A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms
The strength-sampling model of free association (Nelson, McEvoy, & Dennis, 2000) claims that the probability of word association in free-association norms results from a sampling process. For a given cue word, each response word has an underlying distribution of strength values. In the free-asso...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavior research methods 2008-02, Vol.40 (1), p.232-235 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 235 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 232 |
| container_title | Behavior research methods |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Maki, William S. |
| description | The strength-sampling model of free association (Nelson, McEvoy, & Dennis, 2000) claims that the probability of word association in free-association norms results from a sampling process. For a given cue word, each response word has an underlying distribution of strength values. In the free-association task, presentation of the cue word activates a random sample of strengths, one for each response. The highest strength wins, and its response is reported. In the present work, gradient descent was used to compute the theoretical mean strengths for each cue-response pair in the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber (2004) norms. The resulting database may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/BRM.40.1.232 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85702675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20701032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-6c5884e062c11d5770f6b3ff8fec612adb467fe06b6e65f39eedd9623424a76a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkltrFDEYhoMotlbvvJbghVc7a86Z9W4tPQitggfwbshMvuxOmUnGJFPZ3-Kf7Wx36YIUepWQ98nzEvIh9JaSOdey_Pj5-_VckDmdM86eoWMqpSi4ZOXzhz39fYRepXRDCC8ZFS_RES0FpVKoY_Rvia3JpjYJcHDYpBSa1uT2FnDKEfwqrxN2MfQ4rw9HRTL90LV-hftgofuEl9s4xE2xFVmcxmHooAefcQ73N79Cl4Kf4evm7DZsZth4i3806whtDRH_DdEeuoPHPsQ-vUYvnOkSvNmvJ-jX-dnP08vi6tvFl9PlVdEIKXKhGlmWAohiDaVWak2cqrlzpYNGUWZsLZR2U14rUNLxBYC1C8W4YMJoZfgJ-rDzDjH8GSHlqm9TA11nPIQxVaXUhCktnwQ1EQshuXoSZEQTSjibwPf_gTdhjH567cQITgQj29rZDmpiSCmCq4bY9iZuKkqq7QxU0wxUglS0YvfOd3vnWPdgD_D-0yeg2AFpivwK4qH0UeEdMze8qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204304205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Maki, William S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maki, William S.</creatorcontrib><description>The strength-sampling model of free association (Nelson, McEvoy, & Dennis, 2000) claims that the probability of word association in free-association norms results from a sampling process. For a given cue word, each response word has an underlying distribution of strength values. In the free-association task, presentation of the cue word activates a random sample of strengths, one for each response. The highest strength wins, and its response is reported. In the present work, gradient descent was used to compute the theoretical mean strengths for each cue-response pair in the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber (2004) norms. The resulting database may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-351X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18411546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Data bases ; Databases, Factual ; Models, Statistical ; Models, Theoretical ; Optimization techniques ; Probability ; Psychology ; Standard deviation ; Word Association Tests - standards ; Word Association Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Behavior research methods, 2008-02, Vol.40 (1), p.232-235</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008</rights><rights>Copyright Psychonomic Society, Inc. Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-6c5884e062c11d5770f6b3ff8fec612adb467fe06b6e65f39eedd9623424a76a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-6c5884e062c11d5770f6b3ff8fec612adb467fe06b6e65f39eedd9623424a76a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BRM.40.1.232$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/BRM.40.1.232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18411546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maki, William S.</creatorcontrib><title>A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms</title><title>Behavior research methods</title><addtitle>Behav Res</addtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><description>The strength-sampling model of free association (Nelson, McEvoy, & Dennis, 2000) claims that the probability of word association in free-association norms results from a sampling process. For a given cue word, each response word has an underlying distribution of strength values. In the free-association task, presentation of the cue word activates a random sample of strengths, one for each response. The highest strength wins, and its response is reported. In the present work, gradient descent was used to compute the theoretical mean strengths for each cue-response pair in the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber (2004) norms. The resulting database may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Data bases</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Word Association Tests - standards</subject><subject>Word Association Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1554-351X</issn><issn>1554-3528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkltrFDEYhoMotlbvvJbghVc7a86Z9W4tPQitggfwbshMvuxOmUnGJFPZ3-Kf7Wx36YIUepWQ98nzEvIh9JaSOdey_Pj5-_VckDmdM86eoWMqpSi4ZOXzhz39fYRepXRDCC8ZFS_RES0FpVKoY_Rvia3JpjYJcHDYpBSa1uT2FnDKEfwqrxN2MfQ4rw9HRTL90LV-hftgofuEl9s4xE2xFVmcxmHooAefcQ73N79Cl4Kf4evm7DZsZth4i3806whtDRH_DdEeuoPHPsQ-vUYvnOkSvNmvJ-jX-dnP08vi6tvFl9PlVdEIKXKhGlmWAohiDaVWak2cqrlzpYNGUWZsLZR2U14rUNLxBYC1C8W4YMJoZfgJ-rDzDjH8GSHlqm9TA11nPIQxVaXUhCktnwQ1EQshuXoSZEQTSjibwPf_gTdhjH567cQITgQj29rZDmpiSCmCq4bY9iZuKkqq7QxU0wxUglS0YvfOd3vnWPdgD_D-0yeg2AFpivwK4qH0UeEdMze8qw</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Maki, William S.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Psychonomic Society, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms</title><author>Maki, William S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-6c5884e062c11d5770f6b3ff8fec612adb467fe06b6e65f39eedd9623424a76a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Data bases</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Word Association Tests - standards</topic><topic>Word Association Tests - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maki, William S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Behavior research methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maki, William S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms</atitle><jtitle>Behavior research methods</jtitle><stitle>Behav Res</stitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>232-235</pages><issn>1554-351X</issn><eissn>1554-3528</eissn><abstract>The strength-sampling model of free association (Nelson, McEvoy, & Dennis, 2000) claims that the probability of word association in free-association norms results from a sampling process. For a given cue word, each response word has an underlying distribution of strength values. In the free-association task, presentation of the cue word activates a random sample of strengths, one for each response. The highest strength wins, and its response is reported. In the present work, gradient descent was used to compute the theoretical mean strengths for each cue-response pair in the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber (2004) norms. The resulting database may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18411546</pmid><doi>10.3758/BRM.40.1.232</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1554-351X |
| ispartof | Behavior research methods, 2008-02, Vol.40 (1), p.232-235 |
| issn | 1554-351X 1554-3528 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85702675 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Cues Data bases Databases, Factual Models, Statistical Models, Theoretical Optimization techniques Probability Psychology Standard deviation Word Association Tests - standards Word Association Tests - statistics & numerical data |
| title | A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20database%20of%20associative%20strengths%20from%20the%20strength-sampling%20model:%20A%20theory-based%20supplement%20to%20the%20Nelson,%20McEvoy,%20and%20Schreiber%20word%20association%20norms&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20research%20methods&rft.au=Maki,%20William%20S.&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=232-235&rft.issn=1554-351X&rft.eissn=1554-3528&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BRM.40.1.232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20701032%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204304205&rft_id=info:pmid/18411546&rfr_iscdi=true |