What Do the Data in Prague Dependency Treebank Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech?

A hypothesis of systemic ordering, proposed by Petr Sgall et al (1980) in the framework of functional generative description as a precise formulation of the notion of natural word order, is tested in part against Czech data from the Prague Dependency Treebank, in which 800,000 words of text are anno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics 2006-12, Vol.86 (Dec), p.39-46
1. Verfasser: Zikanova, Sarka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue Dec
container_start_page 39
container_title Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics
container_volume 86
creator Zikanova, Sarka
description A hypothesis of systemic ordering, proposed by Petr Sgall et al (1980) in the framework of functional generative description as a precise formulation of the notion of natural word order, is tested in part against Czech data from the Prague Dependency Treebank, in which 800,000 words of text are annotated for features of syntax, morphology, & information structure. The hypothesis predicts that, whenever surface order violates the systemic order of agent + addressee + patient, the topic-focus articulation is distributed across the point of violation; eg, if patient precedes agent, then the patient is contextually bound (topic) & the agent, contextually unbound (focus). Results show six sentence types that contradict this prediction in that the surface order of two elements in focus violates systemic order; it is concluded that the theory of topic-focus articulation must be expanded to include formal & lexical constraints on surface word order, in particular heavy complements, prepositional phrases, & the copula byt. References. J. Hitchcock
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85653724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85653724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_856537243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7sOgjAUQDtoIj7-4U5uJEhtZXMAjZsmkDiSC1wBhYJtGfDr1cQPcDo5yTkT5nge910pAjFjc2PunicDLjcOS64VWog6sBVBhBahVnDRWA4fpZ5UQSofIdFEGaoHxDgCZt1gIR6NpbbO4awL0rUqv2f4orzaL9n0ho2h1Y8Ltj4ekvDk9rp7DmRs2tYmp6ZBRd1g0kBIwXf-lv8dvgHrR0HG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85653724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Do the Data in Prague Dependency Treebank Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zikanova, Sarka</creator><creatorcontrib>Zikanova, Sarka</creatorcontrib><description>A hypothesis of systemic ordering, proposed by Petr Sgall et al (1980) in the framework of functional generative description as a precise formulation of the notion of natural word order, is tested in part against Czech data from the Prague Dependency Treebank, in which 800,000 words of text are annotated for features of syntax, morphology, &amp; information structure. The hypothesis predicts that, whenever surface order violates the systemic order of agent + addressee + patient, the topic-focus articulation is distributed across the point of violation; eg, if patient precedes agent, then the patient is contextually bound (topic) &amp; the agent, contextually unbound (focus). Results show six sentence types that contradict this prediction in that the surface order of two elements in focus violates systemic order; it is concluded that the theory of topic-focus articulation must be expanded to include formal &amp; lexical constraints on surface word order, in particular heavy complements, prepositional phrases, &amp; the copula byt. References. J. Hitchcock</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-6585</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBMLAT</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics, 2006-12, Vol.86 (Dec), p.39-46</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zikanova, Sarka</creatorcontrib><title>What Do the Data in Prague Dependency Treebank Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech?</title><title>Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics</title><description>A hypothesis of systemic ordering, proposed by Petr Sgall et al (1980) in the framework of functional generative description as a precise formulation of the notion of natural word order, is tested in part against Czech data from the Prague Dependency Treebank, in which 800,000 words of text are annotated for features of syntax, morphology, &amp; information structure. The hypothesis predicts that, whenever surface order violates the systemic order of agent + addressee + patient, the topic-focus articulation is distributed across the point of violation; eg, if patient precedes agent, then the patient is contextually bound (topic) &amp; the agent, contextually unbound (focus). Results show six sentence types that contradict this prediction in that the surface order of two elements in focus violates systemic order; it is concluded that the theory of topic-focus articulation must be expanded to include formal &amp; lexical constraints on surface word order, in particular heavy complements, prepositional phrases, &amp; the copula byt. References. J. Hitchcock</description><issn>0032-6585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi7sOgjAUQDtoIj7-4U5uJEhtZXMAjZsmkDiSC1wBhYJtGfDr1cQPcDo5yTkT5nge910pAjFjc2PunicDLjcOS64VWog6sBVBhBahVnDRWA4fpZ5UQSofIdFEGaoHxDgCZt1gIR6NpbbO4awL0rUqv2f4orzaL9n0ho2h1Y8Ltj4ekvDk9rp7DmRs2tYmp6ZBRd1g0kBIwXf-lv8dvgHrR0HG</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Zikanova, Sarka</creator><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>What Do the Data in Prague Dependency Treebank Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech?</title><author>Zikanova, Sarka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_856537243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zikanova, Sarka</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zikanova, Sarka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Do the Data in Prague Dependency Treebank Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech?</atitle><jtitle>Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>Dec</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>39-46</pages><issn>0032-6585</issn><coden>PBMLAT</coden><abstract>A hypothesis of systemic ordering, proposed by Petr Sgall et al (1980) in the framework of functional generative description as a precise formulation of the notion of natural word order, is tested in part against Czech data from the Prague Dependency Treebank, in which 800,000 words of text are annotated for features of syntax, morphology, &amp; information structure. The hypothesis predicts that, whenever surface order violates the systemic order of agent + addressee + patient, the topic-focus articulation is distributed across the point of violation; eg, if patient precedes agent, then the patient is contextually bound (topic) &amp; the agent, contextually unbound (focus). Results show six sentence types that contradict this prediction in that the surface order of two elements in focus violates systemic order; it is concluded that the theory of topic-focus articulation must be expanded to include formal &amp; lexical constraints on surface word order, in particular heavy complements, prepositional phrases, &amp; the copula byt. References. J. Hitchcock</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-6585
ispartof Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics, 2006-12, Vol.86 (Dec), p.39-46
issn 0032-6585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85653724
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title What Do the Data in Prague Dependency Treebank Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A14%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Do%20the%20Data%20in%20Prague%20Dependency%20Treebank%20Say%20about%20Systemic%20Ordering%20in%20Czech?&rft.jtitle=Prague%20bulletin%20of%20mathematical%20linguistics&rft.au=Zikanova,%20Sarka&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=Dec&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=39-46&rft.issn=0032-6585&rft.coden=PBMLAT&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E85653724%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85653724&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true