Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change
The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to dem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Linguistics and education 2008, Vol.19 (4), p.351-365 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 365 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | Linguistics and education |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Hood, Susan |
description | The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85681784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ820367</ericid><els_id>S0898589808000363</els_id><sourcerecordid>85681784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMIf9JATt4RxFmfCAQlVBYoqgQScLceZgKssxU5Z_h6XVBy5zBzeovceYzMOEQcuLtZRY7pXqqIYACMQEUBywCYc8yTkKNJDNgEsMMz8OWYnzq0BeM4BJ-zxadu2yn4Hn9YM3iQwXaC0qqg1OtB9N9DX4C6DZbtpjFa_jJZUt2dubK_JOXJBXwf6TfkQp-yoVo2js_2fspebxfP8Llw93C7n16tQJ0kxhIgKs7gsSNRUVroUPK5ryImroio1Ic8IqcgyUUOMAErVMUeVirjkkOScJ1N2Pvr6DO9bcoNsjdPUNKqjfuskZgJ5jqknpiNR2945S7XcWLOrLDnI3XxyLcf55G4-CUL6-bxsNsrIGv0nWdxjDInIPXy1h33HD0NWOm2o01QZS3qQVW_-9_8BqvOEsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85681784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hood, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hood, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIEDE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Discourse ; Appraisal ; Commitment ; English for Academic Purposes ; Instantiation ; Language Processing ; Metafunctions ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Summary writing ; Systemic functional linguistics ; Teaching Methods ; Textbooks ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Skills</subject><ispartof>Linguistics and education, 2008, Vol.19 (4), p.351-365</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ820367$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hood, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</title><title>Linguistics and education</title><description>The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.</description><subject>Academic Discourse</subject><subject>Appraisal</subject><subject>Commitment</subject><subject>English for Academic Purposes</subject><subject>Instantiation</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Metafunctions</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Summary writing</subject><subject>Systemic functional linguistics</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><issn>0898-5898</issn><issn>1873-1864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMIf9JATt4RxFmfCAQlVBYoqgQScLceZgKssxU5Z_h6XVBy5zBzeovceYzMOEQcuLtZRY7pXqqIYACMQEUBywCYc8yTkKNJDNgEsMMz8OWYnzq0BeM4BJ-zxadu2yn4Hn9YM3iQwXaC0qqg1OtB9N9DX4C6DZbtpjFa_jJZUt2dubK_JOXJBXwf6TfkQp-yoVo2js_2fspebxfP8Llw93C7n16tQJ0kxhIgKs7gsSNRUVroUPK5ryImroio1Ic8IqcgyUUOMAErVMUeVirjkkOScJ1N2Pvr6DO9bcoNsjdPUNKqjfuskZgJ5jqknpiNR2945S7XcWLOrLDnI3XxyLcf55G4-CUL6-bxsNsrIGv0nWdxjDInIPXy1h33HD0NWOm2o01QZS3qQVW_-9_8BqvOEsw</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Hood, Susan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</title><author>Hood, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-88a852b9e6febdcb612ff07e1a9dbce815e8e9556f02800aaf218a462b1037113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Discourse</topic><topic>Appraisal</topic><topic>Commitment</topic><topic>English for Academic Purposes</topic><topic>Instantiation</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Metafunctions</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Summary writing</topic><topic>Systemic functional linguistics</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hood, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hood, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ820367</ericid><atitle>Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>365</epage><pages>351-365</pages><issn>0898-5898</issn><eissn>1873-1864</eissn><coden>LIEDE8</coden><abstract>The practice of summary writing from source texts has long been a core activity in academic writing programs. When described as précis writing, textbooks focusing on teaching this skill date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. In current guidelines, students are typically asked to demonstrate an understanding of the key meanings encoded in source texts by recording those meanings in note form and then reconstructing them in a significantly shorter summary, relying minimally on the original wording. However, what is presented as a relatively straightforward process is made considerably more complex when we consider that any change in wording necessarily impacts on meaning in some way. In this paper, I explore how meaning is implicated in one process of re-instantiation from original text to notes to summary text, and to consider at a theoretical level what is involved in these changes. The findings suggest ways to scaffold the task more effectively for students and novice writers in academic English.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-5898 |
ispartof | Linguistics and education, 2008, Vol.19 (4), p.351-365 |
issn | 0898-5898 1873-1864 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85681784 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Academic Discourse Appraisal Commitment English for Academic Purposes Instantiation Language Processing Metafunctions Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Summary writing Systemic functional linguistics Teaching Methods Textbooks Writing Instruction Writing Skills |
title | Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summary%20writing%20in%20academic%20contexts:%20Implicating%20meaning%20in%20processes%20of%20change&rft.jtitle=Linguistics%20and%20education&rft.au=Hood,%20Susan&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=365&rft.pages=351-365&rft.issn=0898-5898&rft.eissn=1873-1864&rft.coden=LIEDE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85681784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85681784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ820367&rft_els_id=S0898589808000363&rfr_iscdi=true |