Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context

This study investigated the language learning strategy use of 55 ESL students with differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds enrolled in a college Intensive English Program (IEP). The IEP is a language learning institute for pre-admissions university ESL students, and is an important step in dev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:System (Linköping) 2006-09, Vol.34 (3), p.399-415
Hauptverfasser: Hong-Nam, Kyungsim, Leavell, Alexandra G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 415
container_issue 3
container_start_page 399
container_title System (Linköping)
container_volume 34
creator Hong-Nam, Kyungsim
Leavell, Alexandra G.
description This study investigated the language learning strategy use of 55 ESL students with differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds enrolled in a college Intensive English Program (IEP). The IEP is a language learning institute for pre-admissions university ESL students, and is an important step in developing not only students’ basic Interpersonal Communications Skills (BICS), but more importantly their Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP). Proficiency with academic English is a key contributor to students’ success in learning in their second language. Using the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL), the study examines the relationship between language learning strategy use and second language proficiency, focusing on differences in strategy use across gender and nationality. The study found a curvilinear relationship between strategy use and English proficiency, revealing that students in the intermediate level reported more use of learning strategies than beginning and advanced levels. More strategic language learners advance along the proficiency continuum faster than less strategic ones. The study found that the students preferred to use metacognitive strategies most, whereas they showed the least use of affective and memory strategies. Females tended to use affective and social strategies more frequently than males. Conclusions and pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85664927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ800633</ericid><els_id>S0346251X06000613</els_id><sourcerecordid>85664927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-f2a9929bd60ac9c76c286b8f94457061b968d72d6569b08f83cfdf994a92f0c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwDXboiVuLm3ZpckFCaPzTJA6A4BZlqVMydelI0ol9ezptghsXW_J7P1t-hExyyHLI2dUyC9sQcZVRAJYBzQDoERnlvBJpQTk9JiMoSpbSaf5xSs5CWAJAKapiRN7nyjW9ajBpUXlnXZOE6FXEZpv0AZPOJLOX-TDra3QxJNYlyg01ogt2g8nMNa0Nn3-07gbtO56TE6PagBeHPiZvd7PX24d0_nz_eHszTxUVLKaGKiGoWNQMlBa6YppytuBGlOW0ApYvBON1RWs2ZWIB3PBCm9oIUSpBDeiiGJPL_d617756DFGubNDYtsph1wfJp4yVglaDsdwbte9C8Gjk2tuV8luZg9ylKJdyn6LcpSiByiHFAZvsMfRW_yKzJz54it3564M8_Lix6GXQFp3G2nrUUdad_X__D6YKh1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85664927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim ; Leavell, Alexandra G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim ; Leavell, Alexandra G.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the language learning strategy use of 55 ESL students with differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds enrolled in a college Intensive English Program (IEP). The IEP is a language learning institute for pre-admissions university ESL students, and is an important step in developing not only students’ basic Interpersonal Communications Skills (BICS), but more importantly their Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP). Proficiency with academic English is a key contributor to students’ success in learning in their second language. Using the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL), the study examines the relationship between language learning strategy use and second language proficiency, focusing on differences in strategy use across gender and nationality. The study found a curvilinear relationship between strategy use and English proficiency, revealing that students in the intermediate level reported more use of learning strategies than beginning and advanced levels. More strategic language learners advance along the proficiency continuum faster than less strategic ones. The study found that the students preferred to use metacognitive strategies most, whereas they showed the least use of affective and memory strategies. Females tended to use affective and social strategies more frequently than males. Conclusions and pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0346-251X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SYTMBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP) ; College Students ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; Gender Differences ; Intensive English learning ; Intensive Language Courses ; Language learning strategies ; Language Proficiency ; Learning Strategies ; Measurement of learning strategies ; Metacognition ; Second Language Learning ; Strategy Inventory for Language Learning ; Strategy inventory for language learning (SILL)</subject><ispartof>System (Linköping), 2006-09, Vol.34 (3), p.399-415</ispartof><rights>2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-f2a9929bd60ac9c76c286b8f94457061b968d72d6569b08f83cfdf994a92f0c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-f2a9929bd60ac9c76c286b8f94457061b968d72d6569b08f83cfdf994a92f0c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ800633$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leavell, Alexandra G.