaffected by a self-reference manipulation. The findings are consistent with an evolutionary account that attributes the recall advantage to adaptive memory biases.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Within-subjects design</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1LHDEUAPBQWnS1PfVeQkEvdbYv38lJytBWQenFQm8hk32rI_OxTXYW979vZBcFEXp6h_fjfRLykcFcGGW_Xtdzoedq7ph4Q2ZMCV4pJ_VbMgNwUCngfw7JUc73AKCU0wfkkFktgDk7I5d1GOj6Dmme0qbdhI4mjKHraFhswrAOt0gbpPiw6kI74II2W9qE3EbaYz-mLV2lMWLOmM_fk3fL0GX8sI_H5PeP7zf1RXX16-dl_e2qilK6dRUsShfRcW5d0FqDxoVDkAIlb4zAiKiM5KCaoJVQYANq0yylsTLyEsQxOd3VLa3_TpjXvm9zxK4LA45T9lYZ0BzEf6F2AoyxvMDPL-D9OKWhLOE5M1KBYrKgLzsU05hzwqVfpbYPaesZ-Mc_-OvaC-2VL38o-tO-5NT0uHi2-8MXcLIHIZd7L1MYYpufHAdpmLasuLOdyyU13GJ6nu21vv8AQN-cZA</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Weinstein, Yana</creator><creator>Bugg, Julie M.</creator><creator>Roediger, Henry L.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?</title><author>Weinstein, Yana ; Bugg, Julie M. ; Roediger, Henry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a8e49ce92289a66606ed9e043e42b73ecee574205ba653508ae67bf4784c2f473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Within-subjects design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Yana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugg, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roediger, Henry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinstein, Yana</au><au>Bugg, Julie M.</au><au>Roediger, Henry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><stitle>Memory & Cognition</stitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>919</epage><pages>913-919</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated a striking phenomenon: Words rated for relevance to a grasslands survival scenario were remembered better than identical words encoded under other deep processing conditions. Having replicated this effect using a novel set of words (Experiment 1), we contrasted the schematic processing and evolutionary accounts of the recall advantage (Experiment 2). Inconsistent with the schematic processing account, the grasslands survival scenario produced better recall than did a city survival scenario requiring comparable schematic processing. Recall in the grasslands scenario was unaffected by a self-reference manipulation. The findings are consistent with an evolutionary account that attributes the recall advantage to adaptive memory biases.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18630198</pmid><doi>10.3758/MC.36.5.913</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
| ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2008-07, Vol.36 (5), p.913-919 |
| issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85706203 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adaptation, Physiological - physiology Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Biological Evolution Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Experiments Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasslands Human Humans Learning. Memory Male Memory Mental Recall Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Vocabulary Within-subjects design |
| title | Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A51%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20the%20survival%20recall%20advantage%20be%20explained%20by%20basic%20memory%20processes?&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Weinstein,%20Yana&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=919&rft.pages=913-919&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/MC.36.5.913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1528999251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217450514&rft_id=info:pmid/18630198&rfr_iscdi=true |