Digestibility and metabolizable energy values of processed cassava chips for growing and finishing pigs
Determinations of digestibility of dry matter (DM), digestible energy (DE), and metabolizable energy (ME) in cassava chips with different levels of crude fiber (CF) were measured in growing pigs (20 kg) and finishing pigs (60 kg). The treatments were (1) cassava starch (0% CF), (2) peeled cassava ch...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical animal health and production 2011-02, Vol.43 (2), p.377-381 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 381 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 377 |
| container_title | Tropical animal health and production |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Lokaewmanee, Kanda Kanto, Uthai Juttupornpong, Sukanya Yamauchi, Koh-en |
| description | Determinations of digestibility of dry matter (DM), digestible energy (DE), and metabolizable energy (ME) in cassava chips with different levels of crude fiber (CF) were measured in growing pigs (20 kg) and finishing pigs (60 kg). The treatments were (1) cassava starch (0% CF), (2) peeled cassava chips (2.5% CF), (3) non-peeled washed cassava chips (3.9% CF), and (4) non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips (5.2% CF). In the growing pigs, peeled cassava chips, non-peeled washed cassava chips, and non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips had DM digestibility of 87.51%, 78.63%, and 73.89%, respectively. Their DE was 3.69, 3.49, and 3.32 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.90 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.54, 3.35, and 3.19 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.74 Mcal/kg DM). On the other hand, in the finishing pigs, the digestibility of DM was 89.13%, 80.63%, and 76.13%, respectively. Their DE was 3.72, 3.53, and 3.43 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.91 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.57, 3.38, and 3.29 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.75 Mcal/kg DM). These values increased with decreasing CF content, and the peeled cassava chips had the highest values (P < 0.01). These suggest that the digestibility values of DM, DE, and ME of cassava chips is inversely related to the CF content in cassava chips. It is recommended that cassava chips be peeled for better nutrition for growing and finishing pigs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11250-010-9702-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856770365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229713421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d80679db9f6383688dd5ed3217dc28f6e9d817548ef97a6d04d982bd75347fca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EokPhAdiAxaarwPVPfO0laikgVWIBXVtObKeuMslgZ4qGp8dDCkgsYGVZPt_ne3UIec7gNQPAN4Ux3kIDDBqDwBvxgGxYi6JBKfRDsgGQppEo8YQ8KeUWKghaPSYnHIzQKNmGDBdpCGVJXRrTcqBu8nQbFtfNY_ruujHQMIU8HOidG_eh0DnSXZ77UErwtHeluDtH-5u0KzTOmQ55_pam4WdNTFMqN8fbLg3lKXkU3VjCs_vzlFxfvvty_qG5-vT-4_nbq6aXXC2N16DQ-M5EJbRQWnvfBi84Q99zHVUwXjNspQ7RoFMepDeadx5bITH2TpySs7W3jvm1TrzYbSp9GEc3hXlfrG4VIgjV_p_kHMEoAZV89Rd5O-_zVNc4QgJbBKwQW6E-z6XkEO0up63LB8vAHm3Z1ZatEuzRlhU18-K-eN9tg_-d-KWnAnwFSn2ahpD__Pyv1pdrKLrZuiGnYq8_c2ACmOESmRA_AGSHqOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822375707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digestibility and metabolizable energy values of processed cassava chips for growing and finishing pigs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lokaewmanee, Kanda ; Kanto, Uthai ; Juttupornpong, Sukanya ; Yamauchi, Koh-en</creator><creatorcontrib>Lokaewmanee, Kanda ; Kanto, Uthai ; Juttupornpong, Sukanya ; Yamauchi, Koh-en</creatorcontrib><description>Determinations of digestibility of dry matter (DM), digestible energy (DE), and metabolizable energy (ME) in cassava chips with different levels of crude fiber (CF) were measured in growing pigs (20 kg) and finishing pigs (60 kg). The treatments were (1) cassava starch (0% CF), (2) peeled cassava chips (2.5% CF), (3) non-peeled washed cassava chips (3.9% CF), and (4) non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips (5.2% CF). In the growing pigs, peeled cassava chips, non-peeled washed cassava chips, and non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips had DM digestibility of 87.51%, 78.63%, and 73.89%, respectively. Their DE was 3.69, 3.49, and 3.32 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.90 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.54, 3.35, and 3.19 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.74 Mcal/kg DM). On the other