A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?
Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied linguistics 2008-12, Vol.29 (4), p.672-693 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 693 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 672 |
container_title | Applied linguistics |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Ruhlemann, Christoph |
description | Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/applin/amn023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85697144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ820245</ericid><oup_id>10.1093/applin/amn023</oup_id><sourcerecordid>85355089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctv1DAQxi0EEkvhyI1DhATiEur3g0u1Wu1SoBKCFlFxsSaJs3XJOsHO8vjvcZTVHriU04xmfp75xh9CTwl-TbBhpzAMnQ-nsAuYsntoQbhSJRf4-j5aYMJpKTEmD9GjlG5zQrVkC_RhWXx2W59GF4vlMMQe6pti7IsrlxMftsWqDz9dTDD6PrwpNhDdL9d1E3I5QmggNsU6bDufbs4eowctdMk9OcQT9GWzvlqdlxcf375bLS9KEJiOZaugkk47obmSymhc8VwB0mhaMV61TQU1cwoMAyNFpWvORMWlUy1TCjeCnaCX89ws98fepdHufKqzKgiu3yerhTSKcP4fIBMCa3MnyBRRgkiawef_gLf9PoZ8raWYGSa51BkqZ6iOfUrRtXaIfgfxjyXYTk7Z2Sk7O5X5F4ehkGro2gih9un4iGLDqWHTOc9mzkVfH9vr95piyqdveTW3-_1w58aDwsn430cY4ncrFVPCnl9_s5-IEZcbLe1X9he5pbpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203936468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-6001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-450X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/applin/amn023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADLSDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Academic Language ; Applied Linguistics ; Classrooms ; Communication ; Conversation ; Cultural diversity ; English ; English (Second Language) ; English language ; Grammar ; Language ; Language teaching ; Language Usage ; Language Variation ; Linguistics ; Oral Language ; Role ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Sociolinguistics ; Speech ; Speech Instruction ; Standard Spoken Usage ; Standardization ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Writing Instruction ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>Applied linguistics, 2008-12, Vol.29 (4), p.672-693</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 2008 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Oxford University Press 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ820245$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20942934$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</title><title>Applied linguistics</title><description>Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.</description><subject>Academic Language</subject><subject>Applied Linguistics</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Cultural diversity</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language teaching</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Language Variation</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Instruction</subject><subject>Standard Spoken Usage</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>0142-6001</issn><issn>1477-450X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctv1DAQxi0EEkvhyI1DhATiEur3g0u1Wu1SoBKCFlFxsSaJs3XJOsHO8vjvcZTVHriU04xmfp75xh9CTwl-TbBhpzAMnQ-nsAuYsntoQbhSJRf4-j5aYMJpKTEmD9GjlG5zQrVkC_RhWXx2W59GF4vlMMQe6pti7IsrlxMftsWqDz9dTDD6PrwpNhDdL9d1E3I5QmggNsU6bDufbs4eowctdMk9OcQT9GWzvlqdlxcf375bLS9KEJiOZaugkk47obmSymhc8VwB0mhaMV61TQU1cwoMAyNFpWvORMWlUy1TCjeCnaCX89ws98fepdHufKqzKgiu3yerhTSKcP4fIBMCa3MnyBRRgkiawef_gLf9PoZ8raWYGSa51BkqZ6iOfUrRtXaIfgfxjyXYTk7Z2Sk7O5X5F4ehkGro2gih9un4iGLDqWHTOc9mzkVfH9vr95piyqdveTW3-_1w58aDwsn430cY4ncrFVPCnl9_s5-IEZcbLe1X9he5pbpU</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</title><author>Ruhlemann, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Language</topic><topic>Applied Linguistics</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Cultural diversity</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language teaching</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Language Variation</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Instruction</topic><topic>Standard Spoken Usage</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruhlemann, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ820245</ericid><atitle>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</atitle><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>672-693</pages><issn>0142-6001</issn><eissn>1477-450X</eissn><coden>ADLSDX</coden><abstract>Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/applin/amn023</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-6001 |
ispartof | Applied linguistics, 2008-12, Vol.29 (4), p.672-693 |
issn | 0142-6001 1477-450X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85697144 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Academic Language Applied Linguistics Classrooms Communication Conversation Cultural diversity English English (Second Language) English language Grammar Language Language teaching Language Usage Language Variation Linguistics Oral Language Role Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Sociolinguistics Speech Speech Instruction Standard Spoken Usage Standardization Teaching Teaching Methods Writing Instruction Written Language |
title | A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A16%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Register%20Approach%20to%20Teaching%20Conversation:%20Farewell%20to%20Standard%20English?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20linguistics&rft.au=Ruhlemann,%20Christoph&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=672-693&rft.issn=0142-6001&rft.eissn=1477-450X&rft.coden=ADLSDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/applin/amn023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85355089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203936468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ820245&rft_oup_id=10.1093/applin/amn023&rfr_iscdi=true |