Irrelevant Speech and Irrelevant Tones: The Relative Importance of Speech to the Irrelevant Speech Effect
Irrelevant auditory stimuli disrupt immediate serial recall. In the equipotentiality hypothesis, D. M. Jones and W. J. Macken (1993) made the controversial prediction that speech and tones have an equivalent disruptive effect. In the present study, 5 experiments tested their hypothesis. Experiments...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 1997-03, Vol.23 (2), p.472-483 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 483 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 472 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | LeCompte, Denny C Neely, Craig B Wilson, Jeffrey R |
| description | Irrelevant auditory stimuli disrupt immediate serial recall. In the equipotentiality hypothesis, D. M. Jones and
W. J. Macken (1993)
made the controversial prediction that speech and tones have an equivalent disruptive effect. In the present study, 5 experiments tested their hypothesis. Experiments 1-4 showed that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Experiments 3 and 4 provided some evidence that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than does meaningless speech, and Experiment 4 showed that even meaningless speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Using slightly different experimental procedures, Experiment 5 showed that letters disrupt recall more than do tones. Implications of these results for a number of theories of primary memory and the irrelevant speech effect are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85644150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78899014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a469t-b17b956556e716f3a91d742b56209fb2917066114134f95ea902756c7d4ba4173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLwzAUx4Moc16-gCAMlb115uSeRxleBgMfnM8h7VLc6NqatOK-vSkbmwhqOBA4_9-58UfoAvAIMJW3mEiVSKrpiMQYMUkOUB801QkQxQ9Rfwcco5MQlrh7VPVQT2OFMfA-Gk68d4X7sGUzeKmdy94GtpwPvmVnVenCGTrKbRHc-fY_Ra8P97PxUzJ9fpyM76aJZUI3SQoy1VxwLpwEkVOrYS4ZSbkgWOcp0SCxEAAMKMs1d1bHDbnI5JylloGkp2i46Vv76r11oTGrRchcUdjSVW0wigvGgON_QamU1hhYBK9-gMuq9WU8wogoU0GZ_gsiEZJUURKh698gUFQrGSd2FNlQma9C8C43tV-srF8bwKZzzXSmmM4UQ2KY6Fosuty2btOVm-9KtjZF_War25DZIve2zBZhhxFBCJNqj9namjqsM-ubRVa4YD6L1X7aF2GzpXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614336349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Irrelevant Speech and Irrelevant Tones: The Relative Importance of Speech to the Irrelevant Speech Effect</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>LeCompte, Denny C ; Neely, Craig B ; Wilson, Jeffrey R</creator><creatorcontrib>LeCompte, Denny C ; Neely, Craig B ; Wilson, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><description>Irrelevant auditory stimuli disrupt immediate serial recall. In the equipotentiality hypothesis, D. M. Jones and
W. J. Macken (1993)
made the controversial prediction that speech and tones have an equivalent disruptive effect. In the present study, 5 experiments tested their hypothesis. Experiments 1-4 showed that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Experiments 3 and 4 provided some evidence that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than does meaningless speech, and Experiment 4 showed that even meaningless speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Using slightly different experimental procedures, Experiment 5 showed that letters disrupt recall more than do tones. Implications of these results for a number of theories of primary memory and the irrelevant speech effect are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9080015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPCEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Auditory Stimulation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term ; Mental Recall ; Pitch Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Learning) ; Serial Learning ; Serial Recall ; Speech ; Speech Perception ; Verbal Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1997-03, Vol.23 (2), p.472-483</ispartof><rights>1997 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 1997</rights><rights>1997, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a469t-b17b956556e716f3a91d742b56209fb2917066114134f95ea902756c7d4ba4173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2622478$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9080015$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LeCompte, Denny C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neely, Craig B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><title>Irrelevant Speech and Irrelevant Tones: The Relative Importance of Speech to the Irrelevant Speech Effect</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Irrelevant auditory stimuli disrupt immediate serial recall. In the equipotentiality hypothesis, D. M. Jones and
W. J. Macken (1993)
