Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)

There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2007-03, Vol.33 (2), p.451-458
Hauptverfasser: O'Malley, Shannon, Reynolds, Michael G, Besner, Derek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 458
container_issue 2
container_start_page 451
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 33
creator O'Malley, Shannon
Reynolds, Michael G
Besner, Derek
description There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to J. A. Fodor's (1983) view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85655150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ755957</ericid><sourcerecordid>614469333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-bff810467a114e9a386c54ca6e18abf61a3f2cb1d69b79dfedb0bd23957ec86b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhDyCELATsMsR2_FqWdgpUIyFeYmk5zjW4ymNqJ21nw2_HQ0YdiQXcjRfnO1fX5yD0lJRLUjL5pqRSFZJptmRsSZcVJ_fQgmimC0IVv48Wd8ARepTSZbkbph6iIyIZp4LyBfr1abJtGO0YrgGfBe8hQu8g4bcw3gD0ePwJ-GII_YhXWXRjwoPHX8bQTe2U8OzeYts3-PsQG3we4WrKG7Y49Pgz2Cb0P_BJO0zNH2YNt8HZFp-BCykM_WP0wNs2wZP9e4y-na--nr4v1h_ffTg9WRe2EmIsau8VKSshLSEVaMuUcLxyVgBRtvaCWOapq0kjdC1146Gpy7qhTHMJTomaHaPX895NHPJ9aTRdSA7a1vYwTMkoLjgnvPwvKEsqpCI8gy_-Ai-HKfb5E0aQqhKa5fkHREnFhNKlzBCdIReHlCJ4s4mhs3FrSGl2RZtdj2bXo2HMUJOLzqbn-81T3UFzsOybzcCrPWBTTtxH2-fID5zimhFdZe7ZzEEM7k5eXUjOc3pZfjnLdmPNJm2djWNwLSRz23aHc34DhuXGFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614469333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>O'Malley, Shannon ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Shannon ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to J. A. Fodor's (1983) view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17352625</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPCEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Decision Making ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Decision ; Mental Recall ; Oral Reading ; Production and perception of written language ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Reading Processes ; Semantics ; Stimuli ; Stimulus Parameters ; Verbal Behavior ; Word Frequency ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2007-03, Vol.33 (2), p.451-458</ispartof><rights>2007 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2007</rights><rights>2007, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-bff810467a114e9a386c54ca6e18abf61a3f2cb1d69b79dfedb0bd23957ec86b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ755957$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18593194$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17352625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to J. A. Fodor's (1983) view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Processes</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Stimulus Parameters</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhDyCELATsMsR2_FqWdgpUIyFeYmk5zjW4ymNqJ21nw2_HQ0YdiQXcjRfnO1fX5yD0lJRLUjL5pqRSFZJptmRsSZcVJ_fQgmimC0IVv48Wd8ARepTSZbkbph6iIyIZp4LyBfr1abJtGO0YrgGfBe8hQu8g4bcw3gD0ePwJ-GII_YhXWXRjwoPHX8bQTe2U8OzeYts3-PsQG3we4WrKG7Y49Pgz2Cb0P_BJO0zNH2YNt8HZFp-BCykM_WP0wNs2wZP9e4y-na--nr4v1h_ffTg9WRe2EmIsau8VKSshLSEVaMuUcLxyVgBRtvaCWOapq0kjdC1146Gpy7qhTHMJTomaHaPX895NHPJ9aTRdSA7a1vYwTMkoLjgnvPwvKEsqpCI8gy_-Ai-HKfb5E0aQqhKa5fkHREnFhNKlzBCdIReHlCJ4s4mhs3FrSGl2RZtdj2bXo2HMUJOLzqbn-81T3UFzsOybzcCrPWBTTtxH2-fID5zimhFdZe7ZzEEM7k5eXUjOc3pZfjnLdmPNJm2djWNwLSRz23aHc34DhuXGFw</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>O'Malley, Shannon</creator><creator>Reynolds, Michael G</creator><creator>Besner, Derek</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision</title><author>O'Malley, Shannon ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-bff810467a114e9a386c54ca6e18abf61a3f2cb1d69b79dfedb0bd23957ec86b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Processes</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Stimulus Parameters</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Malley, Shannon</au><au>Reynolds, Michael G</au><au>Besner, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ755957</ericid><atitle>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>451-458</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><coden>JEPCEA</coden><abstract>There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to J. A. Fodor's (1983) view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>17352625</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2007-03, Vol.33 (2), p.451-458
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85655150
source MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Decision Making
Experimental psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Language
Lexical Decision
Mental Recall
Oral Reading
Production and perception of written language
Psycholinguistics
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Reading
Reading Processes
Semantics
Stimuli
Stimulus Parameters
Verbal Behavior
Word Frequency
Word Recognition
title Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20Differences%20Between%20the%20Joint%20Effects%20of%20Stimulus%20Quality%20and%20Word%20Frequency%20in%20Reading%20Aloud%20and%20Lexical%20Decision:%20Extensions%20to%20Yap%20and%20Balota%20(2007)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=O'Malley,%20Shannon&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=451-458&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.coden=JEPCEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614469333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614469333&rft_id=info:pmid/17352625&rft_ericid=EJ755957&rfr_iscdi=true