Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change

The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to dem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistics and education 2008, Vol.19 (4), p.351-365
1. Verfasser: Hood, Susan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 365
container_issue 4
container_start_page 351
container_title Linguistics and education
container_volume 19
creator Hood, Susan
description The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85681784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ820367</ericid><els_id>S0898589808000363</els_id><sourcerecordid>85681784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMIf9JATt4RxFmfCAQlVBYoqgQScLceZgKssxU5Z_h6XVBy5zBzeovceYzMOEQcuLtZRY7pXqqIYACMQEUBywCYc8yTkKNJDNgEsMMz8OWYnzq0BeM4BJ-zxadu2yn4Hn9YM3iQwXaC0qqg1OtB9N9DX4C6DZbtpjFa_jJZUt2dubK_JOXJBXwf6TfkQp-yoVo2js_2fspebxfP8Llw93C7n16tQJ0kxhIgKs7gsSNRUVroUPK5ryImroio1Ic8IqcgyUUOMAErVMUeVirjkkOScJ1N2Pvr6DO9bcoNsjdPUNKqjfuskZgJ5jqknpiNR2945S7XcWLOrLDnI3XxyLcf55G4-CUL6-bxsNsrIGv0nWdxjDInIPXy1h33HD0NWOm2o01QZS3qQVW_-9_8BqvOEsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85681784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hood, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hood, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIEDE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Discourse ; Appraisal ; Commitment ; English for Academic Purposes ; Instantiation ; Language Processing ; Metafunctions ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Summary writing ; Systemic functional linguistics ; Teaching Methods ; Textbooks ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Skills</subject><ispartof>Linguistics and education, 2008, Vol.19 (4), p.351-365</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ820367$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hood, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</title><title>Linguistics and education</title><description>The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.</description><subject>Academic Discourse</subject><subject>Appraisal</subject><subject>Commitment</subject><subject>English for Academic Purposes</subject><subject>Instantiation</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Metafunctions</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Summary writing</subject><subject>Systemic functional linguistics</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><issn>0898-5898</issn><issn>1873-1864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMIf9JATt4RxFmfCAQlVBYoqgQScLceZgKssxU5Z_h6XVBy5zBzeovceYzMOEQcuLtZRY7pXqqIYACMQEUBywCYc8yTkKNJDNgEsMMz8OWYnzq0BeM4BJ-zxadu2yn4Hn9YM3iQwXaC0qqg1OtB9N9DX4C6DZbtpjFa_jJZUt2dubK_JOXJBXwf6TfkQp-yoVo2js_2fspebxfP8Llw93C7n16tQJ0kxhIgKs7gsSNRUVroUPK5ryImroio1Ic8IqcgyUUOMAErVMUeVirjkkOScJ1N2Pvr6DO9bcoNsjdPUNKqjfuskZgJ5jqknpiNR2945S7XcWLOrLDnI3XxyLcf55G4-CUL6-bxsNsrIGv0nWdxjDInIPXy1h33HD0NWOm2o01QZS3qQVW_-9_8BqvOEsw</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Hood, Susan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</title><author>Hood, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Discourse</topic><topic>Appraisal</topic><topic>Commitment</topic><topic>English for Academic Purposes</topic><topic>Instantiation</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Metafunctions</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Summary writing</topic><topic>Systemic functional linguistics</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hood, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hood, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ820367</ericid><atitle>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>365</epage><pages>351-365</pages><issn>0898-5898</issn><eissn>1873-1864</eissn><coden>LIEDE8</coden><abstract>The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-5898
ispartof Linguistics and education, 2008, Vol.19 (4), p.351-365
issn 0898-5898
1873-1864
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85681784
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Academic Discourse
Appraisal
Commitment
English for Academic Purposes
Instantiation
Language Processing
Metafunctions
Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Summary writing
Systemic functional linguistics
Teaching Methods
Textbooks
Writing Instruction
Writing Skills
title Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summary%20writing%20in%20academic%20contexts:%20Implicating%20meaning%20in%20processes%20of%20change&rft.jtitle=Linguistics%20and%20education&rft.au=Hood,%20Susan&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=365&rft.pages=351-365&rft.issn=0898-5898&rft.eissn=1873-1864&rft.coden=LIEDE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85681784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85681784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ820367&rft_els_id=S0898589808000363&rfr_iscdi=true