The Voice Handicap of Student-Teachers and Risk Factors Perceived to Have a Negative Influence on the Voice

Summary A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed. The objectives of the study were to assess the psychosocial impact of current voice complaints as perceived by student-teachers with voice complaints in comparison with student-teachers without voice complaints, and to observe the pattern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 2007-05, Vol.21 (3), p.325-336
Hauptverfasser: Thomas, George, Kooijman, Piet G.C, Donders, A. Rogier T, Cremers, Cor W.R.J, de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 3
container_start_page 325
container_title Journal of voice
container_volume 21
creator Thomas, George
Kooijman, Piet G.C
Donders, A. Rogier T
Cremers, Cor W.R.J
de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S
description Summary A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed. The objectives of the study were to assess the psychosocial impact of current voice complaints as perceived by student-teachers with voice complaints in comparison with student-teachers without voice complaints, and to observe the pattern of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap. Subjects in the general population without a voice-demanding profession were selected as a reference group for limited comparison with the total group of student-teachers (future professional voice users). The respondents to the questionnaires were anonymous. Among the student-teachers, 17.2% reported current voice complaints in comparison with 9.7% of the reference group, and the odds ratio was 1.94, which showed the relative risk. Student-teachers had significantly greater total Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores than the reference group ( P = 0.034). The VHI subscale scores were not significantly different ( P > 0.05). Student-teachers who reported current voice complaints had a significantly higher total VHI and subscale scores than student teachers without voice complaints ( P < 0.001). Of the student-teachers without voice complaints, 17.0% had VHI scores greater than the 75th percentile. These persons may be neglecting their voice handicap and probably represent the false-negative cases in the estimation of voice complaints. Logistic regression analysis of each of the given risk factors with the VHI as the independent variable showed that the perceived negative influence of the given risk factors on their voices was significantly greater with increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. A significant correlation was observed between the number of perceived risk factors and increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. An increased awareness of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap would serve to motivate student-teachers to change factors that contributed to their voice problem. Attention to all risk factors, which the subjects perceive to be a risk, would aid in effective management of their voice handicap.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85667519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A164807168</galeid><els_id>S0892199705001633</els_id><sourcerecordid>A164807168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-978b41079784e27851f037ae1e6ef6633bc8ab1758e8296d78712fee1543fff93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl9rFDEUxQdR7Fr9BiJ58m3GZDL5My9CKa0tFBW7-hqymZttZmeTNZlZ6Lc3w6wIUih5CNx7zrkkv1sU7wmuCCb8U1_1x-AMVDXGrCJ1hTF9UayIFLRsmJQvixWWbV2SthVnxZuUeoxxnbuvizPCGW4aLlfFbv0A6Necg26075zRBxQsuh-nDvxYrkGbB4gJ5R764dIOXWszhlz4DtGAO0KHxpCtR0AafYWtHnMN3Xo7TOBzaPBo_DvhbfHK6iHBu9N9Xvy8vlpf3pR3377cXl7clYbVdCxbITcNwSLfDdRCMmIxFRoIcLCcU7oxUm-IYBJk3fJOSEFqC0BYQ621LT0vPi65hxh-T5BGtXfJwDBoD2FKSjLOBSPPCwVmhOAaZ2G5CLd6AOW8DWPUZgseoh6CB-ty-YLwRmJBuMz66gl9Ph3snXnS0CwGE0NKEaw6RLfX8VERrGbcqlcLbjXjVqRWGXe2fTg9YNrsoftnOvHNgs-LAPJ_Hx1ElYybwXQughlVF9xzE_4PMIPzeU2GHTxC6sMUfWapiErZoO7nlZs3DjOcMymlfwCHns_i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70511020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Voice Handicap of Student-Teachers and Risk Factors Perceived to Have a Negative Influence on the Voice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Thomas, George ; Kooijman, Piet G.C ; Donders, A. Rogier T ; Cremers, Cor W.R.J ; de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, George ; Kooijman, Piet G.C ; Donders, A. Rogier T ; Cremers, Cor W.R.J ; de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</creatorcontrib><description>Summary A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed. The objectives of the study were to assess the psychosocial impact of current voice complaints as perceived by student-teachers with voice complaints in comparison with student-teachers without voice complaints, and to observe the pattern of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap. Subjects in the general population without a voice-demanding profession were selected as a reference group for limited comparison with the total group of student-teachers (future professional voice users). The respondents to the questionnaires were anonymous. Among the student-teachers, 17.2% reported current voice complaints in comparison with 9.7% of the reference group, and the odds ratio was 1.94, which showed the relative risk. Student-teachers had significantly greater total Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores than the