Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)
This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Bo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language and literature (Harlow, England) England), 1999-06, Vol.8 (2), p.163-178 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Language and literature (Harlow, England) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Forceville, Charles |
description | This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/096394709900800204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85683320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_096394709900800204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>85683320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAkyeEAyh145jxywIlVIqKiGh0jW4znVJlR-IE6FuvAavx5OQqGxITHc550rnI-SUwSVjSo1Ay1ALBVoDxAAcxB4ZMCFZoLgO98mgB4KeOCRH3m8AQAgdDcjLJG2tabJyTZtXpLjFa_pQo_fUlCldmpLOEdsPLL8_vzx9QpP26Kwwa_RXdNEp09oUhalp5egy863J6S36bF3Sc6a1vDgmB87kHk9-75A8300W4_tg_jidjW_mgeUhawJ0HJVULkYpeSyiVSpsqGVsUsWsQ-AWIXYWnOBKRGAFYKqksbFYOaEkD4fkbPf3ra7eW_RNUmTeYp6bEqvWJ3Ek4zDk0IF8B9q68r5Gl7zVWRewTRgk_ZjJ3zE7abSTfBeebKq2LruY_4wfINVzXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85683320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Forceville, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Forceville, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/096394709900800204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LLITET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Language and literature (Harlow, England), 1999-06, Vol.8 (2), p.163-178</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/096394709900800204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096394709900800204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forceville, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</title><title>Language and literature (Harlow, England)</title><description>This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.</description><issn>0963-9470</issn><issn>1461-7293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAkyeEAyh145jxywIlVIqKiGh0jW4znVJlR-IE6FuvAavx5OQqGxITHc550rnI-SUwSVjSo1Ay1ALBVoDxAAcxB4ZMCFZoLgO98mgB4KeOCRH3m8AQAgdDcjLJG2tabJyTZtXpLjFa_pQo_fUlCldmpLOEdsPLL8_vzx9QpP26Kwwa_RXdNEp09oUhalp5egy863J6S36bF3Sc6a1vDgmB87kHk9-75A8300W4_tg_jidjW_mgeUhawJ0HJVULkYpeSyiVSpsqGVsUsWsQ-AWIXYWnOBKRGAFYKqksbFYOaEkD4fkbPf3ra7eW_RNUmTeYp6bEqvWJ3Ek4zDk0IF8B9q68r5Gl7zVWRewTRgk_ZjJ3zE7abSTfBeebKq2LruY_4wfINVzXQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Forceville, Charles</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</title><author>Forceville, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forceville, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language and literature (Harlow, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forceville, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</atitle><jtitle>Language and literature (Harlow, England)</jtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>163-178</pages><issn>0963-9470</issn><eissn>1461-7293</eissn><coden>LLITET</coden><abstract>This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/096394709900800204</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-9470 |
ispartof | Language and literature (Harlow, England), 1999-06, Vol.8 (2), p.163-178 |
issn | 0963-9470 1461-7293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85683320 |
source | SAGE Complete |
title | Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Educating%20the%20eye?%20Kress%20and%20Van%20Leeuwen%E2%80%99s%20Reading%20Images:%20The%20Grammar%20of%20Visual%20Design%20(1996)&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20literature%20(Harlow,%20England)&rft.au=Forceville,%20Charles&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=163-178&rft.issn=0963-9470&rft.eissn=1461-7293&rft.coden=LLITET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/096394709900800204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85683320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85683320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_096394709900800204&rfr_iscdi=true |