Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon

Bilingualism provides a unique opportunity for exploring hypotheses about how the human brain encodes language. For example, the "input switch" theory states that bilinguals can deactivate one language module while using the other. A new measure of spoken language comprehension, headband-m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science 1999-05, Vol.10 (3), p.281-284
Hauptverfasser: Spivey, Michael J., Marian, Viorica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 3
container_start_page 281
container_title Psychological science
container_volume 10
creator Spivey, Michael J.
Marian, Viorica
description Bilingualism provides a unique opportunity for exploring hypotheses about how the human brain encodes language. For example, the "input switch" theory states that bilinguals can deactivate one language module while using the other. A new measure of spoken language comprehension, headband-mounted eyetracking, allows a firm test of this theory. When given spoken instructions to pick up an object, in a monolingual session, late bilinguals looked briefly at a distractor object whose name in the irrelevant language was initially phonetically similar to the spoken word more often than they looked at a control distractor object. This result indicates some overlap between the two languages in bilinguals, and provides support for parallel, interactive accounts of spoken word recognition in general.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-9280.00151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85691328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40063426</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_1467-9280.00151</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40063426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-352222814bcb32faf03161eaa9d69de73aa2ddc239d4bcc3f2b5a26f3bde331e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXroTBhSvTziOZJO5K8VEoKlhXLoab5KakpkmdSar-eydGigiezYXhO4fhI-SUsxF3GXNfhV4sIjZijAd8jwx2L_tkwOJAeWEcqkNyZO2KuYRSDcjL1NTW0gWUrzTB5h2xovfQFFukUGX0CdPanTlUyxaWaK_oI5imgJJOUgc5sK5onTuWzozBErdQNXSOH4XrHZODHEqLJz93SJ5vrhfTO2_-cDubTuZe6gvReDIQLhH3kzSRIoecSa44AsSZijMMJYDIslTIOHNIKnORBCBULpMMpeQoh-Si392Y-q1F2-h1YVMsS6iwbq2OAhVzKSIHnv8BV3VrKvc3zeMgiASLfAeNeyjtzBjM9cYUazCfmjPdmdadV9151d-mXeOyb1in6Nfkv_hZj69sU5vdus-Ykr5Q8gtBt4b6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195582084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Spivey, Michael J. ; Marian, Viorica</creator><creatorcontrib>Spivey, Michael J. ; Marian, Viorica</creatorcontrib><description>Bilingualism provides a unique opportunity for exploring hypotheses about how the human brain encodes language. For example, the "input switch" theory states that bilinguals can deactivate one language module while using the other. A new measure of spoken language comprehension, headband-mounted eyetracking, allows a firm test of this theory. When given spoken instructions to pick up an object, in a monolingual session, late bilinguals looked briefly at a distractor object whose name in the irrelevant language was initially phonetically similar to the spoken word more often than they looked at a control distractor object. This result indicates some overlap between the two languages in bilinguals, and provides support for parallel, interactive accounts of spoken word recognition in general.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00151</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSYSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Bilingualism ; Brain ; Cognitive models ; Eye movements ; Language comprehension ; Memory ; Mental objects ; Orthographies ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Research Reports ; Speech discrimination ; Words</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 1999-05, Vol.10 (3), p.281-284</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 American Psychological Society</rights><rights>1999 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. May 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-352222814bcb32faf03161eaa9d69de73aa2ddc239d4bcc3f2b5a26f3bde331e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-352222814bcb32faf03161eaa9d69de73aa2ddc239d4bcc3f2b5a26f3bde331e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40063426$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40063426$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spivey, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marian, Viorica</creatorcontrib><title>Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>Bilingualism provides a unique opportunity for exploring hypotheses about how the human brain encodes language. For example, the "input switch" theory states that bilinguals can deactivate one language module while using the other. A new measure of spoken language comprehension, headband-mounted eyetracking, allows a firm test of this theory. When given spoken instructions to pick up an object, in a monolingual session, late bilinguals looked briefly at a distractor object whose name in the irrelevant language was initially phonetically similar to the spoken word more often than they looked at a control distractor object. This result indicates some overlap between the two languages in bilinguals, and provides support for parallel, interactive accounts of spoken word recognition in general.</description><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Language comprehension</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental objects</subject><subject>Orthographies</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Speech discrimination</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXroTBhSvTziOZJO5K8VEoKlhXLoab5KakpkmdSar-eydGigiezYXhO4fhI-SUsxF3GXNfhV4sIjZijAd8jwx2L_tkwOJAeWEcqkNyZO2KuYRSDcjL1NTW0gWUrzTB5h2xovfQFFukUGX0CdPanTlUyxaWaK_oI5imgJJOUgc5sK5onTuWzozBErdQNXSOH4XrHZODHEqLJz93SJ5vrhfTO2_-cDubTuZe6gvReDIQLhH3kzSRIoecSa44AsSZijMMJYDIslTIOHNIKnORBCBULpMMpeQoh-Si392Y-q1F2-h1YVMsS6iwbq2OAhVzKSIHnv8BV3VrKvc3zeMgiASLfAeNeyjtzBjM9cYUazCfmjPdmdadV9151d-mXeOyb1in6Nfkv_hZj69sU5vdus-Ykr5Q8gtBt4b6</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>Spivey, Michael J.</creator><creator>Marian, Viorica</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon</title><author>Spivey, Michael J. ; Marian, Viorica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-352222814bcb32faf03161eaa9d69de73aa2ddc239d4bcc3f2b5a26f3bde331e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Language comprehension</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental objects</topic><topic>Orthographies</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Speech discrimination</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spivey, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marian, Viorica</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spivey, Michael J.</au><au>Marian, Viorica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>281-284</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><coden>PSYSET</coden><abstract>Bilingualism provides a unique opportunity for exploring hypotheses about how the human brain encodes language. For example, the "input switch" theory states that bilinguals can deactivate one language module while using the other. A new measure of spoken language comprehension, headband-mounted eyetracking, allows a firm test of this theory. When given spoken instructions to pick up an object, in a monolingual session, late bilinguals looked briefly at a distractor object whose name in the irrelevant language was initially phonetically similar to the spoken word more often than they looked at a control distractor object. This result indicates some overlap between the two languages in bilinguals, and provides support for parallel, interactive accounts of spoken word recognition in general.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-9280.00151</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7976
ispartof Psychological science, 1999-05, Vol.10 (3), p.281-284
issn 0956-7976
1467-9280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85691328
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Bilingualism
Brain
Cognitive models
Eye movements
Language comprehension
Memory
Mental objects
Orthographies
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Research Reports
Speech discrimination
Words
title Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A27%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%20Talk%20between%20Native%20and%20Second%20Languages:%20Partial%20Activation%20of%20an%20Irrelevant%20Lexicon&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Spivey,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=281-284&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft.coden=PSYSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9280.00151&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40063426%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195582084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40063426&rft_sage_id=10.1111_1467-9280.00151&rfr_iscdi=true