Monitoring in Language Perception

Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language product...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language and linguistics compass 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1211-1224
Hauptverfasser: Van De Meerendonk, Nan, Kolk, Herman H.J., Chwilla, Dorothee J., Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1224
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1211
container_title Language and linguistics compass
container_volume 3
creator Van De Meerendonk, Nan
Kolk, Herman H.J.
Chwilla, Dorothee J.
Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.
description Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85705497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwH8KFW8K6fubAAVVQEKFUiNfNcmOnckmTYqei_fckBCGO7GVH2vlWmkEowpDgds6XCRY0jSWWb8kIIE0AMCfJdg8Nfg_7f_QhOgphCcAh5WSATu_ryjW1d9UiclWU6Wqx0QsbzazP7bpxdXWMDgpdBnvys4fo-frqaXwTZw-T2_FlFueMERJTy6glZiQkMTkGUlA60pACpcJISbkgRsB8TkYSGE8N5xKMBI61SecFM4QM0Vn_d-3rj40NjVq5kNuy1JWtN0FJJoDRVLRG2RtzX4fgbaHW3q203ykMqutELVUXV3VxVdeJ-u5EbVv0okc_XWl3_-ZUNh2TVrV83PMuNHb7y2v_rtqAgqnX6UQ9vrDZjIJUd-QLuyl09g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85705497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring in Language Perception</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Van De Meerendonk, Nan ; Kolk, Herman H.J. ; Chwilla, Dorothee J. ; Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van De Meerendonk, Nan ; Kolk, Herman H.J. ; Chwilla, Dorothee J. ; Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-818X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Language and linguistics compass, 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1211-1224</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-818X.2009.00163.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-818X.2009.00163.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolk, Herman H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring in Language Perception</title><title>Language and linguistics compass</title><description>Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.</description><issn>1749-818X</issn><issn>1749-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwH8KFW8K6fubAAVVQEKFUiNfNcmOnckmTYqei_fckBCGO7GVH2vlWmkEowpDgds6XCRY0jSWWb8kIIE0AMCfJdg8Nfg_7f_QhOgphCcAh5WSATu_ryjW1d9UiclWU6Wqx0QsbzazP7bpxdXWMDgpdBnvys4fo-frqaXwTZw-T2_FlFueMERJTy6glZiQkMTkGUlA60pACpcJISbkgRsB8TkYSGE8N5xKMBI61SecFM4QM0Vn_d-3rj40NjVq5kNuy1JWtN0FJJoDRVLRG2RtzX4fgbaHW3q203ykMqutELVUXV3VxVdeJ-u5EbVv0okc_XWl3_-ZUNh2TVrV83PMuNHb7y2v_rtqAgqnX6UQ9vrDZjIJUd-QLuyl09g</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</creator><creator>Kolk, Herman H.J.</creator><creator>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</creator><creator>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Monitoring in Language Perception</title><author>Van De Meerendonk, Nan ; Kolk, Herman H.J. ; Chwilla, Dorothee J. ; Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5533-4e54e3d2783dc103f442a090447d884673d70bb3280569d6680d8061ad9bf5d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolk, Herman H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language and linguistics compass</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van De Meerendonk, Nan</au><au>Kolk, Herman H.J.</au><au>Chwilla, Dorothee J.</au><au>Vissers, Constance Th.W.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring in Language Perception</atitle><jtitle>Language and linguistics compass</jtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1224</epage><pages>1211-1224</pages><issn>1749-818X</issn><eissn>1749-818X</eissn><abstract>Monitoring is an aspect of executive control that entails the detection of errors and the triggering of corrective actions when there is a mismatch between competing responses or representations. In the language domain, research of monitoring has mainly focused on errors made during language production. However, in language perception, for example while reading or listening, errors occur as well and people are able to detect them. A hypothesis that was developed to account for these errors is the monitoring hypothesis for language perception. According to this account, when a strong expectation conflicts with what is actually observed, a reanalysis is triggered to check the input for processing errors reflected by the P600 component. In contrast to what has been commonly assumed, the P600 is thought to reflect a general reanalysis and not a syntactic reanalysis. In this review, we will describe the different studies that led to this hypothesis and try to extend it beyond the language domain.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-818X
ispartof Language and linguistics compass, 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1211-1224
issn 1749-818X
1749-818X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705497
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Monitoring in Language Perception
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A50%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20in%20Language%20Perception&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20linguistics%20compass&rft.au=Van%20De%20Meerendonk,%20Nan&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1224&rft.pages=1211-1224&rft.issn=1749-818X&rft.eissn=1749-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00163.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85705497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85705497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true