ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode

The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screenin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of audiology 2008-08, Vol.47 (8), p.499-504
Hauptverfasser: Gaddam, Anupa, Ferraro, John A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 504
container_issue 8
container_start_page 499
container_title International journal of audiology
container_volume 47
creator Gaddam, Anupa
Ferraro, John A.
description The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14992020802116268
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85676640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69425102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gBuZlbvRJM1r0E0tvkAQRNchk7nRKdOkJjNI_72RFkSEurqXe79zOByETgg-J1jhC8KqimKaV0qIoELtoDGRWJWKKLGb9_wvMyBH6CClOcZEMq720Si_K8UpGyM5vX4uItgQm9a_paL1hYfPOkSfiiHlU2F8ASYW1njTFdCB7WNo4AjtOdMlON7MQ_R6e_Myuy8fn-4eZtPH0rIJ78uaS1w71ShjqJGKOMsAS04Y49g2NcOcVpUjEwYVztGcdLIWkgsFrJI1IZNDdLb2XcbwMUDq9aJNFrrOeAhD0ooLKQTD_4KiYpQTTDNI1qCNIaUITi9juzBxpQnW37XqP7VmzenGfKgX0PwoNj1m4GoNtN6FuDCfIXaN7s2qC9FF422b9GSb_-Uv-TuYrn-3JoKehyHm5tOWdF-RT5U_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69425102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Gaddam, Anupa ; Ferraro, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaddam, Anupa ; Ferraro, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14992020802116268</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18698524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation ; Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods ; Auditory brainstem response ; Auditory Threshold ; Ear Canal - physiology ; Ear canal electrode ; Electrodes ; Equipment Design ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Newborns ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ; Reaction Time</subject><ispartof>International journal of audiology, 2008-08, Vol.47 (8), p.499-504</ispartof><rights>2008 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14992020802116268$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992020802116268$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,59646,59752,60435,60541,61220,61255,61401,61436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18698524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaddam, Anupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</title><title>International journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation</subject><subject>Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods</subject><subject>Auditory brainstem response</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Ear Canal - physiology</subject><subject>Ear canal electrode</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Newborns</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><issn>1499-2027</issn><issn>1708-8186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gBuZlbvRJM1r0E0tvkAQRNchk7nRKdOkJjNI_72RFkSEurqXe79zOByETgg-J1jhC8KqimKaV0qIoELtoDGRWJWKKLGb9_wvMyBH6CClOcZEMq720Si_K8UpGyM5vX4uItgQm9a_paL1hYfPOkSfiiHlU2F8ASYW1njTFdCB7WNo4AjtOdMlON7MQ_R6e_Myuy8fn-4eZtPH0rIJ78uaS1w71ShjqJGKOMsAS04Y49g2NcOcVpUjEwYVztGcdLIWkgsFrJI1IZNDdLb2XcbwMUDq9aJNFrrOeAhD0ooLKQTD_4KiYpQTTDNI1qCNIaUITi9juzBxpQnW37XqP7VmzenGfKgX0PwoNj1m4GoNtN6FuDCfIXaN7s2qC9FF422b9GSb_-Uv-TuYrn-3JoKehyHm5tOWdF-RT5U_</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Gaddam, Anupa</creator><creator>Ferraro, John A.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</title><author>Gaddam, Anupa ; Ferraro, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-b570bf8d8aa2a781fc4e07514450cdb405299f134e90458f7f7b67568e497b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation</topic><topic>Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods</topic><topic>Auditory brainstem response</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Ear Canal - physiology</topic><topic>Ear canal electrode</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Newborns</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaddam, Anupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaddam, Anupa</au><au>Ferraro, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode</atitle><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>499-504</pages><issn>1499-2027</issn><eissn>1708-8186</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (−), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (−) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>18698524</pmid><doi>10.1080/14992020802116268</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1499-2027
ispartof International journal of audiology, 2008-08, Vol.47 (8), p.499-504
issn 1499-2027
1708-8186
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85676640
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Analysis of Variance
Audiometry, Evoked Response - instrumentation
Audiometry, Evoked Response - methods
Auditory brainstem response
Auditory Threshold
Ear Canal - physiology
Ear canal electrode
Electrodes
Equipment Design
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Newborns
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
Reaction Time
title ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ABR%20recordings%20in%20newborns%20using%20an%20ear%20canal%20electrode&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Gaddam,%20Anupa&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=499-504&rft.issn=1499-2027&rft.eissn=1708-8186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14992020802116268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69425102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69425102&rft_id=info:pmid/18698524&rfr_iscdi=true