Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3
The usual source of crosslinguistic influence in the interlanguage of a person learning a first foreign language (L2) is quite obviously his/her L1. Pinpointing the source of crosslinguistic influences in the interlanguage of a multilingual speaker is less straightforward. The main source of crossli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied linguistics 1998-12, Vol.19 (4), p.471-490 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 490 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | Applied linguistics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Dewaele, Jean-Marc |
description | The usual source of crosslinguistic influence in the interlanguage of a person learning a first foreign language (L2) is quite obviously his/her L1. Pinpointing the source of crosslinguistic influences in the interlanguage of a multilingual speaker is less straightforward. The main source of crosslinguistic influence in the L3 of a speaker is not automatically, as the present study shows, the L1 of the speaker. This paper investigates this phenomenon in the context of non-target-like lexemes (‘lexical inventions’) in the advanced oral French interlanguage of 39 Dutch L1 speakers, 32 of whom had French as an L2 and English as an L3, the remaining 7 speakers having English as an L2 and French as an L3. Our results show that a higher proportion of lexical inventions produced by the French L2 speakers derive from creative (non-standard) use of target language rules compared to the French L3 speakers. Crosslinguistic influence is visible in the lexical inventions of both groups, but the French L2 speakers seem to rely more on information attached to their Dutch L1 lemmas, whereas the French L3 speakers draw more on their English L2 lemmas. This suggests principles blocking L1 transfer in L3 learners in terms of spreading activation (cf Green 1986, Poulisse and Bongaerts 1994) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/applin/19.4.471 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85688421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ577550</ericid><sourcerecordid>85688421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-dbd722fe91fc418da3c23d27f0a6f020d76d80c7dd46ecd9025d90499a81fdb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtPwzAQxi0EEuUxszBEArGl9Ss-mw0Q5aFKLCBVXSzXdkogJMVOEPz3GAV1YGK5O_n73afzh9ARwWOCFZuY9bqumglRYz7mQLbQiHCAnBd4vo1GmHCaC4zJLtqL8SUNVAo2QnLmPytr6uyu-fBNV7VNPM-mwTf2OT11PtSmWfVm5TMTsxnNPnyIfZrYAdopTR394W_fR0_T68er23z2cHN3dTHLDWeqy93SAaWlV6S0nEhnmKXMUSixESWm2IFwEltwjgtvncK0SIUrZSQp3ZKyfXQ2-K5D-9772Om3Klpfp7t820ctCyElp-QfIGMSAyTw5A_40vahSZ_QBBQBLriQiZoMlA1tjMGXeh2qNxO-NMH6J3A9BK6J0lynwNPG6a-viSnRMpjGVnGzRjGRwH-MjwfMh8pu1Ov7AqAocJLzQa5i5z83ugmvWgCDQt_OF_oSpovHm2mhgX0DcdWYMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791746468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><description>The usual source of crosslinguistic influence in the interlanguage of a person learning a first foreign language (L2) is quite obviously his/her L1. Pinpointing the source of crosslinguistic influences in the interlanguage of a multilingual speaker is less straightforward. The main source of crosslinguistic influence in the L3 of a speaker is not automatically, as the present study shows, the L1 of the speaker. This paper investigates this phenomenon in the context of non-target-like lexemes (‘lexical inventions’) in the advanced oral French interlanguage of 39 Dutch L1 speakers, 32 of whom had French as an L2 and English as an L3, the remaining 7 speakers having English as an L2 and French as an L3. Our results show that a higher proportion of lexical inventions produced by the French L2 speakers derive from creative (non-standard) use of target language rules compared to the French L3 speakers. Crosslinguistic influence is visible in the lexical inventions of both groups, but the French L2 speakers seem to rely more on information attached to their Dutch L1 lemmas, whereas the French L3 speakers draw more on their English L2 lemmas. This suggests principles blocking L1 transfer in L3 learners in terms of spreading activation (cf Green 1986, Poulisse and Bongaerts 1994)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-6001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-450X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/applin/19.4.471</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADLSDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adults. Performance, acquisition ; Applied Linguistics ; Dutch ; English ; French ; Interlanguage ; Language Research ; Linguistics ; Multilingualism ; Oral Language ; Production and comprehension processes ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology of language ; Second Language Learning ; Transfer of Training ; Uncommonly Taught Languages ; Vocabulary Development</subject><ispartof>Applied linguistics, 1998-12, Vol.19 (4), p.471-490</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-dbd722fe91fc418da3c23d27f0a6f020d76d80c7dd46ecd9025d90499a81fdb23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ577550$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2018748$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3</title><title>Applied linguistics</title><description>The usual source of crosslinguistic influence in the interlanguage of a person learning a first foreign language (L2) is quite obviously his/her L1. Pinpointing the source of crosslinguistic influences in the interlanguage of a multilingual speaker is less straightforward. The main source of crosslinguistic influence in the L3 of a speaker is not automatically, as the present study shows, the L1 of the speaker. This paper investigates this phenomenon in the context of non-target-like lexemes (‘lexical inventions’) in the advanced oral French interlanguage of 39 Dutch L1 speakers, 32 of whom had French as an L2 and English as an L3, the remaining 7 speakers having English as an L2 and French as an L3. Our results show that a higher proportion of lexical inventions produced by the French L2 speakers derive from creative (non-standard) use of target language rules compared to the French L3 speakers. Crosslinguistic influence is visible in the lexical inventions of both groups, but the French L2 speakers seem to rely more on information attached to their Dutch L1 lemmas, whereas the French L3 speakers draw more on their English L2 lemmas. This suggests principles blocking L1 transfer in L3 learners in terms of spreading activation (cf Green 1986, Poulisse and Bongaerts 1994)</description><subject>Adults. Performance, acquisition</subject><subject>Applied Linguistics</subject><subject>Dutch</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>French</subject><subject>Interlanguage</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Production and comprehension processes</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology of language</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><subject>Uncommonly Taught Languages</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><issn>0142-6001</issn><issn>1477-450X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkLtPwzAQxi0EEuUxszBEArGl9Ss-mw0Q5aFKLCBVXSzXdkogJMVOEPz3GAV1YGK5O_n73afzh9ARwWOCFZuY9bqumglRYz7mQLbQiHCAnBd4vo1GmHCaC4zJLtqL8SUNVAo2QnLmPytr6uyu-fBNV7VNPM-mwTf2OT11PtSmWfVm5TMTsxnNPnyIfZrYAdopTR394W_fR0_T68er23z2cHN3dTHLDWeqy93SAaWlV6S0nEhnmKXMUSixESWm2IFwEltwjgtvncK0SIUrZSQp3ZKyfXQ2-K5D-9772Om3Klpfp7t820ctCyElp-QfIGMSAyTw5A_40vahSZ_QBBQBLriQiZoMlA1tjMGXeh2qNxO-NMH6J3A9BK6J0lynwNPG6a-viSnRMpjGVnGzRjGRwH-MjwfMh8pu1Ov7AqAocJLzQa5i5z83ugmvWgCDQt_OF_oSpovHm2mhgX0DcdWYMw</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3</title><author>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-dbd722fe91fc418da3c23d27f0a6f020d76d80c7dd46ecd9025d90499a81fdb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adults. Performance, acquisition</topic><topic>Applied Linguistics</topic><topic>Dutch</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>French</topic><topic>Interlanguage</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Production and comprehension processes</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology of language</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><topic>Uncommonly Taught Languages</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dewaele, Jean-Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ577550</ericid><atitle>Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3</atitle><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>471-490</pages><issn>0142-6001</issn><eissn>1477-450X</eissn><coden>ADLSDX</coden><abstract>The usual source of crosslinguistic influence in the interlanguage of a person learning a first foreign language (L2) is quite obviously his/her L1. Pinpointing the source of crosslinguistic influences in the interlanguage of a multilingual speaker is less straightforward. The main source of crosslinguistic influence in the L3 of a speaker is not automatically, as the present study shows, the L1 of the speaker. This paper investigates this phenomenon in the context of non-target-like lexemes (‘lexical inventions’) in the advanced oral French interlanguage of 39 Dutch L1 speakers, 32 of whom had French as an L2 and English as an L3, the remaining 7 speakers having English as an L2 and French as an L3. Our results show that a higher proportion of lexical inventions produced by the French L2 speakers derive from creative (non-standard) use of target language rules compared to the French L3 speakers. Crosslinguistic influence is visible in the lexical inventions of both groups, but the French L2 speakers seem to rely more on information attached to their Dutch L1 lemmas, whereas the French L3 speakers draw more on their English L2 lemmas. This suggests principles blocking L1 transfer in L3 learners in terms of spreading activation (cf Green 1986, Poulisse and Bongaerts 1994)</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/applin/19.4.471</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-6001 |
ispartof | Applied linguistics, 1998-12, Vol.19 (4), p.471-490 |
issn | 0142-6001 1477-450X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85688421 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Adults. Performance, acquisition Applied Linguistics Dutch English French Interlanguage Language Research Linguistics Multilingualism Oral Language Production and comprehension processes Psycholinguistics Psychology of language Second Language Learning Transfer of Training Uncommonly Taught Languages Vocabulary Development |
title | Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A51%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lexical%20Inventions:%20French%20Interlanguage%20as%20L2%20versus%20L3&rft.jtitle=Applied%20linguistics&rft.au=Dewaele,%20Jean-Marc&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=471-490&rft.issn=0142-6001&rft.eissn=1477-450X&rft.coden=ADLSDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/applin/19.4.471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85688421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791746468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ577550&rfr_iscdi=true |