Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity

Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.971-979
Hauptverfasser: Yarkoni, Tal, Balota, David, Yap, Melvin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 979
container_issue 5
container_start_page 971
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 15
creator Yarkoni, Tal
Balota, David
Yap, Melvin
description Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named orthographic Levenshtein distance 20 (OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654424851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0VtrFDEUB_Agir3YN58lCPWps-Y-Sd_q0lahXpD6HM5mz-xOmZlskxll3_wafj0_iZFdLIjgUwL5cXLO-RPynLOZrLV9_enN5xnXMz1zNX9EDrmWvNJSsMflzoyrnLTqgBzlfMcY08aZp-SAWyeMc_yQXL-PX9thRRe4jcOSzmM3rhHS-PP7j0w_nNMLOuA32iPkKSGNDY1pXMdVgs26DTS3fdtBasftM_KkgS7jyf48Jl-uLm_nb6ubj9fv5hc3VdBGjJVgCi13jbUIMiwlMkDBQTWIqBtpNGAIblEHHWrFYAGSMYFgncElSmfkMXm1q7tJ8X7CPPq-zQG7DgaMU_a2TKhMXf8XlkXUyihe4Mu_4F2c0lCG8KVbp7SSoqCzHQop5pyw8ZvU9pC2njP_OwZfYvBce-1LDIW_2NecFj0uH_B-7wWc7gHkAF2TYAht_uMEs0JaJourdi6Xp2GF6aG5f378C8P_nuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204945432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Yarkoni, Tal ; Balota, David ; Yap, Melvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yarkoni, Tal ; Balota, David ; Yap, Melvin</creatorcontrib><description>Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named orthographic Levenshtein distance 20 (OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18926991</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brief Reports ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Competition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Linguistics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Miscellaneous ; Phonetics ; Psychology ; Psychology - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Verbal Behavior ; Visual Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.971-979</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20823803$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yarkoni, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balota, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Melvin</creatorcontrib><title>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named orthographic Levenshtein distance 20 (OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0VtrFDEUB_Agir3YN58lCPWps-Y-Sd_q0lahXpD6HM5mz-xOmZlskxll3_wafj0_iZFdLIjgUwL5cXLO-RPynLOZrLV9_enN5xnXMz1zNX9EDrmWvNJSsMflzoyrnLTqgBzlfMcY08aZp-SAWyeMc_yQXL-PX9thRRe4jcOSzmM3rhHS-PP7j0w_nNMLOuA32iPkKSGNDY1pXMdVgs26DTS3fdtBasftM_KkgS7jyf48Jl-uLm_nb6ubj9fv5hc3VdBGjJVgCi13jbUIMiwlMkDBQTWIqBtpNGAIblEHHWrFYAGSMYFgncElSmfkMXm1q7tJ8X7CPPq-zQG7DgaMU_a2TKhMXf8XlkXUyihe4Mu_4F2c0lCG8KVbp7SSoqCzHQop5pyw8ZvU9pC2njP_OwZfYvBce-1LDIW_2NecFj0uH_B-7wWc7gHkAF2TYAht_uMEs0JaJourdi6Xp2GF6aG5f378C8P_nuQ</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Yarkoni, Tal</creator><creator>Balota, David</creator><creator>Yap, Melvin</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</title><author>Yarkoni, Tal ; Balota, David ; Yap, Melvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-204e819f88ea3cd3e0ae21a4feee5f365aecc9b7c5c740aba3002ea896ede3963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yarkoni, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balota, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Melvin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yarkoni, Tal</au><au>Balota, David</au><au>Yap, Melvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>979</epage><pages>971-979</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>Visual word recognition studies commonly measure the orthographic similarity of words using Coltheart’s orthographic neighborhood size metric (ON). Although ON reliably predicts behavioral variability in many lexical tasks, its utility is inherently limited by its relatively restrictive definition. In the present article, we introduce a new measure of orthographic similarity generated using a standard computer science metric of string similarity (Levenshtein distance). Unlike ON, the new measure—named orthographic Levenshtein distance 20 (OLD20)—incorporates comparisons between all pairs of words in the lexicon, including words of different lengths. We demonstrate that OLD20 provides significant advantages over ON in predicting both lexical decision and pronunciation performance in three large data sets. Moreover, OLD20 interacts more strongly with word frequency and shows stronger effects of neighborhood frequency than does ON. The discussion section focuses on the implications of these results for models of visual word recognition.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18926991</pmid><doi>10.3758/PBR.15.5.971</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.971-979
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85694677
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Brief Reports
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Psychology
Competition
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Linguistics - statistics & numerical data
Miscellaneous
Phonetics
Psychology
Psychology - statistics & numerical data
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recognition (Psychology)
Verbal Behavior
Visual Perception
Young Adult
title Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T15%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving%20beyond%20Coltheart%E2%80%99s%20N:%20A%20new%20measure%20of%20orthographic%20similarity&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Yarkoni,%20Tal&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=979&rft.pages=971-979&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654424851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204945432&rft_id=info:pmid/18926991&rfr_iscdi=true