</creatorcontrib><title>Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context</title><title>System (Linköping)</title><description>This study investigated the language learning strategy use of 55 ESL students with differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds enrolled in a college Intensive English Program (IEP). The IEP is a language learning institute for pre-admissions university ESL students, and is an important step in developing not only students’ basic Interpersonal Communications Skills (BICS), but more importantly their Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP). Proficiency with academic English is a key contributor to students’ success in learning in their second language. Using the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL), the study examines the relationship between language learning strategy use and second language proficiency, focusing on differences in strategy use across gender and nationality. The study found a curvilinear relationship between strategy use and English proficiency, revealing that students in the intermediate level reported more use of learning strategies than beginning and advanced levels. More strategic language learners advance along the proficiency continuum faster than less strategic ones. The study found that the students preferred to use metacognitive strategies most, whereas they showed the least use of affective and memory strategies. Females tended to use affective and social strategies more frequently than males. Conclusions and pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed.</description><subject>Cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP)</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Intensive English learning</subject><subject>Intensive Language Courses</subject><subject>Language learning strategies</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Measurement of learning strategies</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</subject><subject>Strategy inventory for language learning (SILL)</subject><issn>0346-251X</issn><issn>1879-3282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwDXboiVuLm3ZpckFCaPzTJA6A4BZlqVMydelI0ol9ezptghsXW_J7P1t-hExyyHLI2dUyC9sQcZVRAJYBzQDoERnlvBJpQTk9JiMoSpbSaf5xSs5CWAJAKapiRN7nyjW9ajBpUXlnXZOE6FXEZpv0AZPOJLOX-TDra3QxJNYlyg01ogt2g8nMNa0Nn3-07gbtO56TE6PagBeHPiZvd7PX24d0_nz_eHszTxUVLKaGKiGoWNQMlBa6YppytuBGlOW0ApYvBON1RWs2ZWIB3PBCm9oIUSpBDeiiGJPL_d617756DFGubNDYtsph1wfJp4yVglaDsdwbte9C8Gjk2tuV8luZg9ylKJdyn6LcpSiByiHFAZvsMfRW_yKzJz54it3564M8_Lix6GXQFp3G2nrUUdad_X__D6YKh1E</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim</creator><creator>Leavell, Alexandra G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context</title><author>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim ; Leavell, Alexandra G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-f2a9929bd60ac9c76c286b8f94457061b968d72d6569b08f83cfdf994a92f0c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP)</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Intensive English learning</topic><topic>Intensive Language Courses</topic><topic>Language learning strategies</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Measurement of learning strategies</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</topic><topic>Strategy inventory for language learning (SILL)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leavell, Alexandra G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>System (Linköping)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hong-Nam, Kyungsim</au><au>Leavell, Alexandra G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ800633</ericid><atitle>Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context</atitle><jtitle>System (Linköping)</jtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>399-415</pages><issn>0346-251X</issn><eissn>1879-3282</eissn><coden>SYTMBO</coden><abstract>This study investigated the language learning strategy use of 55 ESL students with differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds enrolled in a college Intensive English Program (IEP). The IEP is a language learning institute for pre-admissions university ESL students, and is an important step in developing not only students’ basic Interpersonal Communications Skills (BICS), but more importantly their Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP). Proficiency with academic English is a key contributor to students’ success in learning in their second language. Using the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL), the study examines the relationship between language learning strategy use and second language proficiency, focusing on differences in strategy use across gender and nationality. The study found a curvilinear relationship between strategy use and English proficiency, revealing that students in the intermediate level reported more use of learning strategies than beginning and advanced levels. More strategic language learners advance along the proficiency continuum faster than less strategic ones. The study found that the students preferred to use metacognitive strategies most, whereas they showed the least use of affective and memory strategies. Females tended to use affective and social strategies more frequently than males. Conclusions and pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0346-251X
ispartof System (Linköping), 2006-09, Vol.34 (3), p.399-415
issn 0346-251X
1879-3282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85664927
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP)
College Students
English (Second Language)
English as a second language
Gender Differences
Intensive English learning
Intensive Language Courses
Language learning strategies
Language Proficiency
Learning Strategies
Measurement of learning strategies
Metacognition
Second Language Learning
Strategy Inventory for Language Learning
Strategy inventory for language learning (SILL)
title Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A17%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Language%20learning%20strategy%20use%20of%20ESL%20students%20in%20an%20intensive%20English%20learning%20context&rft.jtitle=System%20(Link%C3%B6ping)&rft.au=Hong-Nam,%20Kyungsim&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=399-415&rft.issn=0346-251X&rft.eissn=1879-3282&rft.coden=SYTMBO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85664927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85664927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ800633&rft_els_id=S0346251X06000613&rfr_iscdi=true