The Effect of Hydraulic Loading Rates on Nitrogen Removal by Using a Biological Filter Proposed for Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines

No on-site sanitation system treats both urine and faecal matter in one process. A laboratory scale biological filter was fed with high concentration of urea (4 g N/L) and 17.1 g COD/L to determine if it will be possible to treat liquid that leach from a ventilated improved pit latrine. The HLR in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Environmental Research 2011, Vol.5 (1), p.119-126
Hauptverfasser: Coetzee, MAA, Roux-Van, MMP, Badenhorst, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 1
container_start_page 119
container_title International Journal of Environmental Research
container_volume 5
creator Coetzee, MAA
Roux-Van, MMP
Badenhorst, J
description No on-site sanitation system treats both urine and faecal matter in one process. A laboratory scale biological filter was fed with high concentration of urea (4 g N/L) and 17.1 g COD/L to determine if it will be possible to treat liquid that leach from a ventilated improved pit latrine. The HLR in the proposed biological filter system was calculated to be ca 36 L/m super(2)/d, significantly lower than the rates that are typical applied in standard rate biological filters (in the range of 1000 - 4000 L/m super(2)/d) used to treat domestic wastewater. However, the TKN and COD concentrations in standard rate biological filters are significantly lower, namely ca 60 mg N/L and 500 mg COD/L, compared to the typical nitrogen and COD concentrations of faecal sludge, namely 3 - 5 g N/L and 20 - 50 g COD/L, respectively. The biological filter was operated at 13.0, 23.9, 35.7 and 62.3 L/m super(2)/d, until stable state conditions were obtained. It was possible to remove most of the nitrogen and COD at the applied hydraulic loading rates by a combination of volatilization, nitrification and de-nitrification processes. However, at 62.3 L/m super(2)/d the column efficiency (1.5 m long column) decreased and ammonia concentration in the effluent increased again. The best performance was achieved at a hydraulic loading rate of 35.7 L/m super(2)/d, with an average ammonia concentration of 285.5 ( plus or minus 9.1)mgN/L.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856783198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>856783198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p187t-a4267e716b28b0cee7d9d60b751fa209ee5fc330dc199c34a280961fae4eb05a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTs1KAzEY3IOCpfoO383TQnazm5-jltYWFi2l9VqyyZcaSTc1SQu9--Cu6FxmmBmGuSkmFadtyQRr74qHlD7JCCola9ik-N5-IMytRZ0hWFheTVRn7zR0QRk3HGCjMiYIA7y6HMMBB9jgMVyUh_4Ku_RbUfDsgg8Hp0d34XzGCOsYTiGhARsivOOQnR-HDKyOpxguo1i7DJ3K0Q2Y7otbq3zCh3-eFrvFfDtblt3by2r21JWnSvBcqqZmHHnF-lr0RCNyIw0jPW8rq2oiEVurKSVGV1Jq2qhaEMnGDBvsSavotHj82x0_fJ0x5f3RJY3eqwHDOe1Fy7iglRT0B7S-X30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856783198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Hydraulic Loading Rates on Nitrogen Removal by Using a Biological Filter Proposed for Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines</title><source>Bioline International</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Coetzee, MAA ; Roux-Van, MMP ; Badenhorst, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Coetzee, MAA ; Roux-Van, MMP ; Badenhorst, J</creatorcontrib><description>No on-site sanitation system treats both urine and faecal matter in one process. A laboratory scale biological filter was fed with high concentration of urea (4 g N/L) and 17.1 g COD/L to determine if it will be possible to treat liquid that leach from a ventilated improved pit latrine. The HLR in the proposed biological filter system was calculated to be ca 36 L/m super(2)/d, significantly lower than the rates that are typical applied in standard rate biological filters (in the range of 1000 - 4000 L/m super(2)/d) used to treat domestic wastewater. However, the TKN and COD concentrations in standard rate biological filters are significantly lower, namely ca 60 mg N/L and 500 mg COD/L, compared to the typical nitrogen and COD concentrations of faecal sludge, namely 3 - 5 g N/L and 20 - 50 g COD/L, respectively. The biological filter was operated at 13.0, 23.9, 35.7 and 62.3 L/m super(2)/d, until stable state conditions were obtained. It was possible to remove most of the nitrogen and COD at the applied hydraulic loading rates by a combination of volatilization, nitrification and de-nitrification processes. However, at 62.3 L/m super(2)/d the column efficiency (1.5 m long column) decreased and ammonia concentration in the effluent increased again. The best performance was achieved at a hydraulic loading rate of 35.7 L/m super(2)/d, with an average ammonia concentration of 285.5 ( plus or minus 9.1)mgN/L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-6865</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International Journal of Environmental Research, 2011, Vol.5 (1), p.119-126</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coetzee, MAA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux-Van, MMP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, J</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Hydraulic Loading Rates on Nitrogen Removal by Using a Biological Filter Proposed for Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines</title><title>International Journal of Environmental