Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages
The main objective of this study is to analyze the differences found in the results of noise mapping using two of the most popular software techniques for the prediction of environmental noise. The location selected to conduct the comparative study is an area encompassed by the ring road that surrou...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2010-04, Vol.163 (1-4), p.503-513 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 513 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-4 |
| container_start_page | 503 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 163 |
| creator | Arana, M San Martin, R San Martin, M. L Aramendía, E |
| description | The main objective of this study is to analyze the differences found in the results of noise mapping using two of the most popular software techniques for the prediction of environmental noise. The location selected to conduct the comparative study is an area encompassed by the ring road that surrounds the city of Pamplona and on a grid, with a total of 6 × 10⁵ points, approximately. In fact, and as the Environmental Noise Directive points out, it is a major road designated by a Member State (Spain). Configuration of the calculation parameters (discretization of the sources, ground absorption, reflection order, etc.) was as equivalent as possible as far as programs allow. In spite of that, a great number of differences appear in the findings. Although in 95.5% of the points the difference in the noise level calculated from the two programs was less than 3 dB, this general statistic result concealed some great differences. These are due to the various algorithms that programs implement to evaluate noise levels. Most differences pertain to highly screened receivers or remote ones. In the former, the algorithm of visibility is the main cause of such differences. In the latter, differences are mainly brought about by a different implementation of the propagation under homogeneous and favorable atmospheric conditions from both software systems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856781301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743758117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-f13f2c17fdce105bb0af310e2beab54f19cfc45c0d8bb36c95ef343adb0c14463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEotvCD-ACFlIFl8CMHcfOEVV8SZU4lJ4tx7EXL0kc7KQr_j1esqISh7Ynj-Rn3vl6i-IFwjsEEO8TQl1jCdCUIDkr-aNig1ywkja8eVxsAGtR1qxuTorTlHaQQVE1T4sTbBggMrEpzNUc9Wy33pAx-GTJoCcSHNE52IVIYtAdMTpGbzsSlpns_fyDzPtA7HjjYxgHO866J1O0nTezDyNJwc17HS2ZtPmptzY9K5443Sf7_PieFdefPn6_-FJefvv89eLDZWnyFHPpkDlqULjOWATetqAdQ7C0tbrllcPGOFNxA51sW1abhlvHKqa7FgxWVc3Oijer7hTDr8WmWQ0-Gdv3erRhSUryWkjMk99LCikoMKjY_WQujJxR-QCSCS4RRSbf3kmiEAI5p418GAo1r6qMvv4P3YUljnnhilIKUMu_K8IVMjGkFK1TU_SDjr8Vgjp4Sq2eUtkq6uApxXPOy6Pw0g62u804migD50dAJ6N7F_VofPrHUSoYY_LQIV25lL_GrY23Hd5V_dWa5HRQehuz8PUVhcMZJVaYgz-V8-uV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222006846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Arana, M ; San Martin, R ; San Martin, M. L ; Aramendía, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Arana, M ; San Martin, R ; San Martin, M. L ; Aramendía, E</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this study is to analyze the differences found in the results of noise mapping using two of the most popular software techniques for the prediction of environmental noise. The location selected to conduct the comparative study is an area encompassed by the ring road that surrounds the city of Pamplona and on a grid, with a total of 6 × 10⁵ points, approximately. In fact, and as the Environmental Noise Directive points out, it is a major road designated by a Member State (Spain). Configuration of the calculation parameters (discretization of the sources, ground absorption, reflection order, etc.) was as equivalent as possible as far as programs allow. In spite of that, a great number of differences appear in the findings. Although in 95.5% of the points the difference in the noise level calculated from the two programs was less than 3 dB, this general statistic result concealed some great differences. These are due to the various algorithms that programs implement to evaluate noise levels. Most differences pertain to highly screened receivers or remote ones. In the former, the algorithm of visibility is the main cause of such differences. In the latter, differences are mainly brought about by a different implementation of the propagation under homogeneous and favorable atmospheric conditions from both software systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19301137</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Assessments ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Atmospherics ; Comparative studies ; Computational models ; Computer programs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; GIS ; Mapping ; Mathematical analysis ; Methods ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Noise ; Noise levels ; Noise maps ; Noise pollution ; Pollution ; Propagation ; Roads ; Software ; Software packages ; Studies ; Traffic noise ; Transportation ; Urban noise prediction</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2010-04, Vol.163 (1-4), p.503-513</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-f13f2c17fdce105bb0af310e2beab54f19cfc45c0d8bb36c95ef343adb0c14463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-f13f2c17fdce105bb0af310e2beab54f19cfc45c0d8bb36c95ef343adb0c14463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22733384$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19301137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arana, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Martin, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Martin, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aramendía, E</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The main objective of this study is to analyze the differences found in