reference group ( P = 0.034). The VHI subscale scores were not significantly different ( P &gt; 0.05). Student-teachers who reported current voice complaints had a significantly higher total VHI and subscale scores than student teachers without voice complaints ( P &lt; 0.001). Of the student-teachers without voice complaints, 17.0% had VHI scores greater than the 75th percentile. These persons may be neglecting their voice handicap and probably represent the false-negative cases in the estimation of voice complaints. Logistic regression analysis of each of the given risk factors with the VHI as the independent variable showed that the perceived negative influence of the given risk factors on their voices was significantly greater with increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. A significant correlation was observed between the number of perceived risk factors and increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. An increased awareness of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap would serve to motivate student-teachers to change factors that contributed to their voice problem. Attention to all risk factors, which the subjects perceive to be a risk, would aid in effective management of their voice handicap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16504468</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOVOEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Demographic aspects ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Otolaryngology ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Statistics ; Student-teachers ; Students ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Voice culture ; Voice disorders ; Voice Disorders - diagnosis ; Voice Disorders - epidemiology ; Voice Handicap Index ; Voice Quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2007-05, Vol.21 (3), p.325-336</ispartof><rights>The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>2007 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Elsevier, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-978b41079784e27851f037ae1e6ef6633bc8ab1758e8296d78712fee1543fff93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-978b41079784e27851f037ae1e6ef6633bc8ab1758e8296d78712fee1543fff93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199705001633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16504468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kooijman, Piet G.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donders, A. Rogier T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremers, Cor W.R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</creatorcontrib><title>The Voice Handicap of Student-Teachers and Risk Factors Perceived to Have a Negative Influence on the Voice</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>Summary A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed. The objectives of the study were to assess the psychosocial impact of current voice complaints as perceived by student-teachers with voice complaints in comparison with student-teachers without voice complaints, and to observe the pattern of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap. Subjects in the general population without a voice-demanding profession were selected as a reference group for limited comparison with the total group of student-teachers (future professional voice users). The respondents to the questionnaires were anonymous. Among the student-teachers, 17.2% reported current voice complaints in comparison with 9.7% of the reference group, and the odds ratio was 1.94, which showed the relative risk. Student-teachers had significantly greater total Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores than the reference group ( P = 0.034). The VHI subscale scores were not significantly different ( P &gt; 0.05). Student-teachers who reported current voice complaints had a significantly higher total VHI and subscale scores than student teachers without voice complaints ( P &lt; 0.001). Of the student-teachers without voice complaints, 17.0% had VHI scores greater than the 75th percentile. These persons may be neglecting their voice handicap and probably represent the false-negative cases in the estimation of voice complaints. Logistic regression analysis of each of the given risk factors with the VHI as the independent variable showed that the perceived negative influence of the given risk factors on their voices was significantly greater with increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. A significant correlation was observed between the number of perceived risk factors and increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. An increased awareness of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap would serve to motivate student-teachers to change factors that contributed to their voice problem. Attention to all risk factors, which the subjects perceive to be a risk, would aid in effective management of their voice handicap.