Alaska North Slope regional gas hydrate production modeling forecasts

A series of gas hydrate development scenarios were created to assess the range of outcomes predicted for the possible development of the “Eileen” gas hydrate accumulation, North Slope, Alaska. Production forecasts for the “reference case” were built using the 2002 Mallik production tests, mechanisti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine and petroleum geology 2011-02, Vol.28 (2), p.460-477
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Scott J., Hunter, Robert B., Collett, Timothy S., Hancock, Steve, Boswell, Ray, Anderson, Brian J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 477
container_issue 2
container_start_page 460
container_title Marine and petroleum geology
container_volume 28
creator Wilson, Scott J.
Hunter, Robert B.
Collett, Timothy S.
Hancock, Steve
Boswell, Ray
Anderson, Brian J.
description A series of gas hydrate development scenarios were created to assess the range of outcomes predicted for the possible development of the “Eileen” gas hydrate accumulation, North Slope, Alaska. Production forecasts for the “reference case” were built using the 2002 Mallik production tests, mechanistic simulation, and geologic studies conducted by the US Geological Survey. Three additional scenarios were considered: A “downside-scenario” which fails to identify viable production, an “upside-scenario” describes results that are better than expected. To capture the full range of possible outcomes and balance the downside case, an “extreme upside scenario” assumes each well is exceptionally productive. Starting with a representative type-well simulation forecasts, field development timing is applied and the sum of individual well forecasts creating the field-wide production forecast. This technique is commonly used to schedule large-scale resource plays where drilling schedules are complex and production forecasts must account for many changing parameters. The complementary forecasts of rig count, capital investment, and cash flow can be used in a pre-appraisal assessment of potential commercial viability. Since no significant gas sales are currently possible on the North Slope of Alaska, typical parameters were used to create downside, reference, and upside case forecasts that predict from 0 to 71 BM 3 (2.5 tcf) of gas may be produced in 20 years and nearly 283 BM 3 (10 tcf) ultimate recovery after 100 years. Outlining a range of possible outcomes enables decision makers to visualize the pace and milestones that will be required to evaluate gas hydrate resource development in the Eileen accumulation. Critical values of peak production rate, time to meaningful production volumes, and investments required to rule out a downside case are provided. Upside cases identify potential if both depressurization and thermal stimulation yield positive results. An “extreme upside” case captures the full potential of unconstrained development with widely spaced wells. The results of this study indicate that recoverable gas hydrate resources may exist in the Eileen accumulation and that it represents a good opportunity for continued research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.03.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856785459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264817210000668</els_id><sourcerecordid>856785459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-e0797b0d1b40a644dfa167fd48efb1aa1a5ccd55021ebc04ee1bed27f1a18cc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwGciNU4vTpk13nKbxR5rgAJyjNHG7jK4ZSYa0b0-mIa6cLNnv2X4_Qm4Z5AxYfb_Jt8rvMPbo8gJSF8ocQJyRCWtEmXEQ5TmZQFHzrGGiuCRXIWwgKWbAJmQ5H1T4VPTF-bimb4PbIfXYWzeqgfYq0PXBeBWR7rwzex3TgG6dwcGOPe2cR61CDNfkolNDwJvfOiUfD8v3xVO2en18XsxXmSoFxAzTUdGCYS0HVXNuOsVq0RneYNcypZiqtDZVBQXDVgNHZC2aQnRMsUbrqpySu9Pe9M3XHkOUWxs0DoMa0e2DbKpaNBWvZkkpTkrtXQgeO7nzNoE6SAbyyE1u5B83eeQmoZSJSnLOT05MQb4tehm0xVGjsSltlMbZf3f8AF3FfKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856785459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alaska North Slope regional gas hydrate production modeling forecasts</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wilson, Scott J. ; Hunter, Robert B. ; Collett, Timothy S. ; Hancock, Steve ; Boswell, Ray ; Anderson, Brian J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Scott J. ; Hunter, Robert B. ; Collett, Timothy S. ; Hancock, Steve ; Boswell, Ray ; Anderson, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><description>A series of gas hydrate development scenarios were created to assess the range of outcomes predicted for the possible development of the “Eileen” gas hydrate accumulation, North Slope, Alaska. Production forecasts for the “reference case” were built using the 2002 Mallik production tests, mechanistic simulation, and geologic studies conducted by the US Geological Survey. Three additional scenarios were considered: A “downside-scenario” which fails to identify viable production, an “upside-scenario” describes results that are better than expected. To capture the full range of possible outcomes and balance the downside case, an “extreme upside scenario” assumes each well is exceptionally productive. Starting with a representative type-well simulation forecasts, field development timing is applied and the sum of individual