Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users
Patrick N. Plyler James W. Thelin Robert A. Muenchen University of Tennessee, Knoxville Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department of Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu . Purpose: To examine whether the effects of speech prese...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.126-135 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 135 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 126 |
| container_title | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C Plyler, Patrick N Thelin, James W Muenchen, Robert A |
| description | Patrick N. Plyler
James W. Thelin
Robert A. Muenchen
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department of Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: To examine whether the effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise could differentiate full-time, part-time, and nonusers of hearing aids and whether these effects could predict hearing aid use.
Method: Participants were separated into 3 groups on the basis of hearing aid use: (a) full-time use, (b) part-time use, or (c) nonuse. Acceptable noise levels (ANLs) were measured conventionally and at 8 fixed presentation levels. The effects of presentation level on ANL were determined by calculating global ANL (ANL averaged across presentation level) and ANL growth (slope of the ANL function).
Results: Global ANLs were smaller for full-time users than for part-time users and nonusers; however, global ANLs were not different for part-time users and nonusers. ANL growth differentiated full-time users from nonusers only. Conventional ANL predicted hearing aid use with 68% accuracy. Compared with conventional ANL, the accuracy of the prediction for global ANL and ANL growth decreased, and the accuracy of the prediction at presentation levels of 65 to 75 dB HL was maintained.
Conclusions: Global ANL differentiated the hearing aid groups in the same manner as conventional ANL. The effects of presentation level on acceptance of noise did not considerably increase the accuracy of the prediction compared with conventional ANL. Clinical applications are discussed.
KEY WORDS: acceptance of noise, acceptable noise level, effect of speech presentation level, prediction of hearing aid use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this? |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/009) |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85665243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A174593592</galeid><ericid>EJ784145</ericid><sourcerecordid>A174593592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e06dab1184a887dac99cfacdbcc3d4a3aa03168c16e832e41fcbab5450524c8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1r3DAQhkVoSdIkv6ClmB5KCnWi7x0fl5CPlpD2kJyFLI_XWrzWRrIJ_ffV4k0DHR1G8D4zDA8hHxm9YFTKS0YrXkoBcM4phUtKq28H5JgpBWXFKH-X_6_EEfmQ0prmYlIfkiMGXFDQ9JjA0jncjnZwWIS2eAg-YXEbw8vYFb_tOGIcUuGH4g5t9MOqWPqmeEoY0yl539o-4dm-n5Cnm-vHq7vy_tftj6vlfemkhLFEqhtbMwbSAiwa66rKtdY1tXOikVZYSwXT4JhGEBwla11tayUVVVw6sOKEfJ33bmN4njCNZuOTw763A4YpGVBaZ1Rk8Mt_4DpMcci3GS64EBw0vG1b2R5Nh7YfuxT6afRhSGbJFlJVQlU8g3wGXQwpRWzNNvqNjX8Mo2an3-zkmp1cs9Nvsv489Hl_wlRvsHkb2evOwKcZwOjdv_j65wIkkyrH3-e486vuxUc0aYvoum6Wb9ap76JRzOTHtfgL57CWUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232332868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Plyler, Patrick N ; Thelin, James W ; Muenchen, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Plyler, Patrick N ; Thelin, James W ; Muenchen, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>Patrick N. Plyler
James W. Thelin
Robert A. Muenchen
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department of Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: To examine whether the effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise could differentiate full-time, part-time, and nonusers of hearing aids and whether these effects could predict hearing aid use.
Method: Participants were separated into 3 groups on the basis of hearing aid use: (a) full-time use, (b) part-time use, or (c) nonuse. Acceptable noise levels (ANLs) were measured conventionally and at 8 fixed presentation levels. The effects of presentation level on ANL were determined by calculating global ANL (ANL averaged across presentation level) and ANL growth (slope of the ANL function).
Results: Global ANLs were smaller for full-time users than for part-time users and nonusers; however, global ANLs were not different for part-time users and nonusers. ANL growth differentiated full-time users from nonusers only. Conventional ANL predicted hearing aid use with 68% accuracy. Compared with conventional ANL, the accuracy of the prediction for global ANL and ANL growth decreased, and the accuracy of the prediction at presentation levels of 65 to 75 dB HL was maintained.
Conclusions: Global ANL differentiated the hearing aid groups in the same manner as conventional ANL. The effects of presentation level on acceptance of noise did not considerably increase the accuracy of the prediction compared with conventional ANL. Clinical applications are discussed.
KEY WORDS: acceptance of noise, acceptable noise level, effect of speech presentation level, prediction of hearing aid use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/009)</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18230860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASHA</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assistive Technology ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Stimuli ; Female ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Impairments ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - psychology ; Hearing Loss - therapy ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Influence ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prediction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychological aspects ; Speech ; Speech Perception ; Studies ; Use Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.126-135</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e06dab1184a887dac99cfacdbcc3d4a3aa03168c16e832e41fcbab5450524c8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e06dab1184a887dac99cfacdbcc3d4a3aa03168c16e832e41fcbab5450524c8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ784145$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18230860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plyler, Patrick N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelin, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muenchen, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Patrick N. Plyler
James W. Thelin
Robert A. Muenchen
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department of Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: To examine whether the effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise could differentiate full-time, part-time, and nonusers of hearing aids and whether these effects could predict hearing aid use.
