Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda
▶ Intensive tree planting produced a closed canopy regenerating forest with10 years. ▶ 39 naturally regenerating tree species were found in the replanted forest. ▶ Shrubs, particularly Lantana camara, threaten the future success of the regeneration. The extensive area of degraded tropical land and t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2011-02, Vol.261 (3), p.703-709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 709 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 703 |
container_title | Forest ecology and management |
container_volume | 261 |
creator | Omeja, Patrick A. Chapman, Colin A. Obua, Joseph Lwanga, Jeremiah S. Jacob, Aerin L. Wanyama, Frederick Mugenyi, Richard |
description | ▶ Intensive tree planting produced a closed canopy regenerating forest with10 years. ▶ 39 naturally regenerating tree species were found in the replanted forest. ▶ Shrubs, particularly Lantana camara, threaten the future success of the regeneration.
The extensive area of degraded tropical land and the calls to conserve forest biodiversity and sequester carbon to offset climate change demonstrate the need to restore forest in the tropics. Deforested land is sometimes replanted with fast-growing trees; however, the consequences of intensive replanting on biomass accumulation or plant and animal diversity are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine how intensive replanting affected tropical forest regeneration and biomass accumulation over ten years. We studied reforested sites in Kibale National Park, Uganda, that were degraded in the 1970s and replanted with five native tree species in 1995. We identified and measured the size of planted versus naturally regenerating trees, and felled and weighed matched trees outside the park to calculate region-specific allometric equations for above-ground tree biomass. The role of shrubs and grasses in facilitating or hindering the establishment of trees was evaluated by correlating observed estimates of percent cover to tree biomass. We found 39 tree species naturally regenerating in the restored area in addition to the five originally planted species. Biomass was much higher for planted (15,675kg/ha) than naturally regenerated trees (4560kg/ha), but naturally regenerating tree regrowth was an important element of the landscape. The establishment of tree seedlings initially appeared to be facilitated by shrubs, primarily Acanthus pubescens and the invasive Lantana camara; however, both are expected to hinder tree recruitment in the long-term. Large and small-seeded tree species were found in the replanted area, indicating that bird and mammal dispersers contributed to natural forest restoration. These results demonstrate that intensive replanting can accelerate the natural accumulation of biomass and biodiversity and facilitate the restoration of tropical forest communities. However, the long-term financial costs and ecological benefits of planting and maintaining reforested areas need to be weighed against other potential restoration strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856779886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112710006997</els_id><sourcerecordid>856779886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c23d87ee8939d455628b9fe82774e5878e314d57bfa19cc7f562c4d14985c7e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGLFDEQhYMoOK7-A8FcRA_bYyqddJKLsCy6Li4q6JxDJl09ZOzpjElmYf69aXvxuKdA5XtVr-oR8hrYGhh0H_brISb0cc3ZXII14-YJWYFWvFFM8KdkxVqlGwCunpMXOe8ZY1IKvSLn26nglMM90pIQ6XF0UwnTjg7OhzEUVzDXn3gM3o10HpML3YbYV0XKoZypm_q5cHA5U-f96XAaXQlxomGiX8PWjUi__StU_Q-Xfl_Sza5q3EvybHBjxlcP7wXZfP706_pLc_f95vb66q7xwkBpPG97rRC1aU0vpOy43poBNVdKoNRKYwuil2o7ODDeq6ESXvQgjJZeYddekHdL32OKf07Vvj2E7HGsi2I8Zatlp5TReibfP0pCp0C2EjhUVCyoTzHnhIM9pnBw6WyB2TkTu7dLJnbOxALYmkmVvX2Y4HK955Dc5EP-r-Wtkp3pROXeLNzgonW7VJnNz9qoZWC45u1s4ONCYD3dfcBksw84eexDnVpsH8PjVv4Chi-ueQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671535121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Omeja, Patrick A. ; Chapman, Colin A. ; Obua, Joseph ; Lwanga, Jeremiah S. ; Jacob, Aerin L. ; Wanyama, Frederick ; Mugenyi, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Omeja, Patrick A. ; Chapman, Colin A. ; Obua, Joseph ; Lwanga, Jeremiah S. ; Jacob, Aerin L. ; Wanyama, Frederick ; Mugenyi, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>▶ Intensive tree planting produced a closed canopy regenerating forest with10 years. ▶ 39 naturally regenerating tree species were found in the replanted forest. ▶ Shrubs, particularly Lantana camara, threaten the future success of the regeneration.
