It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension
Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 2007-12, Vol.105 (3), p.658-668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 668 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 658 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Corley, Martin MacGregor, Lucy J. Donaldson, David I. |
description | Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech.
Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word
er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85664935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ776940</ericid><els_id>S0010027706002186</els_id><sourcerecordid>68360994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuEzEUQC1ERUPhDxB4U1ad4PeDXVUVWlSJDUjsLOPcSRwlM8H2UGXHb_B7fAmeZtQus7rSvec-7IPQO0rmlFD1YT0P_bKLJfbdnBGianZOKHmGZtRo3mjDzXM0IzXVEKb1KXqZ85oQIpg2L9Ap1VRzY_QM_bgt__78zbisAN_7fY2-4H0_XGBIFzjXTCwf8Q3kWPy4LePY4bwDCCvs2xZCwRvfLQe_BBz67S7BCrpcwVfopPWbDK-neIa-f7r-dnXT3H39fHt1edcEqVhpKDAD2nIifWsNk8QbDpZ7Sri23gpurPaCM7aQ1AovqPBAWtNaZQVYLfgZen-Yu0v9rwFycduYA2zqVdAP2RmplLBcHgWV4YpYe3wiV5oJzfhRsB6sJKWqgvoAhtTnnKB1uxS3Pu0dJW706dbu0acbfY6FKq92vp1WDD-3sHjqmwRW4HwCfA5-0ybfhZifOEullQ-PenPgIMXwWL7-onX9yHHP5VSuqn5HSC6HCF2ARUzVsVv08eit_wE3U8pG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19465116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Corley, Martin ; MacGregor, Lucy J. ; Donaldson, David I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Corley, Martin ; MacGregor, Lucy J. ; Donaldson, David I.</creatorcontrib><description>Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech.
Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word
er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17173887</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGTNAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Comparative Analysis ; Disfluency ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; English (Second Language) ; ERPs ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Language comprehension ; Language Processing ; Language Research ; Learning ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Oral Language ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Speech ; Speech Communication ; Speech Perception ; Tests ; Vocabulary ; Word Frequency</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2007-12, Vol.105 (3), p.658-668</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ776940$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19159594$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGregor, Lucy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, David I.</creatorcontrib><title>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech.
Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word
er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Disfluency</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>ERPs</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language comprehension</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuEzEUQC1ERUPhDxB4U1ad4PeDXVUVWlSJDUjsLOPcSRwlM8H2UGXHb_B7fAmeZtQus7rSvec-7IPQO0rmlFD1YT0P_bKLJfbdnBGianZOKHmGZtRo3mjDzXM0IzXVEKb1KXqZ85oQIpg2L9Ap1VRzY_QM_bgt__78zbisAN_7fY2-4H0_XGBIFzjXTCwf8Q3kWPy4LePY4bwDCCvs2xZCwRvfLQe_BBz67S7BCrpcwVfopPWbDK-neIa-f7r-dnXT3H39fHt1edcEqVhpKDAD2nIifWsNk8QbDpZ7Sri23gpurPaCM7aQ1AovqPBAWtNaZQVYLfgZen-Yu0v9rwFycduYA2zqVdAP2RmplLBcHgWV4YpYe3wiV5oJzfhRsB6sJKWqgvoAhtTnnKB1uxS3Pu0dJW706dbu0acbfY6FKq92vp1WDD-3sHjqmwRW4HwCfA5-0ybfhZifOEullQ-PenPgIMXwWL7-onX9yHHP5VSuqn5HSC6HCF2ARUzVsVv08eit_wE3U8pG</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Corley, Martin</creator><creator>MacGregor, Lucy J.</creator><creator>Donaldson, David I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</title><author>Corley, Martin ; MacGregor, Lucy J. ; Donaldson, David I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Disfluency</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>ERPs</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language comprehension</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGregor, Lucy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, David I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corley, Martin</au><au>MacGregor, Lucy J.</au><au>Donaldson, David I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ776940</ericid><atitle>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>658-668</pages><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><coden>CGTNAU</coden><abstract>Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech.
Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word
er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17173887</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 2007-12, Vol.105 (3), p.658-668 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85664935 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition Comparative Analysis Disfluency Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes English (Second Language) ERPs Evoked Potentials - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Language comprehension Language Processing Language Research Learning Linguistics Listening Comprehension Medical sciences Memory Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) Neurology Oral Language Production and perception of spoken language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition (Psychology) Semantics Speech Speech Communication Speech Perception Tests Vocabulary Word Frequency |
title | It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It%E2%80%99s%20the%20way%20that%20you,%20er,%20say%20it:%20Hesitations%20in%20speech%20affect%20language%20comprehension&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Corley,%20Martin&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=658-668&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.coden=CGTNAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68360994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19465116&rft_id=info:pmid/17173887&rft_ericid=EJ776940&rft_els_id=S0010027706002186&rfr_iscdi=true |