It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension

Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognition 2007-12, Vol.105 (3), p.658-668
Hauptverfasser: Corley, Martin, MacGregor, Lucy J., Donaldson, David I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 668
container_issue 3
container_start_page 658
container_title Cognition
container_volume 105
creator Corley, Martin
MacGregor, Lucy J.
Donaldson, David I.
description Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85664935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ776940</ericid><els_id>S0010027706002186</els_id><sourcerecordid>68360994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuEzEUQC1ERUPhDxB4U1ad4PeDXVUVWlSJDUjsLOPcSRwlM8H2UGXHb_B7fAmeZtQus7rSvec-7IPQO0rmlFD1YT0P_bKLJfbdnBGianZOKHmGZtRo3mjDzXM0IzXVEKb1KXqZ85oQIpg2L9Ap1VRzY_QM_bgt__78zbisAN_7fY2-4H0_XGBIFzjXTCwf8Q3kWPy4LePY4bwDCCvs2xZCwRvfLQe_BBz67S7BCrpcwVfopPWbDK-neIa-f7r-dnXT3H39fHt1edcEqVhpKDAD2nIifWsNk8QbDpZ7Sri23gpurPaCM7aQ1AovqPBAWtNaZQVYLfgZen-Yu0v9rwFycduYA2zqVdAP2RmplLBcHgWV4YpYe3wiV5oJzfhRsB6sJKWqgvoAhtTnnKB1uxS3Pu0dJW706dbu0acbfY6FKq92vp1WDD-3sHjqmwRW4HwCfA5-0ybfhZifOEullQ-PenPgIMXwWL7-onX9yHHP5VSuqn5HSC6HCF2ARUzVsVv08eit_wE3U8pG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19465116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Corley, Martin ; MacGregor, Lucy J. ; Donaldson, David I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Corley, Martin ; MacGregor, Lucy J. ; Donaldson, David I.</creatorcontrib><description>Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie &amp; Butterworth [Beattie, G., &amp; Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17173887</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGTNAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Comparative Analysis ; Disfluency ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; English (Second Language) ; ERPs ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Language comprehension ; Language Processing ; Language Research ; Learning ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Oral Language ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Speech ; Speech Communication ; Speech Perception ; Tests ; Vocabulary ; Word Frequency</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2007-12, Vol.105 (3), p.658-668</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ776940$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19159594$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGregor, Lucy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, David I.</creatorcontrib><title>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie &amp; Butterworth [Beattie, G., &amp; Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Disfluency</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>ERPs</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language comprehension</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuEzEUQC1ERUPhDxB4U1ad4PeDXVUVWlSJDUjsLOPcSRwlM8H2UGXHb_B7fAmeZtQus7rSvec-7IPQO0rmlFD1YT0P_bKLJfbdnBGianZOKHmGZtRo3mjDzXM0IzXVEKb1KXqZ85oQIpg2L9Ap1VRzY_QM_bgt__78zbisAN_7fY2-4H0_XGBIFzjXTCwf8Q3kWPy4LePY4bwDCCvs2xZCwRvfLQe_BBz67S7BCrpcwVfopPWbDK-neIa-f7r-dnXT3H39fHt1edcEqVhpKDAD2nIifWsNk8QbDpZ7Sri23gpurPaCM7aQ1AovqPBAWtNaZQVYLfgZen-Yu0v9rwFycduYA2zqVdAP2RmplLBcHgWV4YpYe3wiV5oJzfhRsB6sJKWqgvoAhtTnnKB1uxS3Pu0dJW706dbu0acbfY6FKq92vp1WDD-3sHjqmwRW4HwCfA5-0ybfhZifOEullQ-PenPgIMXwWL7-onX9yHHP5VSuqn5HSC6HCF2ARUzVsVv08eit_wE3U8pG</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Corley, Martin</creator><creator>MacGregor, Lucy J.</creator><creator>Donaldson, David I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</title><author>Corley, Martin ; MacGregor, Lucy J. ; Donaldson, David I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-1e28e79305af98250a83e93a10379a943897a4322d5194a414ae0f8f9694e9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Disfluency</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>ERPs</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language comprehension</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGregor, Lucy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, David I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corley, Martin</au><au>MacGregor, Lucy J.</au><au>Donaldson, David I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ776940</ericid><atitle>It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>658-668</pages><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><coden>CGTNAU</coden><abstract>Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie &amp; Butterworth [Beattie, G., &amp; Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17173887</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-0277
ispartof Cognition, 2007-12, Vol.105 (3), p.658-668
issn 0010-0277
1873-7838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85664935
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Comparative Analysis
Disfluency
Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes
English (Second Language)
ERPs
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Language comprehension
Language Processing
Language Research
Learning
Linguistics
Listening Comprehension
Medical sciences
Memory
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Oral Language
Production and perception of spoken language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recognition (Psychology)
Semantics
Speech
Speech Communication
Speech Perception
Tests
Vocabulary
Word Frequency
title It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It%E2%80%99s%20the%20way%20that%20you,%20er,%20say%20it:%20Hesitations%20in%20speech%20affect%20language%20comprehension&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Corley,%20Martin&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=658-668&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.coden=CGTNAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68360994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19465116&rft_id=info:pmid/17173887&rft_ericid=EJ776940&rft_els_id=S0010027706002186&rfr_iscdi=true