Method: Participants were separated into 3 groups on the basis of hearing aid use: (a) full-time use, (b) part-time use, or (c) nonuse. Acceptable noise levels (ANLs) were measured conventionally and at 8 fixed presentation levels. The effects of presentation level on ANL were determined by calculating global ANL (ANL averaged across presentation level) and ANL growth (slope of the ANL function).
Results: Global ANLs were smaller for full-time users than for part-time users and nonusers; however, global ANLs were not different for part-time users and nonusers. ANL growth differentiated full-time users from nonusers only. Conventional ANL predicted hearing aid use with 68% accuracy. Compared with conventional ANL, the accuracy of the prediction for global ANL and ANL growth decreased, and the accuracy of the prediction at presentation levels of 65 to 75 dB HL was maintained.
Conclusions: Global ANL differentiated the hearing aid groups in the same manner as conventional ANL. The effects of presentation level on acceptance of noise did not considerably increase the accuracy of the prediction compared with conventional ANL. Clinical applications are discussed.
KEY WORDS: acceptance of noise, acceptable noise level, effect of speech presentation level, prediction of hearing aid use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Aids</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - therapy</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Use Studies</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1r3DAQhkVoSdIkv6ClmB5KCnWi7x0fl5CPlpD2kJyFLI_XWrzWRrIJ_ffV4k0DHR1G8D4zDA8hHxm9YFTKS0YrXkoBcM4phUtKq28H5JgpBWXFKH-X_6_EEfmQ0prmYlIfkiMGXFDQ9JjA0jncjnZwWIS2eAg-YXEbw8vYFb_tOGIcUuGH4g5t9MOqWPqmeEoY0yl539o-4dm-n5Cnm-vHq7vy_tftj6vlfemkhLFEqhtbMwbSAiwa66rKtdY1tXOikVZYSwXT4JhGEBwla11tayUVVVw6sOKEfJ33bmN4njCNZuOTw763A4YpGVBaZ1Rk8Mt_4DpMcci3GS64EBw0vG1b2R5Nh7YfuxT6afRhSGbJFlJVQlU8g3wGXQwpRWzNNvqNjX8Mo2an3-zkmp1cs9Nvsv489Hl_wlRvsHkb2evOwKcZwOjdv_j65wIkkyrH3-e486vuxUc0aYvoum6Wb9ap76JRzOTHtfgL57CWUw</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creator><creator>Plyler, Patrick N</creator><creator>Thelin, James W</creator><creator>Muenchen, Robert A</creator><general>ASHA</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users</title><author>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Plyler, Patrick N ; Thelin, James W ; Muenchen, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e06dab1184a887dac99cfacdbcc3d4a3aa03168c16e832e41fcbab5450524c8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Aids</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - therapy</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Use Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plyler, Patrick N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelin, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muenchen, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</au><au>Plyler, Patrick N</au><au>Thelin, James W</au><au>Muenchen, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ784145</ericid><atitle>Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>126-135</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Patrick N. Plyler
James W. Thelin
Robert A. Muenchen
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department of Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: To examine whether the effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise could differentiate full-time, part-time, and nonusers of hearing aids and whether these effects could predict hearing aid use.
Method: Participants were separated into 3 groups on the basis of hearing aid use: (a) full-time use, (b) part-time use, or (c) nonuse. Acceptable noise levels (ANLs) were measured conventionally and at 8 fixed presentation levels. The effects of presentation level on ANL were determined by calculating global ANL (ANL averaged across presentation level) and ANL growth (slope of the ANL function).
Results: Global ANLs were smaller for full-time users than for part-time users and nonusers; however, global ANLs were not different for part-time users and nonusers. ANL growth differentiated full-time users from nonusers only. Conventional ANL predicted hearing aid use with 68% accuracy. Compared with conventional ANL, the accuracy of the prediction for global ANL and ANL growth decreased, and the accuracy of the prediction at presentation levels of 65 to 75 dB HL was maintained.
Conclusions: Global ANL differentiated the hearing aid groups in the same manner as conventional ANL. The effects of presentation level on acceptance of noise did not considerably increase the accuracy of the prediction compared with conventional ANL. Clinical applications are discussed.
KEY WORDS: acceptance of noise, acceptable noise level, effect of speech presentation level, prediction of hearing aid use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASHA</pub><pmid>18230860</pmid><doi>10.1044/1092-4388(2008/009)</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1092-4388 |
| ispartof | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.126-135 |
| issn | 1092-4388 1558-9102 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85665243 |
| source | MEDLINE; Education Source |
| subjects | Accuracy Aged Aged, 80 and over Assistive Technology Auditory Perception Auditory Stimuli Female Hearing Aids Hearing Impairments Hearing loss Hearing Loss - psychology Hearing Loss - therapy Hearing Tests Humans Influence Listening Comprehension Male Middle Aged Noise Patient Compliance - psychology Patient Satisfaction Prediction Predictive Value of Tests Psychological aspects Speech Speech Perception Studies Use Studies |
| title | Acceptance of Noise Growth Patterns in Hearing Aid Users |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T08%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptance%20of%20Noise%20Growth%20Patterns%20in%20Hearing%20Aid%20Users&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Freyaldenhoven,%20Melinda%20C&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=126-135&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/009)&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA174593592%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232332868&rft_id=info:pmid/18230860&rft_galeid=A174593592&rft_ericid=EJ784145&rfr_iscdi=true |