made the controversial prediction that speech and tones have an equivalent disruptive effect. In the present study, 5 experiments tested their hypothesis. Experiments 1-4 showed that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Experiments 3 and 4 provided some evidence that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than does meaningless speech, and Experiment 4 showed that even meaningless speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Using slightly different experimental procedures, Experiment 5 showed that letters disrupt recall more than do tones. Implications of these results for a number of theories of primary memory and the irrelevant speech effect are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Stimulation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Learning)</subject><subject>Serial Learning</subject><subject>Serial Recall</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Verbal Stimuli</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLwzAUx4Moc16-gCAMlb115uSeRxleBgMfnM8h7VLc6NqatOK-vSkbmwhqOBA4_9-58UfoAvAIMJW3mEiVSKrpiMQYMUkOUB801QkQxQ9Rfwcco5MQlrh7VPVQT2OFMfA-Gk68d4X7sGUzeKmdy94GtpwPvmVnVenCGTrKbRHc-fY_Ra8P97PxUzJ9fpyM76aJZUI3SQoy1VxwLpwEkVOrYS4ZSbkgWOcp0SCxEAAMKMs1d1bHDbnI5JylloGkp2i46Vv76r11oTGrRchcUdjSVW0wigvGgON_QamU1hhYBK9-gMuq9WU8wogoU0GZ_gsiEZJUURKh698gUFQrGSd2FNlQma9C8C43tV-srF8bwKZzzXSmmM4UQ2KY6Fosuty2btOVm-9KtjZF_War25DZIve2zBZhhxFBCJNqj9namjqsM-ubRVa4YD6L1X7aF2GzpXc</recordid><startdate>19970301</startdate><enddate>19970301</enddate><creator>LeCompte, Denny C</creator><creator>Neely, Craig B</creator><creator>Wilson, Jeffrey R</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970301</creationdate><title>Irrelevant Speech and Irrelevant Tones</title><author>LeCompte, Denny C ; Neely, Craig B ; Wilson, Jeffrey R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a469t-b17b956556e716f3a91d742b56209fb2917066114134f95ea902756c7d4ba4173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Stimulation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Learning)</topic><topic>Serial Learning</topic><topic>Serial Recall</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Verbal Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LeCompte, Denny C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neely, Craig B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LeCompte, Denny C</au><au>Neely, Craig B</au><au>Wilson, Jeffrey R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Irrelevant Speech and Irrelevant Tones: The Relative Importance of Speech to the Irrelevant Speech Effect</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>1997-03-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>472-483</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><coden>JEPCEA</coden><abstract>Irrelevant auditory stimuli disrupt immediate serial recall. In the equipotentiality hypothesis, D. M. Jones and
W. J. Macken (1993)
made the controversial prediction that speech and tones have an equivalent disruptive effect. In the present study, 5 experiments tested their hypothesis. Experiments 1-4 showed that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Experiments 3 and 4 provided some evidence that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than does meaningless speech, and Experiment 4 showed that even meaningless speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Using slightly different experimental procedures, Experiment 5 showed that letters disrupt recall more than do tones. Implications of these results for a number of theories of primary memory and the irrelevant speech effect are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>9080015</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1997-03, Vol.23 (2), p.472-483 |
| issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85644150 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Adult Attention Auditory Stimulation Biological and medical sciences Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning. Memory Male Memory Memory, Short-Term Mental Recall Pitch Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition (Learning) Serial Learning Serial Recall Speech Speech Perception Verbal Stimuli |
| title | Irrelevant Speech and Irrelevant Tones: The Relative Importance of Speech to the Irrelevant Speech Effect |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A39%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Irrelevant%20Speech%20and%20Irrelevant%20Tones:%20The%20Relative%20Importance%20of%20Speech%20to%20the%20Irrelevant%20Speech%20Effect&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=LeCompte,%20Denny%20C&rft.date=1997-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=472-483&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.coden=JEPCEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78899014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614336349&rft_id=info:pmid/9080015&rfr_iscdi=true |