the results of noise mapping using two of the most popular software techniques for the prediction of environmental noise. The location selected to conduct the comparative study is an area encompassed by the ring road that surrounds the city of Pamplona and on a grid, with a total of 6 × 10⁵ points, approximately. In fact, and as the Environmental Noise Directive points out, it is a major road designated by a Member State (Spain). Configuration of the calculation parameters (discretization of the sources, ground absorption, reflection order, etc.) was as equivalent as possible as far as programs allow. In spite of that, a great number of differences appear in the findings. Although in 95.5% of the points the difference in the noise level calculated from the two programs was less than 3 dB, this general statistic result concealed some great differences. These are due to the various algorithms that programs implement to evaluate noise levels. Most differences pertain to highly screened receivers or remote ones. In the former, the algorithm of visibility is the main cause of such differences. In the latter, differences are mainly brought about by a different implementation of the propagation under homogeneous and favorable atmospheric conditions from both software systems.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computational models</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>Noise maps</subject><subject>Noise pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Traffic noise</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Urban noise prediction</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEotvCD-ACFlIFl8CMHcfOEVV8SZU4lJ4tx7EXL0kc7KQr_j1esqISh7Ynj-Rn3vl6i-IFwjsEEO8TQl1jCdCUIDkr-aNig1ywkja8eVxsAGtR1qxuTorTlHaQQVE1T4sTbBggMrEpzNUc9Wy33pAx-GTJoCcSHNE52IVIYtAdMTpGbzsSlpns_fyDzPtA7HjjYxgHO866J1O0nTezDyNJwc17HS2ZtPmptzY9K5443Sf7_PieFdefPn6_-FJefvv89eLDZWnyFHPpkDlqULjOWATetqAdQ7C0tbrllcPGOFNxA51sW1abhlvHKqa7FgxWVc3Oijer7hTDr8WmWQ0-Gdv3erRhSUryWkjMk99LCikoMKjY_WQujJxR-QCSCS4RRSbf3kmiEAI5p418GAo1r6qMvv4P3YUljnnhilIKUMu_K8IVMjGkFK1TU_SDjr8Vgjp4Sq2eUtkq6uApxXPOy6Pw0g62u804migD50dAJ6N7F_VofPrHUSoYY_LQIV25lL_GrY23Hd5V_dWa5HRQehuz8PUVhcMZJVaYgz-V8-uV</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Arana, M</creator><creator>San Martin, R</creator><creator>San Martin, M. L</creator><creator>Aramendía, E</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages</title><author>Arana, M ; San Martin, R ; San Martin, M. L ; Aramendía, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-f13f2c17fdce105bb0af310e2beab54f19cfc45c0d8bb36c95ef343adb0c14463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computational models</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>Noise maps</topic><topic>Noise pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Traffic noise</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Urban noise prediction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arana, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Martin, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Martin, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aramendía, E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arana, M</au><au>San Martin, R</au><au>San Martin, M. L</au><au>Aramendía, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>503-513</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>The main objective of this study is to analyze the differences found in the results of noise mapping using two of the most popular software techniques for the prediction of environmental noise. The location selected to conduct the comparative study is an area encompassed by the ring road that surrounds the city of Pamplona and on a grid, with a total of 6 × 10⁵ points, approximately. In fact, and as the Environmental Noise Directive points out, it is a major road designated by a Member State (Spain). Configuration of the calculation parameters (discretization of the sources, ground absorption, reflection order, etc.) was as equivalent as possible as far as programs allow. In spite of that, a great number of differences appear in the findings. Although in 95.5% of the points the difference in the noise level calculated from the two programs was less than 3 dB, this general statistic result concealed some great differences. These are due to the various algorithms that programs implement to evaluate noise levels. Most differences pertain to highly screened receivers or remote ones. In the former, the algorithm of visibility is the main cause of such differences. In the latter, differences are mainly brought about by a different implementation of the propagation under homogeneous and favorable atmospheric conditions from both software systems.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>19301137</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2010-04, Vol.163 (1-4), p.503-513 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856781301 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Algorithms Applied sciences Assessments Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Atmospherics Comparative studies Computational models Computer programs Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental Monitoring - methods Exact sciences and technology GIS Mapping Mathematical analysis Methods Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Noise Noise levels Noise maps Noise pollution Pollution Propagation Roads Software Software packages Studies Traffic noise Transportation Urban noise prediction |
| title | Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20noise%20map%20of%20a%20major%20road%20carried%20out%20with%20two%20environmental%20prediction%20software%20packages&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Arana,%20M&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=503-513&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743758117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222006846&rft_id=info:pmid/19301137&rfr_iscdi=true |