What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish

What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish

This paper analyzes the acquisition of complement structures in Turkish, concentrating on the acquisition of object complements formed with the nominalizers -mAK, -mA, -DIK & -(y)AcAK. Experimental tasks were carried out with 42 children between the ages 3;0 & 6;5, There were different exper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkic languages 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.122-148
1. Verfasser: Altan, AslI
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue 1
container_start_page 122
container_title Turkic languages
container_volume 12
creator Altan, AslI
description This paper analyzes the acquisition of complement structures in Turkish, concentrating on the acquisition of object complements formed with the nominalizers -mAK, -mA, -DIK & -(y)AcAK. Experimental tasks were carried out with 42 children between the ages 3;0 & 6;5, There were different experiments assessing children's production, comprehension & imitation of complementation. The order of acquisition among the nominalizing suffixes was investigated. The role of matrix verbs in the choice of the nominalizing suffix is discussed. Graphs, References. Adapted from the source document
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85674507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85674507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_856745073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjc0KgkAUhWdRkJTvcFftBGX8XYYZ7TNayiRXnBpn1DsDPX4iPUBnc-DjfJwN86KYR0Fc5HzHfKJXuCRNIs4Lj90evbBQfUac5YDaCgVnYQXUqBTBnUA8jbNge4RTOzlJ0kqjwXRQmmFUuDorkhpqN78l9Qe27YQi9H-9Z8dLVZfXYJzN5JBsM0hqlwOh0Thq8iTN4iTM-N_DL9tkQ1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85674507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Altan, AslI</creator><creatorcontrib>Altan, AslI</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes the acquisition of complement structures in Turkish, concentrating on the acquisition of object complements formed with the nominalizers -mAK, -mA, -DIK &amp; -(y)AcAK. Experimental tasks were carried out with 42 children between the ages 3;0 &amp; 6;5, There were different experiments assessing children's production, comprehension &amp; imitation of complementation. The order of acquisition among the nominalizing suffixes was investigated. The role of matrix verbs in the choice of the nominalizing suffix is discussed. Graphs, References. Adapted from the source document</description><identifier>ISSN: 1431-4983</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Turkic languages, 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.122-148</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altan, AslI</creatorcontrib><title>What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish</title><title>Turkic languages</title><description>This paper analyzes the acquisition of complement structures in Turkish, concentrating on the acquisition of object complements formed with the nominalizers -mAK, -mA, -DIK &amp; -(y)AcAK. Experimental tasks were carried out with 42 children between the ages 3;0 &amp; 6;5, There were different experiments assessing children's production, comprehension &amp; imitation of complementation. The order of acquisition among the nominalizing suffixes was investigated. The role of matrix verbs in the choice of the nominalizing suffix is discussed. Graphs, References. Adapted from the source document</description><issn>1431-4983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjc0KgkAUhWdRkJTvcFftBGX8XYYZ7TNayiRXnBpn1DsDPX4iPUBnc-DjfJwN86KYR0Fc5HzHfKJXuCRNIs4Lj90evbBQfUac5YDaCgVnYQXUqBTBnUA8jbNge4RTOzlJ0kqjwXRQmmFUuDorkhpqN78l9Qe27YQi9H-9Z8dLVZfXYJzN5JBsM0hqlwOh0Thq8iTN4iTM-N_DL9tkQ1c</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Altan, AslI</creator><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish</title><author>Altan, AslI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_856745073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altan, AslI</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Turkic languages</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altan, AslI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish</atitle><jtitle>Turkic languages</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>122-148</pages><issn>1431-4983</issn><abstract>This paper analyzes the acquisition of complement structures in Turkish, concentrating on the acquisition of object complements formed with the nominalizers -mAK, -mA, -DIK &amp; -(y)AcAK. Experimental tasks were carried out with 42 children between the ages 3;0 &amp; 6;5, There were different experiments assessing children's production, comprehension &amp; imitation of complementation. The order of acquisition among the nominalizing suffixes was investigated. The role of matrix verbs in the choice of the nominalizing suffix is discussed. Graphs, References. Adapted from the source document</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1431-4983
ispartof Turkic languages, 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.122-148
issn 1431-4983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85674507
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title What Experimental Data Tells Us about the Acquisition of Complementation in Turkish
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A11%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Experimental%20Data%20Tells%20Us%20about%20the%20Acquisition%20of%20Complementation%20in%20Turkish&rft.jtitle=Turkic%20languages&rft.au=Altan,%20AslI&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=122-148&rft.issn=1431-4983&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E85674507%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85674507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true