Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity
Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.971-979 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 979 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 971 |
container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Yarkoni, Tal Balota, David Yap, Melvin |
description | Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named
orthographic Levenshtein distance 20
(OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654424851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0VtrFDEUB_Agir3YN58lCPWps-Y-Sd_q0lahXpD6HM5mz-xOmZlskxll3_wafj0_iZFdLIjgUwL5cXLO-RPynLOZrLV9_enN5xnXMz1zNX9EDrmWvNJSsMflzoyrnLTqgBzlfMcY08aZp-SAWyeMc_yQXL-PX9thRRe4jcOSzmM3rhHS-PP7j0w_nNMLOuA32iPkKSGNDY1pXMdVgs26DTS3fdtBasftM_KkgS7jyf48Jl-uLm_nb6ubj9fv5hc3VdBGjJVgCi13jbUIMiwlMkDBQTWIqBtpNGAIblEHHWrFYAGSMYFgncElSmfkMXm1q7tJ8X7CPPq-zQG7DgaMU_a2TKhMXf8XlkXUyihe4Mu_4F2c0lCG8KVbp7SSoqCzHQop5pyw8ZvU9pC2njP_OwZfYvBce-1LDIW_2NecFj0uH_B-7wWc7gHkAF2TYAht_uMEs0JaJourdi6Xp2GF6aG5f378C8P_nuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204945432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Yarkoni, Tal ; Balota, David ; Yap, Melvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yarkoni, Tal ; Balota, David ; Yap, Melvin</creatorcontrib><description>Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named
orthographic Levenshtein distance 20
(OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18926991</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brief Reports ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Competition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Linguistics - statistics & numerical data ; Miscellaneous ; Phonetics ; Psychology ; Psychology - statistics & numerical data ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Verbal Behavior ; Visual Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.971-979</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20823803$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yarkoni, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balota, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Melvin</creatorcontrib><title>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named
orthographic Levenshtein distance 20
(OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0VtrFDEUB_Agir3YN58lCPWps-Y-Sd_q0lahXpD6HM5mz-xOmZlskxll3_wafj0_iZFdLIjgUwL5cXLO-RPynLOZrLV9_enN5xnXMz1zNX9EDrmWvNJSsMflzoyrnLTqgBzlfMcY08aZp-SAWyeMc_yQXL-PX9thRRe4jcOSzmM3rhHS-PP7j0w_nNMLOuA32iPkKSGNDY1pXMdVgs26DTS3fdtBasftM_KkgS7jyf48Jl-uLm_nb6ubj9fv5hc3VdBGjJVgCi13jbUIMiwlMkDBQTWIqBtpNGAIblEHHWrFYAGSMYFgncElSmfkMXm1q7tJ8X7CPPq-zQG7DgaMU_a2TKhMXf8XlkXUyihe4Mu_4F2c0lCG8KVbp7SSoqCzHQop5pyw8ZvU9pC2njP_OwZfYvBce-1LDIW_2NecFj0uH_B-7wWc7gHkAF2TYAht_uMEs0JaJourdi6Xp2GF6aG5f378C8P_nuQ</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Yarkoni, Tal</creator><creator>Balota, David</creator><creator>Yap, Melvin</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</title><author>Yarkoni, Tal ; Balota, David ; Yap, Melvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yarkoni, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balota, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Melvin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yarkoni, Tal</au><au>Balota, David</au><au>Yap, Melvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><stitle>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>979</epage><pages>971-979</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named
orthographic Levenshtein distance 20
(OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18926991</pmid><doi>10.3758/PBR.15.5.971</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.971-979 |
issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694677 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Brief Reports Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Competition Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Linguistics - statistics & numerical data Miscellaneous Phonetics Psychology Psychology - statistics & numerical data Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition (Psychology) Verbal Behavior Visual Perception Young Adult |
title | Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T15%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving%20beyond%20Coltheart%E2%80%99s%20N:%20A%20new%20measure%20of%20orthographic%20similarity&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Yarkoni,%20Tal&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=979&rft.pages=971-979&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654424851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204945432&rft_id=info:pmid/18926991&rfr_iscdi=true |