Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward
In the research conducted by Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of second language writing 2009-06, Vol.18 (2), p.136-140 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 136 |
container_title | Journal of second language writing |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Bruton, Anthony |
description | In the research conducted by
Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ838301</ericid><els_id>S1060374309000071</els_id><sourcerecordid>85694735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPAzEQhE8IJJ5_AFG4ortjbZ_tO0SDeKMIGqgt41snjpIz2IaIf4-jIEqqXe3MrDRfVR1TaChQeTZv5mmxahhA3wBrAMRWtUc7xWvaMrZddpBQc9Xy3Wo_pTkAqE7AXqWvMfnp6McpiZjQRDsjfsyB5BkSdA5tTiQ4Mo1muTSR2BBjufkwFhuZMLKKPpf0OXkKmaRAUo7GT2fZhbgycTisdpxZJDz6nQfV6-3Ny9V9PXm-e7i6nNSGK5HrQSlUvXXClAZMsaGX8o1LZFSBE44zypyzCiR_cxJYCwo60zkhRG9bPkh-UJ1u_r7H8PGJKeulTxYXCzNi-Ey6E7JvFRfFyDZGG0NKEZ1-j740-9YU9Jqlnus1S71mqYHpwrKETjYhjN7-BW4eO95xoEW--JVLwy-PUSfrcbQ4-DUsPQT_3_cfvGOGpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85694735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bruton, Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruton, Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>In the research conducted by
Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1060-3743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSLWEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>English (Second Language) ; Error Correction ; Grammar ; Language Research ; Research Methodology ; Revision (Written Composition) ; Second Language Learning ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Improvement</subject><ispartof>Journal of second language writing, 2009-06, Vol.18 (2), p.136-140</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374309000071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ838301$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruton, Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</title><title>Journal of second language writing</title><description>In the research conducted by
Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.</description><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Error Correction</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Revision (Written Composition)</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Improvement</subject><issn>1060-3743</issn><issn>1873-1422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPAzEQhE8IJJ5_AFG4ortjbZ_tO0SDeKMIGqgt41snjpIz2IaIf4-jIEqqXe3MrDRfVR1TaChQeTZv5mmxahhA3wBrAMRWtUc7xWvaMrZddpBQc9Xy3Wo_pTkAqE7AXqWvMfnp6McpiZjQRDsjfsyB5BkSdA5tTiQ4Mo1muTSR2BBjufkwFhuZMLKKPpf0OXkKmaRAUo7GT2fZhbgycTisdpxZJDz6nQfV6-3Ny9V9PXm-e7i6nNSGK5HrQSlUvXXClAZMsaGX8o1LZFSBE44zypyzCiR_cxJYCwo60zkhRG9bPkh-UJ1u_r7H8PGJKeulTxYXCzNi-Ey6E7JvFRfFyDZGG0NKEZ1-j740-9YU9Jqlnus1S71mqYHpwrKETjYhjN7-BW4eO95xoEW--JVLwy-PUSfrcbQ4-DUsPQT_3_cfvGOGpA</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Bruton, Anthony</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</title><author>Bruton, Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-d77e79cf5a009272d966b36e2170f5f3212ffc7063bf60240708a8f5559c43d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Error Correction</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Revision (Written Composition)</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Improvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruton, Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of second language writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruton, Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ838301</ericid><atitle>Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward</atitle><jtitle>Journal of second language writing</jtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>136-140</pages><issn>1060-3743</issn><eissn>1873-1422</eissn><coden>JSLWEC</coden><abstract>In the research conducted by
Truscott and Hsu (2008), the authors demonstrate that although rewriting corrected drafts results in lower grammar error rates on the rewritten texts, this effect does not carry over to a subsequent new writing task. The authors conclude that the result indicates that there may have been no language improvement from the correction-rewrite procedure. This commentary, however, attempts to show that the conclusion seems to be true, but arguably for the wrong reasons because the details in the various sets of data suggest a possible alternative explanation. On the basis of the analysis offered, some general suggestions about the design of future research on the effects of correction in L2 writing are made.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1060-3743 |
ispartof | Journal of second language writing, 2009-06, Vol.18 (2), p.136-140 |
issn | 1060-3743 1873-1422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694735 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | English (Second Language) Error Correction Grammar Language Research Research Methodology Revision (Written Composition) Second Language Learning Writing (Composition) Writing Improvement |
title | Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A40%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20research%20into%20the%20effects%20of%20grammar%20correction%20in%20L2%20writing:%20Not%20so%20straightforward&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20second%20language%20writing&rft.au=Bruton,%20Anthony&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=136-140&rft.issn=1060-3743&rft.eissn=1873-1422&rft.coden=JSLWEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85694735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85694735&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ838301&rft_els_id=S1060374309000071&rfr_iscdi=true |