Research</title><description>No on-site sanitation system treats both urine and faecal matter in one process. A laboratory scale biological filter was fed with high concentration of urea (4 g N/L) and 17.1 g COD/L to determine if it will be possible to treat liquid that leach from a ventilated improved pit latrine. The HLR in the proposed biological filter system was calculated to be ca 36 L/m super(2)/d, significantly lower than the rates that are typical applied in standard rate biological filters (in the range of 1000 - 4000 L/m super(2)/d) used to treat domestic wastewater. However, the TKN and COD concentrations in standard rate biological filters are significantly lower, namely ca 60 mg N/L and 500 mg COD/L, compared to the typical nitrogen and COD concentrations of faecal sludge, namely 3 - 5 g N/L and 20 - 50 g COD/L, respectively. The biological filter was operated at 13.0, 23.9, 35.7 and 62.3 L/m super(2)/d, until stable state conditions were obtained. It was possible to remove most of the nitrogen and COD at the applied hydraulic loading rates by a combination of volatilization, nitrification and de-nitrification processes. However, at 62.3 L/m super(2)/d the column efficiency (1.5 m long column) decreased and ammonia concentration in the effluent increased again. The best performance was achieved at a hydraulic loading rate of 35.7 L/m super(2)/d, with an average ammonia concentration of 285.5 ( plus or minus 9.1)mgN/L.</description><issn>1735-6865</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotTs1KAzEY3IOCpfoO383TQnazm5-jltYWFi2l9VqyyZcaSTc1SQu9--Cu6FxmmBmGuSkmFadtyQRr74qHlD7JCCola9ik-N5-IMytRZ0hWFheTVRn7zR0QRk3HGCjMiYIA7y6HMMBB9jgMVyUh_4Ku_RbUfDsgg8Hp0d34XzGCOsYTiGhARsivOOQnR-HDKyOpxguo1i7DJ3K0Q2Y7otbq3zCh3-eFrvFfDtblt3by2r21JWnSvBcqqZmHHnF-lr0RCNyIw0jPW8rq2oiEVurKSVGV1Jq2qhaEMnGDBvsSavotHj82x0_fJ0x5f3RJY3eqwHDOe1Fy7iglRT0B7S-X30</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Coetzee, MAA</creator><creator>Roux-Van, MMP</creator><creator>Badenhorst, J</creator><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>The Effect of Hydraulic Loading Rates on Nitrogen Removal by Using a Biological Filter Proposed for Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines</title><author>Coetzee, MAA ; Roux-Van, MMP ; Badenhorst, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p187t-a4267e716b28b0cee7d9d60b751fa209ee5fc330dc199c34a280961fae4eb05a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coetzee, MAA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux-Van, MMP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Environmental Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coetzee, MAA</au><au>Roux-Van, MMP</au><au>Badenhorst, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Hydraulic Loading Rates on Nitrogen Removal by Using a Biological Filter Proposed for Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Environmental Research</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>119-126</pages><issn>1735-6865</issn><abstract>No on-site sanitation system treats both urine and faecal matter in one process. A laboratory scale biological filter was fed with high concentration of urea (4 g N/L) and 17.1 g COD/L to determine if it will be possible to treat liquid that leach from a ventilated improved pit latrine. The HLR in the proposed biological filter system was calculated to be ca 36 L/m super(2)/d, significantly lower than the rates that are typical applied in standard rate biological filters (in the range of 1000 - 4000 L/m super(2)/d) used to treat domestic wastewater. However, the TKN and COD concentrations in standard rate biological filters are significantly lower, namely ca 60 mg N/L and 500 mg COD/L, compared to the typical nitrogen and COD concentrations of faecal sludge, namely 3 - 5 g N/L and 20 - 50 g COD/L, respectively. The biological filter was operated at 13.0, 23.9, 35.7 and 62.3 L/m super(2)/d, until stable state conditions were obtained. It was possible to remove most of the nitrogen and COD at the applied hydraulic loading rates by a combination of volatilization, nitrification and de-nitrification processes. However, at 62.3 L/m super(2)/d the column efficiency (1.5 m long column) decreased and ammonia concentration in the effluent increased again. The best performance was achieved at a hydraulic loading rate of 35.7 L/m super(2)/d, with an average ammonia concentration of 285.5 ( plus or minus 9.1)mgN/L.</abstract><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1735-6865
ispartof International Journal of Environmental Research, 2011, Vol.5 (1), p.119-126
issn 1735-6865
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856783198
source Bioline International; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title The Effect of Hydraulic Loading Rates on Nitrogen Removal by Using a Biological Filter Proposed for Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A32%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Hydraulic%20Loading%20Rates%20on%20Nitrogen%20Removal%20by%20Using%20a%20Biological%20Filter%20Proposed%20for%20Ventilated%20Improved%20Pit%20Latrines&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Research&rft.au=Coetzee,%20MAA&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=119-126&rft.issn=1735-6865&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E856783198%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856783198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true