The extensive area of degraded tropical land and the calls to conserve forest biodiversity and sequester carbon to offset climate change demonstrate the need to restore forest in the tropics. Deforested land is sometimes replanted with fast-growing trees; however, the consequences of intensive replanting on biomass accumulation or plant and animal diversity are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine how intensive replanting affected tropical forest regeneration and biomass accumulation over ten years. We studied reforested sites in Kibale National Park, Uganda, that were degraded in the 1970s and replanted with five native tree species in 1995. We identified and measured the size of planted versus naturally regenerating trees, and felled and weighed matched trees outside the park to calculate region-specific allometric equations for above-ground tree biomass. The role of shrubs and grasses in facilitating or hindering the establishment of trees was evaluated by correlating observed estimates of percent cover to tree biomass. We found 39 tree species naturally regenerating in the restored area in addition to the five originally planted species. Biomass was much higher for planted (15,675kg/ha) than naturally regenerated trees (4560kg/ha), but naturally regenerating tree regrowth was an important element of the landscape. The establishment of tree seedlings initially appeared to be facilitated by shrubs, primarily Acanthus pubescens and the invasive Lantana camara; however, both are expected to hinder tree recruitment in the long-term. Large and small-seeded tree species were found in the replanted area, indicating that bird and mammal dispersers contributed to natural forest restoration. These results demonstrate that intensive replanting can accelerate the natural accumulation of biomass and biodiversity and facilitate the restoration of tropical forest communities. However, the long-term financial costs and ecological benefits of planting and maintaining reforested areas need to be weighed against other potential restoration strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.029</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acanthus pubescens ; allometry ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anthropogenic disturbance ; artificial regeneration ; Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass accumulation ; botanical composition ; Carbon offset ; dry matter accumulation ; Ecology ; equations ; forest restoration ; forest trees ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grasses ; Kibale National Park ; land restoration ; Lantana camara ; Mathematical analysis ; mathematical models ; national parks ; natural regeneration ; plant competition ; recruitment ; reforestation ; Regeneration ; Restoration ; seed dispersal ; shrubs ; Sowing and planting ; species diversity ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; tree growth ; Tree planting ; Trees ; Tropical forests ; vegetation cover ; wildlife</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2011-02, Vol.261 (3), p.703-709</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c23d87ee8939d455628b9fe82774e5878e314d57bfa19cc7f562c4d14985c7e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c23d87ee8939d455628b9fe82774e5878e314d57bfa19cc7f562c4d14985c7e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23756964$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omeja, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Colin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obua, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lwanga, Jeremiah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Aerin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanyama, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugenyi, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>▶ Intensive tree planting produced a closed canopy regenerating forest with10 years. ▶ 39 naturally regenerating tree species were found in the replanted forest. ▶ Shrubs, particularly Lantana camara, threaten the future success of the regeneration.
The extensive area of degraded tropical land and the calls to conserve forest biodiversity and sequester carbon to offset climate change demonstrate the need to restore forest in the tropics. Deforested land is sometimes replanted with fast-growing trees; however, the consequences of intensive replanting on biomass accumulation or plant and animal diversity are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine how intensive replanting affected tropical forest regeneration and biomass accumulation over ten years. We studied reforested sites in Kibale National Park, Uganda, that were degraded in the 1970s and replanted with five native tree species in 1995. We identified and measured the size of planted versus naturally regenerating trees, and felled and weighed matched trees outside the park to calculate region-specific allometric equations for above-ground tree biomass. The role of shrubs and grasses in facilitating or hindering the establishment of trees was evaluated by correlating observed estimates of percent cover to tree biomass. We found 39 tree species naturally regenerating in the restored area in addition to the five originally planted species. Biomass was much higher for planted (15,675kg/ha) than naturally regenerated trees (4560kg/ha), but naturally regenerating tree regrowth was an important element of the landscape. The establishment of tree seedlings initially appeared to be facilitated by shrubs, primarily Acanthus pubescens and the invasive Lantana camara; however, both are expected to hinder tree recruitment in the long-term. Large and small-seeded tree species were found in the replanted area, indicating that bird and mammal dispersers contributed to natural forest restoration. These results demonstrate that intensive replanting can accelerate the natural accumulation of biomass and biodiversity and facilitate the restoration of tropical forest communities. However, the long-term financial costs and ecological benefits of planting and maintaining reforested areas need to be weighed against other potential restoration strategies.</description><subject>Acanthus pubescens</subject><subject>allometry</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anthropogenic disturbance</subject><subject>artificial regeneration</subject><subject>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass accumulation</subject><subject>botanical composition</subject><subject>Carbon offset</subject><subject>dry matter accumulation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>forest restoration</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grasses</subject><subject>Kibale National Park</subject><subject>land restoration</subject><subject>Lantana camara</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>national parks</subject><subject>natural regeneration</subject><subject>plant competition</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>reforestation</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>seed dispersal</subject><subject>shrubs</subject><subject>Sowing and planting</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>tree growth</subject><subject>Tree planting</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUGLFDEQhYMoOK7-A8FcRA_bYyqddJKLsCy6Li4q6JxDJl09ZOzpjElmYf69aXvxuKdA5XtVr-oR8hrYGhh0H_brISb0cc3ZXII14-YJWYFWvFFM8KdkxVqlGwCunpMXOe8ZY1IKvSLn26nglMM90pIQ6XF0UwnTjg7OhzEUVzDXn3gM3o10HpML3YbYV0XKoZypm_q5cHA5U-f96XAaXQlxomGiX8PWjUi__StU_Q-Xfl_Sza5q3EvybHBjxlcP7wXZfP706_pLc_f95vb66q7xwkBpPG97rRC1aU0vpOy43poBNVdKoNRKYwuil2o7ODDeq6ESXvQgjJZeYddekHdL32OKf07Vvj2E7HGsi2I8Zatlp5TReibfP0pCp0C2EjhUVCyoTzHnhIM9pnBw6WyB2TkTu7dLJnbOxALYmkmVvX2Y4HK955Dc5EP-r-Wtkp3pROXeLNzgonW7VJnNz9qoZWC45u1s4ONCYD3dfcBksw84eexDnVpsH8PjVv4Chi-ueQ</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Omeja, Patrick A.