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Student-teachers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Voice culture</subject><subject>Voice disorders</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Voice Handicap Index</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl9rFDEUxQdR7Fr9BiJ58m3GZDL5My9CKa0tFBW7-hqymZttZmeTNZlZ6Lc3w6wIUih5CNx7zrkkv1sU7wmuCCb8U1_1x-AMVDXGrCJ1hTF9UayIFLRsmJQvixWWbV2SthVnxZuUeoxxnbuvizPCGW4aLlfFbv0A6Necg26075zRBxQsuh-nDvxYrkGbB4gJ5R764dIOXWszhlz4DtGAO0KHxpCtR0AafYWtHnMN3Xo7TOBzaPBo_DvhbfHK6iHBu9N9Xvy8vlpf3pR3377cXl7clYbVdCxbITcNwSLfDdRCMmIxFRoIcLCcU7oxUm-IYBJk3fJOSEFqC0BYQ621LT0vPi65hxh-T5BGtXfJwDBoD2FKSjLOBSPPCwVmhOAaZ2G5CLd6AOW8DWPUZgseoh6CB-ty-YLwRmJBuMz66gl9Ph3snXnS0CwGE0NKEaw6RLfX8VERrGbcqlcLbjXjVqRWGXe2fTg9YNrsoftnOvHNgs-LAPJ_Hx1ElYybwXQughlVF9xzE_4PMIPzeU2GHTxC6sMUfWapiErZoO7nlZs3DjOcMymlfwCHns_i</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Thomas, George</creator><creator>Kooijman, Piet G.C</creator><creator>Donders, A. Rogier T</creator><creator>Cremers, Cor W.R.J</creator><creator>de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>The Voice Handicap of Student-Teachers and Risk Factors Perceived to Have a Negative Influence on the Voice</title><author>Thomas, George ; Kooijman, Piet G.C ; Donders, A. Rogier T ; Cremers, Cor W.R.J ; de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-978b41079784e27851f037ae1e6ef6633bc8ab1758e8296d78712fee1543fff93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Student-teachers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Voice culture</topic><topic>Voice disorders</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Voice Handicap Index</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kooijman, Piet G.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donders, A. Rogier T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremers, Cor W.R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, George</au><au>Kooijman, Piet G.C</au><au>Donders, A. Rogier T</au><au>Cremers, Cor W.R.J</au><au>de Jong, Felix I.C.R.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Voice Handicap of Student-Teachers and Risk Factors Perceived to Have a Negative Influence on the Voice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>325-336</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><coden>JOVOEA</coden><abstract>Summary A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed. The objectives of the study were to assess the psychosocial impact of current voice complaints as perceived by student-teachers with voice complaints in comparison with student-teachers without voice complaints, and to observe the pattern of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap. Subjects in the general population without a voice-demanding profession were selected as a reference group for limited comparison with the total group of student-teachers (future professional voice users). The respondents to the questionnaires were anonymous. Among the student-teachers, 17.2% reported current voice complaints in comparison with 9.7% of the reference group, and the odds ratio was 1.94, which showed the relative risk. Student-teachers had significantly greater total Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores than the reference group ( P = 0.034). The VHI subscale scores were not significantly different ( P &gt; 0.05). Student-teachers who reported current voice complaints had a significantly higher total VHI and subscale scores than student teachers without voice complaints ( P &lt; 0.001). Of the student-teachers without voice complaints, 17.0% had VHI scores greater than the 75th percentile. These persons may be neglecting their voice handicap and probably represent the false-negative cases in the estimation of voice complaints. Logistic regression analysis of each of the given risk factors with the VHI as the independent variable showed that the perceived negative influence of the given risk factors on their voices was significantly greater with increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. A significant correlation was observed between the number of perceived risk factors and increasing VHI scores across the VHI range. An increased awareness of risk factors in relation to their voice handicap would serve to motivate student-teachers to change factors that contributed to their voice problem. Attention to all risk factors, which the subjects perceive to be a risk, would aid in effective management of their voice handicap.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>16504468</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-1997
ispartof Journal of voice, 2007-05, Vol.21 (3), p.325-336
issn 0892-1997
1873-4588
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85667519
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Demographic aspects
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Otolaryngology
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Statistics
Student-teachers
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Voice culture
Voice disorders
Voice Disorders - diagnosis
Voice Disorders - epidemiology
Voice Handicap Index
Voice Quality
title The Voice Handicap of Student-Teachers and Risk Factors Perceived to Have a Negative Influence on the Voice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Voice%20Handicap%20of%20Student-Teachers%20and%20Risk%20Factors%20Perceived%20to%20Have%20a%20Negative%20Influence%20on%20the%20Voice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Thomas,%20George&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=325-336&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft.coden=JOVOEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA164807168%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70511020&rft_id=info:pmid/16504468&rft_galeid=A164807168&rft_els_id=S0892199705001633&rfr_iscdi=true