Monitoring in Language Perception
Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language product...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language and linguistics compass 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1211-1224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1224 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1211 |
container_title | Language and linguistics compass |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Van De Meerendonk, Nan Kolk, Herman H.J. Chwilla, Dorothee J. Vissers, Constance Th.W.M. |
description | Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85705497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwH8KFW8K6fubAAVVQEKFUiNfNcmOnckmTYqei_fckBCGO7GVH2vlWmkEowpDgds6XCRY0jSWWb8kIIE0AMCfJdg8Nfg_7f_QhOgphCcAh5WSATu_ryjW1d9UiclWU6Wqx0QsbzazP7bpxdXWMDgpdBnvys4fo-frqaXwTZw-T2_FlFueMERJTy6glZiQkMTkGUlA60pACpcJISbkgRsB8TkYSGE8N5xKMBI61SecFM4QM0Vn_d-3rj40NjVq5kNuy1JWtN0FJJoDRVLRG2RtzX4fgbaHW3q203ykMqutELVUXV3VxVdeJ-u5EbVv0okc_XWl3_-ZUNh2TVrV83PMuNHb7y2v_rtqAgqnX6UQ9vrDZjIJUd-QLuyl09g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85705497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring in Language Perception</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Van De Meerendonk, Nan ; Kolk, Herman H.J. ; Chwilla, Dorothee J. ; Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van De Meerendonk, Nan ; Kolk, Herman H.J. ; Chwilla, Dorothee J. ; Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-818X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Language and linguistics compass, 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1211-1224</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-818X.2009.00163.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-818X.2009.00163.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolk, Herman H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring in Language Perception</title><title>Language and linguistics compass</title><description>Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.</description><issn>1749-818X</issn><issn>1749-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwH8KFW8K6fubAAVVQEKFUiNfNcmOnckmTYqei_fckBCGO7GVH2vlWmkEowpDgds6XCRY0jSWWb8kIIE0AMCfJdg8Nfg_7f_QhOgphCcAh5WSATu_ryjW1d9UiclWU6Wqx0QsbzazP7bpxdXWMDgpdBnvys4fo-frqaXwTZw-T2_FlFueMERJTy6glZiQkMTkGUlA60pACpcJISbkgRsB8TkYSGE8N5xKMBI61SecFM4QM0Vn_d-3rj40NjVq5kNuy1JWtN0FJJoDRVLRG2RtzX4fgbaHW3q203ykMqutELVUXV3VxVdeJ-u5EbVv0okc_XWl3_-ZUNh2TVrV83PMuNHb7y2v_rtqAgqnX6UQ9vrDZjIJUd-QLuyl09g</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</creator><creator>Kolk, Herman H.J.</creator><creator>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</creator><creator>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Monitoring in Language Perception</title><author>Van De Meerendonk, Nan ; Kolk, Herman H.J. ; Chwilla, Dorothee J. ; Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolk, Herman H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language and linguistics compass</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</au><au>Kolk, Herman H.J.</au><au>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</au><au>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring in Language Perception</atitle><jtitle>Language and linguistics compass</jtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1224</epage><pages>1211-1224</pages><issn>1749-818X</issn><eissn>1749-818X</eissn><abstract>Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1749-818X |
ispartof | Language and linguistics compass, 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1211-1224 |
issn | 1749-818X 1749-818X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705497 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
title | Monitoring in Language Perception |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A50%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20in%20Language%20Perception&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20linguistics%20compass&rft.au=Van%20De%20Meerendonk,%20Nan&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1224&rft.pages=1211-1224&rft.issn=1749-818X&rft.eissn=1749-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85705497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85705497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |