Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)

This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Bo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language and literature (Harlow, England) England), 1999-06, Vol.8 (2), p.163-178
1. Verfasser: Forceville, Charles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title Language and literature (Harlow, England)
container_volume 8
creator Forceville, Charles
description This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/096394709900800204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85683320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_096394709900800204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>85683320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAkyeEAyh145jxywIlVIqKiGh0jW4znVJlR-IE6FuvAavx5OQqGxITHc550rnI-SUwSVjSo1Ay1ALBVoDxAAcxB4ZMCFZoLgO98mgB4KeOCRH3m8AQAgdDcjLJG2tabJyTZtXpLjFa_pQo_fUlCldmpLOEdsPLL8_vzx9QpP26Kwwa_RXdNEp09oUhalp5egy863J6S36bF3Sc6a1vDgmB87kHk9-75A8300W4_tg_jidjW_mgeUhawJ0HJVULkYpeSyiVSpsqGVsUsWsQ-AWIXYWnOBKRGAFYKqksbFYOaEkD4fkbPf3ra7eW_RNUmTeYp6bEqvWJ3Ek4zDk0IF8B9q68r5Gl7zVWRewTRgk_ZjJ3zE7abSTfBeebKq2LruY_4wfINVzXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85683320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Forceville, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Forceville, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/096394709900800204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LLITET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Language and literature (Harlow, England), 1999-06, Vol.8 (2), p.163-178</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/096394709900800204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096394709900800204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forceville, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</title><title>Language and literature (Harlow, England)</title><description>This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.</description><issn>0963-9470</issn><issn>1461-7293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAkyeEAyh145jxywIlVIqKiGh0jW4znVJlR-IE6FuvAavx5OQqGxITHc550rnI-SUwSVjSo1Ay1ALBVoDxAAcxB4ZMCFZoLgO98mgB4KeOCRH3m8AQAgdDcjLJG2tabJyTZtXpLjFa_pQo_fUlCldmpLOEdsPLL8_vzx9QpP26Kwwa_RXdNEp09oUhalp5egy863J6S36bF3Sc6a1vDgmB87kHk9-75A8300W4_tg_jidjW_mgeUhawJ0HJVULkYpeSyiVSpsqGVsUsWsQ-AWIXYWnOBKRGAFYKqksbFYOaEkD4fkbPf3ra7eW_RNUmTeYp6bEqvWJ3Ek4zDk0IF8B9q68r5Gl7zVWRewTRgk_ZjJ3zE7abSTfBeebKq2LruY_4wfINVzXQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Forceville, Charles</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</title><author>Forceville, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-ef2e767f8e662845bd4c3968ad71cfe02ce08fc0f427450c40ed76ac84bf47623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forceville, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language and literature (Harlow, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forceville, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)</atitle><jtitle>Language and literature (Harlow, England)</jtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>163-178</pages><issn>0963-9470</issn><eissn>1461-7293</eissn><coden>LLITET</coden><abstract>This review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (KvL) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) begins by giving a summary of its main issues, and highlights its innovative and bold proposals. In the following sections, some weaknesses and controversial aspects of the book are discussed. Both are seen as following from the semiotic and ideological approach adopted by the authors. Specifically, these affect the proposals for the classification and interpretation of images, and the degree to which the concepts delineated are generalizable. In the later sections, tentative suggestions are made as to how KvL’s approach is relevant to the currently emerging ‘cognitivist’ paradigm.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/096394709900800204</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-9470
ispartof Language and literature (Harlow, England), 1999-06, Vol.8 (2), p.163-178
issn 0963-9470
1461-7293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85683320
source SAGE Complete
title Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Educating%20the%20eye?%20Kress%20and%20Van%20Leeuwen%E2%80%99s%20Reading%20Images:%20The%20Grammar%20of%20Visual%20Design%20(1996)&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20literature%20(Harlow,%20England)&rft.au=Forceville,%20Charles&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=163-178&rft.issn=0963-9470&rft.eissn=1461-7293&rft.coden=LLITET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/096394709900800204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85683320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85683320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_096394709900800204&rfr_iscdi=true