Acceptance of Noise With Intelligible, Reversed, and Unfamiliar Primary Discourse

University of South Alabama, Mobile Contact author: Susan Gordon-Hickey, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 2000 UCOM, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002. E-mail: gordonhickey{at}usouthal.edu . Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intelligib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of audiology 2008-12, Vol.17 (2), p.129-135
Hauptverfasser: Gordon-Hickey, Susan, Moore, Robert E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title American journal of audiology
container_volume 17
creator Gordon-Hickey, Susan
Moore, Robert E
description University of South Alabama, Mobile Contact author: Susan Gordon-Hickey, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 2000 UCOM, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002. E-mail: gordonhickey{at}usouthal.edu . Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intelligible and unintelligible primary discourse on acceptance of noise. Of particular interest was the effect of intelligibility on the most comfortable loudness (MCL) component of acceptable noise level (ANL). Method: ANLs were measured for 30 participants using an intelligible discourse, a reversed discourse, and an unfamiliar primary discourse. For each discourse, MCL and background noise level (BNL) were found. The ANL was then computed by subtracting the mean BNL from the MCL. Results: The intelligibility of the primary discourse did not affect MCL. The ANL was significantly different for the intelligible versus reversed condition and the intelligible versus unfamiliar (Chinese) condition. Conclusion: Results indicate that ANL may change as speech intelligibility changes and/or speech recognition ability decreases in adults with normal hearing. Key Words: acceptable noise level, background noise level, most comfortable loudness level CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?
doi_str_mv 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/06-0018)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85701610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A190851790</galeid><sourcerecordid>A190851790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-806002c6dcd94efb2477d95851a831b3bcb541410da454f5a95528d7651bad7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptku1r1TAYxYsobk7_BS0KQ2XdnrRNk3y8zLfB8A2HH0OaPL3NpU2uSav435vSKzqRfEgIv3M4eU6y7AmBcwJ1fUGAigI4F89LAH4BTQFA-Is72TGhlBeCVOxuOv-mjrIHMe4SUgpe3s-OCOc1MGiOs08brXE_Kacx913-3tuI-Vc79fmVm3AY7Na2A57ln_E7hojmLFfO5DeuU6MdrAr5x2BHFX7mr2zUfk7Iw-xep4aIjw77SXbz5vWXy3fF9Ye3V5eb60JTgKng0ACUujHaiBq7tqwZM4JyShSvSFu1uqU1qQkYVdO6o0pQWnLDGkpaZRhWJ9np6rsP_tuMcZJjipAiK4d-jpJTBqQhkMCn_4C7FNSlbLJMsySCN1WCnq3QVg0orev8FJReHOWGCEixmFiszv9DpWVwtNo77Gy6vyU4_UvQoxqmPvphnqx38TbYrKAOPsaAndyvg5UE5FK5XMqUS5lyqVxCI5fKk_Dx4XVzO6L5IztUnICXK9Dbbf_DBpRxj6j7FCZYt5VqpyRhspTpc1S_AOAEsXU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204419863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptance of Noise With Intelligible, Reversed, and Unfamiliar Primary Discourse</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Gordon-Hickey, Susan ; Moore, Robert E</creator><creatorcontrib>Gordon-Hickey, Susan ; Moore, Robert E</creatorcontrib><description>University of South Alabama, Mobile Contact author: Susan Gordon-Hickey, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 2000 UCOM, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002. E-mail: gordonhickey{at}usouthal.edu . Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intelligible and unintelligible primary discourse on acceptance of noise. Of particular interest was the effect of intelligibility on the most comfortable loudness (MCL) component of acceptable noise level (ANL). Method: ANLs were measured for 30 participants using an intelligible discourse, a reversed discourse, and an unfamiliar primary discourse. For each discourse, MCL and background noise level (BNL) were found. The ANL was then computed by subtracting the mean BNL from the MCL. Results: The intelligibility of the primary discourse did not affect MCL. The ANL was significantly different for the intelligible versus reversed condition and the intelligible versus unfamiliar (Chinese) condition. Conclusion: Results indicate that ANL may change as speech intelligibility changes and/or speech recognition ability decreases in adults with normal hearing. Key Words: acceptable noise level, background noise level, most comfortable loudness level CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/06-0018)</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18840706</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJALFZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASHA</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy ; Assistive Technology ; Attention ; Attention Deficit Disorders ; Audiology ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Threshold ; Communication Skills ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Evaluation ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hearing aids ; Hearing loss ; Humans ; Hyperactivity ; Intelligibility ; Listening Comprehension ; Loudness Perception ; Management ; Measurement Techniques ; Noise ; Predictor Variables ; Risk factors ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Communication ; Speech Discrimination Tests ; Speech Reception Threshold Test ; Speech, Intelligibility of ; Success ; Word Lists ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of audiology, 2008-12, Vol.17 (2), p.129-135</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-806002c6dcd94efb2477d95851a831b3bcb541410da454f5a95528d7651bad7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-806002c6dcd94efb2477d95851a831b3bcb541410da454f5a95528d7651bad7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18840706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gordon-Hickey, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Robert E</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptance of Noise With Intelligible, Reversed, and Unfamiliar Primary Discourse</title><title>American journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><description>University of South Alabama, Mobile Contact author: Susan Gordon-Hickey, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 2000 UCOM, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002. E-mail: gordonhickey{at}usouthal.edu . Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intelligible and unintelligible primary discourse on acceptance of noise. Of particular interest was the effect of intelligibility on the most comfortable loudness (MCL) component of acceptable noise level (ANL). Method: ANLs were measured for 30 participants using an intelligible discourse, a reversed discourse, and an unfamiliar primary discourse. For each discourse, MCL and background noise level (BNL) were found. The ANL was then computed by subtracting the mean BNL from the MCL. Results: The intelligibility of the primary discourse did not affect MCL. The ANL was significantly different for the intelligible versus reversed condition and the intelligible versus unfamiliar (Chinese) condition. Conclusion: Results indicate that ANL may change as speech intelligibility changes and/or speech recognition ability decreases in adults with normal hearing. Key Words: acceptable noise level, background noise level, most comfortable loudness level CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorders</subject><subject>Audiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hearing aids</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Intelligibility</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Loudness Perception</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Speech Discrimination Tests</subject><subject>Speech Reception Threshold Test</subject><subject>Speech, Intelligibility of</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Word Lists</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1059-0889</issn><issn>1558-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptku1r1TAYxYsobk7_BS0KQ2XdnrRNk3y8zLfB8A2HH0OaPL3NpU2uSav435vSKzqRfEgIv3M4eU6y7AmBcwJ1fUGAigI4F89LAH4BTQFA-Is72TGhlBeCVOxuOv-mjrIHMe4SUgpe3s-OCOc1MGiOs08brXE_Kacx913-3tuI-Vc79fmVm3AY7Na2A57ln_E7hojmLFfO5DeuU6MdrAr5x2BHFX7mr2zUfk7Iw-xep4aIjw77SXbz5vWXy3fF9Ye3V5eb60JTgKng0ACUujHaiBq7tqwZM4JyShSvSFu1uqU1qQkYVdO6o0pQWnLDGkpaZRhWJ9np6rsP_tuMcZJjipAiK4d-jpJTBqQhkMCn_4C7FNSlbLJMsySCN1WCnq3QVg0orev8FJReHOWGCEixmFiszv9DpWVwtNo77Gy6vyU4_UvQoxqmPvphnqx38TbYrKAOPsaAndyvg5UE5FK5XMqUS5lyqVxCI5fKk_Dx4XVzO6L5IztUnICXK9Dbbf_DBpRxj6j7FCZYt5VqpyRhspTpc1S_AOAEsXU</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Gordon-Hickey, Susan</creator><creator>Moore, Robert E</creator><general>ASHA</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Acceptance of Noise With Intelligible, Reversed, and Unfamiliar Primary Discourse</title><author>Gordon-Hickey, Susan ; Moore, Robert E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-806002c6dcd94efb2477d95851a831b3bcb541410da454f5a95528d7651bad7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorders</topic><topic>Audiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hearing aids</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Intelligibility</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Loudness Perception</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Speech Discrimination Tests</topic><topic>Speech Reception Threshold Test</topic><topic>Speech, Intelligibility of</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Word Lists</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gordon-Hickey, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Robert E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gordon-Hickey, Susan</au><au>Moore, Robert E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptance of Noise With Intelligible, Reversed, and Unfamiliar Primary Discourse</atitle><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>129-135</pages><issn>1059-0889</issn><eissn>1558-9137</eissn><coden>AJALFZ</coden><abstract>University of South Alabama, Mobile Contact author: Susan Gordon-Hickey, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 2000 UCOM, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002. E-mail: gordonhickey{at}usouthal.edu . Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intelligible and unintelligible primary discourse on acceptance of noise. Of particular interest was the effect of intelligibility on the most comfortable loudness (MCL) component of acceptable noise level (ANL). Method: ANLs were measured for 30 participants using an intelligible discourse, a reversed discourse, and an unfamiliar primary discourse. For each discourse, MCL and background noise level (BNL) were found. The ANL was then computed by subtracting the mean BNL from the MCL. Results: The intelligibility of the primary discourse did not affect MCL. The ANL was significantly different for the intelligible versus reversed condition and the intelligible versus unfamiliar (Chinese) condition. Conclusion: Results indicate that ANL may change as speech intelligibility changes and/or speech recognition ability decreases in adults with normal hearing. Key Words: acceptable noise level, background noise level, most comfortable loudness level CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASHA</pub><pmid>18840706</pmid><doi>10.1044/1059-0889(2008/06-0018)</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0889
ispartof American journal of audiology, 2008-12, Vol.17 (2), p.129-135
issn 1059-0889
1558-9137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85701610
source MEDLINE; Education Source
subjects Adult
Anatomy
Assistive Technology
Attention
Attention Deficit Disorders
Audiology
Auditory Perception
Auditory Threshold
Communication Skills
Ears & hearing
Evaluation
Female
Health aspects
Hearing aids
Hearing loss
Humans
Hyperactivity
Intelligibility
Listening Comprehension
Loudness Perception
Management
Measurement Techniques
Noise
Predictor Variables
Risk factors
Sound Spectrography
Speech
Speech Acoustics
Speech Communication
Speech Discrimination Tests
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Speech, Intelligibility of
Success
Word Lists
Young Adult
title Acceptance of Noise With Intelligible, Reversed, and Unfamiliar Primary Discourse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A10%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptance%20of%20Noise%20With%20Intelligible,%20Reversed,%20and%20Unfamiliar%20Primary%20Discourse&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Gordon-Hickey,%20Susan&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=129-135&rft.issn=1059-0889&rft.eissn=1558-9137&rft.coden=AJALFZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2008/06-0018)&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA190851790%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204419863&rft_id=info:pmid/18840706&rft_galeid=A190851790&rfr_iscdi=true