Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)
There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2007-03, Vol.33 (2), p.451-458 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 458 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 451 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | O'Malley, Shannon Reynolds, Michael G Besner, Derek |
description | There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to
J. A. Fodor's (1983)
view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85655150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ755957</ericid><sourcerecordid>614469333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-bff810467a114e9a386c54ca6e18abf61a3f2cb1d69b79dfedb0bd23957ec86b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhDyCELATsMsR2_FqWdgpUIyFeYmk5zjW4ymNqJ21nw2_HQ0YdiQXcjRfnO1fX5yD0lJRLUjL5pqRSFZJptmRsSZcVJ_fQgmimC0IVv48Wd8ARepTSZbkbph6iIyIZp4LyBfr1abJtGO0YrgGfBe8hQu8g4bcw3gD0ePwJ-GII_YhXWXRjwoPHX8bQTe2U8OzeYts3-PsQG3we4WrKG7Y49Pgz2Cb0P_BJO0zNH2YNt8HZFp-BCykM_WP0wNs2wZP9e4y-na--nr4v1h_ffTg9WRe2EmIsau8VKSshLSEVaMuUcLxyVgBRtvaCWOapq0kjdC1146Gpy7qhTHMJTomaHaPX895NHPJ9aTRdSA7a1vYwTMkoLjgnvPwvKEsqpCI8gy_-Ai-HKfb5E0aQqhKa5fkHREnFhNKlzBCdIReHlCJ4s4mhs3FrSGl2RZtdj2bXo2HMUJOLzqbn-81T3UFzsOybzcCrPWBTTtxH2-fID5zimhFdZe7ZzEEM7k5eXUjOc3pZfjnLdmPNJm2djWNwLSRz23aHc34DhuXGFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614469333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>O'Malley, Shannon ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Shannon ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to
J. A. Fodor's (1983)
view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17352625</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPCEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Decision Making ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Decision ; Mental Recall ; Oral Reading ; Production and perception of written language ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Reading Processes ; Semantics ; Stimuli ; Stimulus Parameters ; Verbal Behavior ; Word Frequency ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2007-03, Vol.33 (2), p.451-458</ispartof><rights>2007 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2007</rights><rights>2007, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-bff810467a114e9a386c54ca6e18abf61a3f2cb1d69b79dfedb0bd23957ec86b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ755957$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18593194$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17352625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to
J. A. Fodor's (1983)
view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Processes</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Stimulus Parameters</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhDyCELATsMsR2_FqWdgpUIyFeYmk5zjW4ymNqJ21nw2_HQ0YdiQXcjRfnO1fX5yD0lJRLUjL5pqRSFZJptmRsSZcVJ_fQgmimC0IVv48Wd8ARepTSZbkbph6iIyIZp4LyBfr1abJtGO0YrgGfBe8hQu8g4bcw3gD0ePwJ-GII_YhXWXRjwoPHX8bQTe2U8OzeYts3-PsQG3we4WrKG7Y49Pgz2Cb0P_BJO0zNH2YNt8HZFp-BCykM_WP0wNs2wZP9e4y-na--nr4v1h_ffTg9WRe2EmIsau8VKSshLSEVaMuUcLxyVgBRtvaCWOapq0kjdC1146Gpy7qhTHMJTomaHaPX895NHPJ9aTRdSA7a1vYwTMkoLjgnvPwvKEsqpCI8gy_-Ai-HKfb5E0aQqhKa5fkHREnFhNKlzBCdIReHlCJ4s4mhs3FrSGl2RZtdj2bXo2HMUJOLzqbn-81T3UFzsOybzcCrPWBTTtxH2-fID5zimhFdZe7ZzEEM7k5eXUjOc3pZfjnLdmPNJm2djWNwLSRz23aHc34DhuXGFw</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>O'Malley, Shannon</creator><creator>Reynolds, Michael G</creator><creator>Besner, Derek</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision</title><author>O'Malley, Shannon ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-bff810467a114e9a386c54ca6e18abf61a3f2cb1d69b79dfedb0bd23957ec86b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Processes</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Stimulus Parameters</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Malley, Shannon</au><au>Reynolds, Michael G</au><au>Besner, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ755957</ericid><atitle>Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>451-458</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><coden>JEPCEA</coden><abstract>There have been multiple reports over the last 3 decades that stimulus quality and word frequency have additive effects on the time to make a lexical decision. However, it is surprising that there is only 1 published report to date that has investigated the joint effects of these two factors in the context of reading aloud, and the outcome of that study is ambiguous. The present study shows that these factors interact in the context of reading aloud and at the same time replicate the standard pattern reported for lexical decision. The main implication of these results is that lexical activation, at least as indexed by the effect of word frequency, does not unfold in a uniform way in the contexts reported here. The observed dissociation also implies, contrary to
J. A. Fodor's (1983)
view, that the mental lexicon is penetrable rather than encapsulated. The distinction between cascaded and thresholded processing offers one way to understand these and related results. A direction for further research is briefly noted.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>17352625</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2007-03, Vol.33 (2), p.451-458 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85655150 |
source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Attention Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Decision Making Experimental psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Language Lexical Decision Mental Recall Oral Reading Production and perception of written language Psycholinguistics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Reading Reading Processes Semantics Stimuli Stimulus Parameters Verbal Behavior Word Frequency Word Recognition |
title | Qualitative Differences Between the Joint Effects of Stimulus Quality and Word Frequency in Reading Aloud and Lexical Decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20Differences%20Between%20the%20Joint%20Effects%20of%20Stimulus%20Quality%20and%20Word%20Frequency%20in%20Reading%20Aloud%20and%20Lexical%20Decision:%20Extensions%20to%20Yap%20and%20Balota%20(2007)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=O'Malley,%20Shannon&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=451-458&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.coden=JEPCEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614469333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614469333&rft_id=info:pmid/17352625&rft_ericid=EJ755957&rfr_iscdi=true |