hand, in the finishing pigs, the digestibility of DM was 89.13%, 80.63%, and 76.13%, respectively. Their DE was 3.72, 3.53, and 3.43 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.91 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.57, 3.38, and 3.29 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.75 Mcal/kg DM). These values increased with decreasing CF content, and the peeled cassava chips had the highest values (P < 0.01). These suggest that the digestibility values of DM, DE, and ME of cassava chips is inversely related to the CF content in cassava chips. It is recommended that cassava chips be peeled for better nutrition for growing and finishing pigs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-010-9702-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20938741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; cassava ; Diet - veterinary ; Digestion - physiology ; Dry matter ; Energy Metabolism ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Manihot ; Manihot esculenta ; metabolizable energy ; Original Research ; Processing ; Starch ; Swine ; Swine - growth & development ; Swine - physiology ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2011-02, Vol.43 (2), p.377-381</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d80679db9f6383688dd5ed3217dc28f6e9d817548ef97a6d04d982bd75347fca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d80679db9f6383688dd5ed3217dc28f6e9d817548ef97a6d04d982bd75347fca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-010-9702-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-010-9702-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20938741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lokaewmanee, Kanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanto, Uthai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juttupornpong, Sukanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamauchi, Koh-en</creatorcontrib><title>Digestibility and metabolizable energy values of processed cassava chips for growing and finishing pigs</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>Determinations of digestibility of dry matter (DM), digestible energy (DE), and metabolizable energy (ME) in cassava chips with different levels of crude fiber (CF) were measured in growing pigs (20 kg) and finishing pigs (60 kg). The treatments were (1) cassava starch (0% CF), (2) peeled cassava chips (2.5% CF), (3) non-peeled washed cassava chips (3.9% CF), and (4) non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips (5.2% CF). In the growing pigs, peeled cassava chips, non-peeled washed cassava chips, and non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips had DM digestibility of 87.51%, 78.63%, and 73.89%, respectively. Their DE was 3.69, 3.49, and 3.32 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.90 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.54, 3.35, and 3.19 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.74 Mcal/kg DM). On the other hand, in the finishing pigs, the digestibility of DM was 89.13%, 80.63%, and 76.13%, respectively. Their DE was 3.72, 3.53, and 3.43 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.91 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.57, 3.38, and 3.29 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.75 Mcal/kg DM). These values increased with decreasing CF content, and the peeled cassava chips had the highest values (P < 0.01). These suggest that the digestibility values of DM, DE, and ME of cassava chips is inversely related to the CF content in cassava chips. It is recommended that cassava chips be peeled for better nutrition for growing and finishing pigs.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>cassava</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Digestion - physiology</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manihot</subject><subject>Manihot esculenta</subject><subject>metabolizable energy</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Processing</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine - growth & development</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EokPhAdiAxaarwPVPfO0laikgVWIBXVtObKeuMslgZ4qGp8dDCkgsYGVZPt_ne3UIec7gNQPAN4Ux3kIDDBqDwBvxgGxYi6JBKfRDsgGQppEo8YQ8KeUWKghaPSYnHIzQKNmGDBdpCGVJXRrTcqBu8nQbFtfNY_ruujHQMIU8HOidG_eh0DnSXZ77UErwtHeluDtH-5u0KzTOmQ55_pam4WdNTFMqN8fbLg3lKXkU3VjCs_vzlFxfvvty_qG5-vT-4_nbq6aXXC2N16DQ-M5EJbRQWnvfBi84Q99zHVUwXjNspQ7RoFMepDeadx5bITH2TpySs7W3jvm1TrzYbSp9GEc3hXlfrG4VIgjV_p_kHMEoAZV89Rd5O-_zVNc4QgJbBKwQW6E-z6XkEO0up63LB8vAHm3Z1ZatEuzRlhU18-K-eN9tg_-d-KWnAnwFSn2ahpD__Pyv1pdrKLrZuiGnYq8_c2ACmOESmRA_AGSHqOU</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Lokaewmanee, Kanda</creator><creator>Kanto, Uthai</creator><creator>Juttupornpong, Sukanya</creator><creator>Yamauchi, Koh-en</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Digestibility