A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?

Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied linguistics 2008-12, Vol.29 (4), p.672-693
1. Verfasser: Ruhlemann, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 693
container_issue 4
container_start_page 672
container_title Applied linguistics
container_volume 29
creator Ruhlemann, Christoph
description Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/applin/amn023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85697144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ820245</ericid><oup_id>10.1093/applin/amn023</oup_id><sourcerecordid>85355089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctv1DAQxi0EEkvhyI1DhATiEur3g0u1Wu1SoBKCFlFxsSaJs3XJOsHO8vjvcZTVHriU04xmfp75xh9CTwl-TbBhpzAMnQ-nsAuYsntoQbhSJRf4-j5aYMJpKTEmD9GjlG5zQrVkC_RhWXx2W59GF4vlMMQe6pti7IsrlxMftsWqDz9dTDD6PrwpNhDdL9d1E3I5QmggNsU6bDufbs4eowctdMk9OcQT9GWzvlqdlxcf375bLS9KEJiOZaugkk47obmSymhc8VwB0mhaMV61TQU1cwoMAyNFpWvORMWlUy1TCjeCnaCX89ws98fepdHufKqzKgiu3yerhTSKcP4fIBMCa3MnyBRRgkiawef_gLf9PoZ8raWYGSa51BkqZ6iOfUrRtXaIfgfxjyXYTk7Z2Sk7O5X5F4ehkGro2gih9un4iGLDqWHTOc9mzkVfH9vr95piyqdveTW3-_1w58aDwsn430cY4ncrFVPCnl9_s5-IEZcbLe1X9he5pbpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203936468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-6001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-450X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/applin/amn023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADLSDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Academic Language ; Applied Linguistics ; Classrooms ; Communication ; Conversation ; Cultural diversity ; English ; English (Second Language) ; English language ; Grammar ; Language ; Language teaching ; Language Usage ; Language Variation ; Linguistics ; Oral Language ; Role ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Sociolinguistics ; Speech ; Speech Instruction ; Standard Spoken Usage ; Standardization ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Writing Instruction ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>Applied linguistics, 2008-12, Vol.29 (4), p.672-693</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 2008 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Oxford University Press 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ820245$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20942934$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</title><title>Applied linguistics</title><description>Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.</description><subject>Academic Language</subject><subject>Applied Linguistics</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Cultural diversity</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language teaching</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Language Variation</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Instruction</subject><subject>Standard Spoken Usage</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>0142-6001</issn><issn>1477-450X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctv1DAQxi0EEkvhyI1DhATiEur3g0u1Wu1SoBKCFlFxsSaJs3XJOsHO8vjvcZTVHriU04xmfp75xh9CTwl-TbBhpzAMnQ-nsAuYsntoQbhSJRf4-j5aYMJpKTEmD9GjlG5zQrVkC_RhWXx2W59GF4vlMMQe6pti7IsrlxMftsWqDz9dTDD6PrwpNhDdL9d1E3I5QmggNsU6bDufbs4eowctdMk9OcQT9GWzvlqdlxcf375bLS9KEJiOZaugkk47obmSymhc8VwB0mhaMV61TQU1cwoMAyNFpWvORMWlUy1TCjeCnaCX89ws98fepdHufKqzKgiu3yerhTSKcP4fIBMCa3MnyBRRgkiawef_gLf9PoZ8raWYGSa51BkqZ6iOfUrRtXaIfgfxjyXYTk7Z2Sk7O5X5F4ehkGro2gih9un4iGLDqWHTOc9mzkVfH9vr95piyqdveTW3-_1w58aDwsn430cY4ncrFVPCnl9_s5-IEZcbLe1X9he5pbpU</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</title><author>Ruhlemann, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-f7ab6e8e584767980b47aba1d82b34bfdbac3e7a93a965b8c435b46e7f3770d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Language</topic><topic>Applied Linguistics</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Cultural diversity</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language teaching</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Language Variation</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Instruction</topic><topic>Standard Spoken Usage</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruhlemann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruhlemann, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ820245</ericid><atitle>A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?</atitle><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>672-693</pages><issn>0142-6001</issn><eissn>1477-450X</eissn><coden>ADLSDX</coden><abstract>Owing to analyses of large spoken corpora the linguistic knowledge of conversation has grown in recent years exponentially. Up until now little of this knowledge has trickled down to the EFL classroom. One of the reasons, this paper argues, is the failure in the relevant literature to spell out clearly how teaching conversational grammar affects the role of what is the major variety in the EFL classroom, Standard English (SE). My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I briefly discuss some neglected conversational features in relation to SE, concluding that the contrast between the grammars of conversation and SE is so stark that the notion of SE is problematic in talking of the spoken language. Second, I consider what this contrast implies for EFL teaching, arguing that for authentic conversation to be taught effectively it is necessary to reduce the role of SE to ‘a core variety’ that has its place in teaching writing while conversational grammar might serve as the underlying model in teaching speech. I argue that such a redefinition of SE would best be implemented in a ‘register approach’ which shifts the emphasis from a monolithic view of language to a register-sensitive view thus acknowledging the fundamental functional diversity of language use. Third, I discuss some important issues arising from this approach and, finally, outline what may be gained by it.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/applin/amn023</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-6001
ispartof Applied linguistics, 2008-12, Vol.29 (4), p.672-693
issn 0142-6001
1477-450X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85697144
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Academic Language
Applied Linguistics
Classrooms
Communication
Conversation
Cultural diversity
English
English (Second Language)
English language
Grammar
Language
Language teaching
Language Usage
Language Variation
Linguistics
Oral Language
Role
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Sociolinguistics
Speech
Speech Instruction
Standard Spoken Usage
Standardization
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Writing Instruction
Written Language
title A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A16%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Register%20Approach%20to%20Teaching%20Conversation:%20Farewell%20to%20Standard%20English?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20linguistics&rft.au=Ruhlemann,%20Christoph&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=672-693&rft.issn=0142-6001&rft.eissn=1477-450X&rft.coden=ADLSDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/applin/amn023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85355089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203936468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ820245&rft_oup_id=10.1093/applin/amn023&rfr_iscdi=true