well forecasts creating the field-wide production forecast. This technique is commonly used to schedule large-scale resource plays where drilling schedules are complex and production forecasts must account for many changing parameters. The complementary forecasts of rig count, capital investment, and cash flow can be used in a pre-appraisal assessment of potential commercial viability. Since no significant gas sales are currently possible on the North Slope of Alaska, typical parameters were used to create downside, reference, and upside case forecasts that predict from 0 to 71 BM 3 (2.5 tcf) of gas may be produced in 20 years and nearly 283 BM 3 (10 tcf) ultimate recovery after 100 years. Outlining a range of possible outcomes enables decision makers to visualize the pace and milestones that will be required to evaluate gas hydrate resource development in the Eileen accumulation. Critical values of peak production rate, time to meaningful production volumes, and investments required to rule out a downside case are provided. Upside cases identify potential if both depressurization and thermal stimulation yield positive results. An “extreme upside” case captures the full potential of unconstrained development with widely spaced wells. The results of this study indicate that recoverable gas hydrate resources may exist in the Eileen accumulation and that it represents a good opportunity for continued research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.03.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alaska North Slope ; Financing ; Gas hydrates ; Geological surveys ; Investment ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Natural gas ; Production forecasting ; Resource development modeling ; Schedules ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Marine and petroleum geology, 2011-02, Vol.28 (2), p.460-477</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-e0797b0d1b40a644dfa167fd48efb1aa1a5ccd55021ebc04ee1bed27f1a18cc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-e0797b0d1b40a644dfa167fd48efb1aa1a5ccd55021ebc04ee1bed27f1a18cc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.03.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Scott J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collett, Timothy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boswell, Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Alaska North Slope regional gas hydrate production modeling forecasts</title><title>Marine and petroleum geology</title><description>A series of gas hydrate development scenarios were created to assess the range of outcomes predicted for the possible development of the “Eileen” gas hydrate accumulation, North Slope, Alaska. Production forecasts for the “reference case” were built using the 2002 Mallik production tests, mechanistic simulation, and geologic studies conducted by the US Geological Survey. Three additional scenarios were considered: A “downside-scenario” which fails to identify viable production, an “upside-scenario” describes results that are better than expected. To capture the full range of possible outcomes and balance the downside case, an “extreme upside scenario” assumes each well is exceptionally productive. Starting with a representative type-well simulation forecasts, field development timing is applied and the sum of individual well forecasts creating the field-wide production forecast. This technique is commonly used to schedule large-scale resource plays where drilling schedules are complex and production forecasts must account for many changing parameters. The complementary forecasts of rig count, capital investment, and cash flow can be used in a pre-appraisal assessment of potential commercial viability. Since no significant gas sales are currently possible on the North Slope of Alaska, typical parameters were used to create downside, reference, and upside case forecasts that predict from 0 to 71 BM 3 (2.5 tcf) of gas may be produced in 20 years and nearly 283 BM 3 (10 tcf) ultimate recovery after 100 years. Outlining a range of possible outcomes enables decision makers to visualize the pace and milestones that will be required to evaluate gas hydrate resource development in the Eileen accumulation. Critical values of peak production rate, time to meaningful production volumes, and investments required to rule out a downside case are provided. Upside cases identify potential if both depressurization and thermal stimulation yield positive results. An “extreme upside” case captures the full potential of unconstrained development with widely spaced wells. The results of this study indicate that recoverable gas hydrate resources may exist in the Eileen accumulation and that it represents a good opportunity for continued research.</description><subject>Alaska North Slope</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Gas hydrates</subject><subject>Geological surveys</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Production forecasting</subject><subject>Resource development modeling</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>0264-8172</issn><issn>1873-4073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwGciNU4vTpk13nKbxR5rgAJyjNHG7jK4ZSYa0b0-mIa6cLNnv2X4_Qm4Z5AxYfb_Jt8rvMPbo8gJSF8ocQJyRCWtEmXEQ5TmZQFHzrGGiuCRXIWwgKWbAJmQ5H1T4VPTF-bimb4PbIfXYWzeqgfYq0PXBeBWR7rwzex3TgG6dwcGOPe2cR61CDNfkolNDwJvfOiUfD8v3xVO2en18XsxXmSoFxAzTUdGCYS0HVXNuOsVq0RneYNcypZiqtDZVBQXDVgNHZC2aQnRMsUbrqpySu9Pe9M3XHkOUWxs0DoMa0e2DbKpaNBWvZkkpTkrtXQgeO7nzNoE6SAbyyE1u5B83eeQmoZSJSnLOT05MQb4tehm0xVGjsSltlMbZf3f8AF3FfKY</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Wilson, Scott J.