and metabolizable energy values of processed cassava chips for growing and finishing pigs</title><author>Lokaewmanee, Kanda ; Kanto, Uthai ; Juttupornpong, Sukanya ; Yamauchi, Koh-en</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d80679db9f6383688dd5ed3217dc28f6e9d817548ef97a6d04d982bd75347fca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>cassava</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Digestion - physiology</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manihot</topic><topic>Manihot esculenta</topic><topic>metabolizable energy</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Processing</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine - growth & development</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lokaewmanee, Kanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanto, Uthai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juttupornpong, Sukanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamauchi, Koh-en</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lokaewmanee, Kanda</au><au>Kanto, Uthai</au><au>Juttupornpong, Sukanya</au><au>Yamauchi, Koh-en</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digestibility and metabolizable energy values of processed cassava chips for growing and finishing pigs</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>377-381</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>Determinations of digestibility of dry matter (DM), digestible energy (DE), and metabolizable energy (ME) in cassava chips with different levels of crude fiber (CF) were measured in growing pigs (20 kg) and finishing pigs (60 kg). The treatments were (1) cassava starch (0% CF), (2) peeled cassava chips (2.5% CF), (3) non-peeled washed cassava chips (3.9% CF), and (4) non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips (5.2% CF). In the growing pigs, peeled cassava chips, non-peeled washed cassava chips, and non-peeled and non-washed cassava chips had DM digestibility of 87.51%, 78.63%, and 73.89%, respectively. Their DE was 3.69, 3.49, and 3.32 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.90 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.54, 3.35, and 3.19 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.74 Mcal/kg DM). On the other hand, in the finishing pigs, the digestibility of DM was 89.13%, 80.63%, and 76.13%, respectively. Their DE was 3.72, 3.53, and 3.43 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (DE of cassava starch is 3.91 Mcal/kg DM). ME was 3.57, 3.38, and 3.29 Mcal/kg DM, respectively (ME of cassava starch is 3.75 Mcal/kg DM). These values increased with decreasing CF content, and the peeled cassava chips had the highest values (P < 0.01). These suggest that the digestibility values of DM, DE, and ME of cassava chips is inversely related to the CF content in cassava chips. It is recommended that cassava chips be peeled for better nutrition for growing and finishing pigs.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>20938741</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-010-9702-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0049-4747 |
| ispartof | Tropical animal health and production, 2011-02, Vol.43 (2), p.377-381 |
| issn | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856770365 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Animal Feed - analysis Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences cassava Diet - veterinary Digestion - physiology Dry matter Energy Metabolism Life Sciences Male Manihot Manihot esculenta metabolizable energy Original Research Processing Starch Swine Swine - growth & development Swine - physiology Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Zoology |
| title | Digestibility and metabolizable energy values of processed cassava chips for growing and finishing pigs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digestibility%20and%20metabolizable%20energy%20values%20of%20processed%20cassava%20chips%20for%20growing%20and%20finishing%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Lokaewmanee,%20Kanda&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=377-381&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-010-9702-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229713421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822375707&rft_id=info:pmid/20938741&rfr_iscdi=true |