</creator><creator>Chapman, Colin A.</creator><creator>Obua, Joseph</creator><creator>Lwanga, Jeremiah S.</creator><creator>Jacob, Aerin L.</creator><creator>Wanyama, Frederick</creator><creator>Mugenyi, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda</title><author>Omeja, Patrick A. ; Chapman, Colin A. ; Obua, Joseph ; Lwanga, Jeremiah S. ; Jacob, Aerin L. ; Wanyama, Frederick ; Mugenyi, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c23d87ee8939d455628b9fe82774e5878e314d57bfa19cc7f562c4d14985c7e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acanthus pubescens</topic><topic>allometry</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anthropogenic disturbance</topic><topic>artificial regeneration</topic><topic>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass accumulation</topic><topic>botanical composition</topic><topic>Carbon offset</topic><topic>dry matter accumulation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>forest restoration</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grasses</topic><topic>Kibale National Park</topic><topic>land restoration</topic><topic>Lantana camara</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>national parks</topic><topic>natural regeneration</topic><topic>plant competition</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>reforestation</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>seed dispersal</topic><topic>shrubs</topic><topic>Sowing and planting</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>tree growth</topic><topic>Tree planting</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omeja, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Colin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obua, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lwanga, Jeremiah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Aerin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanyama, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugenyi, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omeja, Patrick A.</au><au>Chapman, Colin A.</au><au>Obua, Joseph</au><au>Lwanga, Jeremiah S.</au><au>Jacob, Aerin L.</au><au>Wanyama, Frederick</au><au>Mugenyi, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>261</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>703-709</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>▶ Intensive tree planting produced a closed canopy regenerating forest with10 years. ▶ 39 naturally regenerating tree species were found in the replanted forest. ▶ Shrubs, particularly Lantana camara, threaten the future success of the regeneration.
The extensive area of degraded tropical land and the calls to conserve forest biodiversity and sequester carbon to offset climate change demonstrate the need to restore forest in the tropics. Deforested land is sometimes replanted with fast-growing trees; however, the consequences of intensive replanting on biomass accumulation or plant and animal diversity are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine how intensive replanting affected tropical forest regeneration and biomass accumulation over ten years. We studied reforested sites in Kibale National Park, Uganda, that were degraded in the 1970s and replanted with five native tree species in 1995. We identified and measured the size of planted versus naturally regenerating trees, and felled and weighed matched trees outside the park to calculate region-specific allometric equations for above-ground tree biomass. The role of shrubs and grasses in facilitating or hindering the establishment of trees was evaluated by correlating observed estimates of percent cover to tree biomass. We found 39 tree species naturally regenerating in the restored area in addition to the five originally planted species. Biomass was much higher for planted (15,675kg/ha) than naturally regenerated trees (4560kg/ha), but naturally regenerating tree regrowth was an important element of the landscape. The establishment of tree seedlings initially appeared to be facilitated by shrubs, primarily Acanthus pubescens and the invasive Lantana camara; however, both are expected to hinder tree recruitment in the long-term. Large and small-seeded tree species were found in the replanted area, indicating that bird and mammal dispersers contributed to natural forest restoration. These results demonstrate that intensive replanting can accelerate the natural accumulation of biomass and biodiversity and facilitate the restoration of tropical forest communities. However, the long-term financial costs and ecological benefits of planting and maintaining reforested areas need to be weighed against other potential restoration strategies.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.029</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1127 |
ispartof | Forest ecology and management, 2011-02, Vol.261 (3), p.703-709 |
issn | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856779886 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acanthus pubescens allometry Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Anthropogenic disturbance artificial regeneration Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biomass accumulation botanical composition Carbon offset dry matter accumulation Ecology equations forest restoration forest trees Forestry Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology grasses Kibale National Park land restoration Lantana camara Mathematical analysis mathematical models national parks natural regeneration plant competition recruitment reforestation Regeneration Restoration seed dispersal shrubs Sowing and planting species diversity Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems tree growth Tree planting Trees Tropical forests vegetation cover wildlife |
title | Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intensive%20tree%20planting%20facilitates%20tropical%20forest%20biodiversity%20and%20biomass%20accumulation%20in%20Kibale%20National%20Park,%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Omeja,%20Patrick%20A.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=261&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=703-709&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E856779886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671535121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112710006997&rfr_iscdi=true |