</creator><creator>Hunter, Robert B.</creator><creator>Collett, Timothy S.</creator><creator>Hancock, Steve</creator><creator>Boswell, Ray</creator><creator>Anderson, Brian J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Alaska North Slope regional gas hydrate production modeling forecasts</title><author>Wilson, Scott J. ; Hunter, Robert B. ; Collett, Timothy S. ; Hancock, Steve ; Boswell, Ray ; Anderson, Brian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-e0797b0d1b40a644dfa167fd48efb1aa1a5ccd55021ebc04ee1bed27f1a18cc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alaska North Slope</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Gas hydrates</topic><topic>Geological surveys</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Production forecasting</topic><topic>Resource development modeling</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Scott J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collett, Timothy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boswell, Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine and petroleum geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Scott J.</au><au>Hunter, Robert B.</au><au>Collett, Timothy S.</au><au>Hancock, Steve</au><au>Boswell, Ray</au><au>Anderson, Brian J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alaska North Slope regional gas hydrate production modeling forecasts</atitle><jtitle>Marine and petroleum geology</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>460-477</pages><issn>0264-8172</issn><eissn>1873-4073</eissn><abstract>A series of gas hydrate development scenarios were created to assess the range of outcomes predicted for the possible development of the “Eileen” gas hydrate accumulation, North Slope, Alaska. Production forecasts for the “reference case” were built using the 2002 Mallik production tests, mechanistic simulation, and geologic studies conducted by the US Geological Survey. Three additional scenarios were considered: A “downside-scenario” which fails to identify viable production, an “upside-scenario” describes results that are better than expected. To capture the full range of possible outcomes and balance the downside case, an “extreme upside scenario” assumes each well is exceptionally productive. Starting with a representative type-well simulation forecasts, field development timing is applied and the sum of individual well forecasts creating the field-wide production forecast. This technique is commonly used to schedule large-scale resource plays where drilling schedules are complex and production forecasts must account for many changing parameters. The complementary forecasts of rig count, capital investment, and cash flow can be used in a pre-appraisal assessment of potential commercial viability. Since no significant gas sales are currently possible on the North Slope of Alaska, typical parameters were used to create downside, reference, and upside case forecasts that predict from 0 to 71 BM 3 (2.5 tcf) of gas may be produced in 20 years and nearly 283 BM 3 (10 tcf) ultimate recovery after 100 years. Outlining a range of possible outcomes enables decision makers to visualize the pace and milestones that will be required to evaluate gas hydrate resource development in the Eileen accumulation. Critical values of peak production rate, time to meaningful production volumes, and investments required to rule out a downside case are provided. Upside cases identify potential if both depressurization and thermal stimulation yield positive results. An “extreme upside” case captures the full potential of unconstrained development with widely spaced wells. The results of this study indicate that recoverable gas hydrate resources may exist in the Eileen accumulation and that it represents a good opportunity for continued research.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.03.007</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8172
ispartof Marine and petroleum geology, 2011-02, Vol.28 (2), p.460-477
issn 0264-8172
1873-4073
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856785459
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Alaska North Slope
Financing
Gas hydrates
Geological surveys
Investment
Marine
Mathematical models
Natural gas
Production forecasting
Resource development modeling
Schedules
Simulation
title Alaska North Slope regional gas hydrate production modeling forecasts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A31%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alaska%20North%20Slope%20regional%20gas%20hydrate%20production%20modeling%20forecasts&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20petroleum%20geology&rft.au=Wilson,%20Scott%20J.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=460-477&rft.issn=0264-8172&rft.eissn=1873-4073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E856785459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856785459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264817210000668&rfr_iscdi=true