ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode
The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screenin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of audiology 2008-08, Vol.47 (8), p.499-504 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 504 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | International journal of audiology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Gaddam, Anupa Ferraro, John A. |
description | The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14992020802116268 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85676640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69425102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gBuZlbvRJM1r0E0tvkAQRNchk7nRKdOkJjNI_72RFkSEurqXe79zOByETgg-J1jhC8KqimKaV0qIoELtoDGRWJWKKLGb9_wvMyBH6CClOcZEMq720Si_K8UpGyM5vX4uItgQm9a_paL1hYfPOkSfiiHlU2F8ASYW1njTFdCB7WNo4AjtOdMlON7MQ_R6e_Myuy8fn-4eZtPH0rIJ78uaS1w71ShjqJGKOMsAS04Y49g2NcOcVpUjEwYVztGcdLIWkgsFrJI1IZNDdLb2XcbwMUDq9aJNFrrOeAhD0ooLKQTD_4KiYpQTTDNI1qCNIaUITi9juzBxpQnW37XqP7VmzenGfKgX0PwoNj1m4GoNtN6FuDCfIXaN7s2qC9FF422b9GSb_-Uv-TuYrn-3JoKehyHm5tOWdF-RT5U_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69425102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Gaddam, Anupa ; Ferraro, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaddam, Anupa ; Ferraro, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14992020802116268</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18698524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation ; Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods ; Auditory brainstem response ; Auditory Threshold ; Ear Canal - physiology ; Ear canal electrode ; Electrodes ; Equipment Design ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Newborns ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ; Reaction Time</subject><ispartof>International journal of audiology, 2008-08, Vol.47 (8), p.499-504</ispartof><rights>2008 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14992020802116268$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992020802116268$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,59646,59752,60435,60541,61220,61255,61401,61436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18698524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaddam, Anupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</title><title>International journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation</subject><subject>Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods</subject><subject>Auditory brainstem response</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Ear Canal - physiology</subject><subject>Ear canal electrode</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Newborns</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><issn>1499-2027</issn><issn>1708-8186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gBuZlbvRJM1r0E0tvkAQRNchk7nRKdOkJjNI_72RFkSEurqXe79zOByETgg-J1jhC8KqimKaV0qIoELtoDGRWJWKKLGb9_wvMyBH6CClOcZEMq720Si_K8UpGyM5vX4uItgQm9a_paL1hYfPOkSfiiHlU2F8ASYW1njTFdCB7WNo4AjtOdMlON7MQ_R6e_Myuy8fn-4eZtPH0rIJ78uaS1w71ShjqJGKOMsAS04Y49g2NcOcVpUjEwYVztGcdLIWkgsFrJI1IZNDdLb2XcbwMUDq9aJNFrrOeAhD0ooLKQTD_4KiYpQTTDNI1qCNIaUITi9juzBxpQnW37XqP7VmzenGfKgX0PwoNj1m4GoNtN6FuDCfIXaN7s2qC9FF422b9GSb_-Uv-TuYrn-3JoKehyHm5tOWdF-RT5U_</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Gaddam, Anupa</creator><creator>Ferraro, John A.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</title><author>Gaddam, Anupa ; Ferraro, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation</topic><topic>Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods</topic><topic>Auditory brainstem response</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Ear Canal - physiology</topic><topic>Ear canal electrode</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Newborns</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaddam, Anupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaddam, Anupa</au><au>Ferraro, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</atitle><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>499-504</pages><issn>1499-2027</issn><eissn>1708-8186</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>18698524</pmid><doi>10.1080/14992020802116268</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1499-2027 |
ispartof | International journal of audiology, 2008-08, Vol.47 (8), p.499-504 |
issn | 1499-2027 1708-8186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85676640 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods Auditory brainstem response Auditory Threshold Ear Canal - physiology Ear canal electrode Electrodes Equipment Design Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem Humans Infant, Newborn Infants Newborns Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous Reaction Time |
title | ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ABR%20recordings%20in%20newborns%20using%20an%20ear%20canal%20electrode&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Gaddam,%20Anupa&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=499-504&rft.issn=1499-2027&rft.eissn=1708-8186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14992020802116268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69425102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69425102&rft_id=info:pmid/18698524&rfr_iscdi=true |