Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward

In the research conducted by Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of second language writing 2009-06, Vol.18 (2), p.136-140
1. Verfasser: Bruton, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 2
container_start_page 136
container_title Journal of second language writing
container_volume 18
creator Bruton, Anthony
description In the research conducted by Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ838301</ericid><els_id>S1060374309000071</els_id><sourcerecordid>85694735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPAzEQhE8IJJ5_AFG4ortjbZ_tO0SDeKMIGqgt41snjpIz2IaIf4-jIEqqXe3MrDRfVR1TaChQeTZv5mmxahhA3wBrAMRWtUc7xWvaMrZddpBQc9Xy3Wo_pTkAqE7AXqWvMfnp6McpiZjQRDsjfsyB5BkSdA5tTiQ4Mo1muTSR2BBjufkwFhuZMLKKPpf0OXkKmaRAUo7GT2fZhbgycTisdpxZJDz6nQfV6-3Ny9V9PXm-e7i6nNSGK5HrQSlUvXXClAZMsaGX8o1LZFSBE44zypyzCiR_cxJYCwo60zkhRG9bPkh-UJ1u_r7H8PGJKeulTxYXCzNi-Ey6E7JvFRfFyDZGG0NKEZ1-j740-9YU9Jqlnus1S71mqYHpwrKETjYhjN7-BW4eO95xoEW--JVLwy-PUSfrcbQ4-DUsPQT_3_cfvGOGpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85694735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bruton, Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruton, Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>In the research conducted by Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1060-3743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSLWEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>English (Second Language) ; Error Correction ; Grammar ; Language Research ; Research Methodology ; Revision (Written Composition) ; Second Language Learning ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Improvement</subject><ispartof>Journal of second language writing, 2009-06, Vol.18 (2), p.136-140</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374309000071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ838301$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruton, Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</title><title>Journal of second language writing</title><description>In the research conducted by Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.</description><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Error Correction</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Revision (Written Composition)</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Improvement</subject><issn>1060-3743</issn><issn>1873-1422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPAzEQhE8IJJ5_AFG4ortjbZ_tO0SDeKMIGqgt41snjpIz2IaIf4-jIEqqXe3MrDRfVR1TaChQeTZv5mmxahhA3wBrAMRWtUc7xWvaMrZddpBQc9Xy3Wo_pTkAqE7AXqWvMfnp6McpiZjQRDsjfsyB5BkSdA5tTiQ4Mo1muTSR2BBjufkwFhuZMLKKPpf0OXkKmaRAUo7GT2fZhbgycTisdpxZJDz6nQfV6-3Ny9V9PXm-e7i6nNSGK5HrQSlUvXXClAZMsaGX8o1LZFSBE44zypyzCiR_cxJYCwo60zkhRG9bPkh-UJ1u_r7H8PGJKeulTxYXCzNi-Ey6E7JvFRfFyDZGG0NKEZ1-j740-9YU9Jqlnus1S71mqYHpwrKETjYhjN7-BW4eO95xoEW--JVLwy-PUSfrcbQ4-DUsPQT_3_cfvGOGpA</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Bruton, Anthony</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</title><author>Bruton, Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Error Correction</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Revision (Written Composition)</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Improvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruton, Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of second language writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruton, Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ838301</ericid><atitle>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</atitle><jtitle>Journal of second language writing</jtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>136-140</pages><issn>1060-3743</issn><eissn>1873-1422</eissn><coden>JSLWEC</coden><abstract>In the research conducted by Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1060-3743
ispartof Journal of second language writing, 2009-06, Vol.18 (2), p.136-140
issn 1060-3743
1873-1422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694735
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects English (Second Language)
Error Correction
Grammar
Language Research
Research Methodology
Revision (Written Composition)
Second Language Learning
Writing (Composition)
Writing Improvement
title Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A40%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20research%20into%20the%20effects%20of%20grammar%20correction%20in%20L2%20writing:%20Not%20so%20straightforward&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20second%20language%20writing&rft.au=Bruton,%20Anthony&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=136-140&rft.issn=1060-3743&rft.eissn=1873-1422&rft.coden=JSLWEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85694735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85694735&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ838301&rft_els_id=S1060374309000071&rfr_iscdi=true